____ _ _ | _ \ _____ _| |__ (_)_ __ | | | |/ _ \ \/ / '_ \| | '_ \ | |_| | (_) > <| |_) | | | | | |____/ \___/_/\_\_.__/|_|_| |_|
Title:Keaton Brown
Created:Dec 20th, 2021
Created by: ft [Rich]
Views: 1,255
Comments: 14
Username: Anonymous - (Login)
Please note that all posted information is publicly available and must follow our TOS.
.-=====-.
| .""". |
| | | |
| | | |
| '---' |
| |
| |
.-================ -' '-================-.
z| _ |
o|.'o\ kt is so sexy __ |
c| '-.'. .'o.` |
'-==='.'.=========-. .-========.'.-'===-'
'.`'._ .===, | _.-' / S/O SCB
'._ '-./ ,//\ _| _.-' _.'
'-.| ,//' \-' ` .-'
`//'_`--; ;.-'
`\._ ;| |
\`-' . |
|_.-'-._|
\ _'_ /
|; -:- |
|| -.- \
|; .\
/ `'\'`\-;
;` '. `_/
|,`-._; .;
`;\ `.-'-;
| \ \ |
| `\ \ |
| ) | |
| / /` /
| | /| |
| | / | /
| / |/ /|
| \ / / |
| /o | |
| |_/ |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
'-=====-'
oooooooooooo .o8 oooo
`888' `8 "888 `888
888 .ooooo. .oooo888 .ooooo. oooo d8b .oooo. 888
888oooo8 d88' `88b d88' `888 d88' `88b `888""8P `P )88b 888
888 " 888ooo888 888 888 888ooo888 888 .oP"888 888
888 888 .o 888 888 888 .o 888 d8( 888 888
o888o `Y8bod8P' `Y8bod88P" `Y8bod8P' d888b `Y888""8o o888o
__________________________
✞ 0x10 - INTRO & REASON ✞ doxbin.com/user/ft ~ federal#4321
KEY ✞ 0x20 - PERSONAL INFO ✞ doxbin.com/user/pep ~ pep#0420
✞ 0x30 - FAMILY INFO ✞ doxbin.com/user/goddesss ~ target practice#0001
✞ - BASE INFO ✞ 0x40 - PROPERTY INFO ✞
✗ - SECONDARY DETAILS ✞ 0x50 - IP INFO ✞
> - THIRD LAYER INFO ✞ 0x60 - LEGAL INFO ✞ LINE COUNT // 16,834
✞ 0x70 - CONCLUSION ✞
\_______________________/
✞ REASON // Claims to be a "harmful dark web hacker", yet can't code. He's a total dick to women, tried egoing me (but was bitched),
claims to make $7,000 a week off of the "dark web" & walks with the roleplay hacker persona.
✞ PROOF //
✗ Can't show any proof of funds / https://imgur.com/a/fcfv5zN
✗ Getting laughed at by kt / https://imgur.com/a/AU5f687
✗ More claims he cannot prove lol / https://imgur.com/a/cRWJe6T
✗ Begging to claim credit for my work / https://imgur.com/a/KnSnASd
✗ Such a pussy he has to ban me because he can't stand up for himself lmaooo / https://imgur.com/a/Shl47so
✗ "IP Pinger" / https://imgur.com/a/fTAzZKI
✗ Doxing with whitepages lol / https://imgur.com/a/UshgRGr
✗ Proof of address / https://imgur.com/a/FbqEGzq
✗ GRAPHIC!! Him cutting himself / https://imgur.com/a/uNNbeLM
✞ EXPLANATION // I met him through his ex who would come to me upset because of how he acted towards her. After multiple tries of trying to
explain to him how he should treat a girl, I would start stepping in for her sake. He'd yell, call her a slut constant BS
as most insecure idiots do. He got so insecure over this shit he made her block me, and started leaking shit about her.
Once she broke up with him, me being the asshole I am started fucking with him which was funny because he gets mad over
literally everything lol. At some point he had made threats to leak info on her, which as you can see didn't end well.
He was bitched and blackmailed by both me & pep, and as you could probably guess by his fake persona, he is scared of us both.
Just your average wannabe hacker that roleplays and larps making money with no skill or intellect of any sort.
His mothers surname is different because he is adopted. I have proven this is his mother with the following pieces of evidence:
~ Snap map location proof, address linked with her.
~ All phones under sprint, including his.
~ Licensed nurse, he claimed his mother is a nurse.
~ Her facebook, pictures of him including one with his full name on it. Proof: https://imgur.com/a/U5v5RVj
His biological parents left him at the age of 8. He claims they performed satanic rituals on him, including tying him
up in the barn, burning pentagons into his chest, cutting satanic things into him and performing other acts on him.
This has led to extreme PTSD, mental instability & him performing acts of self harm. I have photo evidence of him
cutting himself, but have left it out of this dox for legal reasons. He has had a troubled past, and loves taking it
out on others. I offered him help in many ways before, yet he never accepted it. He was just a dick to me and others.
This dox has been made in response to his actions and out of protection for a certain individual who he is targeting.
I warned him not to cross my path, guess he didn't listen.
As stated later in the dox on court records, his parents were killed by his cousin in self defense, which is not surprising.
The entire family seems a bit messed up in the head. The only logical one who is hard working, and struggles to make a living
flipping houses, is his cousin. For that reason, I have left his information out of this dox. All listed information is 100%
confirmed, if you have anything to add feel free tor each out on discord.
~ federal
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
.,
t ,Wt t
Ej i#D. GEEEEEEELEj .. :
t .DD.E#, f#f ,;;L#K;;.E#, ,W, .Et
EK: ,WK. E#t .D#i t#E E#t t##, ,W#t
E#t i#D E#t :KW, t#E E#t L###, j###t
E#t j#f E#t t#f t#E E#t .E#j##, G#fE#t
E#tL#i E#t ;#G t#E E#t ;WW; ##,:K#i E#t
E#WW, E#t :KE. t#E E#t j#E. ##f#W, E#t
E#K: E#t .DW: t#E E#t .D#L ###K: E#t
ED. E#t L#, t#E E#t :K#t ##D. E#t
t E#t jt fE E#t ... #G .. Loading data...
,;. : ,;. j
C://root@federal: whois Keaton Brown
✞ FIRST NAME // KEATON
✞ LAST NAME // BROWN
✞ AGE // 16
✞ DOB // 10/11/2005
✞ PHONE NUMBER // 317-937-4577
✗ CARRIER / Sprint PCS/2
✗ MOBILE / true
✗ SMS GATEWAY / 3179374577@tmomail.net
✗ MMS GATEWAY / 3179374577@tmomail.net
✞ ADDRESS // 11239 E New York St, Indianapolis, IN 46229, USA
✞ FACE // 6
✗ https://imgur.com/a/2wB6bKG
✗ https://imgur.com/a/CoOlV90
✗ https://imgur.com/a/aP6ANiI
✗ https://imgur.com/a/x481ZVQ
✗ https://imgur.com/a/l6F5Oga
✗ https://imgur.com/a/SHp33iZ
✞ EMAIL // jchapman6868@gmail.com
✗ JACKED / https://imgur.com/a/KG2Tlh9
✗ STATUS / VALID
✞ SOCIALS // 4
✗ DISCORD / slit#0999 | 389549638849396738
✗ INSTAGRAM / eyphahhh
✗ SNAPCHAT / im.daddy.boii
✗ DOXBIN / doxbin got taken down by charge lol
✞ ALIASES // 5
✗ EYPHAH
> SEEN ON / DISCORD
✗ DARK
> SEEN ON / DISCORD
✗ SLIT
> SEEN ON / DISCORD
✞ SSN // 317-96-9281
✗ VERIFIED
✞ ETHNICITY // Mixed
✞ RELIGION // Satanic
✞ BIRTH PLACE // INDIANA
✞ ASSOCIATES // 1
✗ RELATION / ADOPTED MOTHER
> NAME / Jill Chapman
✞ SCHOOLING // Creston Intermediate Academy
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
,
Et
E#t ,;
E##t . . f#i j.
E#W#t .. GEEEEEEELDi Dt .E#t EW,
E#tfL. ;W, ,;;L#K;;.E#i E#i i#W, E##j
E#t j##, t#E E#t E#t L#D. E###D.
,ffW#Dffj. G###, t#E E#t E#t :K#Wfff; E#jG#W;
;LW#ELLLf. :E####, t#E E########f. i##WLLLLt E#t t##f
E#t ;W#DG##, t#E E#j..K#j... .E#L E#t :K#E:
E#t j###DW##, t#E E#t E#t f#E: E#KDDDD###i
E#t G##i,,G##, t#E E#t E#t ,WW; E#f,t#Wi,,,
E#t :K#K: L##, t#E f#t f#t .D#; E#t ;#W:
E#t ;##D. L##, fE ii ii tt DWi ,KK:
;#t ,,, .,, : Loading data...
:;
✞ Father is decased. He was adopted at the age of 8, removing all links from his abusive parents. They have not been in his life for around 10 years, deeming them meaningless.
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
:
t#, ,;
;##W. . . f#i j.
.. : :#L:WE GEEEEEEELDi Dt .E#t EW,
,W, .Et .KG ,#D ,;;L#K;;.E#i E#i i#W, E##j
t##, ,W#t EE ;#f t#E E#t E#t L#D. E###D.
L###, j###t f#. t#i t#E E#t E#t :K#Wfff; E#jG#W;
.E#j##, G#fE#t :#G GK t#E E########f. i##WLLLLt E#t t##f
;WW; ##,:K#i E#t ;#L LW. t#E E#j..K#j... .E#L E#t :K#E:
j#E. ##f#W, E#t t#f f#: t#E E#t E#t f#E: E#KDDDD###i
.D#L ###K: E#t f#D#; t#E E#t E#t ,WW; E#f,t#Wi,,,
:K#t ##D. E#t G#t t#E f#t f#t .D#; E#t ;#W:
... #G .. t fE ii ii tt DWi ,KK:
j : Loading data...
✞ NOTE // This is his adopted mother, biological is deceased & hasn't been in his life for years.
✞ FIRST NAME // JILL
✞ MIDDLE NAME // WYNNE
✞ LAST NAME // CHAPMAN
✞ AGE // 53
✞ DOB // 01/06/1986
✞ PHONE NUMBERS // 7
✗ 203-758-8323
> CARRIER / Comcast/3
> MOBILE / false
✗ 317-201-9688
> CARRIER / Sprint PCS/2
> MOBILE / true
> SMS GATEWAY / 3172019688@tmomail.net
> MMS GATEWAY / 3172019688@tmomail.net
✗ 765-564-6092
> CARRIER / Frontier Rochester:0121 - NSR/1
> MOBILE / false
✗ 317-956-6345
> CARRIER / Sprint PCS/2
> MOBILE / true
> SMS GATEWAY / 3179566345@tmomail.net
> MMS GATEWAY / 3179566345@tmomail.net
✗ 317-295-0698
> CARRIER / Ameritech-AT+T Wireline/1
> MOBILE / false
✗ 765-295-0698
> CARRIER / Terra Nova Telecom-AST/4
> MOBILE / false
✗ 317-201-1702
> CARRIER / Verizon Wireless:6006 - SVR/2
> MOBILE / true
> SMS GATEWAY / 3172011702@vtext.com
> MMS GATEWAY / 3172011702@vzwpix.com
✞ ADDRESS // 11239 E New York St, Indianapolis, IN 46229, USA
✞ EMAILS // 3
✗ jchapman6868@gmail.com
> VALID
> JACKED / https://imgur.com/a/KG2Tlh9
✗ chappy112@hotmail.com
> VALID
✗ jchaprn@hotmail.com
> VALID
✞ WORK // FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE-MBH
> ADDRESS / 5442 ELKHORN DR APT 1117 INDIANAPOLIS IN 46254
> NURSING LICENSE / 28130759A
✞ SSN // 304-82-1742
✗ VERIFIED
✞ SOCIALS //
✗ FACEBOOK / https://www.facebook.com/jill.chapman.7792
✗ LINKEDIN / https://www.linkedin.com/in/jill-chapman-a27a0170
✞ ETHNICITY // White monkey with back rolls and 17 STDs and has cancer in her pussy alongside mental instability
✞ RELIGION // Christian
✞ BIRTH PLACE // Indiana
✞ ASSOCIATES // 6
✗ NAME / ROBERT STEPHEN FRAZIER
> AGE / 69
✗ NAME / CARLA JEAN FRAZIER
> AGE / 64
✗ NAME / CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
✗ NAME / CASEY M FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
✗ NAME / WILLIAM E BROWN
> AGE / 48
✗ NAME / DALE R SEWARD
> AGE / 59
✞ RELATIVES // 54
✗ NAME / JULIE L WATKINS
> AGE / 50
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / CARLA JEAN FRAZIER
> AGE / 64
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / JILL C ELDRIDGE
> AGE / 51
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / WAYNE E CHAPMAN
> AGE / 87
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / TIMOTHY LAWRENCE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 41
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / RUSSELL DEAN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 51
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / MELODY DAWN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 41
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / JOHN MILTON CHAPMAN
> AGE / 58
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / E EVELYN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 85
> GENERATION / 1st
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / CYNTHIA ANN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 60
> GENERATION / 1st
✗ NAME / EUGENE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 110
> GENERATION / 1st
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / THOMAS M WATKINS
> AGE / 43
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / WILLIAM THOMAS SEWARD
> AGE / 71
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / WILLIAM JASON SEWARD
> AGE / 45
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / VICTORIA KATHRYN SEWARD
> AGE / 72
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / KYLE ANTHONY SEWARD
> AGE / 28
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / DALE R SEWARD
> AGE / 59
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / CORY WAYNE SEWARD
> AGE / 27
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / MELINDA K ROSSETTER
> AGE / 58
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / KRISTINE NICOLE KALB
> AGE / 46
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / TOM SEWARD
> AGE / 45
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / AMANDA JO HALL
> AGE / 37
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / SUSAN L FRAZIER
> AGE / 56
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBERT STEPHEN FRAZIER
> AGE / 69
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBERT D FRAZIER
> AGE / 91
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / NATALIE L FRAZIER
> AGE / 35
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / CASEY M FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JAMES BROOKE ELDRIDGE
> AGE / 55
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / TANSY H CHAPMAN
> AGE / 83
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBERT J CHAPMAN
> AGE / 75
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / RICHARD MANLEY CHAPMAN
> AGE / 99
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / PETER ANDREW CHAPMAN
> AGE / 49
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / PAUL H CHAPMAN
> AGE / 83
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JOHN FORREST CHAPMAN
> AGE / 50
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JILL REECE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 52
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JILL PELRIN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JILL MARIE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JENNIFER ANN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / HUNTER REECE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 24
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / DALE ALLEN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 74
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / CAROLE LYNN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 73
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / BYRON GLENN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 51
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / AUDREY MAE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 97
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / JILLIAN CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBERT JAMES CHAPMAN
> AGE / 75
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBT W CHAPMAN
> AGE / 103
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / LINDA SUE FENTON
> AGE / 44
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JOSHUA J COBB
> AGE / 38
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JAMES ALBERT COBB
> AGE / 71
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / DONNA MARIE COBB
> AGE / 64
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JILLIAN RAE ALLEN
> AGE / 40
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / VERONICA KAYE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 49
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / TYLER LEE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 27
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / TOSHA LEIGH CHAPMAN
> AGE / 43
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / LANDIN D CHAPMAN
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JASON LEE CHAPMANA
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / TOSHA L MANN
> AGE / 43
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / MISTY A STOUT
> AGE / 42
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ALEXANDER D MARCH
> AGE / 30
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JODY LYNN HORN
> AGE / 47
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBERT SAMUE HANEY
> AGE / 45
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBBIN W HANDY
> AGE / 45
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / ROBBIN LEE HANDY
> AGE / 67
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / NICHOLAS A HANDY
> AGE / 43
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / MICHAEL JOSEPH HANDY
> AGE / 41
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / CAROL SUE HANDY
> AGE / 67
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / PHYLLIS ANN GREIN
> AGE / 83
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / TIMOTHY L CHAPMAN
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / LAWRENCE MICHAEL CHAPMAN
> AGE / 61
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JEFFERY WESLEY CHAPMAN
> AGE / 53
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / PAULA JEAN THOMPSON
> AGE / 64
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / SUSAN MICHELLE CHAPMAN
> AGE / 62
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JOHN RICHARD CHAPMAN
> AGE / 64
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / WILLIAM MICHAEL DAISY
> AGE / 52
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / WILLIAM JOSEPH DAISY
> AGE / 84
> GENERATION / 2nd
> DECEASED
✗ NAME / DELORES FERN DAISY
> AGE / 84
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / JUSTIN M BURGE
> AGE / 33
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / GARY LYNN BURGE
> AGE / 66
> GENERATION / 2nd
✗ NAME / DEREK JOSEPH BURGE
> AGE / 35
> GENERATION / 2nd
✞ SCHOOLING //
✞ PAST ADDRESSES // 14
✗ ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229
> DATES / 1986 - 2021
> OWNER / JENNIFER HARGIS
> PURCHASE DATE / 11/2020
> PURCHASE PRICE / $132,000
> ASSESSED VALUE / $83,800
> LIVING SPACE / 1,232 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 11,674 Square Feet (0.26 Acres)
> ESTIMATED START / 04/1986
> ESTIMATED END / 11/2021
✗ ADDRESS / 735 LONG MEADOW RD MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762
> DATES / 2020 - 2020
> OWNER / LINDA MCWEENEY
> PURCHASE DATE / 08/1977
> ASSESSED VALUE / $205,700
> LIVING SPACE / 2,156 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 98,010 Square Feet (2.25 Acres)
> ESTIMATED START / 07/2020
> ESTIMATED END / 07/2020
✗ ADDRESS / 6994 W CRESTWOOD DR DELPHI, IN 46923
> DATES / 1998 - 2019
> OWNER / JOHN CHAPMAN
> OWNER / CYNTHIA CHAPMAN
> PURCHASE DATE / 06/2020
> ASSESSED VALUE / $150,700
> LIVING SPACE / 1,416 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 34,968 Square Feet (0.80 Acres)
> ESTIMATED VALUE / 06/1998
> ESTIMATED END / 03/2019
✗ ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST # U INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229
> DATES / 2010 - 2010
> Estimated Start / 05/2010
> Estimated End / 05/2010
✗ ADDRESS / 1922 WINTON AVE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224
> DATES / 2007 - 2009
> OWNER / SHIRLEY KOSKEY
> PURCHASE DATE / 06/2008
> PURCHASE PRICE / $90,095
> ASSESSED VALUE / $131,000
> LIVING SPACE / 1,373 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 6,578 Square Feet
> Estimated Start / 01/2007
> Estimated End / 03/2009
✗ ADDRESS / 3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> DATES / 2003 - 2006
> Estimated Start / 10/2003
> Estimated End / 12/2006
✗ ADDRESS / 5460 ELKHORN DR APT 914 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46254
> DATES / 1999 - 2003
> Estimated Start / 10/1999
> Estimated End / 03/2003
✗ ADDRESS / 2305 ROGATE CIR UNIT 201 WINDSOR MILL, MD 21244
> DATES / 2000 - 2003
> Estimated Start / 07/2000
> Estimated End / 01/2003
✗ ADDRESS / 5442 ELKHORN DR APT 1117 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46254
> DATES / 1999 - 2003
> Estimated Start / 06/1999
> Estimated End / 01/2003
✗ ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST APT 706 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112
> DATES / 1999 - 2003
> Estimated Start / 06/1999
> Estimated End /01/2003
✗ ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 1502 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211
> DATES / 1998 - 1999
> Estimated Start / 09/1998
> Estimated End / 12/1999
✗ ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112
> DATES / 1999 - 1999
> OWNER / UNION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
> ASSESSED VALUE / $864,500
> LIVING SPACE / 218,395 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 12,874 Square Feet
> Estimated Start / 06/1999
> Estimated End / 06/1999
✗ ADDRESS / 324 N BROOKFIELD DR LAFAYETTE, IN 47905
> DATES / 1998 - 1998
> OWNER / DEREK DEWITT
> OWNER / Owner ALICIA DEWITT
> PURCHASE DATE / 07/2015
> PURCHASE PRICE / $125,000
> ASSESSED VALUE / $138,200
> LIVING SPACE / 1,456 Square Feet
> LAND SIZE / 10,950 Square Feet
> Estimated Start / 11/1998
> Estimated End / 11/1998
✗ ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211
> DATES / 1998 - 1998
> OWNER / TIMBERS HOLDING CO LLC
> PURCHASE DATE / 11/2021
> ASSESSED VALUE / $7,065,780
> LAND SIZE / 1,328,580 Square Feet
> Estimated Start / 09/1998
> Estimated End / 09/1998
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
,
Et
E#t
E##t t i
E#W#t .. .. : Ej LE f. ;WE.
E#tfL. ;W, ,W, .Et E#, L#E E#, i#G
E#t j##, t##, ,W#t E#t G#W. E#t f#f
,ffW#Dffj. G###, L###, j###t E#t D#K. E#t G#i
;LW#ELLLf. :E####, .E#j##, G#fE#t E#t E#K. E#jEW,
E#t ;W#DG##, ;WW; ##,:K#i E#t E#t .E#E. E##E.
E#t j###DW##, j#E. ##f#W, E#t E#t .K#E E#G
E#t G##i,,G##, .D#L ###K: E#t E#t .K#D E#t
E#t :K#K: L##, :K#t ##D. E#t E#t .W#G E#t
E#t ;##D. L##, ... #G .. E#t :W##########Wt EE.
;#t ,,, .,, j ,;. :,,,,,,,,,,,,,.t Loading data...
:;
✞ RELATION // ADOPTED GRANDFATHER
✗ FIRST NAME / WAYNE
✗ MIDDLE NAME / E
✗ LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
✗ AGE / 87
✗ DOB / 10/13/1934
✗ PHONE NUMBERS / 2
> 765-564-6092
> CARRIER / Frontier Rochester:0121 - NSR/1
> MOBILE / false
> 765-564-4779
> CARRIER / Frontier Rochester:0121 - NSR/1
> MOBILE / false
✗ EMAIL / chappy112@hotmail.com
> VALID
✗ ADDRESS / 6994 W CRESTWOOD DR DELPHI, IN 46923
✗ SSN / 303-01-2102
✗ ASSOCIATES / 12
> NAME / DALE R SEWARD
> AGE / 59
> NAME / ELAINE RENEE DAIRO
> AGE / 65
> NAME / EBENEZER OLUMUYIWA DAIRO
> AGE / 66
> NAME / CURTIS J MEIRING
> AGE / 72
> NAME / LI ZEMIN
> AGE / 75
> NAME / DARIUS LEMUEL STYLES
> AGE / 43
> NAME / THOMAS M WATKINS
> AGE / 43
> NAME / CORY WAYNE SEWARD
> AGE / 27
> NAME / ROBERT STEPHEN FRAZIER
> AGE / 69
> NAME / CARLA JEAN FRAZIER
> AGE / 64
> NAME / CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
> NAME / CASEY M FRAZIER
> AGE / 36
✗ LICENSES / 1
> TYPE / CONCEALED CARRY
> NUMBER / 1630986
> ISSUE DATE / 03/03/2007
> EXPIRATION DATE / 03/03/2011
> HOLDER NAME / WAYNE E CHAPMAN
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
:
t#, ,;
t j. ;##W. t f#i j.
ED. EW, :#L:WE ED. .E#t EW, GEEEEEEELf. ;WE.
E#K: E##j .KG ,#D E#K: i#W, E##j ,;;L#K;;.E#, i#G
E##W; E###D. EE ;#f E##W; L#D. E###D. t#E E#t f#f
E#E##t E#jG#W; f#. t#iE#E##t :K#Wfff; E#jG#W; t#E E#t G#i
E#ti##f E#t t##f :#G GK E#ti##f i##WLLLLt E#t t##f t#E E#jEW,
E#t ;##D. E#t :K#E:;#L LW. E#t ;##D. .E#L E#t :K#E: t#E E##E.
E#ELLE##K:E#KDDDD###it#f f#: E#ELLE##K: f#E: E#KDDDD###i t#E E#G
E#L;;;;;;,E#f,t#Wi,,, f#D#; E#L;;;;;;, ,WW; E#f,t#Wi,,, t#E E#t
E#t E#t ;#W: G#t E#t .D#; E#t ;#W: t#E E#t
E#t DWi ,KK: t E#t tt DWi ,KK: fE EE.
: t Loading info...
✞ ADDRESS // 11239 E New York St, Indianapolis, IN 46229, USA
✗ OWNER / JILL CHAPMAN
✗ LOT SIZE / 8,712 Sq. Ft.
✗ PARCEL NUMBER / 490903115002000724
✗ BEDROOMS / 2
✗ BATHROOMS / 1
✗ VALUE / $59,000
✗ HEATING / Forced Air
✗ COOLING / Central Air
✗ YEAR BUILT / 1952
✗ YEAR RENOVATED / 1952
✗ ZIP CODE / 46229
✗ COUNTY / Marion
✗ GOVT REP / Stan Mcain
> REPUBLICAN
✗ POST OFFICE / United States Postal Service
> ADDRESS / 456 N Meridian St Ste X, Indianapolis, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / (800) 275-8777
✗ LOCAL PD / Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department - Headquarters
> ADDRESS / 50 N Alabama St, Indianapolis, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / (317) 327-3811
✗ SCHOOL DISTRICT / Warren Township
> ELEMENTARY / Creston Intermediate Academy
> ADDRESS / 10925 East Prospect Street, Indianapolis, IN 46239
> PHONE NUMBER / (317) 869-1327
> EMAIL / jsimmons@warren.k12.in.us
> MIDDLE / Creston Middle School
> ADDRESS / 10925 East Prospect Street, Indianapolis, IN 46239
> PHONE NUMBER / (317) 532-6800
> EMAIL / CSTORM@WARREN.K12.IN.US
> HIGH / Warren Central High School
> ADDRESS / 9500 East 16th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46229
> PHONE NUMBER / (317) 532-6200
> EMAIL / RSHEPLER@WARREN.K12.IN.US
> FIRE DEPT / Indianapolis Fire Department Station 1
> ADDRESS / 1903 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46222
> PHONE NUMBER / (317) 327-6041
✗ TAXES
> YEAR PROPERTY TAXES TAX ASSESSMENT
> 2020 $1,439 (+9.8%) $69,200 (+6.3%)
> 2019 $1,311 (-22%) $65,100 (+9.8%)
> 2018 $1,681 (+50.1%) $59,300 (+10%)
> 2017 $1,120 (+4.9%) $53,900 (-0.9%)
> 2016 $1,068 (+1.3%) $54,400 (+3.2%)
> 2014 $1,054 (-22.2%) $52,700
> 2013 $1,354 $52,700 (-22.2%)
> 2012 $1,354 $67,700 (+14%)
> 2011 -- $59,400
> 2010 $1,188 (+200.2%) $59,400 (-3.7%)
> 2009 $396 $61,700 (-6.4%)
> 2007 -- $65,900
> NEIGHBORS / 54
> NAME / SENIE MOORE
> ADDRESS / 11349 E NEW YORK ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-3722
> AGE / 63
> NAME / ANIKA HUGHES
> ADDRESS / 11349 E NEW YORK ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-3722
> AGE / 38
> NAME / TRACEY WILSON
> ADDRESS / 11118 E NEW YORK ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2762
> AGE / 59
> NAME / SAMURAS EATON
> ADDRESS / 11405 E NEW YORK ST APT 1, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-3723
> AGE / 50
> NAME / NANCY R WRIGHT
> ADDRESS / 11650 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2810
> AGE / 60
> NAME / RANDY RICHEY
> ADDRESS / 11801 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 62
> NAME / PAULA K RICHEY
> ADDRESS / 11801 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 70
> NAME / ANITA FARMERD
> ADDRESS / 11817 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 87
> NAME / JEFFREY HIGGINS
> ADDRESS / 11825 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 55
> NAME / NANCY R WRIGHT
> ADDRESS / 11650 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2810
> AGE / 60
> NAME / RANDY RICHEY
> ADDRESS / 11801 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 62
> NAME / PAULA K RICHEY
> ADDRESS / 11801 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 70
> NAME / ANITA FARMERD
> ADDRESS / 11817 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 87
> NAME / JEFFREY HIGGINS
> ADDRESS / 11825 E COLMAR ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229-2903
> AGE / 55
> NAME / C C MC WEENEY
> ADDRESS / 735 LONG MEADOW RD, MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762-3408
> AGE / 72
> NAME / ROBERT A MAVRICZ
> ADDRESS / 757 LONG MEADOW RD, MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762-3408
> AGE / 80
> NAME / NANCY K MAVRICZ
> ADDRESS / 757 LONG MEADOW RD, MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762-3408
> AGE / 79
> NAME / ROBERT STROBYD
> ADDRESS / 847 LONG MEADOW RD, MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762-3408
> AGE / 64
> NAME / LAUREN STROBY
> ADDRESS / 847 LONG MEADOW RD, MIDDLEBURY, CT 06762-3408
> AGE / 32
> NAME / GARALD F MANAHAN
> ADDRESS / 7000 W CRESTWOOD DR, DELPHI, IN 46923-9121
> NAME / CARRIE PARKHURST
> ADDRESS / 6975 W CRESTWOOD DR, DELPHI, IN 46923-9120
> AGE / 37
> NAME / JIM C TYNER
> ADDRESS / 6972 W CRESTWOOD DR, DELPHI, IN 46923-9120
> AGE / 63
> NAME / JANE L FEHRHOLZ
> ADDRESS / 7040 W CRESTWOOD DR, DELPHI, IN 46923-9121
> AGE / 75
> NAME / ALLAN R FEHRHOLZ
> ADDRESS / 7040 W CRESTWOOD DR, DELPHI, IN 46923-9121
> AGE / 52
> NAME / WALTER L BISHOPD
> ADDRESS / 1918 WINTON AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-5626
> AGE / 87
> NAME / RONALD E PHELPS
> ADDRESS / 1916 WINTON AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-5626
> AGE / 69
> NAME / JANIS A KOMLANC
> ADDRESS / 1929 WINTON AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-5625
> AGE / 66
> NAME / JUDITH BUNCH
> ADDRESS / 1914 WINTON AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-5626 82
> NAME / TERESA SNIDER
> ADDRESS / 1910 WINTON AVE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-5626
> AGE / 71
> NAME / NITIN MCADORY
> ADDRESS / 2305 ROGATE CIR, WINDSOR MILL, MD 21244-5711
> AGE / 38
> NAME / NICOLE BRISCOE
> ADDRESS / 2305 ROGATE CIR, WINDSOR MILL, MD 21244-5711
> AGE / 40
> NAME / BARBARA GREGORY
> ADDRESS / 5442 ELKHORN DR, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46254-5290
> AGE / 60
> NAME / ANDREW JONES
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST APT 1001, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1506
> AGE / 70
> NAME / KATHLEEN BOYLE
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 48
> NAME / JEFF STEVENS
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 59
> NAME / JAMES JANG
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 50
> NAME / ANDREW JONES
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST APT 1001, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1506
> AGE / 70
> NAME / KATHLEEN BOYLE
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 48
> NAME / JEFF STEVENS
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 59
> NAME / JAMES JANG
> ADDRESS / 837 GRAVIER ST, NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112-1516
> AGE / 50
> NAME / NORBERT MATSON
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 1101, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5345
> AGE / 58
> NAME / ROY KING
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 2732, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5202
> AGE / 56
> NAME / MOSE CUNNINGKIN
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 215, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5373
> AGE / 65
> NAME / JAMES LOVINS
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 105, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5380
> AGE / 56
> NAME / CAROL LOVINS
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 105, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5380
> AGE / 76
> NAME / ROY KING
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 2732, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5202
> AGE / 56
> NAME / NORBERT MATSON
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 1101, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5345
> AGE / 58
> NAME / MOSE CUNNINGKIN
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 215, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5373
> AGE / 65
> NAME / JAMES LOVINS
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 105, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5380
> AGE / 56
> NAME / CAROL LOVINS
> ADDRESS / 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 105, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211-5380
> AGE / 76
> NAME / CARL LANDSKRON
> ADDRESS / 317 N BROOKFIELD DR, LAFAYETTE, IN 47905-7635
> AGE / 52
> NAME / JANICE STOLARZ
> ADDRESS / 332 N BROOKFIELD DR, LAFAYETTE, IN 47905-7631
> AGE / 74
> NAME / CHARLES STOLARZ
> ADDRESS / 332 N BROOKFIELD DR, LAFAYETTE, IN 47905-7631
> AGE / 81
> NAME / TIFFANY LEUCK
> ADDRESS / 340 N BROOKFIELD DR, LAFAYETTE, IN 47905-7631
> AGE / 50
> NAME / JERRY LEUCK
> ADDRESS / 340 N BROOKFIELD DR, LAFAYETTE, IN 47905-7631
> AGE / 65
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
:
L. ,; t#, G:
EW: ,ft f#i ;##W. j. E#, :
E##; t#E .E#t GEEEEEEEL ; :#L:WE EW, E#t .GE
E###t t#E i#W, ,;;L#K;;. .DL .KG ,#D E##j E#t j#K;
E#fE#f t#E L#D. t#E f. :K#L LWL EE ;#f E###D. E#GK#f
E#t D#G t#E :K#Wfff; t#E EW: ;W##L .E#f f#. t#iE#jG#W; E##D.
E#t f#E. t#E i##WLLLLt t#E E#t t#KE#L ,W#; :#G GK E#t t##f E##Wi
E#t t#K: t#E .E#L t#E E#t f#D.L#L t#K: ;#L LW. E#t :K#E: E#jL#D:
E#t ;#W,t#E f#E: t#E E#jG#f L#LL#G t#f f#: E#KDDDD###iE#t ,K#j
E#t :K#D#E ,WW; t#E E###; L###j f#D#; E#f,t#Wi,,,E#t jD
E#t .E##E .D#; t#E E#K: L#W; G#t E#t ;#W: j#t
.. G#E tt fE EG LE. t DWi ,KK: ,; Loading data...
fE : ; ;@
,
✞ IP ADDRESS // 69.86.201.61
✗ ISP / WINDS-6
> NAME / Windstream Communications LLC
> ADDRESS / 4001 Rodney Parham Rd
> CITY / Little Rock
> POSTAL CODE / AR
✗ CIDR / 69.86.192.0/20, 69.86.216.0/22, 69.86.208.0/21
✗ BINARY / 01000101.01010110.11001001.00111101
✗ NETRANGE / 69.86.192.0 - 69.86.219.255
✗ NETNAME / WINDSTREAM-69-86-0-0
✗ NETHANDLE / NET-69-86-192-0-1
✗ NETTYPE / Direct Allocation
✗ REGDATE / 2003-10-17
✗ UPDATED / 2021-02-12
✗ ORGTECHHANDLE / WINDS-ARIN
> ORGTECHNAME / Windstream Communications Inc
> ORGTECHEMAIL / ipadmin@windstream.net
> ORGTECHPHONE / +1-888-292-3827
✗ ORGABUSEHANDLE / WINDS1-ARIN
> ORGABUSENAME / Windstream Abuse
> ORGABUSEEMAIL / abuse@windstream.net
> ORGABUSEPHONE / +1-800-347-1991
✗ OPEN PORTS / 2
> TYPE / HTTP(S)
> NUMBER / 80
> DEVICE / Router
> TYPE / DNS
> NUMBER / 53
> DEVICE / Router
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
,;
i f#i .Gt i
LE .E#t j#W: .. LE
L#E i#W, ;K#f ;W, L#E
G#W. L#D. .G#D. j##, G#W.
D#K. :K#Wfff; j#K; G###, D#K.
E#K. i##WLLLLt ,K#f ,GD; :E####, E#K.
.E#E. .E#L j#Wi E#t ;W#DG##, .E#E.
.K#E f#E: .G#D: E#t j###DW##, .K#E
.K#D ,WW; ,K#fK#t G##i,,G##, .K#D
.W#G .D#; j###t :K#K: L##, .W#G
:W##########Wt tt .G#t ;##D. L##, :W##########Wt
:,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ;; ,,, .,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
Loading data...
✞ NOTE // Yes, there is thousands of lines of court records alone. More info is past them if you can scroll that far.
✞ LEGAL RECORDS //
✗ DRIVING 15-20 MPH ABOVE LIMIT
> DATE / 2001
> CASE # / 2001TR1809
> CASE TYPE / CRIMINAL
> CLASSIFICATION / TRAFFIC
> DEGREE OF OFFENSE / CLASS P OTHER
> CRIME COUNTY / ILLINOIS
> OFFENSE CODE / 11-601(B)
> OFFENSE DATE / 06/16/2001
> OFFENSE DESCRIPTION / DRIVING 15-20 MPH ABOVE LIMIT
> CHARGES FILED DATE / 06/18/2001
> COURT / CIRCUIT
> PLEA / GUILTY
> Disposition GUILTY
> Disposition Date 07/24/2001
✗ IN - INDIANAPOLIS - SOUTHERN
> DATE / 2007
> DEBTORS / JILL WYNNE CHAPMAN
> ASSESTS / AVAILABLEY
> ATTORNEY / NAME DAVID G WALTON JR
> ATTORNEY ADDRESS / 5610 CRAWFORDSVILLE RD, STE 1200, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224-3784
> ATTORNEY PHONE # / 3172412900
> LAW FIRM / WALTON LEGAL SERVICES
> JUDGE NAME / ANTHONY J. METZ III
> CASE #' / 0706737
> CLAIM DATE / 07/19/2007
> CONVERTED DATE / 09/17/2007
> COURT ADDRESS / 46 EAST OHIO STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> COURT DISTRICT / IN - INDIANAPOLIS - SOUTHERN
> COURT DIVISION / 1
> COURT PHONE / 3172293800
> NOTICE TYPE / DISCHARGE
> TRUSTEE ADDRESS / 429 N PENNSYLVANIA ST, STE 100, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-1873
> TRUSTEE NAME / WILLIAM J TUCKER
> TRUSTEE PHONE / 3178333030
> DISCHARGE DATE / 01/09/2013
> FILE DATE / 07/19/2007
> REPORT DATE / 01/10/2013
✗ CIVIL JUDGMENT
> COURT / MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - 7
> COURT CASE # / 49D070610CC044037
> FILING DATE / 07/09/2007
> FILING TYPE / CIVIL JUDGMENT
> PLAINTIFF / BENEFICIAL INDIANA INC
> PLAINTIFF NAME / BENEFICIAL INDIANA INC
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $10,330.00
✗ CIVIL JUDGMENT
> COURT / CARROLL SUPERIOR COURT
> COURT CASE # / 08D010612CC056
> FILING DATE / 02/01/2007
> FILING TYPE / CIVIL JUDGMENT
> PLAINTIFF / INDIANA MEMBERS CREDIT UNIONUNE
> PLAINTIFF NAME / INDIANA MEMBERS CREDIT UNIONUNE
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $11,146.00
✗ CIVIL JUDGMENT
> COURT / CARROLL SUPERIOR COURT
> COURT CASE # / 08D010612CC048
> FILING DATE / 01/29/2007
> FILING TYPE / CIVIL JUDGMENT
> PLAINTIFF / TARGET NATIONAL BANK
> PLAINTIFF NAME / TARGET NATIONAL BANK
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $1,791.00
✗ SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT CASE # / 49K010609SC008083
> FILING DATE / 11/16/2006
> FILING TYPE / SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES INC
> PLAINTIFF NAME / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES INC
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $1,500.00
✗ FORCIBLE ENTRY/DETAINER
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT CASE # / 49K010609SC008083
> FILING DATE / 09/19/2006
> FILING TYPE / FORCIBLE ENTRY/DETAINER
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES
> PLAINTIFF NAME / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $0.00
✗ FORCIBLE ENTRY/DETAINER
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT CASE # / 49K010608SC007252
> FILING DATE / 08/22/2006
> FILING TYPE / FORCIBLE ENTRY/DETAINER
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES
> PLAINTIFF NAME / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $0.00
✗ CIVIL NEW FILING
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT CASE # / 49K010409SC8535
> FILING DATE / 09/09/2004
> FILING TYPE / CIVIL NEW FILING
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOC
> PLAINTIFF NAME / STALLARD AND ASSOC
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $0.00
✗ CIVIL NEW FILING
> COURT / MARION - PIKE SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT CASE # / 49K059804SC3551
> FILING DATE / 04/15/1998
> FILING TYPE / CIVIL NEW FILING
> PLAINTIFF / EDWARD ROSE OF INDIANA
> PLAINTIFF NAME / EDWARD ROSE OF INDIANA
> TOTAL JUDGEMENT AMOUNT / $0.00
✗ Small Claims
> NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> AUCTION TYPE / 05
> FULL ADDRESS / 3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> CASE # / 49K010609SC008083
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> DEPARTMENT / SC
> FILING DATE / 11/16/2006
> FILING TYPE / Small Claims
> FILING STATE / IN
> LIABILITY AMOUNT / 1500
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES INC
✗ Forcible Detainer
> NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> FULL ADDRESS / 3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> CASE # / 49K010609SC008083
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> FILING DATE / 09/19/2006
> FILING TYPE / Forcible Detainer
> FILING STATE / IN
✗ Civil New Filing
> AUCTION TYPE / 17
> NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> FULL ADDRESS /3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> CASE # / 49K010609SC008083
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> DEPARTMENT / SC
> FILING DATE / 09/07/2006
> FILING TYPE / Civil New Filing
> FILING STATE / IN
> PLAINTIFF / STALLARD AND ASSOCIATES INC
✗ Forcible Detainer
> NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> FULL ADDRESS / 3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> CASE # / 49K010608SC007252
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> FILING DATE / 08/22/2006
> FILING TYPE / Forcible Detainer
> FILING STATE / IN
✗ Civil New Filing
> AUCTION TYPE / 17
> NAME / JILL CHAPMAN
> FULL ADDRESS / 3540 N PENNSYLVANIA ST APT U, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205
> CASE # / 49K010608SC007252
> COURT / MARION - CENTER SMALL CLAIMS
> DEPARTMENT / SC
> FILING DATE / 08/10/2006
> FILING TYPE / Civil New Filing
> FILING STATE / IN
✗ FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE-MBH
> OWNER / FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE-MBH
> ADDRESS / 5442 ELKHORN DR APT 1117
> CITY / INDIANAPOLIS
> STATE / IN
> POSTAL CODE / 46254
✗ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
> DATE / 03/14/2000
> TRADE TYPE / HEALTHCARE
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> LICENSE # / RN148299
> LICENSE STATE / GA
> LICENSE STATUS / EXPIRED
> LICENSE TYPE / REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL NURSE
> ISSUE DATE / 03/14/2000
> EXPIRATION DATE / 01/31/2001
✗ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
> DATE / 03/14/2000
> TRADE TYPE / HEALTHCARE
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> LICENSE # / RN148299
> LICENSE STATE / GA
> LICENSE STATUS / EXPIRED
> LICENSE TYPE / REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL NURSE
> ISSUE DATE / 03/14/2000
> EXPIRATION DATE / 01/31/2001
> OWNER / FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE-MBH
✗ REGISTERED NURSE
> DATE / 09/27/1995
> TRADE TYPE / HEALTHCARE
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> LICENSE # / 28130759A
> LICENSE STATE / IN
> LICENSE STATUS / ACTIVE
> LICENSE TYPE / REGISTERED NURSE
> ISSUE DATE / 09/27/1995
> EXPIRATION DATE / 10/31/2007
✗ NURSE
> DATE / 09/1995
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> LICENSE # / 28130759A
> LICENSE STATE / IN
> LICENSE STATUS / ACTIVE
> LICENSE TYPE / NURSE
> JOB FUNCTIONS / REGISTERED NURSE - PROFESSIONAL NURSE
> ISSUE DATE / 09/1995
✗ NON-PARTISAN
> DATE / 1986
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST
> CITY / INDIANAPOLIS
> STATE / IN
> POSTAL CODE / 46229
> PARTY / NON-PARTISAN
> DATE OF REGISTRATION / 04/07/1986
✗ Not Specified
> 1986
> FIRST NAME / JILL
> MIDDLE NAME / WYNNE
> LAST NAME / CHAPMAN
> ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST
> CITY / INDIANAPOLIS
> STATE / IN
> POSTAL CODE / 46229
> PARTY / NOT SPECIFIED
> DATE OF REGISTRATION / 01/04/1986
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. / 49G13-1507-OV-039971
> CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS V. JILL W CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE / OV - LOCAL ORDINANCE VIOLATION
> DATE FILED / 07/20/2015
> LOCATION / MARION SUPERIOR COURT, CRIMINAL DIVISION 13
> APPEAR BY / 09/18/2015
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT / CHAPMAN, JILL W FEMALE WHITE
> 5'6", 192 LBS STEVEN D ALLEN
> ADDRESS / 110 N. DELAWARE STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-634-9800(W)
> ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229
> ORDINANCE PLAINTIFF CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES / CHAPMAN, JILL W CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. SPEEDING - CERTAIN STREETS/OI 000072526282 441-323 NO STATE CODE 07/15/2015
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
07/20/2015 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
09/11/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/02/2015 AT 8:30 AM.
09/11/2015 NOTICE OF BENCH TRIAL ON TRAFFIC CASE
11/18/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY / CHAPMAN, JILL W
> ATTORNEY / ALLEN, STEVEN D
> FILE STAMP / 11/18/2015
12/02/2015 BENCH TRIAL (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PRATT, MARCEL A, JR.) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/02/2015
✗ DISPOSITION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: PRATT, MARCEL A, JR.)
> 1. SPEEDING - CERTAIN STREETS/OI
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO./ 49D07-1905-CC-020445
> PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC V. JILL CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE / CC - CIVIL COLLECTION
> DATE FILED / 05/21/2019
> LOCATION / MARION SUPERIOR COURT, CIVIL DIVISION 7
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, JILL W
> ADDRESS / 11625 E COLMAR ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46229
> PLAINTIFF PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC JULIA M ANDREWS
RETAINED
> BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
> ADDRESS / 9247 N MERIDIAN ST, SUITE 101INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
> PHONE NUMBER / 888-574-0700(W)CHRISTOPHER NEESON
RETAINED
> BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
> ADRESS / 9247 N MERIDIAN ST, SUITE 101 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-574-0700(W)FRED S HECHT
RETAINED
> BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
> ADRESS / 9247 N MERIDIAN ST, SUITE 101 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-574-0700(W)FRED S HECHT
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-574-0700(W)STEPHEN K. ANDREWS
RETAINED
> BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
> ADRESS / 9247 N MERIDIAN ST, SUITE 101 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
✗ ** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **TRACI B. SHUTTZ
RETAINED
> BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
> ADRESS / 9247 N MERIDIAN ST, SUITE 101 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
✗ ** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **
> 9247 N MERIDIAN STREET, STE 101 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
05/21/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
05/21/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
✗ APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 05/21/2019
05/21/2019 COMPLAINT/EQUIVALENT PLEADING FILED
> COMPLAINT WITH EXHIBITS / AOD
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 05/21/2019
05/21/2019 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
✗ SUMMONS
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 05/21/2019
06/03/2019 SERVICE ISSUED
✗ SUMMONS-
> SERVE TO: CHAPMAN, JILL W
06/04/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY LEFT AT 11625 E COLMAR ST 46229 AND MAILED A COPY BY FIRST CLASS MAIL - 32073
> PARTY SERVED: CHAPMAN, JILL W
07/19/2019 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED
> MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (PLEADINGS, SUMMARY)
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 07/19/2019
07/19/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/19/2019
07/20/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ---- 7/19/2019 : JILL W CHAPMAN
07/20/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ---- 7/19/2019 : CHRISTOPHER NEESON;FRED S HECHT;JULIA M ANDREWS;JOHN CHARLES COX;STEPHEN K. ANDREWS;TRACI B. SHUTTZ
07/22/2019
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T)
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 07/19/2019
> AWARDED TO: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> AWARDED AGAINST: JILL CHAPMAN
> JUDGMENT: $7,180.86
08/26/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR PROSUP
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 08/26/2019
08/26/2019 ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> OTA: 12/13/2019 @ 1:30 PM RM T341
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/26/2019
08/26/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/26/2019
08/26/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> NOTICE OF GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS SUMMONS AND ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES: NOTICE OF HEARING AND INTERROGATORIES.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/26/2019
08/26/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/13/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
08/27/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 8/26/2019 : JILL W CHAPMAN ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/26/2019 : JILL W CHAPMAN HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/26/2019 : JILL W CHAPMAN
08/27/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 8/26/2019 : CHRISTOPHER NEESON;FRED S HECHT;JULIA M ANDREWS;JOHN CHARLES COX;STEPHEN K. ANDREWS;TRACI B. SHUTTZ ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/26/2019 : CHRISTOPHER NEESON;FRED S
HECHT;JULIA M ANDREWS;JOHN CHARLES COX;STEPHEN K. ANDREWS;TRACI B. SHUTTZ HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/26/2019 : CHRISTOPHER NEESON;FRED S HECHT;JULIA M ANDREWS;JOHN CHARLES COX;STEPHEN K. ANDREWS;TRACI B. SHUTTZ
09/04/2019 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - SEPARATELY FILED
> COI
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 09/04/2019
09/12/2019 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ANSWERED INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 09/12/2019
12/13/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STEWART, IAN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/13/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> JILL CHAPMAN ELIGIBLE FOR FINAL ORDER IN WAGES/COMMISSIONS
12/13/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PLAN IN PLACE GARNISHMENT ONLY UPON EVIDENCE OF DEFAULT OF PLAN
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS A
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D06-1706-SC-003905
> BRENDA CHAPMAN V. NANCY MADAY
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 06/15/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 6
> PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT / MADAY, NANCY
> ADDRESS / 2108 KATHLEEN EVANSVILLE, IN 47714
> PLAINTIFF CHAPMAN, BRENDA FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHAPMAN ROHLFER, BRENDA PRO SE
> ADRESS / 10005 TWYCKENHAM CT INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
06/15/2017
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
06/15/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
06/15/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 06/15/2017
06/15/2017
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> MADAY, NANCY
> SERVED 06/17/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 06/20/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
06/15/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> SERVE TO: MADAY, NANCY
> ISSUED: 06/15/2017
06/15/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/28/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
> 07/28/2017 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/28/2017
> DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
COMMENT (PARTIES FAIL TO APPEAR; ON MOTION OF THE COURT, CAUSE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [EF])
08/01/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ---- 7/28/2017 : BRENDA CHAPMAN;NANCY MADAY
PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE T
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1703-IF-000586
> STATE OF INDIANA V. CHASITY N CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: IF - INFRACTION
> DATE FILED: 03/07/2017
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> APPEAR BY: 05/11/2017
> PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, CHASITY N FEMALE WHITE
> 5'3", 220 LBS PRO SE
> ADRESS / 5829 BEACHVIEW DR APT 342 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> ADDRESS / 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, CHASITY N CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)/IFC: SPEEDING 000091865851 9-21-5-2(A) INFRACTION CLASS C 03/02/2017
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
03/07/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
05/23/2017 INFRACTION COURT COSTS AND FEES FOR MOVING VIOLATION DUE
> DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR OR CONTACT THE COURT PRIOR TO THE APPEAR BY DATE OF MAY 11, 2017 AS INDICATED ON THE CITATION. COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR THE OFFENSE OF SPEEDING (SPEED AMOUNT: 85 / SPEED LIMIT: 70)
WITH FINES AND COSTS ASSESSED IN THE AMOUNT OF $160.00. IN THE EVENT FINES AND COSTS ARE NOT PAID ON OR BEFORE JULY 3, 2017, A LATE FEE OF $25.00 WILL BE ASSESSED AND DEFENDANT'S LICENSE WILL BE SUSPENDED. NOTICE MAILED TO DEFENDANT.
05/23/2017
> DISPOSITION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)/IFC: SPEEDING
✗ DEFAULT JUDGMENT
05/23/2017 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-21-5-2(A)
05/24/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> INFRACTION COURT COSTS AND FEES FOR MOVING VIOLATION DUE ---- 5/23/2017 : CHASITY N CHAPMAN
05/24/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> INFRACTION COURT COSTS AND FEES FOR MOVING VIOLATION DUE ---- 5/23/2017 : JILL ALLISON GAGNON
07/05/2017 FTP SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV
07/05/2017 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> FTP SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-21-5-2(A)
07/06/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> FTP SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV ---- 7/5/2017 : CHASITY N CHAPMAN
07/06/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> FTP SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV ---- 7/5/2017 : JILL ALLISON GAGNON
07/20/2017 PAYMENT SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV
07/20/2017 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> PAYMENT SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-21-5-2(A)
07/21/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PAYMENT SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV ---- 7/20/2017 : CHASITY N CHAPMAN
07/21/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PAYMENT SR16 TO BE SENT TO BMV ---- 7/20/2017 : JILL ALLISON GAGNON
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 32C01-1901-PL-000008
> SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN V. JEREMY JONES
> CASE TYPE: PL - CIVIL PLENARY
> DATE FILED: 01/15/2019
> LOCATION: HENDRICKS CIRCUIT COURT
> PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT JONES, JEREMY MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
RETAINED
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> INDIANA GOVERNMENT CENTER SOUTH 5TH FLOOR 302 W WASHINGTON STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-232-6287(W)ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL
RETAINED
> ADDRESS / 200 EAST WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 1601 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-327-4055(W)LYUBOV GORE
RETAINED
> OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
> 302 WEST WASHINGTON STREET FIFTH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> IDOC #860995
> ADDRESS / 727 MOON ROAD PLAINFIELD, IN 46168
> PLAINTIFF CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN PRO SE
> PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
> NUMBER / #860995
> 727 MOON ROAD PLAINFIELD, IN 46168
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
01/15/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
01/15/2019 PETITION FILED
> MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. LES
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> AGAINST: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> LES
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> LES
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019 COMPLAINT/EQUIVALENT PLEADING FILED
> LES
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> AGAINST: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/17/2019 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: JONES, JEREMY
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/16/2019
01/17/2019 NOTICE ISSUED
> TO: PET W/ORDER, RESP (BY C/M) W/ SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, APPEARANCE, MOTION & ORDER
01/18/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 1/17/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN;JEREMY JONES
01/24/2019 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, MOTION, ORDER, APPEARANCE - SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE
> PARTY SERVED: JONES, JEREMY
> DATE SIGNED: 01/22/2019
02/05/2019 AMENDED PLEADING FILED
> PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED CLAIM FOR RELIEF AND AMENDED RELIEF REQUEST. NK
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 02/05/2019
02/19/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY BY SCHEIL
> FOR PARTY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 02/18/2019
02/19/2019 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER AND STATEMENT OF DEFENSES
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 02/18/2019
02/19/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE OF LYUBOV GORE
> FOR PARTY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 02/19/2019
03/07/2019 MOTION FILED
> PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION. NK
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 03/07/2019
03/13/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> HEARING SET DUE TO TRIAL RULE 65A ON APRIL 9, 2019 AT 1PM FOR 30 MINUTES
03/13/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/09/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
03/13/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF W/ CCS ENTRY BY REG MAIL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
03/14/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 3/13/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
03/14/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 3/13/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE
03/26/2019 MOTION FILED
> BELATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 03/26/2019
03/26/2019 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> BELATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/26/2019
03/27/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/26/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
03/27/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/26/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE
03/27/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD DEFT W/ ORDER BY REG MAIL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
04/03/2019 RESPONSE FILED
> RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 04/02/2019
04/05/2019 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 04/04/2019
04/05/2019 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/05/2019
04/06/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 4/5/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
04/06/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 4/5/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE
04/08/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> W/ ORDER
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
04/09/2019 HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F)
> ON TRIAL RULE 65 A
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/09/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/30/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
04/09/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> TRIAL RULE 65 A
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> HEARING DATE: 04/09/2019
04/09/2019 ORDER ON HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> PLAINTIFF APPEARS BY PHONE, DEFT FAILED TO APPEAR. PLAINTIFF REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. HEARING IS RESET TO 4-30-19 @ 9:00 A.M.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/09/2019
04/09/2019 NOTICE ISSUED
> TO: PLAINTIFF W/ORDER
04/10/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON HEARING ---- 4/9/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
04/10/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON HEARING ---- 4/9/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE
04/15/2019 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO RESET COURT HEARING
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 04/15/2019
04/15/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> RESET HEARING
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/15/2019
04/15/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 04/30/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/08/2019 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
04/15/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF W/ ORDER RESETTING HEARING BY REG MAIL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
04/16/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/15/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
04/16/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/15/2019 : JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN
04/16/2019 DOCUMENT FILED
> PLTF'S REPLY TO DEFT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COPY OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY SENT TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD.
> PARTY 2: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> PARTY 2: GORE, LYUBOV
> PARTY 2: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
04/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 4/17/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE
05/08/2019 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F)
> **TRIAL RULE 65 A** BY PHONE
> 04/30/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 05/08/2019
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/08/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> ON HEARING. LYUBOV GORE APPEARED FOR DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO APPEAR.
> NOT PRESENT: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> NOT PRESENT: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> NOT PRESENT: GORE, LYUBOV
> NOT PRESENT: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> HEARING DATE: 05/08/2019
05/08/2019 ORDER ON HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> COURT DENIES MOTION FOR INJUNCTION. DEFENDANT TO PREPARE PROPOSED ORDER.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/08/2019
05/08/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> W/ ORDER
05/09/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 5/8/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN ORDER ON HEARING ---- 5/8/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
05/09/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 5/8/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE ORDER ON HEARING ---- 5/8/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE
05/13/2019 ORDER DENYING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/12/2019
05/14/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER DENYING ---- 5/13/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
05/14/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER DENYING ---- 5/13/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE
05/14/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF W/ ORDER BY REG MAIL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
05/22/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE OF MARLEY G HANCOCK
> FOR PARTY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 05/22/2019
05/22/2019 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED
> MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 05/22/2019
05/23/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> JILL E. ESENWEIN.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: ESENWEIN, JILL ELAINE
> > SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/23/2019
05/23/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF AND ATTNY W/ ORDER TO WITHDRAW
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
05/24/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 5/23/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
05/24/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 5/23/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN;LYUBOV GORE;MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
07/16/2019 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. NG
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 07/16/2019
07/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DEFENDANT GIVEN 15 DAYS TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT.
> PARTY 2: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> PARTY 2: GORE, LYUBOV
> PARTY 2: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
> PARTY 2: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> FILE STAMP: 07/17/2019
07/18/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 7/17/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
> 07/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 7/17/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE;MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
> 08/01/2019 RESPONSE FILED
> RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 08/01/2019
08/07/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> OF DISMISSAL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/07/2019
08/07/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF W/ ORDER BY REG MAIL.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
08/08/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/7/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
08/08/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/7/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE;MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
08/15/2019 RESPONSE FILED
> PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. NG
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 08/15/2019
08/20/2019 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT 2.0. NG
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 08/20/2019
08/22/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT NOTES THIS CASE WAS DISMISSED ON 8-7-18 AND THEREFORE DENIES THE MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. CAUSE DISPOSED
> PARTY 2: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> PARTY 2: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
08/22/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD DEFT W/ CCS ENTY BY MAIL
> SERVED: JONES, JEREMY
08/23/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 8/22/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
08/23/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 8/22/2019 : MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
11/14/2019 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED
> MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
> FILED BY: JONES, JEREMY
> FILE STAMP: 11/14/2019
11/14/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> MOVANT: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> > SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/14/2019
11/14/2019 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PARTIES W/ ORDER BY MAIL
11/15/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 11/14/2019 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
11/15/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 11/14/2019 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE;MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
03/13/2020 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY. NG
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> FILE STAMP: 03/13/2020
03/17/2020 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ZIELINSKI, DANIEL F )
> COURT TAKES NO ACTION AS FILING DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TRIAL RULES.
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> SERVED: GORE, LYUBOV
> SERVED: HANCOCK, MARLEY GENELE
> SERVED: SCHEIL, ANDREW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/17/2020
03/17/2020 NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NTFD PLAINTIFF W. ORDER BY MAIL
> SERVED: CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
03/18/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/17/2020 : SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN
03/18/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/17/2020 : ANDREW CHARLES SCHEIL;LYUBOV GORE;MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D07-1706-SC-003906
> BRENDA CHAPMAN V. TRACY FEAGANS
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 06/15/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7
> PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT FEAGANS, TRACY
> 2513 E CHANDLER EVANSVILLE, IN 47715
> PLAINTIFF CHAPMAN, BRENDA PRO SE
> 10005 TWYCKENHAM CT INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
06/15/2017
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
06/15/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
06/15/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 06/15/2017
06/15/2017
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> FEAGANS, TRACY RETURNED UNSERVED 07/03/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 07/03/2017
> NO SUCH NUMBER, UNABLE TO FORWARD (6-28-17)
06/15/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, BRENDA
> SERVE TO: FEAGANS, TRACY
> ISSUED: 06/15/2017
06/15/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/28/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
07/28/2017 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/28/2017
> DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> COMMENT (PARTIES FAIL TO APPEAR; ON MOTION OF THE COURT, CAUSE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [EF])
08/01/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ---- 7/28/2017 : BRENDA CHAPMAN;TRACY FEAGANS
08/18/2017 CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> E-NOTICE RETURNED NOT DELIVERABLE
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1604-CM-000446
> STATE OF INDIANA V. THOMAS O. CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 04/21/2016
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: 201600108249
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 73-DM45319
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, THOMAS O. MALE WHITE
> 6'1", 300 LBS
> ADDRESS / 3890 E. 500 S. GREENFIELD, IN 46140
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> ADDRESS / 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O. CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1)/MB: LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT DRIVER FAILS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP AT THE SCENE 000081849274 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1) MISDEMEANOR CLASS B 04/14/2016
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
04/21/2016 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
04/21/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> JILL A. GAGNON. KMM
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> ATTORNEY: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 INFORMATION FILED
> CT. I LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT. KMM
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/26/2016 AT 8:30 AM.
04/22/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
04/22/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
05/26/2016 INITIAL HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/26/2016 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
06/01/2016 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL )
> COURT DETERMINES PROBABLE CAUSE. DEF APPEARS IN PERSON AND WITHOUT COUNSEL; STATE BY JG. INITIAL HEARING IS HELD AND THE COURT SETS: PRE-TRIAL: AUG 3, 2016 AT 8:30 A.M. BENCH TRIAL: AUG 18, 2016 AT
1:00 P.M. OMNIBUS DATE IS JUL 25, 2016 DEF REQUESTS PAUPER COUNSEL; GRANTED. WARREN GOOD IS APPOINTED AND NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. PC N/G DEF; PROS
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/26/2016
06/01/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM PRO SE
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
> FILE STAMP: 05/26/2016
06/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 08/03/2016 AT 8:30 AM.
06/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/18/2016 AT 1:00 PM.
06/02/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
06/02/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
06/29/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> PAUPER APPEARANCE FORM
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
> FILE STAMP: 06/28/2016
08/03/2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/03/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL )
> DEF APPEARS W/COUNSEL; STATE BY JG. STATE ORALLY MOVES TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE OF ACTION; SO ORDERED. COURT TO PREPARE ORDER OF DISMISSAL. SF
> HEARING DATE: 08/03/2016
08/04/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/04/2016
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1)/MB: LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT DRIVER FAILS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP AT THE SCENE
> DISMISSED
08/09/2016 ORDER OF DISMISSAL
> COURT ENTERS AN ORDER DISMISSING THIS CAUSE OF ACTION. SF C/SCANNED CLERK
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/04/2016
08/09/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER OF DISMISSAL KMW
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/04/2016
08/10/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
08/10/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/10/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/18/2016 AT 1:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: DISMISSAL / JUDGMENT.
08/11/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
08/11/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/18/2016 CANCELED BENCH TRIAL (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> DISMISSAL / JUDGMENT
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1604-CM-000446
> STATE OF INDIANA V. THOMAS O. CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 04/21/2016
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: 201600108249
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 73-DM45319
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, THOMAS O. MALE WHITE
> 6'1", 300 LBS
> ADDRESS / 3890 E. 500 S. GREENFIELD, IN 46140
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O. CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1)/MB: LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT DRIVER FAILS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP AT THE SCENE 000081849274 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1) MISDEMEANOR CLASS B 04/14/2016
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
04/21/2016 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
04/21/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> JILL A. GAGNON. KMM
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> ATTORNEY: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 INFORMATION FILED
> CT. I LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT. KMM
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/21/2016
04/21/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/26/2016 AT 8:30 AM.
04/22/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
04/22/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
05/26/2016 INITIAL HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/26/2016 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
06/01/2016 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL )
> COURT DETERMINES PROBABLE CAUSE. DEF APPEARS IN PERSON AND WITHOUT COUNSEL; STATE BY JG. INITIAL HEARING IS HELD AND THE COURT SETS: PRE-TRIAL: AUG 3, 2016 AT 8:30 A.M. BENCH TRIAL: AUG 18,
2016 AT 1:00 P.M. OMNIBUS DATE IS JUL 25, 2016 DEF REQUESTS PAUPER COUNSEL; GRANTED. WARREN GOOD IS APPOINTED AND NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. PC N/G DEF; PROS
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/26/2016
06/01/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM PRO SE
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
> FILE STAMP: 05/26/2016
06/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 08/03/2016 AT 8:30 AM.
06/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/18/2016 AT 1:00 PM.
06/02/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
06/02/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
06/29/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> PAUPER APPEARANCE FORM
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
> FILE STAMP: 06/28/2016
08/03/2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/03/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL )
> DEF APPEARS W/COUNSEL; STATE BY JG. STATE ORALLY MOVES TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE OF ACTION; SO ORDERED. COURT TO PREPARE ORDER OF DISMISSAL. SF
> HEARING DATE: 08/03/2016
08/04/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/04/2016
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-26-1-1.1(A)(1)/MB: LEAVING THE SCENE OF AN ACCIDENT DRIVER FAILS TO IMMEDIATELY STOP AT THE SCENE
> DISMISSED
08/09/2016 ORDER OF DISMISSAL
> COURT ENTERS AN ORDER DISMISSING THIS CAUSE OF ACTION. SF C/SCANNED CLERK
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/04/2016
08/09/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER OF DISMISSAL KMW
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/04/2016
08/10/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
08/10/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/10/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/18/2016 AT 1:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: DISMISSAL / JUDGMENT.
08/11/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: CHAPMAN, THOMAS O.
08/11/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GAGNON, JILL ALLISON
> SENT TO: GOOD, WARREN ROBERT
08/18/2016 CANCELED BENCH TRIAL (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1908-IF-001221
> STATE OF INDIANA V. GUY K CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: IF - INFRACTION
> DATE FILED: 08/13/2019
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> APPEAR BY: 09/19/2019
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, GUY K MALE WHITE
> 6'1", 170 LBS PRO SE
> ADDRESS / 413 SUMMIT AVE CONNERSVILLE, IN 47331
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, GUY K CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-21-8-5(1)/IFC: IMPROPER PASSING 000094203801 9-21-8-5(1) INFRACTION CLASS C 08/08/2019
> 2. 9-21-5-2(A)/IFC: SPEEDING 000094203801 9-21-5-2(A) INFRACTION CLASS C 08/08/2019
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
08/13/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
08/13/2019 TRAFFIC CITATION FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/12/2019
09/06/2019 ADMISSION PAID IN FULL
> PMT MADE IN CLERKS OFFICE BY DEFENDANT
09/06/2019
DISPOSITION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-21-8-5(1)/IFC: IMPROPER PASSING
ADMISSION
> 2. 9-21-5-2(A)/IFC: SPEEDING
ADMISSION
> 09/06/2019 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-21-8-5(1)
09/06/2019 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 2 FOR STATUTE 9-21-5-2(A)
09/07/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMISSION PAID IN FULL ---- 9/6/2019 : GUY K CHAPMAN
09/07/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMISSION PAID IN FULL ---- 9/6/2019 : JILL ALLISON GAGNON
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D01-1812-SC-010274
> RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DELYN CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 12/26/2018
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, DELYN
> ADDRESS / 4233 SHADWELL DR EVANSVILLE, IN 47715
> PLAINTIFF RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC MAUREEN T OWEN
RETAINED
> ATTORNEY AT LAW PO BOX 20636 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-829-0077(W)
> PO BOX 349 1809 N. BROADWAY GREENSBURG, IN 47240
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
12/26/2018 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
12/26/2018 APPEARANCE FILED
> ATTORNEY APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 12/26/2018
12/26/2018 CLAIM FILED
> NOTICE OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 12/26/2018
12/26/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/14/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
12/26/2018 ORDER TO APPEAR
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/26/2018
12/27/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 12/26/2018 : DELYN CHAPMAN
12/27/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 12/26/2018 : JAMES E PRUETT
01/23/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY SERVICE
> PARTY SERVED: CHAPMAN, DELYN
> DATE SERVED: 01/22/2019
02/14/2019 FIRST HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> SOC DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/14/2019 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; PLTF'S COUNSEL MOVES FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED.
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 02/14/2019
02/14/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/14/2019
02/14/2019
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 02/14/2019
> AWARDED TO: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> AWARDD AGAINST: DELYN CHAPMAN
> COURT COSTS PLUS JUDGMENT: $3,928.23; ATTORNEY FEES: $1,071.77
> RJO: BOOK 2019, PAGE 0214
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2019, PAGE 0214
03/11/2020 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/03/2020
03/11/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/17/2020 AT 9:30 AM.
03/11/2020 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, DELYN
> FILED BY: EVSC TEACHER
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 03/03/2020
03/11/2020 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, DELYN
> FILED BY: EVSC TEACHER
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 03/03/2020
03/18/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/17/2020 AT 9:30 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
03/18/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> ALL EVENTS FILED ON 03/11/2020 ARE HEREBY VACATED BY THE COURT PURSUANT TO VANDERBURGH COUNTY COURTS COVID-19 PLAN.
> FILE STAMP: 03/18/2020
03/19/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 3/18/2020 : DELYN CHAPMAN
03/19/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT ---- 3/18/2020 : JAMES E PRUETT
03/19/2020 INVALID EMAIL: AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT -- 3/18/2020 : JAMES E PRUETT
04/17/2020 CANCELED PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (9:30 AM) ()
> OTHER
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT EVSC TEACHER
05/22/2020 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILE STAMP: 05/22/2020
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 72C01-1508-CT-000022
> JENNIE MADDEN V. DENNIS L CHAPMAN,STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
> CASE TYPE: CT - CIVIL TORT
> DATE FILED: 08/11/2015
> LOCATION: SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY MATTHEW CHARLES ROBINSON
RETAINED
> YARLING ROBINSON LLC
> ADDRESS / 151 N DELAWARE STREET - SUITE 1535 P O BOX 44128 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2596
> 317-262-8800 X102(W)CHARLES F ROBINSON
RETAINED
> YARLING & ROBINSON
> PO BOX 44128 151 NORTH DELAWARE STREET, SUITE 1535 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-262-8800 X21(W)SARAH M. DILLINGER
RETAINED
> YARLING ROBINSON LLC
> 151 N DELAWARE STREET - SUITE 1535 P O BOX 44128 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-0128
✗ ** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **
> ATTN: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, PROCESS AGENT
> 150 W MARKET ST STE 800 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, DENNIS L MALE WHITE RANDALL G. DEGAN
RETAINED
> DEGAN LAW PC
> 310 NORTH ALABAMA STREET SUITE 100 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-637-7760(W)
> 2559 BRENT TREE LANE APT 102 SEYMOUR, IN 47274
> DEFENDANT STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY JILL SUZANNE MCGINNIS
RETAINED
> STATE AUTO INSURANCE HOUSE COUNSEL
> 11611 NORTH MERIDIAN ST. SUITE 160 CARMEL, IN 46032
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-816-1277(W)
> ATTN: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, PROCESS AGENT
> 251 E OHIO ST STE 500 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PLAINTIFF MADDEN, JENNIE KENNETH G. DOANE, JR.
RETAINED
> 300 MISSOURI AVENUE, SUITE 200
> JEFFERSONVILLE, IN 47130
> 812-590-2213(W)KATHERINE ANN DUNNINGTON
RETAINED
> 9300 SHELBYVILLE ROAD SUITE 210 LOUISVILLE, KY 40222
> 502-753-1600(W)
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
08/11/2015 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
08/11/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: MADDEN, JENNIE
> ATTORNEY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
08/11/2015 COMPLAINT/EQUIVALENT PLEADING FILED
> COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
> 08/11/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
08/11/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED
> ALL SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO ALL DEFENDANTS FOR SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
08/1/2015 CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> REQUEST FOR RULE 5(F) NOT PERMITTED DUE TO NOT BEING SENT CERTIFIED MAIL
08/11/2015 DOCUMENT FILED
> EXHIBIT 1
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
08/12/2015 CLERICAL MISTAKE CORRECTED
> SUMMONS FIOR D CHAPMAN WAS REISSUED TO SHERIFF OF SCOTT CO FOR SERVICE
08/13/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED
> SUMMONS FOR D CHAPMAN REISSUED TO SHERIFF OF JACKSON CO FOR SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2015
08/17/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNED BY MARY COLEMAN ON 08-14-15
> DATE SIGNED: 08/14/2015
08/17/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNED BY ? ON 8/14/15.
> DATE SIGNED: 08/14/2015
08/24/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED FOR D CHAPMAN SIGNED BY ?
> PARTY SERVED: CHAPMAN, DENNIS L
> DATE SIGNED: 08/22/2015
08/31/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
> ATTORNEY: DILLINGER, SARAH M.
> ATTORNEY: ROBINSON, CHARLES F
> ATTORNEY: ROBINSON, MATTHEW CHARLES
> FILE STAMP: 08/25/2015
08/31/2015 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FILED
> PLEADINGS FILE STAMPED 08/25/15 PURSUANT TO TR5(F).
> FILED BY: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
> FILED BY: ROBINSON, MATTHEW CHARLES
> FILE STAMP: 08/25/2015
08/31/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
> CLERK TO ISSUE COPY ORDER TO K. DUNNINGTON AND COPY ALL TO M. ROBINSON.
> MOVANT: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
> MOVANT: ROBINSON, MATTHEW CHARLES
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/31/2015
08/31/2015 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
09/03/2015 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> SHERIFF OF SCOTT CO SHOWS NO SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR D CHAPMAN "DOES NOT LIVE HERE"
> PTY NOT SVD: CHAPMAN, DENNIS L
> FILE STAMP: 08/31/2015
09/08/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FILESTAMPED PER CERTIFIED MAILING DATE
> FOR PARTY: STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
> ATTORNEY: CORRELL, MARK CASWELL
> FILE STAMP: 09/04/2015
09/08/2015 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FILED PER CERTIFIED MAILING DATE
> FILED BY: CORRELL, MARK CASWELL
> FILE STAMP: 09/04/2015
09/09/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
> ATTORNEY: CORRELL, MARK CASWELL
> FILE STAMP: 09/09/2015
09/09/2015 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FILED.
> FILED BY: STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
> FILE STAMP: 09/09/2015
09/16/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> ALIAS CIVIL SUMMONS FILED
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 09/16/2015
09/16/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED
> SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF SCOTT COUNTY FOR SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 09/16/2015
09/17/2015 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> SHERIFF OF SCOTT COUNTY RETURNED ALIAS CIVIL SUMMONS ADDRESS IS NOT IN OUR COUNTY.
> PTY NOT SVD: CHAPMAN, DENNIS L
09/21/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, DENNIS L
> ATTORNEY: DEGAN, RANDALL G.
> FILE STAMP: 09/21/2015
09/21/2015 ANSWER FILED
> DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL FILED.
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, DENNIS L
> FILE STAMP: 09/21/2015
10/01/2015 ANSWER FILED
> DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S ANSWER WITH FILE STAMPED DATE 09/28/2015 PER TRIAL RULE 5(F)
> FILED BY: ROBINSON, MATTHEW CHARLES
> FILE STAMP: 09/28/2015
10/14/2015 RESPONSE FILED
> PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIM FOR ATTORNEY FEES FILE STAMPED 10/08/15 PURSUANT TO TR 5, COPY RETURNED TO ATTY.
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILED BY: MADDEN, JENNIE
> FILE STAMP: 10/08/2015
10/14/2015 ORDER GRANTING
> ORDER ENTERED. SEE ORDER. CLERK TO ISSUE COPY TO ATTYS.
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/14/2015
10/14/2015 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
10/26/2015 NOTICE FILED
> FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND FILED.
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 10/23/2015
10/26/2015 JURY TRIAL DEMAND FILED
> FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND FILED. CLERK TO ISSUE COPY TO ATTY.
> FILED BY: DUNNINGTON, KATHERINE ANN
> FILE STAMP: 10/23/2015
10/27/2015 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
10/28/2015 DOCUMENT FILED
> DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL
> FILED BY: DEGAN, RANDALL G.
> FILE STAMP: 10/28/2015
11/09/2015 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES FILED. CLERK TO ISSUE ALL TO ATTY.
> FILED BY: CORRELL, MARK CASWELL
> FILE STAMP: 11/09/2015
11/10/2015 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
11/12/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> ALIAS SUMMONS FILED
> FILED BY: MADDEN, JENNIE
> FILE STAMP: 11/12/2015
11/12/2015 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED
> ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED TO D. CHAPMAN BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
> FILE STAMP: 11/12/2015
11/16/2015 ANSWER FILED
> DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED PER CERTIFIED MAILING DATE
> FILED BY: ROBINSON, MATTHEW CHARLES
> FILE STAMP: 11/11/2015
12/14/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED ON D CHAPMAN STATING UNABLE TO FORWARD
02/01/2016 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE FILED.
> FILED BY: MADDEN, JENNIE
> FILE STAMP: 02/01/2016
02/16/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: MADDEN, JENNIE
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2016
04/04/2016 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> CERTIFIED MAIL FOR D CHAPMAN RETURNED "BAD ADDRESS"
04/11/2016 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> ALIAS SUMMONS FILED FOR D CHAPMAN
> FILED BY: DOANE, KENNETH G., JR.
> FILE STAMP: 04/11/2016
04/11/2016 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED
> ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF SCOTT CO FOR SERVICE ON D CHAPMAN
> FILE STAMP: 04/11/2016
05/02/2016 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> SHERIFF OF SCOTT CO. SHOWS ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED FOR DENNIS CHAPMAN UNSERVED, "LOOKS VACANT" 5-1-16
08/11/2016 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2016
08/11/2016 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DUVALL, ROGER L )
> SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL ENTERED. CLERK TO ISSUE COPY TO PARTIES AND ALL TO ATTY., J. MCGINNIS.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/11/2016
08/11/2016 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
12/15/2016 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL FILED
> JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FILED.
> FILED BY: DEGAN, RANDALL G.
> FILED BY: DILLINGER, SARAH M.
> FILED BY: DOANE, KENNETH G., JR.
> FILED BY: MCGINNIS, JILL SUZANNE
> FILE STAMP: 12/15/2016
12/15/2016 ORDER OF DISMISSAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DUVALL, ROGER L )
> ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ENTERED. SEE ORDER. CLERK TO ISSUE TO PARTIES.
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/15/2016
12/15/2016
> DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DUVALL, ROGER L)
> COMMENT ()
12/16/2016 NOTICE ISSUED
> PER COURT NOTES
12/20/2016 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL FILED
> ORIGINAL JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FILED.
> FILED BY: DEGAN, RANDALL G.
> FILED BY: DILLINGER, SARAH M.
> FILED BY: DOANE, KENNETH G., JR.
> FILED BY: MCGINNIS, JILL SUZANNE
> FILE STAMP: 12/15/2016
12/20/2016 ORDER OF DISMISSAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DUVALL, ROGER L )
> ORDER ENTERED. SEE ORDER. CLERK TO ISSUE TO PARTIES.
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/15/2016
12/20/2016 NOTICE ISSUED
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G19-1708-CM-030762
> STATE OF INDIANA V. REGINALD CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 08/21/2017
> LOCATION:
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: DP170093770
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49-DM1282418
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, REGINALD MALE BLACK
> 5'9", 160 LBS KENDAL RYAN GULBRANDSEN
RETAINED
> MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY
> 151 N. DELAWARE ST. SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-4100(W)EVAN MICHAEL DOMINGUEZ
RETAINED
> 151 N DELAWARE SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-2813(W)LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ
RETAINED
> HALL, RENDER, KILLIAN, HEATH & LYMAN
> 500 N MERIDIAN ST STE 400 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-977-1453(W)
> 228 N LASALLE ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46218
> OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000624680INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA LEE MANDEL
> 251 E OHIO STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-7625(W)JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND
> 251 E OHIO ST 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
> MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> 251 EAST OHIO STREET SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-5338(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, REGINALD STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 7.1-5-1-3(A)(1)/MB: PUBLIC INTOXICATION - ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE DEF. ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE 7.1-5-1-3(A)(1) MISDEMEANOR CLASS B 08/20/2017
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
08/21/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
08/21/2017 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
08/21/2017 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/21/2017
08/21/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> PC APC CHAPMAN.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/21/2017
08/21/2017 DISCOVERY FILED
> CM HISTORY CHAPMAN.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/21/2017
08/21/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/21/2017
08/21/2017 ORDE TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> AS TO THIS CASE ONLY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/21/2017
08/21/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT CARD GIVEN AND HANDLED OFF RECORD. COURT DATE IS 08/29/2017 PM
08/21/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/29/2017 AT 1:00 PM.
08/22/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/21/2017 : REGINALD CHAPMAN
08/22/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/21/2017 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
08/22/2017 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY, INITIAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/22/2017
08/22/2017 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/22/2017
08/29/2017 INITIAL HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PIERSON-TREACY, BECKY)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/29/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/01/2017 AT 8:30 AM.
08/30/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/29/2017 : REGINALD CHAPMAN;JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND
08/30/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/29/2017 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
09/01/2017 INITIAL HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PIERSON-TREACY, BECKY)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/01/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/22/2017 AT 1:00 PM.
09/02/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/1/2017 : REGINALD CHAPMAN;JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND
09/02/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/1/2017 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
09/22/2017 INITIAL HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PIERSON-TREACY, BECKY)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/22/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/18/2017 AT 1:00 PM.
09/22/2017 WAIVER OF INITIAL HEARING FILED
> FILE STAMP: 09/22/2017
09/23/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/22/2017 : JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND
09/23/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/22/2017 : LEE MANDEL;LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
10/18/2017 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PIERSON-TREACY, BECKY)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/18/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/20/2017 AT 8:30 AM.
10/19/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/18/2017 : JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND
10/19/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/18/2017 : LEE MANDEL;LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
10/20/2017 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER PIERSON-TREACY, BECKY)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/20/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/04/2018 AT 8:30 AM.
10/20/2017 APPEARANCE FILED
> PDIS FILING - APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, REGINALD
> FILE STAMP: 10/20/2017
10/21/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/20/2017 : JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND;EVAN MICHAEL DOMINGUEZ
10/21/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/20/2017 : LEE MANDEL;KENDAL RYAN GULBRANDSEN;LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
01/04/2018 BENCH TRIAL (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HUERTA, RONNIE - MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/04/2018 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HUERTA, RONNIE - MAG )
> AS TO THIS CASE
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 WRITTEN ADVISEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED
> FILE STAMP: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED STAMP: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 MOTION TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED BY: DOMINGUEZ, EVAN MICHAEL
> FILE STAMP: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HUERTA, RONNIE - MAG )
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 COURT FINDS DEFENDANT INDIGENT AS TO FINES AND COSTS
01/04/2018 CASE CLOSED
> EFFECTIVE: 01/04/2018
01/04/2018
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HUERTA, RONNIE - MAG)
> 1. 7.1-5-1-3(A)(1)/MB: PUBLIC INTOXICATION - ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE DEF. ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
01/04/2018
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HUERTA, RONNIE - MAG)
> 1. 7.1-5-1-3(A)(1)/MB: PUBLIC INTOXICATION - ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE DEF. ENDANGERS HIS/HER LIFE
> COMMENT ()
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/04/2018
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 180 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 2 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 176 DAYS
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. ABSTRACT: RECOMMENDED DEGREE OF SECURITY - NOT APPLICABLE, 01/04/2018, ACTIVE 01/04/2018
01/04/2018 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
01/05/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT ---- 1/4/2018 : JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND;LEE MANDEL;EVAN MICHAEL DOMINGUEZ;KENDAL RYAN GULBRANDSEN;LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ;TERRY RAYMOND
CURRY SENTENCED ---- 1/4/2018 : JENNIFER BROOKE REDMOND;LEE MANDEL;EVAN MICHAEL DOMINGUEZ;KENDAL RYAN GULBRANDSEN;LAUREN NICOLE RODRIGUEZ;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
✗ 01CV0581 CHASE MANHATTAN BANK VS. CHAPMAN, RUTH C RJO
> CASE STATUS / CLOSED
> FILE DATE / 06/27/2001
> ACTION / FORECLOSURE
> CASE JUDGE / O'NEILL, RICHARD J
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
> - PLAINTIFF
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS 5901 E FOWLER AVE TAMPA, FL 33617
> ALIAS
> AKA
> IMC HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> ATTORNEY FEALKO, JILL L
> ADDRESS
> PHONE
> CHAPMAN, RUTH C
> - DEFENDANT
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS / 239 BEACH CITY ROAD #2313
> HILTON HEAD ISLAND, SC 29926
> ALIAS
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> JOHN DOE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF RUTH C CHAPMAN
> - DEFENDANT
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS / 239 BEACH CITY ROAD #2313 HILTON HEAD, SC 29926
> ALIAS
> AKA
> DOE, JOHN
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> JAMES DOE UNKNOWN OCCUPANT
> - DEFENDANT
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS / 1827 WOODWARD SPRINGFIELD, OH 45506
> ALIAS
> AKA
> DOE, JAMES
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> JANE DOE UNKNOWN OCCUPANT
> - DEFENDANT
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS / 1827 WOODWARD SPRINGFIELD, OH 45506
> ALIAS
> AKA
> DOE, JANE
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> BANC ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
> - DEFENDANT
> DOB
> DISPOSITION
> DISP DATE
> ADDRESS / BANK ONE CENTER/TOWER 111 MONUMENT CIRCLE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46277
> ALIAS
> PARTY ATTORNEY
> DOCKET INFORMATION
DATE DOCKET TEXT
06/27/2001 COMPLAINT NOTICE AND EXHIBITS A & B FILED
06/27/2001 REQUEST FILED AND SUMMONS TOGETHER WITH COPY OF COMPLAINT/NOTICE & EXHIBITS A-B ISSUED BY CERT MAIL FOR SERVICE UPON ALL DEFENDANTS
06/27/2001 REQUEST FILED AND SUMMONS TOGETHER WITH COPY OF COMPLAINT/NOTICE & EXHIBITS A-B ISSUED TO SHERIFF OF CLARK CO., OHIO FOR (PERSONAL) SERVICE UPON JAMES DOE, WHOSE REAL NAME IS UNKNOWN, OCCUPANT & JANE DOE, WHOSE REAL NAME IS UNKNOWN, OCCUPANT
07/02/2001 CERT MAIL ENVELOPE RETURNED FOR JANE DOE UNKNOWN OCCUPANT CONTAINING COMPLAINT AND NOTICE TOGETHER WITH EXHIBITS A&B MARKED: NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED/UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE OF FAILURE OF SERVICE ISSUED TO ATTY JILL L DIMITT
07/02/2001 CERT MAIL ENVELOPE RETURNED FOR JAMES DOE UNKNOWN OCCUPANT CONTAINING COMPLAINT AND NOTICE TOGETHER WITH EXHIBITS A&B MARKED: NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED/UNABLE TO FORWARD NOTICE OF FAILURE OF SERVICE ISSUED TO ATTY JILL L DIMITT
07/05/2001 CERT MAIL RETURN RECEIPT FOR BANC ONE MORTGAGE CORP DOD 7/02/01 /S/ DENNIS GEBHART
07/23/2001 CERT MAIL RETURN RECEIPT FOR RUTH C CHAPMAN DOD 07/16/01 /S/RUTH C CHAPMAN
07/25/2001 CERT MAIL RETURN RECEIPT FOR JOHN DOE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF RUTH CHAPMAN DOD 7/16/01 /S/ RUTH CHAPMAN
07/27/2001 SUMMONS RETURNED ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: SHERIFFS RETURN ON JULY 27, 2001 I MADE PERSONAL SERVICE UPON JAMES DOE OCCUPANT - ALICIA BRIGGS GENE A KELLY SHERIFF
07/27/2001 SUMMONS RETURNED ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: SHERIFFS RETURN ON JULY 27, 2001 I MADE PERSONAL SERVICE UPON JANE DOE OCCUPANT - ALICIA BRIGGS GENE A KELLY SHERIFF
10/16/2001 REQUEST FILED ORDER OF SALE ISSUED SHERIFF OF CLARK COUNTY, OHIO.
11/05/2001 LAND APPRAISEMENT, FILED.
11/26/2001 NOTICE OF DATE OF SHERIFF SALE FILED DECEMBER 14, 2001
01/16/2002 ORDER OF SALE RETURNED ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: SHERIFF'S RETURN ON DECEMBER 14, 2001 CAME DIANA E JONES WHO BID $39,500.00 BEING THE HIGHEST BIDDER. I SOLD AND STRUCK OFF THE SAID LANDS AND TENEMENTS FOR THE SAME SUM. GENE A. KELLY, SHERIFF
02/15/2002 ORDERED--JUDGMENT ENTRY CONFIRMING SALE, ORDERING DEED AND DISTRIBUTION FILED---A DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO PLFF., AGAINST THE DEFT., RUTH C. CHAPMAN IN THE AMOUNT OF ($30,013.34), WITH
INTEREST THEREON. VOLUME # 735 PAGE # 678
02/17/2002 REQUEST FILED AND WRIT OF CONFIRMATION AND DISTRIBUION OF PROCEEDS TOGETHER WITH CERT. COPY OF ENTRY CONFIRMING SALE ISSUED TO SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, OHIO.
02/26/2002 REQUEST FILED AND CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT ISSUED FOR FILING IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT RETURNED ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: FILED: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 AT
5:19 P.M. DOCKETED IN DOCKET 65 PAGE 11 RONALD E VINCENT, CLERK PAULA JONES, DEPUTY
03/26/2002 WRIT OF ORDER OF CONFIRMATION AND DISTRIBUTION RETURNED ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: SHERIFF'S RETURN ON 3/22/02 I EXECUTED & DELIVERED TO DIANA E JONES AND HAVE DISTRIBUTED THE
PROCEEDS AS FOLLOW: $39,500.00 CLERK-$923.75 TREAS- $306.79 DIANA JONES-$386.29 CHASE-$37,883.17 REC'D GENE A. KELLY,SHERIFF
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1704-IF-001009
> STATE OF INDIANA V. GREG A MURPHY
> CASE TYPE: IF - INFRACTION
> DATE FILED: 04/26/2017
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> APPEAR BY: 06/01/2017
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> ATTORNEYS
> DEFENDANT MURPHY, GREG A MALE WHITE
> 5'11", 162 LBS PRO SE
> ADDRESS / 1163 CHAPMAN DR GREENFIELD, IN 46140
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: MURPHY, GREG A CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)(1)/IFC: SPEEDING -- EXCEEDING 30 MPH IN AN URBAN DISTRICT 000084373030 9-21-5-2(A)(1) INFRACTION CLASS C 04/20/2017
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
> 04/26/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
> 05/12/2017 CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PMT APPROVED THROUGH GOVPAY
> 05/16/2017
> DISPOSITION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)(1)/IFC: SPEEDING -- EXCEEDING 30 MPH IN AN URBAN DISTRICT
> DISMISSED
> 05/19/2017 ORDER OF DISMISSAL
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/18/2017
> 05/20/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER OF DISMISSAL ---- 5/19/2017 : GREG A MURPHY;JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D06-1505-SC-004532
> HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES V. TIMOTHY O JENKINS
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 05/20/2015
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 6
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> 3055 BLUEBELL LN INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> P.O. BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
05/20/2015
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
> 05/20/2015 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
> 05/20/2015 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/20/2015
05/20/2015
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> SERVED 06/03/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 06/03/2015
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE; TRACKING # 71124369468033066553
05/20/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 05/20/2015
05/20/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/13/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
> 07/13/201 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T.)
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/13/2015
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T.)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 07/13/2015
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> AWARDED AGAINST: TIMOTHY JENKINS
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $283.75; JUDGMENT: $1,414.27; ATTORNEY FEES: $75.00
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED $1773.02 PLUS INT & COSTS. [ETBF] CMJ
07/27/2015 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 07/23/2015
07/27/2015 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 07/23/2018
07/27/2015
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O RETURNED UNSERVED 08/28/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNED 08/28/2015
> NO SERVICE: UNCLAIMED-UNABLE TO FORWARD (08/22/2015)
> PGW
> SERVED 08/03/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 08/03/2015
> GOOD SERVICE
07/27/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> SERVE TO: PGW
ISSUED: 07/23/2015
> 07/27/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/31/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
07/30/2015 RJO ENTRY
> JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR $1773.02 PLUS $81.00 COURT COST FOR A TOTAL OF $1854.02 PLUS INTEREST AND ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS, ENTRY ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK ON 7/20/15
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/13/2015
> VOL./BOOK 1555, PAGE 91
08/03/2015 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> GARNISHEE DEFENDANT PGW ADVISES DEFENDANT IS NOT EMPLOYED; JTS/KNU
> FILED BY: PGW
> FILE STAMP: 08/03/2015
08/31/2015 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> CM DEFT AND CM GND PGW; JTS/KNU; DEFT NOT EMPD
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/31/2015 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; P/S DISMISSED;
09/18/2015 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 09/16/2015
09/18/2015 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 09/16/2015
09/18/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 09/16/2015
09/18/2015
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> SERVED 09/22/2015
> ANTICIPATED SERVER VANDERBURGH
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 09/23/2015
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
09/18/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 10/19/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
> 10/19/2015 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> SVC DEFT; TAX ORDER; SMC/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
> 10/19/2015 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> DEFT DEFAULTED; ORDER ENTERED FOR 25% OF DEFT'S FUTURE TAX REFUNDS TO BE APPLIED TO THE JUDGMENT HEREIN. (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/19/2015
10/22/2015 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND(S) TO JUDGMENT RECEIVED AND ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK FOR 10/21/15.
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/21/2015
> VOL./BOOK 1569, PAGE 221
10/23/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND(S) TO JUDGMENT
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 10/21/2015
10/23/2015
> ORDER
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND(S) TO JUDGMENT
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> SERVED 11/04/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 11/09/2015
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
03/22/2016 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/21/2016
> 03/22/2016 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/21/2016
03/22/2016
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O UNSERVED
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> DUKE ENERGY
> SERVED 03/25/2016
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 03/28/2016
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
03/22/2016 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> SERVE TO: DUKE ENERGY
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 03/21/2016
03/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/18/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
04/18/2016 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> CM DEFT AND CM GARN/DEFT DUKE ENERGY; JTS/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/18/2016 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $1773.02 PLUS COSTS AND INTEREST. (ETBF) ELR
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/18/2016
04/20/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER OF GARNISHMENT FOR DEFT TIMOTHY O JENKINS GARN/DEFT DUKE ENERGY IS FILED AND ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK 4/19/2016
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/18/2016
> VOL./BOOK 1595, PAGE 185-186
05/20/2016 ANSWER FILED
> GARNISHEE DEFENDANT DUKE ENERGY FILES ANSWER WITH THE COURT ADVISING DEFENDANT IS NOT EMPLOYED; SAME PLACED IN FILE.
> FILED BY: DUKE ENERGY
> FILE STAMP: 05/20/2016
01/30/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 01/23/2017
01/30/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/23/2017
01/30/2017
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> SERVED 02/07/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 02/10/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE:SIGNED BY TIMOTHY JENKINS
01/30/2017
> SUBPOENA
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O UNSERVED
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
01/30/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 01/23/2017
01/30/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 03/20/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
03/20/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM CM DEFT X2; JAS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/20/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> DEFT TIMOTHY JENKINS FAILS TO APPEAR; AT THE REQUEST OF PLTF'S COUNSEL RULE TO SHOW CAUSE IS SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ON 5-8-17 AT 1:30 PM; FAILURE TO APPEAR COULD RESULT IN AN ARREST WARRANT BEING ISSUED. (ETBF)
03/21/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE SCHEDULED FOR 05/08/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
03/23/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> SHOW CAUSE ORDER FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT & NOTICE OF ARREST WARRANT
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> ISSUED: 03/22/2017
03/23/2017
> ORDER
> SHOW CAUSE ORDER FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN COURT & NOTICE OF ARREST WARRANT
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> JENKINS, TIMOTHY O UNSERVED
> ANTICIPATED SERVER MARION
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
05/08/2017 HEARING ON MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> CM W/A LTR TO DEFT FROM P/S; 3055 BLUEBELL LN, INDIANAPOLIS IN 46224
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/08/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT P/S DISMISSED.
07/25/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 07/11/2017
07/25/2017 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 07/11/2017
07/25/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 07/11/2017
07/25/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/14/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
07/25/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/25/2017
07/26/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 7/25/2017 : TIMOTHY O JENKINS
07/26/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 7/25/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
08/08/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> GOOD SERVICE: SIGNED BY TIM JENKINS
> PARTY SERVED: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> DATE SERVED: 08/03/2017
08/14/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER WEIBERG, KRISTINA H - MAG)
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT FEMA; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/14/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: WEIBERG, KRISTINA H - MAG )
> DEFT TIMOTHY O JENKINS FAILS TO APPEAR; ON MOTION OF PLTF'S COUNSEL RULE TO SHOW CAUSE IS SET FOR HEARING ON 09/18/17 AT 1:30 P.M.; FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN AN ARREST WARRANT BEING ISSUED. (ETBF)
08/14/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: WEIBERG, KRISTINA H - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/14/2017
08/15/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE SCHEDULED FOR 09/18/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
08/17/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ---- 8/14/2017 : TIMOTHY O JENKINS
08/17/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE ---- 8/14/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
08/22/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> GOOD SERVICE:SIGNED BY TIMOTHY JENKINS
> PARTY SERVED: JENKINS, TIMOTHY O
> DATE SERVED: 08/19/2017
09/18/2017 HEARING ON MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T.)
> W/A LETTER ISSUED TO DEFT FROM P/S; (3055 BLUEBELL LN, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46224)
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/18/2017 ORDER FOR WRIT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> COURT ORDERS WRIT; $500 BOND; TIMOTHY O JENKINS, 3055 BLUEBELL LN, INDIANAPOLIS IN 46224; NUMERIC I.D.#8385-68.
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/18/2017
09/20/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G09-1910-F6-041747
> STATE OF INDIANA V. TYRELL A CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: F6 - FELONY 6
> DATE FILED: 10/29/2019
> LOCATION:
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: IP190120662
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49-DM1445263
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, TYRELL A MALE BLACK
> 5'8", 170 LBS ADAM CURTIS STEELE
RETAINED
> 151 N DELAWARE STREET SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-2899(W)
> 3704 HOOVINGHAM DR APT E APT E INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46226
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000726595INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA RYAN WILSON MEARS
> 251 E OHIO ST SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46228
✗ ** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, TYRELL A STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-30-10-16(A)(1)/F6: OPERATE VEH AFTER BEING HABITUAL TRAFFIC OFFENDER 9-30-10-16(A)(1) FELONY 6 10/26/2019
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
10/29/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
10/29/2019 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
10/29/2019 NOTICE FILED
> LR49-CR2.3-101 CASE CONSOLIDATION NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/29/2019
10/29/2019 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/29/2019
10/29/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> PC APC CHAPMAN.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/29/2019
10/29/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/12/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
10/29/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/29/2019
10/29/2019 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> AS TO THIS CASE ONLY
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/29/2019
10/30/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/29/2019 : TYRELL A CHAPMAN
10/30/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/29/2019 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
10/30/2019 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> DISCOVERY, INITIAL (MUNI)
> PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/30/2019
10/30/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM (L6-MISD)
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/30/2019
11/12/2019 INITIAL HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER REYOME, JASON G - MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/12/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/09/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
11/12/2019 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: REYOME, JASON G - MAG )
11/12/2019 OMNIBUS DATE
12/27/19
11/12/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> WILL HIRE COUNSEL
11/13/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/12/2019 : TYRELL A CHAPMAN
11/13/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/12/2019 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
11/25/2019 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> DISCOVERY, SUPPLEMENTAL (MUNI)
> PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/25/2019
12/09/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER GARNER, CHARNETTE D.)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/09/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/13/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
12/09/2019 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
12/09/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
12/09/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, TYRELL A
> FILE STAMP: 12/09/2019
12/10/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/9/2019 : ADAM CURTIS STEELE;RYAN WILSON MEARS
01/13/2020 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER GARNER, CHARNETTE D.)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/13/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTES
01/13/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/24/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
01/14/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/13/2020 : ADAM CURTIS STEELE;RYAN WILSON MEARS
02/24/2020 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER ORBISON, CAROL - SR)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/24/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/06/2020 AT 8:30 AM.
02/24/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTES
02/24/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> ORDER NAMING SENIOR JUDGE - CAROL ORBISON
02/25/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/24/2020 : ADAM CURTIS STEELE;RYAN WILSON MEARS
03/23/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 04/06/2020 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/11/2020 AT 8:30 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
03/24/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/23/2020 : ADAM CURTIS STEELE;RYAN WILSON MEARS
04/27/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 05/11/2020 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/15/2020 AT 8:30 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
04/28/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/27/2020 : ADAM CURTIS STEELE;RYAN WILSON MEARS
06/15/2020 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER GARNER, CHARNETTE D.)
04/06/2020 RESET BY COURT TO 05/11/2020
05/11/2020 RESET BY COURT TO 06/15/2020
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 20D04-0407-IF-02562
> STATE V JILL SLABAUGH
> CASE TYPE: IF - INFRACTION
> DATE FILED: 07/20/2004
> LOCATION: ELKHART SUPERIOR COURT 4
> ORIGINAL COUNTY CAUSE NUMBER: D404IF2562
> APPEAR BY: 08/10/2004
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT SLABAUGH, JILL M FEMALE WHITE
> 5'6", 280 LBS
> 342 CHAPMAN ST APT D ELKHART, IN 46516
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA CURTIS THEOPHILUS HILL
> INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL 302 WEST WASHINGTON STREET IGCS-5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-232-6201(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: SLABAUGH, JILL M CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. SPEEDING - ALTERATION OF MAXIMUM SPEED:73 SPEED ZONE: 55 152252 9-21-5-3 INFRACTION CLASS C 07/17/2004
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
07/20/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> DOCKET LEVEL COMMENT: DLW/CPAY
07/20/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMPLAINT FILED. APP DATE: 08/10/2004 AT 0500 PM. DLW (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 2004-07-20
08/10/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> CALENDAR :INITIAL HEARING
08/10/2004
> DISPOSITION
> 1. SPEEDING - ALTERATION OF MAXIMUM SPEED:73 SPEED ZONE: 55
> FINDING OF GUILTY
08/11/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> DEFT. APPEARS AND FILES RIGHTS. DEFT. ADMITS TO VIOLATION. JUDGMENT FOR STATE. FINE OF $10.00 PLUS COSTS OF $86.50. TO BE PAID BY CASH OR MONEY ORDER ONLY BY 9-7-2004, OR CLERK TO
CERTIFY TO THE BMV AS FAILURE TO PAY. DLW (DISPOSED: GP ) (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 2004-08-10
09/15/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> SR16 SENT ELECTRONICALLY. DLW (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 2004-09-15
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D06-1709-SC-006337
> PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC V. LESLIE D CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 09/22/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 6
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, LESLIE D
> 6670 BLACK ANTLER CIR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46217
> PLAINTIFF PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC MATTHEW DAVID MALCOLM
RETAINED
> P.O BOX 3646 EVANSVILLE, IN 47735-3646
> 812-423-3183(W)
> C/O KAHN, DEES, DONOVAN, & KAHN
> 501 MAIN ST EVANSVILLE, IN 47708
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
09/22/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
09/22/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM/FDCPA/EXHIBIT
> FILED BY: PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC
> FILE STAMP: 09/22/2017
09/22/2017 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> REDACTION
> FILED BY: PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC
> FILE STAMP: 09/22/2017
09/25/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/01/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
10/05/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> PARTY SERVED: CHAPMAN, LESLIE D
> DATE SERVED: 10/04/2017
12/01/2017 FIRST HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER TORNATTA, ROBERT J)
> SOC DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/01/2017
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TORNATTA, ROBERT J)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 12/01/2017
> AWARDED TO: PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC
> AWARDED AGAINST: LESLIE CHAPMAN
> COURT COSTS PLUS JUDGMENT: $1,273.50; ATTORNEY FEES: $424.00
> RJO: BOOK 2017, PAGE 1201
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2017, PAGE 1201
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL NICK GOLDING; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED $1697.50 PLUS INTEREST AND COSTS. [ETBF] KNU
03/20/2018 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/14/2018
03/20/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/14/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
03/20/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC
> FILE STAMP: 03/14/2018
03/20/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/20/2018
03/21/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/20/2018 : LESLIE D CHAPMAN
03/21/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/20/2018 : MATTHEW DAVID MALCOLM
04/05/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> GOOD SERVICE
> PARTY SERVED: IWT HEALTH
> DATE SERVED: 04/03/2018
05/14/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT IWT HEALTH; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/14/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JOSH R TROCKMAN; NO SERVICE ON THE DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 05/14/2018
05/09/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENT
> FILE STAMPED: 05/06/2019
05/09/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/17/2019 AT 9:30 AM.
05/09/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS COLLECTIONS LLC AS AGENT FOR COLLECTION FOR DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC
> FILE STAMP: 05/06/2019
05/10/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/10/2019
05/11/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/10/2019 : LESLIE D CHAPMAN
05/11/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/10/2019 : MATTHEW DAVID MALCOLM
05/17/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> CM RETURNED SERVED; EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SCHOOL CORP.
> PARTY SERVED: EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SCHOOL CORPORATION
> DATE SERVED: 05/16/2019
06/17/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER VOWELS, DONALD)
> P/S DEFT AND GND EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SCHOOL CORPORATION; JAS/ALL
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/17/2019 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> FILED BY: EVANSVILLE VANDERBURGH SCHOOL CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/17/2019
06/17/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> PLAINTIFF BY COUNSEL WM. ROYAL GEARHART; DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED;
06/26/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTRY FOR 06/17/2019 IS FILED AND APPROVED BY THE COURT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/26/2019
06/27/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 6/26/2019 : LESLIE D CHAPMAN
06/27/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 6/26/2019 : MATTHEW DAVID MALCOLM
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D05-1703-SC-001559
> HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES V. TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 03/17/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 5
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
> C/O ASCESION HEALTH
> 4040 VINCENNES CIRCLE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46268
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> P.O. BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
03/17/2017
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
03/17/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
03/17/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/17/2017
03/17/2017
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C RETURNED UNSERVED 04/17/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/17/2017
> NO SERVICE: UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (4-11-17)
03/17/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
> ISSUED: 03/17/2017
03/17/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/24/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
04/24/2017 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
> 04/24/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRYPLAINTIFF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; ALIAS TO BE FILED.
> HEARING DATE: 04/24/2017
05/01/2017 CLAIM FILED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 04/26/2017
05/01/2017 CASE REOPENED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILE STAMPED: 04/26/2017
05/01/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/12/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/03/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> DATE SERVED: 05/02/2017
06/12/2017
> HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM DEFT; SMC/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/12/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLAINTIFF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; NO SERVICE ON THE DEFT; ALIAS TO BE FILED.
> HEARING DATE: 06/12/2017
07/31/2017 CASE REOPENED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILE STAMPED: 07/18/2017
07/31/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/21/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
07/31/2017 CLAIM FILED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 07/18/2017
08/01/2017 CLERICAL MISTAKE CORRECTED
>HEARING TYPE SHOULD READ AS ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
08/03/2017 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> NOT EMPLOYED (8-2-17)
> PTY NOT SVD: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
08/21/2017 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T.)
> ALIAS SOC DEFT C/O POE; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/21/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL ANGELA D CHAPMAN IN PERSON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT ALIAS TO BE FILED;
09/22/2017 CASE REOPENED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILE STAMPED: 09/20/2017
09/22/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/23/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
09/22/2017 CLAIM FILED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 09/20/2017
09/27/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY SERVICE
> PARTY SERVED: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
> DATE SERVED: 09/26/2017
10/23/2017 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> ALIAS SOC DEFT; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/23/2017
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 10/23/2017
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> AWARDED AGAINST: TAMISHA MCBAINE HUDGINS
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $408.09; JUDGMENT: $1,071.60; ATTORNEY FEES: $75.00
> RJO: BOOK 2017, PAGE 1023
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2017, PAGE 1023
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST THE DEFT IN THE SUM OF $1554.69 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (ETBF) TLS
10/24/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 10/23/2017 : TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
10/24/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 10/23/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
11/02/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 10/31/2017
11/02/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 11/27/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
11/02/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO APPLY TAX MONIES TO THE JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 10/31/2017
11/02/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/02/2017
11/03/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/2/2017 : TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
11/03/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/2/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
11/27/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; JAS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/27/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL ANGELA CHAPMAN; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; ON MOTION OF PLTF'S COUNSEL P/S DISMISSED.
12/04/2017 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (11-30-17)
> PTY NOT SVD: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
01/26/2018 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 01/17/2018
01/26/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/12/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
01/26/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO APPLY TAX MONIES TO JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/17/2018
01/30/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/30/2018
01/31/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/30/2018 : TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
01/31/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/30/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
02/07/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY SERVICE; 02/06/18
> PARTY SERVED: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
02/12/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/12/2018 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT ORDER ENTERED FOR DEFT TO APPLY STATE AND/OR FEDERAL INCOME TAX REFUNDS TOWARDS THE JUDGMENT HEREIN. (EF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/12/2018
02/14/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 2/12/2018 : TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
02/14/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 2/12/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
02/21/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
> DATE SERVED: 02/20/2018
03/22/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/15/2018
03/22/2018 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/15/2018
03/22/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/16/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
03/22/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2018
03/23/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/22/2018 : TAMISHA C MCBAINE HUDGINS
03/23/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/22/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
03/28/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: MCBAINE HUDGINS, TAMISHA C
> DATE SERVED: 03/27/2018
03/28/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> PERSONAL
> PARTY SERVED: ST VINCENT OF EVANSVILLE
> DATE SERVED: 03/27/2018
04/16/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT ST VINCENT OF EVANSVILLE; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/16/2018 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN E HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $1554.69 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (EF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/16/2018
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D07-1410-SC-010654
> HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES V. DAVID LINDER
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 10/24/2014
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT LINDER, DAVID 3560 ST THOMAS BLVD APT D INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46214
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> P.O. BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
10/24/2014
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
10/24/2014 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
10/24/2014 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 10/24/2014
10/24/2014
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 10/31/2014
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 10/31/2014
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
10/31/04 #71124369468032889535 GOOD SERVICE
10/24/2014 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 10/24/2014
10/24/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/08/2014 AT 1:30 PM.
12/08/2014 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) ()
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/08/2014
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 12/08/2014
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> AWARDED AGAINST: DAVID LINDER
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $86.60; JUDGMENT: $1,055.64; ATTORNEY FEES: $351.00
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED $1493.24 PLUS INT & COSTS. (ETBF) CMJ
12/17/2014 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 12/17/2014
12/17/2014 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 12/17/2014
12/17/2014
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID RETURNED UNSERVED 03/02/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 03/02/2015
> NO SERVICE; UNCLAIMED; UNABLE TO FORWARD; TRACKING # 71124369468032948577; 2/25/15
> CHECK INTO CASH
> SERVED 12/26/2014
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 12/29/2014
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE, TRACKING #7112 4369 4680 3294 8584
12/17/2014 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: CHECK INTO CASH
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 12/17/2014
12/17/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/02/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
02/02/2015 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) ()
> CM DEFT & CM GARN/DEFT CHECK INTO CASH; JRM/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/02/2015 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $1493.24 PLUS COSTS AND INTEREST. (ETBF) ELR
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/02/2015
02/05/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> ORDER OF GARNISHMENT
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: CHECK INTO CASH
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 02/04/2015
02/05/2015
> ORDER
> ORDER OF GARNISHMENT
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID RETURNED UNSERVED 03/17/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 03/17/2015
> NO SERVICE; UNCLAIMED; UNABLE TO FORWARD; TRACKING # 71124369468032968162; 3/14/15
> CHECK INTO CASH
> SERVED 02/13/2015
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 02/17/2015
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> 71124369468032968155 GOOD SERVICE
02/06/2015 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER OF GARNISHMENT FOR DEFT DAVID LINDER AND GARN/DEFT CHECK INTO CASH IS FILED AND ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK 02-05-15.
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/04/2015
> VOL./BOOK 1530, PAGE 2-3
02/24/2015 RJO ENTRY
> JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST DEFT FOR $1493.24 PLUS $81.00 COURT COST FOR A TOTAL OF $1574.24 PLUS INTEREST AND ANY ADDITIONAL COST. ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK 12-17-14.
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/10/2014
> VOL./BOOK 1521, PAGE 96
02/25/2015 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL & SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 02/25/2015
02/25/2015 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL & SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/25/2015
02/25/2015
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL & SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 03/03/2015
> ANTICIPATED SERVER VANDERBURGH
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 03/05/2015
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
02/25/2015
> SUBPOENA
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL & SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID UNSERVED
> ANTICIPATED SERVER VANDERBURGH
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
02/25/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL & SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 02/25/2015
02/25/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/13/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
02/25/2015 CLERICAL MISTAKE CORRECTED
> FILINGS DATED 2/25/15 SHOULD REFLECT THAT A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WAS NOT FILED AS TO THE CAUSE WAS ENTERED IN ERROR
04/13/2015 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> SVC DEFT; TAX ORDER; JAS/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/13/2015 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL; P/S DISMISSED;
04/24/2015 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 04/23/2015
04/24/2015 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 04/23/2015
04/24/2015
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 04/30/2015
> ANTICIPATED SERVER BOONE
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 05/04/2015
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
04/24/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
ISSUED: 04/23/2015
04/24/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/15/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
06/15/2015 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> BOONE CO DEFT; TAX ORDER; JRM/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
> 06/15/2015 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> DEFT DEFAULTED; ORDER ENTERED FOR 25% OF DEFT'S FUTURE TAX REFUNDS TO BE APPLIED TO THE JUDGMENT HEREIN; (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/15/2015
06/19/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND TO JUDGMENT
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 06/18/2015
06/19/2015
> ORDER
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND TO JUDGMENT
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 06/25/2015
> ANTICIPATED SERVER BOONE
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 06/29/2015
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
06/19/2015 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER TO APPLY INCOME TAX REFUND TO JUDGMENT IS FILED AND ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK 06-18-15.
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/18/2015
> VOL./BOOK 1551, PAGE 31
03/01/2016 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 02/29/2016
03/01/2016 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/29/2016
03/01/2016 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 02/29/2016
03/01/2016
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 03/08/2016
> ANTICIPATED SERVER BOONE
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 03/14/2016
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
03/01/2016
> SUBPOENA
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 03/08/2016
> ANTICIPATED SERVER BOONE
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 03/14/2016
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
03/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
04/04/2016 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> PS AND SDT BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF DEFT; JAS/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/04/2016 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON; PERSONAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $1493.24 PLUS INT & COSTS; DEFT AGREES TO MAKE PAYMENTS OF $100 WEEKLY COMMENCING 04/15/16. (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/04/2016
04/08/2016 RJO ENTRY
> PERSONAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT FOR DEFT DAVID LINDER IS FILED AND ENTERED INTO ORDER BOOK 04/07/16.
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/07/2016
> VOL./BOOK 1593, PAGE 311-312
08/18/2016 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 08/12/2016
08/18/2016 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 08/12/2016
08/18/2016 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 08/12/2016
08/18/2016
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 08/23/2016
> ANTICIPATED SERVER BOONE
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 08/29/2016
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
> ASCENSION HEALTH
> SERVED 08/22/2016
> ANTICIPATED SERVER VANDERBURGH
> ANTICIPATED METHOD SERVICE BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
> RETURNED 08/23/2016
> SERVING METHOD COPY SERVICE WITH FIRST CLASS MAIL
08/18/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 09/19/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
09/19/2016 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> BOONE CO DEFT AND SVC GND ASCENSION HEALTH; JRM/KNU
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/19/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN E HADDOX; PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL DISMISSED.
11/14/2016 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 11/14/2016
11/14/2016 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 11/14/2016
11/14/2016 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: CHEWY.COM
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> ISSUED: 11/14/2016
11/14/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/19/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
11/14/2016
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID
> SERVED 11/17/2016
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 11/23/2016
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
> CHEWY.COM
> SERVED 11/28/2016
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 11/28/2016
> GOOD SERVICE
11/28/2016 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> FILED BY: CHEWY.COM
> FILE STAMP: 11/28/2016
12/19/2016 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> CM DEFT & CM GARN/DEFT CHEWY.COM; JTS/KNU; DEFT NOT EMPD
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/19/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN E HADDOX; DEFT IN PERSON; PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL DISMISSED.
03/23/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> > FILE STAMPED: 03/22/2017
03/23/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2017
03/23/2017
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> LINDER, DAVID RETURNED UNSERVED 04/19/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/19/2017
> NO SERVICE: UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (4-15-17)
> SPHERION STAFFING
> SERVED 03/27/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 03/29/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
03/23/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: LINDER, DAVID
> SERVE TO: SPHERION STAFFING
> ISSUED: 03/22/2017
03/23/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/01/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/01/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> CM DEFT AND CM GARN/DEFT SPHERION STAFFING; JAS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/01/2017 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLAINTIFF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT DEFAULTED; ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED IN THE AMOUNT OF $693.24 PLUS INTEREST AND COSTS. [EF]
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/01/2017
05/03/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/1/2017 : DAVID LINDER
05/03/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/1/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/19/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 06/14/2017
06/19/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 07/17/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
06/19/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> SUBSEQUENT MOTION FOR PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 06/14/2017
06/19/2017 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 06/14/2017
06/19/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/19/2017
06/20/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 6/19/2017 : DAVID LINDER
06/20/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 6/19/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
07/17/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T.)
> SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DEFT; SMC/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/17/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT SUB P/S DISMISSED.
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G08-1911-CM-043294
> STATE OF INDIANA V. TIMOTHY L CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 11/12/2019
> LOCATION: POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: AP190001259
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49-DM1451595
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, TIMOTHY L MALE WHITE
> 6'2", 181 LBS MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP
RETAINED
> 155 E MARKET ST STE 575 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-941-7592(W)
> 2915 LANDOLA LN INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46241
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000548821INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA RYAN WILSON MEARS
> 251 E OHIO ST SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46228
✗ ** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **
> CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, TIMOTHY L CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-30-5-2(A)/MC: OPERATING A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED N/A 9-30-5-2(A) MISDEMEANOR CLASS C 11/02/2019
> 2. 9-30-5-1(A)/MC: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO AT LEAST .08 BUT LESS THAN .15 9-30-5-1(A) MISDEMEANOR CLASS C 11/02/2019
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
11/12/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
11/12/2019 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
11/12/2019 NOTICE FILED
> LR49-CR2.3-101 CASE CONSOLIDATION NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/12/2019
11/12/2019 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/12/2019
11/12/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> PC APC CHAPMAN.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/12/2019
11/13/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/20/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
11/13/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/13/2019
11/13/2019 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> AS TO THIS CASE ONLY.
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/13/2019
11/13/2019 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY, SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/13/2019
11/13/2019 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY, INITIAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/13/2019
11/13/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/13/2019
11/14/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/13/2019 : TIMOTHY L CHAPMAN
11/14/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/13/2019 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
11/20/2019 CANCELED INITIAL HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER REYOME, JASON G - MAG)
> OTHER
11/20/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, TIMOTHY L
> FILE STAMP: 11/20/2019
11/20/2019 WAIVER OF INITIAL HEARING FILED
> REQUEST TO WAIVE MISDEMEANOR INITIAL HEARING
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, TIMOTHY L
> FILE STAMP: 11/20/2019
11/20/2019 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: JONES, AMY M. )
> WAIVER OF INITIAL HEARING
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/20/2019
11/20/2019 OMNIBUS DATE
> 1-6-20
11/20/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/20/2019 AT 1:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
11/20/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/17/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
11/21/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 11/20/2019 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/20/2019 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/20/2019 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS
12/17/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RENNER, MARK F- MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: CONTINUED
12/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> OFF RECORD
12/17/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE: FAILED WITH IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION
> SIGNED DATE: 12/17/2019
> VOL./BOOK .122
12/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> STATE HAS NO OBJECTION TO SDP.
12/17/2019 PCZNT - AN ELECTRONIC PC AFFIDAVIT WAS CREATED IN INCITE
> PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT SENT TO BMV
12/17/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/11/2020 AT 1:00 PM.
12/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
12/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/17/2019 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS
02/11/2020 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RENNER, MARK F- MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/11/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
02/11/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> ORDER ON FINES AND COSTS FILED
02/11/2020 REPORT TO PROBATION
02/11/2020 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RENNER, MARK F- MAG )
02/11/2020 PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED STAMP: 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 MOTION TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, TIMOTHY L
> FILE STAMP: 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RENNER, MARK F- MAG )
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
> COUNT 2
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RENNER, MARK F- MAG )
> COUNT 2
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 PROBABLE CAUSE: FAILED WITH IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION
> SIGNED DATE: 12/17/2019
> VOL./BOOK 60, PAGE DAYS
02/11/2020
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RENNER, MARK F- MAG)
> 1. 9-30-5-2(A)/MC: OPERATING A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 2. 9-30-5-1(A)/MC: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO AT LEAST .08 BUT LESS THAN .15
> DISMISSED
02/11/2020 PCZNT - AN ELECTRONIC PC AFFIDAVIT WAS CREATED IN INCITE
> PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT SENT TO BMV
02/11/2020 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-30-5-2(A)
02/11/2020
> SENTENCED
> VOL./BOOK 2020, PAGE 211
> (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RENNER, MARK F- MAG)
> 1. 9-30-5-2(A)/MC: OPERATING A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED
FEE TOTALS:
> ADULT PROBATION ADMINISTRATIVE FEE $50.00
> ADULT PROBATION USER FEE PROGRAM $290.00
> CRIMINAL COURT COSTS AND FEES $185.00
> HIGHWAY WORK ZONE FEE - STANDARD $0.50
> ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES PROGRAM FEE $400.00
> ALCOHOL AND DRUG COUNTERMEASURES FEE $200.00
FEE TOTALS $ $1,125.50
CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 02/11/2020
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 60 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 1 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 58 DAYS
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. PROBATION, 363 PROBATION, AAID, AET, RANDOM DRUG AND ALCOHOL SCREENS, NO ALCOHOL, ALCOHOL MONITORITING AS A CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR 180 DAYS - MAY TERMINATE AFTER 90 DAYS IF NO POSITIVE TESTS 02/11/2020, ACTIVE 02/11/2020
> 2. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, 180 DAYS ALCOHOL MONITORING AS A CONDITION OF PROBATION, MAY TERMINATE AFTER 90 DAYS IF NO POSITIVE TESTS 02/11/2020, ACTIVE 02/11/2020
02/11/2020 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
02/12/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> REPORT TO PROBATION ---- 2/11/2020 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS SENTENCED ---- 2/11/2020 : MICHAEL ERIC KRUPP;RYAN WILSON MEARS
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 73D02-1907-IF-000939
> STATE OF INDIANA V. NICOLE L ATCHLEY
> CASE TYPE: IF - INFRACTION
> DATE FILED: 07/03/2019
> LOCATION: SHELBY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 2
> APPEAR BY: 08/29/2019
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT ATCHLEY, NICOLE L FEMALE WHITE
> 5'4", 130 LBS PRO SE
> 1114 CHAPMAN DR GREENFIELD, IN 46140
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JILL ALLISON GAGNON
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> 302 W WASHINGTON ST, IGCS 5TH FLOOR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-233-8296(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: ATCHLEY, NICOLE L CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)(2)/IFC: SPEEDING -- EXCEEDING MAXIMUM 55 MPH 000112910280 9-21-5-2(A)(2) INFRACTION CLASS C 06/26/2019
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
07/03/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
07/03/2019 TRAFFIC CITATION FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 07/02/2019
09/09/2019 NOTICE ISSUED
> DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR OR CONTACT THE COURT PRIOR TO THE APPEAR BY DATE OF AUGUST 29, 2019 AS INDICATED ON THE CITATION. COURT ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR THE OFFENSE OF SPEEDING
(SPEED AMOUNT: 70 / SPEED LIMIT: 55) WITH FINES AND COSTS ASSESSED IN THE AMOUNT OF $160.00. IN THE EVENT FINES AND COSTS ARE NOT PAID ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 18, 2019, THE CLERK MAY START
COLLECTION PROCEEDINGS, A $25.00 LATE FEE WILL BE ASSESSED, AND LICENSE WILL BE SUSPENDED. PC
09/09/2019
> DISPOSITION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RIGGINS, DAVID NEAL)
> 1. 9-21-5-2(A)(2)/IFC: SPEEDING -- EXCEEDING MAXIMUM 55 MPH
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT
09/09/2019 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 1 FOR STATUTE 9-21-5-2(A)(2)
09/10/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NOTICE ISSUED ---- 9/9/2019 : NICOLE L ATCHLEY
> 09/10/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> NOTICE ISSUED ---- 9/9/2019 : JILL ALLISON GAGNON
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D05-1702-SC-000664
> HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES V. TONISHEA WARREN
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 02/06/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 5
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT WARREN, TONISHEA
> 3429 SUMMER BREEZE CIR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46239
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> P.O. BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
02/06/2017
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
02/06/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
02/07/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/06/2017
02/07/2017
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> WARREN, TONISHEA
> SERVED 02/10/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 02/14/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
02/07/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: WARREN, TONISHEA
> ISSUED: 02/06/2017
02/07/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/20/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
03/20/2017 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/20/2017
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 03/20/2017
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> AWARDED AGAINST: TONISHEA WARREN
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $645.05; JUDGMENT: $1,874.17; ATTORNEY FEES: $488.00
> RJO: BOOK 2017, PAGE 0320
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2017, PAGE 0320
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST THE DEFT IN THE SUM OF $3007.22 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (ETBF) TLS
03/30/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/27/2017
03/30/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/27/2017
03/30/2017
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> WARREN, TONISHEA RETURNED UNSERVED 04/26/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/26/2017
> NO SERVICE: UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (4-24-17)
> HASGOE CLEANING
> SERVED 04/04/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/06/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
03/30/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: HASGOE CLEANING
> SERVE TO: WARREN, TONISHEA
> ISSUED: 03/27/2017
03/30/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/08/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/08/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> CM DEFT AND CM GARN/DEFT HASGOE CLEANING; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/08/2017 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $3007.22 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/08/2017
05/10/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/8/2017 : TONISHEA WARREN
05/10/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/8/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
05/31/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 05/24/2017
05/31/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/26/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/31/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO APPLY NON-EXEMPT TAX MONIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2017
05/31/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/31/2017
06/01/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/31/2017 : TONISHEA WARREN
06/01/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/31/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/07/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 06/06/2017
06/26/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/26/2017 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL ANGELA CHAPMAN; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT TAX ORDER ENTERED FOR DEFT TO APPLY 25% OF INCOME TAX REFUNDS TOWARDS THE JUDGMENT HEREIN. (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/26/2017
> 08/02/2017 CASE FILE DESTROYED
> PAPER FILE WAS SCANNED IN AND DESTROYED THIS DATE.(AF)
08/17/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 08/16/2017
01/09/2018 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 01/02/2018
01/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/05/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
01/09/2018 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/02/2018
01/09/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/02/2018
01/16/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/16/2018
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/16/2018 : TONISHEA WARREN
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/16/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
01/22/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 01/19/2018
02/05/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> P/S AND SDT DEFT X2; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/05/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 02/05/2018
02/26/2018 CASE REOPENED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 02/16/2018
02/26/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 03/19/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
02/26/2018 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2018
02/26/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2018
02/27/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/27/2018
02/28/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 2/27/2018 : TONISHEA WARREN
02/28/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 2/27/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
03/19/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> SD T& P/S DEFT X2; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/19/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; NO SERVICE ON THE DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 03/19/2018
03/26/2018 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (3-23-18)
> PTY NOT SVD: WARREN, TONISHEA
05/19/2020 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/29/2020 AT 1:30 PM.
05/19/2020 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/19/2020
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/19/2020 : TONISHEA WARREN
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/19/2020 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/29/2020 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) ()
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT ANTHONY ANDERSON COR; DRV/ALL
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D05-1702-SC-000664
> HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES V. TONISHEA WARREN
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 02/06/2017
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 5
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT WARREN, TONISHEA
> 3429 SUMMER BREEZE CIR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46239
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> P.O. BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
02/06/2017
> CAUSE OF ACTIONS COMPLAINT ON ACCOUNT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> ACTION TYPE CLAIM
> REMEDIES SOUGHT
> MONETARY
02/06/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
02/07/2017 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/06/2017
02/07/2017
> NOTICE
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> WARREN, TONISHEA
> SERVED 02/10/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 02/14/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
02/07/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: WARREN, TONISHEA
> ISSUED: 02/06/2017
02/07/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/20/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
03/20/2017 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> CM DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/20/2017
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 03/20/2017
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> AWARDED AGAINST: TONISHEA WARREN
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $645.05; JUDGMENT: $1,874.17; ATTORNEY FEES: $488.00
> RJO: BOOK 2017, PAGE 0320
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2017, PAGE 0320
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST THE DEFT IN THE SUM OF $3007.22 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (ETBF) TLS
03/30/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/27/2017
> 03/30/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 03/27/2017
03/30/2017
> ORDER
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE, HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> WARREN, TONISHEA RETURNED UNSERVED 04/26/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/26/2017
> NO SERVICE: UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (4-24-17)
> HASGOE CLEANING
> SERVED 04/04/2017
> ANTICIPATED METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> RETURNED 04/06/2017
> SERVING METHOD REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
> GOOD SERVICE
03/30/2017 SERVICE ISSUED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> REQUESTED BY: CHAPMAN, ANGELA DIANE
> REQUESTED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> SERVE TO: HASGOE CLEANING
> SERVE TO: WARREN, TONISHEA
> ISSUED: 03/27/2017
03/30/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/08/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/08/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> CM DEFT AND CM GARN/DEFT HASGOE CLEANING; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/08/2017 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT DEFAULTED; DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED $3007.22 PLUS INTEREST AND COURT COSTS; (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/08/2017
05/10/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/8/2017 : TONISHEA WARREN
05/10/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 5/8/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
05/31/2017 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 05/24/2017
05/31/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/26/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
05/31/2017 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO APPLY NON-EXEMPT TAX MONIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2017
05/31/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/31/2017
06/01/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/31/2017 : TONISHEA WARREN
06/01/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/31/2017 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/07/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 06/06/2017
06/26/2017 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/26/2017 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL ANGELA CHAPMAN; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT TAX ORDER ENTERED FOR DEFT TO APPLY 25% OF INCOME TAX REFUNDS TOWARDS THE JUDGMENT HEREIN. (ETBF)
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/26/2017
08/02/2017 CASE FILE DESTROYED
> PAPER FILE WAS SCANNED IN AND DESTROYED THIS DATE.(AF)
> 08/17/2017 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 08/16/2017
01/09/2018 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILE STAMPED: 01/02/2018
01/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 02/05/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
01/09/2018 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/02/2018
01/09/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 01/02/2018
01/16/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/16/2018
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/16/2018 : TONISHEA WARREN
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 1/16/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
01/22/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: WARREN, TONISHEA
> DATE SERVED: 01/19/2018
02/05/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> P/S AND SDT DEFT X2; JRM/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/05/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 02/05/2018
02/26/2018 CASE REOPENED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 02/16/2018
02/26/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 03/19/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
02/26/2018 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2018
02/26/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2018
02/27/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SHOULDERS, JEFFREY T. )
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/27/2018
02/28/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 2/27/2018 : TONISHEA WARREN
02/28/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 2/27/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
03/19/2018 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> SD T& P/S DEFT X2; JTS/KMS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/19/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; NO SERVICE ON THE DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 03/19/2018
03/26/2018 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (3-23-18)
> PTY NOT SVD: WARREN, TONISHEA
05/19/2020 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/29/2020 AT 1:30 PM.
05/19/2020 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNT SERVICES
> FILE STAMP: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/19/2020
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/19/2020 : TONISHEA WARREN
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/19/2020 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/29/2020 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) ()
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT ANTHONY ANDERSON COR; DRV/ALL
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D06-1809-SC-007932
> HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE V. MICHELLE L BROWN
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 09/14/2018
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 6
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT BROWN, MICHELLE L
> 4519 CLINTON ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46226
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST. NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> 315 N MAIN ST PO BOX 4007 EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT yes
09/14/2018 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
09/17/2018 CLAIM FILED
> NOTICE OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2018
09/17/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
09/17/2018 ORDER TO APPEAR
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/14/2018
09/18/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 9/17/2018 : MICHELLE L BROWN
09/18/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 9/17/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
09/20/2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - SEPARATELY FILED
> NO RETURN SERVICE AT THIS TIME
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 09/20/2018
10/22/2018 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> SOC DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/22/2018 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (10-19-18)
> PTY NOT SVD: BROWN, MICHELLE L
10/22/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN E HADDOX IN PERSON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT ALIAS TO BE FILED.
10/25/2018 CASE REOPENED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILE STAMPED: 10/24/2018
10/25/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/03/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
10/25/2018 CLAIM FILED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 10/24/2018
10/31/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: BROWN, MICHELLE L
> DATE SERVED: 10/30/2018
12/03/2018 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> ALIAS DEFT; TD
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/03/2018
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 12/03/2018
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> AWARDED AGAINST: MICHELLE BROWN
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $307.00; JUDGMENT: $1,357.40; ATTORNEY FEES: $411.00
> RJO: BOOK 2018, PAGE 1203
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2018, PAGE 1203
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX; DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON; ADMITTED JUDGMENT ENTERED $2075.40 PLUS INT & COSTS. [EF] CMJ
12/11/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 12/3/2018 : MICHELLE L BROWN
12/11/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 12/3/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
> 06/18/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 06/13/2019
06/18/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 07/22/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
06/18/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER TO APPLY TAX MONIES TO JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 06/13/2019
06/20/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/20/2019
06/21/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 6/20/2019 : MICHELLE L BROWN
06/21/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 6/20/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
07/22/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; DV/ALL
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/22/2019 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX IN PERSON; DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON; AGREED TAX ORDER ENTERED [EF].
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/22/2019
07/24/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 7/22/2019 : MICHELLE L BROWN
07/24/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 7/22/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
07/25/2019 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (7-21-19)
> PTY NOT SVD: BROWN, MICHELLE L
11/08/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 10/29/2019
11/08/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/09/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
11/08/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 10/29/2019
> 11/08/2019 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 10/29/2019
11/18/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/18/2019
11/19/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/18/2019 : MICHELLE L BROWN
11/19/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/18/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
12/09/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER VOWELS, DONALD)
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT DELTA AIR LINES; MB/ALL
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/09/2019 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON; DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON; AGREED TAX ORDER ENTERED [EF].
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/09/2019
12/12/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 12/9/2019 : MICHELLE L BROWN
12/12/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED ---- 12/9/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
02/03/2020 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> FILED BY: DELTA AIR LINES
> FILE STAMP: 02/03/2020
03/02/2020 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 02/25/2020
03/02/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/06/2020 AT 1:30 PM.
03/02/2020 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 02/25/2020
03/02/2020 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 02/25/2020
03/10/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/10/2020
03/11/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/10/2020 : MICHELLE L BROWN
03/11/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/10/2020 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
03/18/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PURSUANT TO VANDERBURGH COUNTY COURTS COVID-19 PLAN, MATTER IS RESET TO 05/18/20 AT 1:30 PM;
03/18/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 04/06/2020 AT 1:30 PM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/18/2020 AT 1:30 PM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
03/20/2020 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> GOOD SERVICE
> PARTY SERVED: DELTA AIR LINES
> DATE SERVED: 03/16/2020
03/24/2020 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> CM RETURNED NOT DELIVERABLE; MICHELLE
> PTY NOT SVD: BROWN, MICHELLE L
> FILE STAMP: 03/20/2020
05/11/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PURSUANT TO VANDERBURGH COUNTY COURT COVID-19 PLAN AND DUE TO EXTENDED CLOSURE, COURT HEREBY VACATES HEARING DATE OF 05/18/20 AT 1:30 PM; P/S DISMISSED.
05/11/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/18/2020 AT 1:30 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
05/18/2020 CANCELED PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) ()
> OTHER
> P/S DEFT AND GARN/DEFT DELTA AIR LINES; MB/ALL
04/06/2020 RESET BY COURT TO 05/18/2020
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D01-1806-SC-005630
> HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE V. TERESA J SNYDER
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 06/21/2018
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT SNYDER, TERESA J
> 8225 MADISON AVE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46227
> PLAINTIFF HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
RETAINED
> 315 STATE ST.
> NEWBURGH, IN 47630-0000
> 812-858-9455(W)
> PO BOX 4007
> 315 N MAIN ST EVANSVILLE, IN 47724
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
06/21/2018 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
06/22/2018 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 06/21/2018
06/25/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/30/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
06/25/2018 ORDER TO APPEAR
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/21/2018
06/25/2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - SEPARATELY FILED
> NO RETURN SERVICE AT THIS TIME
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 06/25/2018
06/26/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 6/25/2018 : TERESA J SNYDER
06/26/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 6/25/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
07/06/2018 CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> E-NOTICE RETURNED; UNDELIVERABLE; 07/04/18 TERESA
07/24/2018 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (7-20-18)
> PTY NOT SVD: SNYDER, TERESA J
07/30/2018 FIRST HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> SOC DEFT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/30/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL BENJAMIN HADDOX AND ANGELA CHAPMAN; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; ALIAS TO BE FILED.
10/09/2018 CASE REOPENED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILE STAMPED: 10/03/2018
10/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/12/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
10/09/2018 CLAIM FILED
> ALIAS STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 10/03/2018
10/15/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: SNYDER, TERESA J
> DATE SERVED: 10/12/2018
11/12/2018 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> ALIAS SOC DEFT;DRR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/12/2018
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 11/12/2018
> AWARDED TO: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> AWARDED AGAINST: TERESA SNYDER
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $306.85; JUDGMENT: $842.00
> RJO: BOOK 2018, PAGE 1112
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2018, PAGE 1112
> COMMENT: PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED $1148.85 PLUS INTEREST AND COSTS [ETBF]. KNU
11/16/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 11/12/2018 : TERESA J SNYDER
11/16/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ---- 11/12/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
12/05/2018 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 11/28/2018
12/05/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/07/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
12/05/2018 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> COMPLAINT IN PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 11/28/2018
12/05/2018 MOTION TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES FILED
> ORDER TO ANSWER INTERROGATORIES
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 11/28/2018
12/11/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: WEIBERG, KRISTINA H - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/11/2018
12/12/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 12/11/2018 : TERESA J SNYDER
12/12/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 12/11/2018 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
12/14/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: SNYDER, TERESA J
> DATE SERVED: 12/13/2018
12/26/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> GOOD SERVICE
> PARTY SERVED: WALMART
> DATE SERVED: 12/17/2018
01/07/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG)
> P/S DEFT C/O POE AND GARN/DEFT WALMART; KHW/ALL
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/07/2019 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> FILED BY: WALMART
> FILE STAMP: 01/07/2019
01/07/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON AND FILES PROOF OF SERVICE ON THE DEFT AND GARNISHEE DEFT WALMART.
> DATE SERVED: 01/07/2019
01/07/2019 GARNISHMENT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CORCORAN, SHEILA M - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON; DEFT FAILS TO APPEAR; DEFAULT ORDER OF GARNISHMENT ENTERED [EF].
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/07/2019
02/01/2019 ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES FILED
> FILED BY: WALMART
> FILE STAMP: 02/01/2019
03/25/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 03/21/2019
03/25/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 04/22/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
03/25/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO APPLY TAX REFUNDS TO THE JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 03/21/2019
03/26/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: WEIBERG, KRISTINA H - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/26/2019
03/27/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/26/2019 : TERESA J SNYDER
03/27/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 3/26/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
03/29/2019 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> MOVED (3-28-19)
> PTY NOT SVD: SNYDER, TERESA J
04/22/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER VOWELS, DONALD)
> P/S DEFT;TAX ORDER;KHW/APW
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/22/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
04/23/2019 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> VANDERBURGH SHERIFF MAILER RETURNED ON 4-23-19 AS NO SERVICE, NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (4-20-19)
> PTY NOT SVD: SNYDER, TERESA J
05/02/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO APPLY TAX MONIES TO JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 04/30/2019
05/02/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 04/30/2019
05/02/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/03/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
05/03/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VOWELS, DONALD )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/03/2019
05/04/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/3/2019 : TERESA J SNYDER
05/04/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 5/3/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
06/03/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG)
> P/S DEFT;TAX ORDER;DRV/APW
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/03/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON; NO SERVICE ON DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
06/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED NOT SERVED
> UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD (6-2-19)
> PTY NOT SVD: SNYDER, TERESA J
11/13/2019 CASE REOPENED
> PROCEEDING SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILE STAMPED: 11/05/2019
11/13/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULED FOR 12/16/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
11/13/2019 MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER TO APPLY TAX MONIES TO JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: HOOSIER ACCOUNTS SERVICE
> FILE STAMP: 11/05/2019
11/20/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/20/2019
11/21/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/20/2019 : TERESA J SNYDER
11/21/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL ---- 11/20/2019 : ANGELA DIANE CHAPMAN
12/16/2019 PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG)
> P/S DEFT; TAX ORDER; MB/CS
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/16/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL LASHAY NEWTON IN PERSON; NO SERVICE ON THE DEFT; P/S DISMISSED.
> HEARING DATE: 12/16/2019
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D01-1905-SC-003211
> RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. TRACY A ROBB
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 05/24/2019
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT ROBB, TRACY A
> 806 HERNDON DR EVANSVILLE, IN 47711-3834
> PLAINTIFF RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC JAMES E PRUETT
RETAINED
> PO BOX 20636 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
> 888-838-1953(W)
> PO BOX 26060 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
05/24/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
05/24/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FOR PARTY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2019
05/24/2019 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2019
05/24/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/02/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
05/24/2019 ORDER TO APPEAR
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/24/2019
05/25/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 5/24/2019 : TRACY A ROBB
05/25/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 5/24/2019 : JAMES E PRUETT
06/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: ROBB, TRACY A
> DATE SERVED: 06/04/2019
07/01/2019 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 07/01/2019
07/01/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> NBC APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 07/01/2019
07/02/2019 FIRST HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/02/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 09/12/2019 AT 10:00 AM.
07/02/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON; COUNSEL NEIL CHAPMAN HAVING PREVIOUSLY FILED APPEARANCE AND ANSWER TO CLAIM ON BEHALF OF THE DEFT HEREIN; COURT CONTACTS DEFT'S COUNSEL BY PHONE; CAUSE IS SET FOR TRIAL ON 09/12/2019 AT 10:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 07/02/2019
09/12/2019 BENCH TRIAL (10:00 AM) ()
> PLTF BY CO IN PERSON; DEFT'S CO BY PHONE WHEN TRIAL SET
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/12/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON AND HAVING CONTACTED DEFT'S COUNSEL BY PHONE; DEFT IN PERSON; DEFT'S COUNSEL ADVISES PLTF'S COUNSEL THAT MOTION TO WITHDRAW WILL BE FILED; CAUSE IS RESET FOR PROGRESS ON 11/12/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 09/12/2019
09/13/2019 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED
> MOTION TO WITHDRAW
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 09/12/2019
09/16/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/12/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
09/25/2019 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> DEFT'S COUNSEL HAVING FILED MOTION TO WITHDRAW; COURT DENIES SAME, AS LOCAL RULE REGARDING SAID MOTION HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/25/2019
09/26/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 9/25/2019 : JAMES E PRUETT;NEIL B CHAPMAN
11/12/2019 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> PLTF BY CO; DEFT'S CO BY PHONE AND ADVISES MO TO W/D WILL BE FILED; DEFT IN PERSON; CAUSE RESET FOR PROGRESS (DEFT'S CO FILED MO TO W/DRAW-SAME DENIED BY COURT)
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/12/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT; DEFT AND DEFT'S COUNSEL CONTACT COURT BY PHONE; BY AGREEMENT OF DEFT AND DEFT'S COUNSEL, MR CHAPMAN'S APPEARANCE AS DEFT'S COUNSEL IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN; COURT AMENDS RECORD
ACCORDINGLY; CAUSE IS RESET FOR PROGRESS HEARING ON 01/09/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 11/12/2019
11/14/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
01/09/2020 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> CAUSE RESET FOR PROGRESS W/ DEFT BY PHONE;
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/09/2020 AGREED JUDGMENT FILED
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON; DEFT IN PERSON AND ADMITS CLAIM; ADMITTED JUDGMENT ENTERED.
> FILE STAMP: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020 ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 01/09/2020
> AWARDED TO: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> AWARDED AGAINST: TRACY ROBB
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $140.70; JUDGMENT: $573.02; ATTORNEY FEES: $140.70
> RJO: BOOK 2020, PAGE 0109
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2020, PAGE 0109
01/17/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT ---- 1/9/2020 : TRACY A ROBB
01/17/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT ---- 1/9/2020 : JAMES E PRUETT
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 82D01-1905-SC-003211
> RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. TRACY A ROBB
> CASE TYPE: SC - SMALL CLAIMS
> DATE FILED: 05/24/2019
> LOCATION: VANDERBURGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT ROBB, TRACY A
> 806 HERNDON DR EVANSVILLE, IN 47711-3834
> PLAINTIFF RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC JAMES E PRUETT
RETAINED
> PO BOX 20636 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
> 888-838-1953(W)
> PO BOX 26060 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
05/24/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
05/24/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FOR PARTY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2019
05/24/2019 CLAIM FILED
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
> FILED BY: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 05/24/2019
05/24/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/02/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
05/24/2019 ORDER TO APPEAR
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/24/2019
05/25/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 5/24/2019 : TRACY A ROBB
05/25/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO APPEAR ---- 5/24/2019 : JAMES E PRUETT
06/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> COPY
> PARTY SERVED: ROBB, TRACY A
> DATE SERVED: 06/04/2019
07/01/2019 ANSWER FILED
> ANSWER
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 07/01/2019
07/01/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> NBC APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 07/01/2019
07/02/2019 FIRST HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/02/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 09/12/2019 AT 10:00 AM.
07/02/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: STRAUS, J. AUGUST - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON; COUNSEL NEIL CHAPMAN HAVING PREVIOUSLY FILED APPEARANCE AND ANSWER TO CLAIM ON BEHALF OF THE DEFT HEREIN; COURT CONTACTS DEFT'S COUNSEL BY PHONE; CAUSE IS SET FOR TRIAL ON 09/12/2019 AT 10:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 07/02/2019
09/12/2019 BENCH TRIAL (10:00 AM) ()
> PLTF BY CO IN PERSON; DEFT'S CO BY PHONE WHEN TRIAL SET
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/12/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON AND HAVING CONTACTED DEFT'S COUNSEL BY PHONE; DEFT IN PERSON; DEFT'S COUNSEL ADVISES PLTF'S COUNSEL THAT MOTION TO WITHDRAW WILL BE FILED; CAUSE IS RESET FOR PROGRESS ON 11/12/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 09/12/2019
09/13/2019 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED
> MOTION TO WITHDRAW
> FILED BY: ROBB, TRACY A
> FILE STAMP: 09/12/2019
09/16/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/12/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
09/25/2019 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MARCRUM, JILL R- MAG )
> DEFT'S COUNSEL HAVING FILED MOTION TO WITHDRAW; COURT DENIES SAME, AS LOCAL RULE REGARDING SAID MOTION HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/25/2019
09/26/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 9/25/2019 : JAMES E PRUETT;NEIL B CHAPMAN
11/12/2019 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> PLTF BY CO; DEFT'S CO BY PHONE AND ADVISES MO TO W/D WILL BE FILED; DEFT IN PERSON; CAUSE RESET FOR PROGRESS (DEFT'S CO FILED MO TO W/DRAW-SAME DENIED BY COURT)
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/12/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT; DEFT AND DEFT'S COUNSEL CONTACT COURT BY PHONE; BY AGREEMENT OF DEFT AND DEFT'S COUNSEL, MR CHAPMAN'S APPEARANCE AS DEFT'S COUNSEL IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN; COURT AMENDS RECORD
ACCORDINGLY; CAUSE IS RESET FOR PROGRESS HEARING ON 01/09/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
> HEARING DATE: 11/12/2019
11/14/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
01/09/2020 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> CAUSE RESET FOR PROGRESS W/ DEFT BY PHONE;
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/09/2020 AGREED JUDGMENT FILED
> PLTF BY COUNSEL JAMES PRUETT IN PERSON; DEFT IN PERSON AND ADMITS CLAIM; ADMITTED JUDGMENT ENTERED.
> FILE STAMP: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020 ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/09/2020
01/09/2020
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BRILES, MOLLY E - MAG)
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 01/09/2020
> AWARDED TO: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC
> AWARDED AGAINST: TRACY ROBB
> COURT COSTS PLUS PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST: $140.70; JUDGMENT: $573.02; ATTORNEY FEES: $140.70
> RJO: BOOK 2020, PAGE 0109
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2020, PAGE 0109
01/17/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT ---- 1/9/2020 : TRACY A ROBB
01/17/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF AGREED JUDGMENT ---- 1/9/2020 : JAMES E PRUETT
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 53C09-1007-FA-00714
> STATE OF INDIANA V. LINDA SUE LITTRELL
> CASE TYPE: FA - CLASS A FELONY
> DATE FILED: 07/30/2010
> LOCATION: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT 9
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
RELATED CASES
> 53C09-1007-FA-00713 (OTHER)
> 53C09-1205-CM-002194 (OTHER)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT LITTRELL, LINDA SUE FEMALE WHITE
> 5'4", 145 LBS PRO SE
> #246533
> IDOC/IWP UNIT 8
> 2596 N. GIRLS SCHOOL ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46214
> PROBATION DEPARTMENT MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> 214 W 7TH ST #200 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA DAVID J. GOHN
> MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> 301 N COLLEGE AVENUE BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> 812-349-2670(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-44-3-2/FC: ASSISTING A CRIMINAL 35-44-3-2 FELONY C 07/12/2010
> FILED AS: 35-42-1-1(1); 35-41-5-2(A)/FA: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER 35-42-1-1(1); 35-41-5-2(A) FELONY A 07/12/2010
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
07/30/2010 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
> 07/30/2010 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED
> APPROVED INFORMATION IS FILED AND PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT HAS BEEN FOUND BY THE HONORABLE TERESA D. HARPER, A DISINTERESTED AND NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE. WARRANT IS NOW ORDERED ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF
MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA FOR THE ARREST OF THE DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT'S BOND IS $250,000.00 SURETY AND $10,000.00 CASH BOND. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/30/2010
07/30/2010 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
07/30/2010 WARRANT /WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON
> ISSUED IN ERROR
07/30/2010 CLERICAL MISTAKE CORRECTED
> WARRANT WAS NOT ISSUED IN THIS CASE. APPROVED INFORMATION IS FILED AND PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ARREST OF DEFENDANT HAS BEEN FOUND BY THE HONORABLE TERESA D. HARPER, A DISINTERESTED AND NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE. CLERK IS INFORMED THAT THE
DEFENDANT IS IN MONROE COUNTY JAIL WITH $250,000.00 SURETY AND $1,000.00 CASH BOND. ASB
08/02/2010 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/02/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/02/2010 AT 1:30 PM.
08/02/2010 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> INITIAL HEARING HELD. STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY JOI KAMPER. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY, PRO SE. A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY IS ENTERED AND CAUSE ASSIGNED AN OMNIBUS DATE OF SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 AND SET FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE,
SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 AT :00 PM. UPON REQUEST, THE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS APPOINTED. PROBABLE CAUSE HAVING BEEN DETERMINED, DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY OF SHERIFF WITH BAIL SET IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.000.00 SURETY AND $10,000.00 CASH.
BAIL REVIEW SET FOR AUGUST 8, 2010 AT 9:00 AM. NCL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/02/2010
> VOL./BOOK Y
08/02/2010 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
08/03/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/06/2010 AT 9:00 AM.
08/03/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/13/2010 AT 2:00 PM.
08/04/2010 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/02/2010
> VOL./BOOK 278
08/06/2010 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/06/2010 MOTION FILED
> MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER FILES MOTION TO APPOINT OUTSIDE COUNSEL. NCL
> FILE STAMP: 08/05/2010
08/06/2010 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING HELD. STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY JOI KAMPER. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL, JASON MEREDITH. THE COURT NOW ORDERS DEFENDANT'S BAIL REMAIN UNCHANGED AT $250,000.00 SURETY AND $10,000.00 CASH. NCL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
08/06/2010 ORDER APPOINTING PAUPER COUNSEL
> THE COURT ISSUES ORDER APPOINTING PAUPER COUNSEL. RONALD L. CHAPMAN IS APPOINTED AS PAUPER COUNSEL IN THIS CAUSE. JM
> APPOINTEE: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/06/2010
08/09/2010 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/06/2010
> VOL./BOOK 278
08/10/2010 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> STATE'S NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE. NCL
> FILE STAMP: 08/09/2010
08/10/2010 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE AND NOTICE FOR DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION. NCL
> FOR PARTY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> ATTORNEY: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> FILE STAMP: 08/10/2010
08/26/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/01/2010 AT 9:30 AM.
09/01/2010 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/01/2010 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING HELD. STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY ROBERT MILLER. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL, RON CHAPMAN. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT DEFENDANT'S BAIL REMAIN UNCHANGED. NCL
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
09/07/2010 NOTICE TO COURT FILED
> NOTICE OF DEPOSITION FILED. ADT
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 09/03/2010
09/07/2010 CLERICAL MISTAKE CORRECTED
> COURT NOTES NOTICE OF DEPOSITION FILED 9/3/10 WAS FILED BY THE STATE. ADT
09/13/2010 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/13/2010 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> HEARING HELD. STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY ROBERT MILLER. CAUSE SET FOR FURTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 8, 2010 AT 1:30 PM. NCL
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> HEARING DATE: 09/13/2010
09/13/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 11/08/2010 AT 1:30 PM.
11/08/2010 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/08/2010 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: WINKLE, DARCIE F
11/10/2010 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/03/2011 AT 1:30 PM.
12/22/2010 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 12/22/2010
12/22/2010 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 12/21/2010
12/22/2010 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> CORRESPONDENCE FORWARDED TO ALL PARTIES. DEFENDANT'S PRO SE REQUEST IS DENIED. ASB
01/03/2011 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/03/2011 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: WINKLE, DARCIE F
01/04/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/24/2011 AT 2:30 PM.
01/11/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/24/2011 AT 2:30 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: AGREED RESOLUTION.
01/11/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/18/2011 AT 8:30 AM.
01/18/2011 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/18/2011 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO THE AMENDED CHARGE. PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT ORDERED AND INTERVIEW SCHEDULED FOR 1/31/11, AT 8:30 A.M. DEFENDANT RELEASED TODAY PENDING SENTENCING.
DEFENDANT ORDERED TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH RICHARD NORTH OR HIS FAMILY. KMP
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
01/18/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> SENTENCING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/28/2011 AT 9:30 AM.
01/18/2011
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 1. 35-44-3-2/FC: ASSISTING A CRIMINAL
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
02/24/2011 CANCELED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (2:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> AGREED RESOLUTION
02/28/2011 SENTENCING HEARING (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO
> RESULT: CONTINUED
02/28/2011 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> HEARINGHELD. STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY REBECCA VEIDLINGER. AS THE PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT WAS JUST FILED, AND MS. LUTRELL DID NOT VIEW THE VIDEO, THIS CAUSE IS CONTINUED UNTIL MARCH 28, 2011 AT
9:30 AM AND SHE IS TO APPEAR TO VIEW THE VIDEO AT 7:45 AM. NCL
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> HEARING DATE: 02/28/2011
> VOL./BOOK Y
02/28/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> SENTENCING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/28/2011 AT 9:30 AM.
03/28/2011 SENTENCING HEARING (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/28/2011 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> CAUSE CONTINUED BECAUSE DEFENDANT DID NOT SEE THE VIDEO AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED BY THE COURT. DEFENDANT IS REMANDED INTO THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF AND WILL BE RELEASED AT 4:30 P.M., TODAY.
DEFENDANT TO APPEAR TO SEE THE VIDEO ON TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2011, AT 7;45, AND THEN HER SENTENCING HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE AT 8:30 A.M., ON THE SAME DATE. KMP
03/28/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/29/2011 AT 8:30 AM.
03/29/2011 SENTENCING HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO
> RESULT: CONCLUDED
03/29/2011 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> REBECCA VEIDLINGER APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE STATE. COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR ASSISTING A CRIMINAL A CLASS C FELONY. DEFENDANT TO PAY $164.00 IN COURT COSTS AND $150.00 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE. AFTER 4 YEARS ON
PROBATION DEFENDANT MAY PETITION THE COURT FOR A MODIFICATION OF PROBATION. KMP
> PRESENT: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> VOL./BOOK Y
03/30/2011 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/29/2011
> VOL./BOOK 285
05/20/2011 MOTION FILED
> REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO TRAVEL OUT OF STATE FILED, AND GRANTED. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 05/20/2011
07/15/2011 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> AFFIDAVIT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FILED BY RONALD CHAPMAN. KP
> FILE DATE: 07/14/2011
07/20/2011 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> AFFUIDAVIT FOR PAYMENT OF FEES FILED. NCL
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, RONALD L
> FILE DATE: 07/14/2011
07/20/2011 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ORDER TO PAY FEES ISSUED. NCL
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/19/2011
> VOL./BOOK Y
07/21/2011 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/19/2011
> VOL./BOOK 289
05/23/2012 CASE REOPENED
> FILE STAMPED: 05/23/2012
05/23/2012 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/23/2012
05/23/2012 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/23/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/23/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
05/23/2012 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> TRISH HUFFMAN APPEARS FOR THE STATE. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY. DENIAL IS ENTERED. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET FOR JULY 10, 2012 AT 3:30 PM WITH DEFENDANT'S OTHER CASE. BAIL REVIEW HEARING IS MAY 30, 2012 AT 9:00 AM.
PUBLIC DEFENDER IS APPOINTED. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/23/2012
05/23/2012 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
05/24/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/30/2012 AT 9:00 AM.
05/24/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/10/2012 AT 3:30 PM.
05/24/2012 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/23/2012
> VOL./BOOK 299
05/30/2012 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/30/2012 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JOI KAMPER APPEARS FOR THE STATE. MICHAEL E. HUNT APPEARS FOR THE DEFENDANT. JILL BARNETT APPEARS VIA TELEPHONE. HOLD IS LIFTED IN THIS CAUSE AND DEFENDANT IS PLACED ON DAY REPORTING AS A CONDITION OF RELEASE.
SHE IS TO REPORT TO JILL BARNETT IMMEDIATELY UPON RELEASE. ASB
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
05/30/2012 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> ATTORNEY: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> FILE STAMP: 05/30/2012
05/30/2012 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED
> FILED BY: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 05/30/2012
07/10/2012 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/10/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> STATE APPEARS BY MATTHEW SCHULZ. PRETRIAL ORDER TENDERED TO THE COURT. DEFENDANT RELEASED FROM DAY REPORTING AS OF THIS DATE. FURTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 6, 2012, AT 2:30 P.M. KMP
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
07/12/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/06/2012 AT 2:30 PM.
07/27/2012 CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COMES NOW LINDA LITTRELL AND PAYS $119.00 THE REMAINDER OF COURT COSTS AS PER RECEIPT #2012-11631-JC.
09/06/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (2:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/06/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PROBATION OFFICER JILL BARNETT APPEARS. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 26, 2012 AT 2:00 P.M. RLR
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
11/26/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
11/26/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET FOR JANUARY 30, 2013 AT 1:30 PM. ASB
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
11/28/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 11/26/2012 AT 2:00 PM.
11/28/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/30/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
01/30/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/30/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ERIKA KROEGER APPEARS FOR THE STATE. CAUSE SET FOR FURTHER EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON APRIL 23, 2013 AT 1:30 PM. SML
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> HEARING DATE: 01/30/2013
02/04/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/23/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
04/22/2013 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> GRANTED AND RESCHEDULED. KMP
> FILED BY: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 04/22/2013
04/22/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 04/23/2013 AT 1:30 PM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/16/2013 AT 10:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
05/16/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
04/23/2013 CONTINUED TO 05/16/2013 - BY REQUEST - LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/16/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS CONTINUED TO JUNE 20, 2013 AT 3:30 PM.
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
05/16/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/20/2013 AT 3:30 PM.
06/20/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/20/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS AND SIGNS AN ORDER TO APPEAR FOR THE NEXT SCHEDULED EVIDENTIARY HEARING, WHICH IS SET FOR JULY 1, 2013, AT 9:30 A.M. DEFENDANT ORDERED TO SUBMIT TO A URINE SCREEN THIS DATE. KMP
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
06/24/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/01/2013 AT 9:30 AM.
07/01/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/01/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR THE PROBATION. CAUSE SET FOR FURTHER EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON JULY 10, 2013 AT 9:00 AM. SML
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> HEARING DATE: 07/01/2013
07/02/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/10/2013 AT 9:00 AM.
07/08/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 07/10/2013 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 08/13/2013 AT 3:00 PM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
08/13/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
07/10/2013 CONTINUED TO 08/13/2013 - BY REQUEST - LITTRELL, LINDA SUE; MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/13/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. DEFENDANT IS PLACED ON DAY REPORTING THIS DATE. CAUSE SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 AT 2:00 PM. SML
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> HEARING DATE: 08/13/2013
08/15/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2013 AT 2:00 PM.
09/05/2013 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED THIS DATE. WARRANT REQUESTED. EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2013 AT 2 PM.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 09/05/2013
09/06/2013 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> WARRANT TO BE ISSUED FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT WITH A HOLD WITHOUT BAIL. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/06/2013
> VOL./BOOK Y
09/06/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
09/10/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
09/10/2013 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
09/10/2013 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/10/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/10/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
09/10/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/06/2013
> VOL./BOOK 315
09/10/2013 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> CHRIS PIERCE APPEARS FOR THE STATE. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY. DENIAL IS ENTERED. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 AT 2:00 PM. PUBLIC DEFENDER IS APPOINTED. ASB
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/10/2013
> VOL./BOOK Y
09/10/2013 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
09/11/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/11/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/10/2013
> VOL./BOOK 315
09/11/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 3, 2013 AT 3:30 PM. DEFENDANT IS TO BE EVALUATED BY DR. WELLER. ASB
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
09/12/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/03/2013 AT 11:00 AM.
10/01/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 10/03/2013 AT 11:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 10/30/2013 AT 11:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
10/30/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
10/03/2013 RESET BY COURT TO 10/30/2013
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/30/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> BRENDA OGBORN APPEARS FOR PROBATION. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLEGATION # 5 OF THE FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. DISPOSITION IS SET OUT UNTIL DECEMBER 30, 2013 AT 1:30 PM. SML
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> HEARING DATE: 10/30/2013
10/30/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/30/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
11/04/2013 CHANGE OF ADDRESS FILED
> NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS FILED BY MICHAEL HUNT. SML
> PARTY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 10/31/2013
12/20/2013 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> MEMORANDUM FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 12/20/2013
12/30/2013 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/30/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> BECCA STREIT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. REVIEW HEARING IS SET FOR JANUARY 22, 2014 AT 11:30 AM. ASB
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
12/30/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/22/2014 AT 11:30 AM.
01/22/2014 REVIEW HEARING (11:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/22/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT IN TREATMENT AT CENTERSTONE AND REC. REVIEW/DISPOSITIONAL HEARING RESET FOR APRIL 16, 2014, AT 9:00 A.M.
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
01/23/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/16/2014 AT 9:00 AM.
04/16/2014
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 1. 35-44-3-2/FC: ASSISTING A CRIMINAL
> COMMENT ()
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 04/16/2014
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM: 1810 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 61 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 04/16/2014
> AWARDED TO: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> AWARDED AGAINST: LINDA LITTRELL
> JUDGMENT: $509.00
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2014, PAGE 0416
> COMMENT: $215 PUF / $135 UDS / $159 DR
04/16/2014 REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> DISPOSITIONAL
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/16/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION.
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: HUNT, MICHAEL EARL
> PRESENT: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
04/16/2014 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT SENT TO DOC
> DATE SIGNED: 04/16/2014
04/16/2014 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION ISSUED. THE DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLEGATION #5 AND THE COURT ACCEPTS THE ADMISSION. THE COURT NOW ORDERS 1810 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED AND SERVED IN THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION WITH GOOD-TIME CREDIT FOR 61 DAYS. DEFENDANT IS DISCHARGED FROM PROBATION UNSUCCESSFULLY. ALL OUTSTANDING COSTS AND FEES ARE PLACED ON THE CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/16/2014
> VOL./BOOK Y
04/17/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/16/2014
> VOL./BOOK 322
04/22/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/16/2014
> VOL./BOOK 322
02/05/2015 CASE REOPENED
02/05/2015 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 02/04/2015
02/19/2015 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> THE COURT RECEIVES, REVIEWS AND FORWARDS DEFENDANT'S CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PROSECUTOR AND PROBATION OFFICER. THE COURT ALSO REFERS THIS CASE TO RE-ENTRY COURT. ASB
05/04/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> NOTICE FOR ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED. FILE STAMPED COPY FORWARDED TO THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT.
> FOR PARTY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015 MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCE FILED
> PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE FILED. FILE STAMPED COPY FORWARDED TO THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT.
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR ORDER FOR PROGRESS REPORT FILED. FILE STAMPED COPY FORWARDED TO THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT.
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 05/04/2015
05/04/2015 DOCUMENT FILED
> REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE/TRANSPORT FILED. FILE STAMPED COPY FORWARDED TO THE PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT.
> FILED BY: LITTRELL, LINDA SUE
> FILE STAMP: 05/04/2015
05/29/2015 ORDER ISSUED
> ORDER FOR PROGRESS REPORT SENT TO INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/29/2015
06/01/2015 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/29/2015
> VOL./BOOK 335
07/31/2015 REPORT FILED
> PROGRESS REPORT RECEIVED FROM DOC AS REQUESTED. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 07/30/2015
08/10/2015 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DEFENDANT'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE IS DENIED.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G12-1904-CM-014701
> STATE OF INDIANA V. MARIA AMORIM
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 04/16/2019
> LOCATION:
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: IP190038308
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49G12-DM1358001
> PROTECTION ORDER REGISTRY: 754631
> 754632
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
> RELATED CASES
> 49G12-1904-MC-014652 (OTHER)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT AMORIM, MARIA FEMALE WHITE
> 5'3", 145 LBS ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
RETAINED
> MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY
> 151 N. DELAWARE, SUITE 200 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 3335 N KENWOOD AVE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46208
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000345632INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA RYAN WILSON MEARS
> 251 E OHIO ST SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46228
** CONFIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBER **
CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: AMORIM, MARIA STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-45-1-3(A)(1)/MB: DISORDERLY CONDUCT: ENGAGES IN FIGHTING OR TUMULTUOUS CONDUCT 35-45-1-3(A)(1) MISDEMEANOR CLASS B 04/15/2019
✗ BONDS
MARION CASH BOND $150
> 04/19/2019 CASH BOND RECEIVED BY CLERK
> COUNTS:1
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
04/16/2019 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
04/16/2019 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
04/16/2019 NOTICE FILED
> LR49-CR2.3-101 CASE CONSOLIDATION NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/16/2019 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/16/2019 MOTION FOR NO CONTACT ORDER FILED
> NO CONTACT ORDER MOTION--PUBLIC
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/16/2019 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> NOTICE OF EXLUSION FROM PUBLIC ACCESS
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/16/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> AMORIM_PC_2_REDACTED.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/16/2019
04/17/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/19/2019 AT 8:30 AM.
04/17/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/17/2019
04/17/2019 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> $150 CASH
> PARTY: AMORIM, MARIA
04/17/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NO CONTACT ORDER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> SEE STATE'S REGISTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/17/2019
04/18/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/17/2019 : MARIA AMORIM
04/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/17/2019 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
04/19/2019 INITIAL HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BOYCE, JOHN JAY - M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/19/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/06/2019 AT 8:30 AM.
04/19/2019 OMNIBUS DATE
> 5-19-19
04/19/2019 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BOYCE, JOHN JAY - M )
04/19/2019 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
04/19/2019 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BOYCE, JOHN JAY - M )
> SEE REGISTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/19/2019
04/19/2019 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BOYCE, JOHN JAY - M )
> 150.00 CASH BOND
> PARTY: AMORIM, MARIA
04/19/2019 CASH BOND ENTERED IN CLERK'S OFFICE
04/19/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> $150 CASH BOND TRANSFERRED FROM CASE NUMBER 49G12-1904-MC-014652
> FILE STAMP: 04/19/2019
04/20/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/19/2019 : MARIA AMORIM
04/20/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/19/2019 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
04/22/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: AMORIM, MARIA
> FILE STAMP: 04/22/2019
05/06/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CERTO, DAVID)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: CONTINUED
05/06/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/17/2019 AT 8:30 AM.
05/06/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
05/07/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/6/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
05/09/2019 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF TAPED STATEMENT
> FILED BY: AMORIM, MARIA
> FILE STAMP: 05/09/2019
05/09/2019 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS FILED
> SUBPOENA OF TYRONE CHAPMAN
> FILED BY: AMORIM, MARIA
> FILE STAMP: 05/09/2019
06/17/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CERTO, DAVID)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: CONTINUED
06/17/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 09/05/2019 AT 8:30 AM.
06/17/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
06/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/17/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
08/26/2019 ORDER GRANTING
> DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONVERT BENCH TRIAL INTO PRE TRIAL HEARING.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/26/2019
08/27/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 8/26/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
08/27/2019 INVALID EMAIL: AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING -- 8/26/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
09/05/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HOOPER, DAVID -MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/05/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> COMPLIANCE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/05/2019 AT 8:30 AM.
09/05/2019 PRETRIAL DIVERSION AGREEMENT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 09/05/2019
09/05/2019 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: MR DAVID HOOPER
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/05/2019
09/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 9/5/2019 10:20 AM PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM;SERVED BY: COURT STAFF; STREET: 902 VIRGINIA AVE; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS; COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 12, CRIMINAL
DIVISION (49G12); MANNER: COURT; ; PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM
09/05/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE EXPIRED
09/05/2019 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - DIVERSION; ISSUED BY: MR DAVID HOOPER
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/05/2019
09/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 9/5/2019 10:20 AM PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM;SERVED BY: COURT STAFF; STREET: 902 VIRGINIA AVE; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS; COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 12, CRIMINAL
DIVISION (49G12); MANNER: COURT; ; PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM
09/05/2019 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: MR DAVID HOOPER
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/05/2019
09/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 9/5/2019 10:20 AM PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM;SERVED BY: COURT STAFF; STREET: 902 VIRGINIA AVE; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS; COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 12, CRIMINAL
DIVISION (49G12); MANNER: COURT; ; PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM
09/05/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE EXPIRED
09/05/2019 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - DIVERSION; ISSUED BY: MR DAVID HOOPER
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/05/2019
09/05/2019 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 9/5/2019 10:20 AM PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM;SERVED BY: COURT STAFF; STREET: 902 VIRGINIA AVE; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS; COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 12, CRIMINAL
DIVISION (49G12); MANNER: COURT; ; PERSON SERVED: MARIA AMORIM
09/05/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
09/06/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/5/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
09/06/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/5/2019 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
12/02/2019 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: AMORIM, MARIA
> FILE STAMP: 12/02/2019
12/03/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 12/2/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
12/03/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 12/2/2019 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
12/05/2019 COMPLIANCE HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HOOPER, DAVID -MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/05/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> COMPLIANCE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/30/2020 AT 8:30 AM.
12/05/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
12/06/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/5/2019 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
12/06/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/5/2019 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
01/30/2020 COMPLIANCE HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CERTO, DAVID) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/30/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> COMPLIANCE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/27/2020 AT 8:30 AM.
01/30/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET 01/30/2020
01/31/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/30/2020 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
01/31/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/30/2020 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
02/04/2020 COMPLIANCE HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CERTO, DAVID)
02/04/2020 RESET BY COURT TO 02/04/2020
02/27/2020 RESET BY COURT TO 02/04/2020
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/04/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> COMPLIANCE HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/27/2020 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/04/2020 AT 8:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
02/04/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> COMPLIANCE HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/04/2020 AT 8:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/04/2020 AT 8:30 AM. REASON: DATA ENTRY ERROR.
02/04/2020 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/04/2020
02/04/2020 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CERTO, DAVID )
> ALL COUNTS
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/04/2020
02/04/2020
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CERTO, DAVID)
> 1. 35-45-1-3(A)(1)/MB: DISORDERLY CONDUCT: ENGAGES IN FIGHTING OR TUMULTUOUS CONDUCT
> DISMISSED
02/04/2020 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (DISP)
02/04/2020 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
02/05/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/4/2020 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/4/2020 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
02/05/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/4/2020 : RYAN WILSON MEARS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/4/2020 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
02/06/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ---- 2/4/2020 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
02/06/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ---- 2/4/2020 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
02/25/2020 BOND FORM FILED
> FILE STAMP: 02/25/2020
02/28/2020 ORDER TO RELEASE BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CERTO, DAVID )
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/28/2020
02/29/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO RELEASE BOND ---- 2/28/2020 : ANDREW ZACHARY STEBBINS
02/29/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER TO RELEASE BOND ---- 2/28/2020 : RYAN WILSON MEARS
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 52C01-1701-PL-000010
> SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN VS SGT BRENDA BOWMAN
> CASE TYPE: PL - CIVIL PLENARY
> DATE FILED: 01/06/2017
> LOCATION: MIAMI CIRCUIT COURT
> LEGACY SYSTEM NUMBER: C117PL10
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT BOWMAN, BRENDA JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN
RETAINED
> 8470 ALLISON POINTE BLVD STE 420 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250-4365
> 317-567-2222(W)MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
RETAINED
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> INDIANA GOVERNMENT CENTER SOUTH 5TH FLOOR
> 302 W WASHINGTON STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-232-6287(W)
> MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
> 3038 WEST 850 SOUTH
> BUNKER HILL, IN 46914
> DEFENDANT UNKNOWN STAFF JILL ELAINE ESENWEIN
RETAINED
> 8470 ALLISON POINTE BLVD STE 420 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250-4365
> 317-567-2222(W)MARLEY GENELE HANCOCK
RETAINED
> OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
> INDIANA GOVERNMENT CENTER SOUTH 5TH FLOOR
> 302 W WASHINGTON STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-232-6287(W)
> PLAINTIFF CHAPMAN , SEBASTIAN
> PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACIL
> 727 MOON ROAD DOC# 860995 PLAINFIELD, IN 46168
EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
01/11/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 1/6/2017, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES APPEARANCE; AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCE; AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES; COMPLAINT, AND SUMMONS. SERVICE TO DEFE NDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. SGD (RJO? N) |
JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 01/06/2017
01/11/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ISSUES ORDER. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO PAY A REDUCED FILING FEE IN THE SUM OF $0.84. SAID FILING FEE MUST BE PAID WITHIN 45 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE COURT TO PROCEED
TO TAKE ANY FURTHER ACTION. SGD (CM RTN SGT BRENDA BOWMAN SIGNED R ANDERSEN 1/13/17) MKJ (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 01/11/2017
02/21/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ISSUES ORDER. THE PLAINTIFF HAS SUBMITTED A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.48. THE COURT NOW DIRECTS THAT THE CLERK RETURN THE CHECK TO THE PLAINTIFF. THE SHALL BE GIVEN AN EXTENSION
UNTIL MARCH 17, 2017, IN WHICH TO PROVIDE THE PROPER AMOUNT OF $0.84. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 02/21/2017
03/01/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 2/28/2017, PETITIONER PAID THE REDUCED FILING FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF $0.84. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/01/2017
03/02/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ISSUES ORDER. THE CLERK OF THE COURT NOW IS DIRECTED TO ISSUE A SUMONS AND A COPY OF EVERY OTHER DOCUMENT OR PLEADING PROVIDED BY THE PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT. SERVICE BY MIAMI
COUNTY SHERIFF. SGD (SHERIFF RTN TO B. BOWMAN SVD IN PERSO BY ANGIE 3/7/17)SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/02/2017
03/29/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 3/27/17, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), ATTORNEY JOSHUA LOWRY ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS, AND FILES MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, TOGETHER WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REC'D ON 3/29/17)SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/29/2017
03/30/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT SUBMITTED AND APPROVED ON 3/30/17. DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE UP TO AND INCLUDING APRIL 26, 2017 TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT. SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/30/2017
04/28/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 4/26/17, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES ANSWER, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/28/2017
05/10/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY. COPY FORWARDED TO CONSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/10/2017
05/15/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER APPROVED ON 5/14/17. AS THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT ANY DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO COOPERATE WITH THE DISCOVERY PROCESS SINCE THIS CASE WAS FILED, THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS DENIED.
SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/15/2017
06/21/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING-DISCOVERY, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 06/21/2017
06/27/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COURT NOW SCHEDULES HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY. HEARING SET FOR AUGUST 14, 2017 AT 9:00 A.M., RESERVING 30 MINUTES. PLAINTIFF TO PARTICIPATE VIA
VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. DEFENSE COUNSEL TO PARTICIPATE TELEPHONICALLY BY CALLING THE COURT AT (765) 472-3901, EXT. 1235. (HEARING CONFIRMED WITH MCCF ON 06/27/2017.)
ORDER SIGNED ON JUNE 21, 2017. GMA (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 06/27/2017
07/03/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 6/29/17, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 07/03/2017
07/03/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING APPROVED ON 6/30/17. THE COURT NOW SCHEDULES A HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY ON AUGUST 14, 2017, AT 9:00 A.M. SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 07/03/2017
08/14/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> CALENDAR: MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS (TIME: 09:00:00) (JUDGE: C01) (NOTES: VIDEO - MCCF; DEFENSE COUNSEL TO CALL COURT)
08/14/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN CUSTODY VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING. DEFENDANT, BRENDA BOWMAN, APPEARS IN PERSON VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING AND WITH COUNSEL, JOSHUA LOWRY, VIA TELEPHONE.
HEARING HELD ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY AND CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING. THE COURT TAKES PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY UNDER ADVISEMENT.
CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES SET, ALL AS PER ORDER TO BE FILED. CLA (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 08/14/2017
08/15/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTER AN ORDER ON 8/14/17. COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE TO THE PLAINTIFF NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 16, 2017, THE NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO MADE
THE ENTRY IN THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S COMPUTER SYSTEM. THE COURT DIRECTS THE COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS TO PUT TOGETHER A PACKET OF AUTHENTICATED DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE A TRUE
AND COMPLETE COPY OF IT TO PLAINTIFF NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 16, 2017. ALL DISCOVERY IN THIS CASE SHALL BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 14, 2018. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF A MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ANY OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION SHALL BE APRIL 16, 2018. SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 08/15/2017
08/23/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION TO RECONSIDER, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGD (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 08/23/2017
09/05/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ISSUES ORDER ON 8/28/17. PLAINTIFF'S RELIANCE ON TRIAL RULE 30(B)(6) IS MISPLACED. WITHOUT ISSUING A PROPER NON-PARTY REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND FOLLOWING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF TRIAL RULE 34(C), THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT SEEK AN ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY FROM THOSE NON-PARTIES. THE PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO REVIES TRIAL RULE 34(C) CAREFULLY IN ORDER
TO ENSURE THAT HE PROPERLY COMPLIES WITH ITS REQUIREMENTS. SIGNED 8/28/17 SGD (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 09/05/2017
10/04/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> RECEIVED 10-2-2017 LETTER FROM PLAINTIFF WITH COPY OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ADDRESSED TO A. HEISHMAN. ON 10-4-17, DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL, JOSHUA LOWRY, CONFIRMED RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THE
AFOREMENTIONED SUBPOENA. CLERK FORWARDS SUBPOENA TO MS. HEISHMAN BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TLS (CM RTN A HEISHMAN LEGAL LIAISON SIGNED A SCOTT 10/5/17) MKJ (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 10/04/2017
10/18/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 10/16/17, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO PROVIDE RESPONSIIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER,
TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 10/18/2017
10/19/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO PROVIDE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. DEFENDANTS HAVE UP TO AND INCLUDING
OCTOBER 30, 2017 TO PROVIDE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 10/19/2017
11/01/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 10/30/17, DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO PROVIDE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE. (REC'D ON 11/1/17)SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 11/01/2017
11/03/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO PROVIDE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER SUBMITTED AND APPROVED ON 11/2/17. DEFENDANTS
HAVE UP TO AND INCLUDING NOVEMBER 27, 2017 TO PROVIDE RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE COURT'S AUGUST 14, 2017 ORDER. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 11/03/2017
11/29/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 11/27/17, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL, FILES NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REC'D ON 11/29/17)SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 11/29/2017
11/30/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER SUBMITTED AND APPROVED ON 11/30/17. DEFENDANT HAS UP TO AND INCLUDING DECEMBER 18, 2017, TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 8/14/17. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 11/30/2017
12/21/2017 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 12/18/17, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVIE. (REC'D ON 12/20/17) SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 12/21/2017
02/05/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSE PLAINTIFF, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REC'D VIA FAX ON 2/5/18) TLC (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 02/05/2018
02/05/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO DEPOSE PLAINTIFF SUBMITTED AND APPROVED ON 2/5/18. DEFENDANT IS NOW GRANTED LEAVE TO DEPOSE THE PLAINTIFF, SEBASTIAN CHAPMAN, AT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018, AT 10:30 A.M. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 02/05/2018
02/12/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 2/7/18, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F), ATTORNEY MARLEY G. HANCOCK ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, INDIAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AND
SGT. BRENDA BOWAN, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REC'D ON 2/12/18)SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 02/12/2018
02/27/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 2/26/18, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES PLAINTIFF'S CHANGE OF ADDRESS, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS IS NOW 727 MOON ROAD, PLAINFIELD, INDIANA 46168-9400. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 02/27/2018
03/16/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 3/14/18, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), JILL E. ESENWEIN, FILES APPEARANCE AND NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL,
JILL E. ESENWEIN SUBSTITUTES DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL JENNIFER E. LEMON, ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/16/2018
03/19/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/19/2018
03/21/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON 3/20/18. THE COURT NOW GRANTS SAID MOTION. THE DEADLINE FOR EACH OF THE PARTIES TO FILE
A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION IS EXTENDED FROM APRIL 16, 2018 TO MAY 16, 2018. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 03/21/2018
04/04/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 4/3/18, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION; MEMORANDUM OF LAW; VERIFICATION BY AFFIRMATION OF AUTHENTICITY OF EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENTS; AND CERTIFICATION OF
RECORDS. (COPY FORWARDED TO DEFENDANTS COUNSEL) SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/04/2018
04/06/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER ON 4/6/18. PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 56(C), THE DEFENDANT HAVE UNTIL 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO FILE A RESPONSE
AND ANY OPPOSING AFFIDAVITS WITH THE COURT. THE PARTIES ARE ADVISED THAT EACH OF THEM HAS 10 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE OR, IF NO SUCH RESPONSE IS
FILED, THEN 10 DAYS AFTER THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF THE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE, TO FILE A MOTION FOR A HEARING ON THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/06/2018
04/18/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 4/12/18, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEPUTY ATTORNEY JILL ESENWEIN, FILES MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEARANCE ON DEPUTY ATTORNEY JOSHUA R. LOWRY, IN THE MATTER. (REC'D ON 4/16/18) SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/18/2018
04/19/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED ON 4/18/18. THE APPEARANCE OF JOSHUA LOWRY IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/19/2018
04/24/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 4/24/18, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION TO WITHDRAW; VERIFICATION BY AFFIRMATION; SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION; AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE.
SGB (AUTHENTICATED DOCUMENTS FILED AT THIS TIME ALSO)SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/24/2018
04/30/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER ON 4/29/18. THE DEFENDANTS HAVE UNTIL 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE MOST RECENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO FILE A RESPONSE AND ANY OPPOSING
AFFIDAVITS WITH THE COURT. THE PARTIES ARE ADVISED THAT EACH OF THEM HAS 10 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE OR, IF NO SUCH RESPONSE IS FILED, THEN 10 DAYS
AFTER THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF THE DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE, TO FILE A MOTION FOR A HEARING ON THE MOST RECENT SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 04/30/2018
05/03/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 4/30/18, PURSUANT TO TRAIL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BRENDA BOWMAN, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (REC'D ON 4/3/18)SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/03/2018
05/04/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND SUBMITTED ON 5/3/18. THE COURT NOW DENIED THIS MOTION BECAUSE IT IS MOOT. THE COURT'S ORDER DATED 4/29/18 CONTROLS. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/04/2018
05/18/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 5/16/18, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE.
(REC'D ON 5/18/18) SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/18/2018
05/22/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER DISMISS THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM PERTAINING TO HIS ZACHARY LAW OFFENDER CLASSIFICATION. THE COURT NOW DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS PREVIOUSLY
RAISED IN THIS CASE BY THE PLAINTIFF WITH RESPECT TO THE ENTRY OF A ZACHARY LAW OFFENDER FLAG AGAINST THE PLAINIFF IN THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S OFFENDER INFORMATION SYSTEM.
THE OTHER CLAIMS RAISED BY THE PLAINTIFF AGAINST DEFENDANT, SERGEANT BRENDA BOWMAN REMAIN PENDING AT THIS TIME. AS ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT "UNKNOWN STATT, INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPICITY"
NOW HAVE BEEN DISMISSED, THE CAPTION FOR THIS CASE SHALL HENCEFORTH BE SEBASTAIN CHAPMAN, PLAINTIFF, VS SGT. BRENDA BOWMAN, INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANT." ORDER SIGNED ON 5/19/18. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/22/2018
05/22/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 5/19/18. PURSUANT TO
TRIAL RULE 56(C), THE PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL 30 DAYS AFTER THE SERVICE OF SAID CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO FILE A RESPONSE AND ANY OPPOSING AFFIDAVITS WITH THE COURT. THE
PARTIES ARE ADVISED THAT EACH OF THEM HAS 10 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE OR, IF NO CUSH RESPONSE IS FILED THEN 10 DAYS AFTER THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF THE
PLAINTIFF'S RESPNSE, TO FILE A MOTION FOR A HEARING ON SAID CROSS MOTION. ORDER SIGNED 5/19/18. SGB (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/22/2018
05/24/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION FOR HEARING ON THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 05/24/2018
06/20/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT/RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 06/20/2018
06/27/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF, PRO SE, FILES MOTION FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 06/27/2018
07/02/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING SIGNED ON JULY 1, 2018. HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ON DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAS BEEN SET ON MONDAY,
AUGUST 13, 2018, AT 9:00 A.M. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE PERMITTED TO PARTICIPATE IN SAID HEARING VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE AND COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT SHALL BE PERMITTED TO PARTICIPATE IN SAID HEARING VIA TELEPHONE.
COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT MAY REACH THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR AT THE TIME OF SAID HEARING BY CALLING (765) 472-3901, EXT. 1235. THE PLAINTIFF AND COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT ARE BOTH CAUTIONED THAT SAID HEARING SHALL
NOT BE AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND SHALL INSTEAD MERELY BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EACH OF THE PARTIES TO PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENT TO THE COURT. CLA (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 07/02/2018
07/09/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> ON 7/2/18, PURSUANT TO TRIAL RULE 5(F)(3), DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
(REC'D ON 7/9/18) SGB (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 07/09/2018
08/13/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> CALENDAR: SUMMARY JUDGMENT (TIME: 09:00:00) (JUDGE: C01) (NOTES: PLAINTIFF VIA VIDE FROM PLAINTIFF CORR FACILITY DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL TO CALL IN TO THE COURT)
08/13/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN CUSTODY VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM THE PLAINFIELD CORRECTIAL FACILITY. DEFENDANT APPEARS BY COUNSEL, JILL ESENWEIN AND MARLEY HANCOCK, VIA TELEPHONE.
HEARING HELD ON ALL PENDING MATTERS. ARGUMENT HEARD. THE COURT TAKES THIS MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT. TLC (RJO? N) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 08/13/2018
08/20/2018 CONVERTED EVENT
> COMES NOW THE COURT AND ENTERS ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND GRANTING THE DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 8/18/18.
THE COURT HEREBY DENIES THE PLAINTIFF'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AS TO ALL CLAIMS
THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE PLAINTIFF. THE COURT NOTES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CLERK THAT THIS ORDER REPRESENTS A FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO ALL CLAIMS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE
PLAINTIFF IN THIS CASE. SGB (DISPOSED: BT ) (RJO? Y) | JTS MINUTE ENTRY DATE: 08/20/2018
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G14-1510-F6-034925
> STATE OF INDIANA V. GREGORY A CHAPMAN
> CASE TYPE: F6 - FELONY 6
> DATE FILED: 10/01/2015
> LOCATION: POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: DP150113694
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49-DM1188849
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
RELATED CASES
> 49G14-1510-F6-034924 (CO-DEFENDANT CASE)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, GREGORY A MALE BLACK
> 5'7", 130 LBS PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS
RETAINED
> 429 E VERMONT ST STE 015 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202
> 317-781-8565(W)
> 9026 SARATOGA DR APT D INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000400400INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
> 251 E. OHIO ST. SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-5965(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-48-4-13(B)(1)/F6: MAINTAINING A COMMON NUISANCE BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE THAT IS USED TO UN 35-48-4-13(B)(1) FELONY 6 09/30/2015
> 2. 16-42-19-18(A)/F6: UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF SYRINGE 16-42-19-18(A) FELONY 6 09/30/2015
> 3. 35-48-4-11(A)(1)/F6: POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA DEFENDANT HAS A PRIOR DRUG OFFENSE CONVICTION AND AMOU 35-48-4-11(A)(1) FELONY 6 09/30/2015
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
10/01/2015 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
10/01/2015 DISCOVERY FILED
> CRIMINAL HISTORY
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/01/2015
10/01/2015 INFORMATION FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/01/2015
10/01/2015 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/01/2015
10/01/2015 NOTICE FILED
> CRIMINAL HISTORY
> > FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/01/2015
10/02/2015 INITIAL HEARING (2:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/02/2015 EARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/02/2015 AT 2:30 AM.
10/02/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/06/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
10/02/2015 OMNIBUS DATE
11-16-15
10/02/2015 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> 1:58A
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/02/2015
10/02/2015 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
10/02/2015 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> $250CASH
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
10/02/2015 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> COURT CARD GIVEN
10/06/2015 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SALINAS, JOSE D)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/06/2015 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SALINAS, JOSE D )
> AS TO THIS CASE ONLY
> MOVANT: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/06/2015
10/06/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/27/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
10/27/2015 STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/27/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/24/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
11/24/2015 STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> 08:30AM
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/24/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/15/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
12/15/2015 STATUS OF COUNSEL HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/15/2015 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> HEARD OFF RECORD
12/15/2015 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
12/15/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/12/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
01/12/2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICERS SALINAS, JOSE D, CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/12/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/16/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
01/15/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> CONFLICT
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
> ATTORNEY: RIOS, PATRICIA LOUISE
> FILE STAMP: 01/14/2016
02/16/2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/16/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/22/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
03/22/2016 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/22/2016 REPORT TO PROBATION
03/22/2016 PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED STAMP: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 MOTION TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C )
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
> COUNT 2, 3
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> 1. 35-48-4-13(B)(1)/F6: MAINTAINING A COMMON NUISANCE BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE THAT IS USED TO UN
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 2. 16-42-19-18(A)/F6: UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF SYRINGE
> DISMISSED
> 3. 35-48-4-11(A)(1)/F6: POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA DEFENDANT HAS A PRIOR DRUG OFFENSE CONVICTION AND AMOU
> DISMISSED
03/22/2016
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> 1. 35-48-4-13(B)(1)/F6: MAINTAINING A COMMON NUISANCE BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE THAT IS USED TO UN
> FEE TOTALS:
> DRUG ABUSE, PROSECUTION, INTERDICTION FEE $200.00
> FEE TOTALS $ $200.00
> COMMENT ()
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 03/22/2016
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 545 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 7 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 531 DAYS
> COMMENT: TIME SERVED
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. PROBATION, 180 DAYS, WEEKLY DRUG TESTING 03/22/2016, ACTIVE 03/22/2016
> 2. SUBSTANCE ABUSE EVALUATION, 03/22/2016, ACTIVE 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 COURT FINDS DEFENDANT INDIGENT AS TO FINES AND COSTS
03/22/2016 REPORT TO PROBATION
> NO LATER THAN 3/23/16 9AM
03/22/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> AMS UPON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF PROBATION
03/22/2016 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
03/22/2016 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (DISP)
07/15/2016 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
> FILE STAMP: 07/15/2016
07/19/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> REVIEWED 7/18/16
08/03/2016 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/03/2016
08/05/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
08/22/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
08/22/2016 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BOYCE, JOHN JAY - M )
> CASH BOND OF $350
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
08/22/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT CARD GIVEN
08/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 08/23/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
08/23/2016 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/23/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DEFENDANT ADMITS VIOLATION
08/23/2016 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C )
> AS TO THIS CASE ONLY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/23/2016
08/23/2016 REPORT TO PROBATION
08/23/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> EXTEND PROBATION 90 DAYS
08/23/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> NO FUTURE COURT DATES
11/28/2016 MOTION TO MODIFY FILED
> REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 11/28/2016
11/30/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT APPROVES PROBATION'S MODIFICATION TO EXTEND PROBATION 90 DAYS TO ALLOW TO COMPLETE SAET AND ALLOW FOR TERMINATION UPON COMPLETION WITH NO EXTRA PROBATION FEES ADDED
11/30/2016 MOTION TO EXTEND PROBATION PERIOD FILED
> 90 DAYS
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
> FILE STAMP: 11/30/2016
12/20/2016 VIOLATION FILED
> PROBATION VIOLATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 12/20/2016
12/20/2016 ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/20/2016
12/20/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 12/28/2016 AT 1:00 PM.
12/21/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/20/2016 : PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS;TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
12/28/2016 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HACKER, NATHAN ADAM - PT) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/28/2016 FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HACKER, NATHAN ADAM - PT )
12/28/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 01/19/2017 AT 1:00 PM.
12/28/2016 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HACKER, NATHAN ADAM - PT )
> ORDER TO APPEAR TO HEARING ON 01-19-2017 AT 1PM
> FILE STAMP: 12/28/2016
12/28/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET 12/28/2016
12/29/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/28/2016 : PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS;TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
01/12/2017 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> AMENDED VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 01/12/2017
01/17/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT WILL ADDRESS THE VIOLATION AT THE NEXT COURT DATE
01/19/2017 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KINKADE, KELLY NOEL-PT)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/19/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 02/10/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
01/19/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET 1/19/2017
01/20/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/19/2017 : PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS;TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
01/25/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/10/2017 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/10/2017 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: CONVERSION.
01/26/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/25/2017 : PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS;TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
02/08/2017 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> AMENDED VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/08/2017
02/09/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT WILL ADDRESS VIOLATION AT THE NEXT HEARING
02/10/2017 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SALINAS, JOSE D)
> PARTIES PRESENT
02/10/2017 RESET BY COURT TO 02/10/2017
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/10/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 05/05/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
02/10/2017 MOTION TO EXTEND PROBATION PERIOD FILED
> 90 DAYS
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, GREGORY A
> FILE STAMP: 02/10/2017
02/10/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> CONTINUE AS DIRECTED IF ANY PROVEN VOPS, A MINIMUM OF 350 DAYS IN MCJ
02/10/2017 REPORT TO PROBATION
> TODAY
02/11/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/10/2017 : PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS;TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY
04/26/2017 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> AMENDED VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/26/2017
04/26/2017 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> FORM ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 9-G1
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/26/2017
04/27/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> WILL ADDRESS VIOLATION NEXT HEARING
05/05/2017 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SALINAS, JOSE D)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/05/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 06/19/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
05/05/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 06/19/2017 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/16/2017 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: DATA ENTRY ERROR.
05/05/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
05/06/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/5/2017 : TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY;PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/5/2017 : TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY;PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS
06/08/2017 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> FORM ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 9-G1
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 06/08/2017
06/08/2017 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> AMENDED VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 06/08/2017
06/09/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
06/12/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
06/12/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 06/13/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
06/13/2017 HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/13/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/12/2017 : TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY;PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS
06/13/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION SCHEDULED FOR 06/16/2017 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
06/13/2017 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FILE STAMP: 06/13/2017
06/13/2017 ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO REVOKE PROBATION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/13/2017
06/13/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PETITION FOR AMS UPON SUCCESFUL COMPLETION
06/13/2017 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/13/2017
06/13/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> SELF REPORT TO COMM CORR 6/14/17
06/13/2017
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C) REASON: REVOCATION OF PROBATION
> 1. 35-48-4-13(B)(1)/F6: MAINTAINING A COMMON NUISANCE BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR VEHICLE THAT IS USED TO UN
> FEE TOTALS:
> DRUG ABUSE, PROSECUTION, INTERDICTION FEE $200.00
> FEE TOTALS $ $200.00
> COMMENT ()
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 06/13/2017
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> TERM: 350 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 2 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> COMMENT: B
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. ABSTRACT: RECOMMENDED DEGREE OF SECURITY - NO RECOMMENDATION, 06/13/2017, ACTIVE 06/13/2017
> 2. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, 06/13/2017, ACTIVE 06/13/2017
> 3. HOME DETENTION, 350 DAYS 06/13/2017, ACTIVE 06/13/2017
06/13/2017 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
06/14/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/13/2017 : TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY;PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 6/13/2017 : TIMOTHY PATRICK CONROY;PATRICIA LOUISE RIOS
06/16/2017 CANCELED HEARING ON VIOLATION OF PROBATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHRIST, JOHN MICHAEL-C)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
06/19/2017 RESET BY COURT TO 06/16/2017
11/18/2017 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (TCN)
11/22/2017 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (TCN)
12/06/2017 MOTION TO DISCHARGE FILED
> DISCHARGE SUMMARY
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 12/06/2017
12/08/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DEFENDANT IS SUCCESSFULLY DISCHARGED FROM MCCC
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G20-1712-F3-048497
> STATE OF INDIANA VS. MIKE CHAPMAN AKA STERLING COBLE, SR.
> CASE TYPE: F3 - FELONY 3
> DATE FILED: 12/19/2017
> LOCATION: POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: DP170141050
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49G20-DM1298014
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
RELATED CASES
> 49G25-1712-MC-048250 (OTHER)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT CHAPMAN, MIKE MALE BLACK
> 6'2", 275 LBS HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON
RETAINED
> 16 N. DELAWARE STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-440-2732(W)CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE
RETAINED
> 6856 E 46TH ST INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46226
> 317-327-4100(W)
> 1126 PLANTATION DR MYRTLE BEACH, SC 59322
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000794019INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
> MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> 251 EAST OHIO STREET SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-5338(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: CHAPMAN, MIKE STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-48-4-1(A)(2)/F3: DEALING IN A NARCOTIC DRUG : MANUFACTURE/DELIVER/FINANCE-5 & 10 GRAMS 35-48-4-1(A)(2) FELONY 3 12/15/2017
> 2. 35-48-4-6(A)/F5: POSSESSION OF A NARCOTIC DRUG 35-48-4-6(A) FELONY 5 12/15/2017
> 3. 35-48-4-11(A)(1)/MB: POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA 35-48-4-11(A)(1) MISDEMEANOR CLASS B 12/15/2017
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
12/19/2017 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
12/19/2017 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
12/19/2017 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 12/19/2017
12/19/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> FINALPC - CHAPMAN.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 12/19/2017
12/19/2017 DISCOVERY FILED
> CM HISTORY CHAPMAN
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 12/19/2017
12/19/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/20/2017 AT 8:45 AM.
12/20/2017 INITIAL HEARING (8:45 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HAGENMAIER, RICHARD - C)
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED12/20/2017AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/19/2017 : MIKE CHAPMAN
12/20/2017AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/19/2017 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
12/20/2017ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> ORDERED RELEASED ON MC CAUSE NUMBER
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/20/2017
12/20/2017PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/20/2017
12/20/2017WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED02/10/2018WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED02/10/2018COURT SETS BOND
> $20,000 CASH BOND
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
02/12/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/13/2018 AT 1:00 PM.
02/13/2018INITIAL HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED02/13/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/12/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
02/13/2018COURT SCHEDULING ORDER
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018MOTION FILED
> APPROPRIATE BOND AFTER OR, MOTION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY, INITIAL (STRIKE)
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018TEMPORARY APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM (STRIKE MAJOR FELONY)
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/25/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
02/13/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/07/2018 AT 8:30 AM.
02/13/2018ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C ) 02/13/2018ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DEFENDANT SWORN IN
> FILE STAMP: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
> JAFFE
02/13/2018OMNIBUS DATE
3/7/18
02/13/2018ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> AS TO BOND CONSIDERATION - WILL REMAIN $20,000 CASH BOND
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/13/2018
02/14/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> COURT SCHEDULING ORDER ---- 2/13/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/13/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE HEARING SCHEDULING
ACTIVITY ---- 2/13/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE
02/14/2018APPEARANCE FILED
> PDIS FILING - APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILE STAMP: 02/14/2018
03/01/2018MOTION TO AMEND INFORMATION FILED
> AMEND INFORMATION INTERLINEATION, MOTION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/01/2018
03/01/2018INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/01/2018
03/02/2018ORDER GRANTING
> MOTION TO AMEND THE INFORMATION BY INTERLINEATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/02/2018
03/03/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/2/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE
03/16/2018MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILED BY: JAFFE, CELESTE HOWARD
> FILE STAMP: 03/16/2018
03/16/2018PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILED BY: JAFFE, CELESTE HOWARD
> FILED STAMP: 03/16/2018
03/16/2018ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> MOTION TO SET CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARING.
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/16/2018
03/16/2018ORDER FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/16/2018
03/16/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/03/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
03/17/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/16/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE
03/28/2018PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT FILED
> PSI
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/28/2018
03/28/2018NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> NOTICE OF EXCLUSION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/28/2018
04/03/2018 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED04/03/2018HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> DEF. SWORN, FACTUAL BASIS TAKEN
04/03/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> PLEA TAKEN U/A
04/03/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> SENTENCING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/18/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
04/04/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/3/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;ROBERT MARTIN YOKE
04/05/2018MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> MCCC SCREENING
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/05/2018
04/05/2018ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> DOCUMENT REVIEWED
04/18/2018SENTENCING HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED04/18/2018NOTICE FILED
> WITHDRAW OF APPEARANCE, NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/18/2018
04/18/2018MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
> DISMISSAL, MOTION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/18/2018
04/18/2018ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/19/2018
04/18/2018
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> 1. 35-48-4-1(A)(2)/F3: DEALING IN A NARCOTIC DRUG : MANUFACTURE/DELIVER/FINANCE-5 & 10 GRAMS
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 2. 35-48-4-6(A)/F5: POSSESSION OF A NARCOTIC DRUG
> DISMISSED
> 3. 35-48-4-11(A)(1)/MB: POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA
> DISMISSED
04/18/2018
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> 1. 35-48-4-1(A)(2)/F3: DEALING IN A NARCOTIC DRUG : MANUFACTURE/DELIVER/FINANCE-5 & 10 GRAMS
> FEE TOTALS:
> DRUG ABUSE, PROSECUTION, INTERDICTION FEE $200.00
> FEE TOTALS $ $200.00
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 04/19/2018
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> TERM:3 YR
> JAIL CREDIT: 71 DAYS
> CONCURRENT WITH PRIOR SENTENCE: 49G201702F5048949
> COMMENT: SET TERM PLEA(OPEN PLACEMENT) 3 Y MCCC WORK RELEASE W/ GPS WHILE ON MCCC WR, NO ALCOHOL OR NON PRESCRIBED CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, RANDOM DRUG TESTING, SLIDING SCALE
FEES DEFENDANT HAS 71 DAYS OF CREDIT PLUS 23.7 CLASS B CREDIT, BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. WORK RELEASE, 3 Y MCCC WORK RELEASE W/ GPS WHILE ON MCCC WR, NO ALCOHOL OR NON PRESCRIBED CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, RANDOM DRUG TESTING, SLIDING SCALE FEES 04/18/2018, ACTIVE 04/18/2018
04/19/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/25/2018 AT 1:30 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
04/19/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 05/07/2018 AT 8:30 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
04/19/2018ORDER ISSUED
> JOC
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/18/2018
04/19/2018ORDER ISSUED
> JOC FEES
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/19/2018
04/19/2018ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> AS TO COUNTS 2 AND 3 ONLY.
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/19/2018
04/19/2018DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
04/19/2018ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY TO BE HELD FOR OTHER AGENCY
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/18/2018
04/20/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY SENTENCED ----
4/18/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ----
4/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
04/25/2018CANCELED FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> OTHER
05/07/2018CANCELED JURY TRIAL (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ)
> OTHER
07/10/2018VIOLATION FILED
> NOTICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS VIOLATION
> FILED BY: MCCC
> FILE STAMP: 07/10/2018
07/10/2018ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> VIOLATION OF MCCC
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/10/2018
07/10/2018WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED07/11/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 7/10/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
07/11/2018WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED07/11/2018PARTY TO BE HELD IN CUSTODY
> NO BOND HOLD
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/11/2018
07/11/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 07/19/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
07/12/2018DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (TCN)
07/12/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 7/11/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
07/19/2018HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED07/19/2018HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> DEF. SWORN, FBT, DEF. WAIVES RIGHTS TO CONTESTED HEARING
07/19/2018HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, DEF. TO CONT. ON MCCC WORK RELEASE W/ GPS, STRICT COMPLIANCE, ADD SAET
07/19/2018ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> VOP JOC
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/19/2018
07/20/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 7/19/2018 : CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
07/30/2018ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY TO BE HELD FOR OTHER AGENCY
> WORK RELEASE
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/30/2018
11/27/2018APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL
> FOR PARTY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILE STAMP: 11/26/2018
11/27/2018MOTION TO MODIFY PLACEMENT FILED
> MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCE AND OR PLACEMENT
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILE STAMP: 11/26/2018
11/27/2018MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> MOTION TO SET HEARING
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILE STAMP: 11/26/2018
11/29/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/13/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
11/30/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 11/29/2018 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
12/11/2018MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> MOTION TO CONTINUE
> FILED BY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> FILE STAMP: 12/10/2018
12/11/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/13/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
12/11/2018ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> MODIFICATION HEARING
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/11/2018
12/11/2018HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> MODIFICATION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/20/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
12/12/2018AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/11/2018 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE ---- 12/11/2018 :
HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 12/11/2018 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
12/13/2018CANCELED HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ)
> OTHER
12/20/2018MODIFICATION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED12/20/2018HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES STATE MCCC & DEFENSE PLACEMENT MODIFIED TO MCCCC PDA
12/20/2018HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> PLACEMENT MODIFIED TO PDA W/ GPS
12/20/2018ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> VOP JOC
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/20/2018
01/15/2019VIOLATION FILED
> NOTICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS VIOLATION
> FILED BY: MCCC
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS VIOLATION; SUMMONS ISSUED
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
1/31/2019 @9:00AM
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
1/31/2019 @9:00AM
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 01/31/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
01/16/2019AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 1/15/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/15/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
01/31/2019HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> INITIAL HEARING ON MCCC VIOLATION
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED01/31/2019FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> WARRANT ISSUED NO BOND HOLD
> FILE STAMP: 01/31/2019
01/31/2019WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED01/31/2019ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
> FILE STAMP: 01/31/2019
02/03/2019WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED02/03/2019PARTY TO BE HELD IN CUSTODY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> NO BOND AS TO THIS CASE ONLY
> PARTY: CHAPMAN, MIKE
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/03/2019
02/04/2019HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 02/06/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
02/05/2019AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/4/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
02/06/2019HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ)
> INITIAL ON VIOLATION OF MCCC
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED02/06/2019HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 02/11/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
02/06/2019ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ ) 02/06/2019INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE02/06/2019HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
> COURT ENTERS DENIAL ON DEFTS BEHALF
> HEARING DATE: 02/06/2019
02/06/2019HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/11/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/11/2019 AT 1:30 PM. REASON: DATA ENTRY ERROR.
02/06/2019ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
> FILE STAMP: 02/06/2019
02/07/2019AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/6/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 2/6/2019 :
HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
02/11/2019HEARING ON VIOLATION (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RUBICK, STEVEN J - MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
02/11/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 02/11/2019
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED02/11/2019HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RUBICK, STEVEN J - MAG )
> DEFT ADMITS ALLEGATIONS AND COURT FINDS THEM TO BE TRUE
02/11/2019HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RUBICK, STEVEN J - MAG )
> DEFT CONT ON MCCC WITH STRICT COMPLIANCE.
02/11/2019REPORT TO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> DEFT TO SELF REPORT BY 2-12-19 AT 10 AM
02/11/2019ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/11/2019
02/11/2019ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
10/02/2019 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 10/02/2019
10/02/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> CORRESPONDENCE: REVIEWED BY COURT
10/03/2019AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 10/2/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
12/09/2019CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> CERTIFICATES
> FILE STAMP: 12/09/2019
12/09/2019CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> 3RD PARTY CORRESPONDENCE
> FILE STAMP: 12/09/2019
12/09/2019ORDER FOR HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RUBICK, STEVEN J - MAG )
> CORRESPONDENCE REQUEST SET FOR HEARING
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/09/2019
12/09/2019HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
12/10/2019AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 12/9/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 12/9/2019 :
HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY ORDER FOR HEARING ---- 12/9/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ----
12/9/2019 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
01/09/2020HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ)
> CORRESPONDENCE REQUEST
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED01/09/2020ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
01/09/2020HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
> DEFT FOUND INDIGENT TO FINES AND COSTS OF MCCC
03/12/2020HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED03/12/2020HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/12/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
03/12/2020HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARRISON, JENNIFER PRINZ )
> DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION OF UPCOMING SURGERY TO MCCC CASE MANAGER. MCCC CASE MANAGER ORDERED TO PLACE DEFENDANTS HD BAND ON THE WRIST.
03/12/2020CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 03/12/2020
03/12/2020ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
03/12/2020ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> CORRESPONDENCE REVIEWED COURT TAKES NO ACTION
03/13/2020AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/12/2020 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 3/12/2020 : HEATHER MARIE DEAN-BARTON;CELESTE HOWARD JAFFE;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
79D01-1104-MF-00032
> CASE TYPE D01-MF
> ACTION: MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE
> CASE STATUS: CLOSED
> STATUS DATE: 04/06/2011
> FILE DATE: 04/06/2011
> CASE JUDGE: WILLIAMS, RANDY J.
> DCM TRACK:
> NEXT EVENT:
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
REGIONS BANK - PLAINTIFF
> ADDRESS / C/O CYNTHIA REESE 2300 ONE AMERICAN SQUAREINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282
> CHAPMAN, JAMES
> ADDRESS / BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP ONE AMERICAN SQUARE STE 2300 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282
> PHONE / (317)632-3232
REESE, CYNTHIA M
> BAR CODE / 0020208
> ADDRESS / ONE AMERICAN SQ STE 2300 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282
> PHONE / (317)632-3232
> LAFAYETTE BANK AND TRUST - DEFENDANT
SCHRIER, JAMES ROBERT
> BAR CODE / 0014113-06
> ADDRESS / RENAISSANCE BLDG 6TH FLR 250 MAIN ST STE 601 PO BOX 280 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / N/A
PORICK, LINDA - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 737 FARMSTEAD COURT FRANKFORT, IL 60423
> ATTORNEY / MEYER, STEVEN PATRICK
> BAR CODE 0010344
> ADDRESS N/A
> PHONE N/A
PORICK, DENNIS - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 737 FARMSTEAD CT FRANKFORT, IL 60423
> ATTORNEY / MEYER, STEVEN PATRICK
> BAR CODE / 0010344
> ADDRESS N/A
> PHONE N/A
NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / % MARK R. SCHARER, REG AGENT 14 N 3RD ST SUITE 200 LAFAYETTE, IN 47901
> ATTORNEY / SEEGER, JAY THOMAS
> BAR CODE 0000105
> ADDRESS / 106 N 9TH ST P.O.BOX 878 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / (765)742-4529
> SCHARER, MARK R - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 4640 S 75 E CUTLER, IN 46920
> ATTORNEY / SEEGER, JAY THOMAS
> BAR CODE / 0000105
> ADDRESS / 106 N 9TH ST P.O.BOX 878 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / (765)742-4529
SCHARER, JILL - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 4737 STATE RD 43 N WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906
> ATTORNEY / SEEGER, JAY THOMAS
> BAR CODE / 0000105
> ADDRESS / 106 N 9TH ST P.O.BOX 878 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE (765)742-4529
LANK, GARY - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 5745 E 850 S OXFORD, IN 47971
> ATTORNEY / SEEGER, JAY THOMAS
> BAR CODE / 0000105
> ADDRESS / 106 N 9TH ST P.O.BOX 878 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / (765)742-4529
LANK, DEWANNA S - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 5745 E 850 S OXFORD, IN 47971
> ATTORNEY / SEEGER, JAY THOMAS
> BAR CODE / 0000105
> ADDRESS / 106 N 9TH ST P.O.BOX 878 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / (765)742-4529
HOLDER, CAROLYN - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS N/A
> C/O HOLDER AND FEHFRENBACH
> 12 NORTH THIRD STREET LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> ALIAS FKA PRICE, CAROLYN
> ATTORNEY HOLDER, CAROLYN S.
> BAR CODE / 0007741-79
> ADDRESS / HOLDER LAW OFFICE PO BOX 757 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE N/A
HOLDER AND FEHRENBACH - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 12 N THIRD ST PO BOX 757 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> ATTORNEY / HOLDER, CAROLYN S.
> BAR CODE / 0007741-79
> ADDRESS / HOLDER LAW OFFICE PO BOX 757 LAFAYETTE, IN 47902
> PHONE / N/A
HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY - DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / C/O NATIONAL REGISTERED AGENTS, INC
> 320 N MERIDIAN STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46024
> ATTORNEY / RICHARDS, SCOTT RIGBY
> BAR CODE / 0019871-49
> ADDRESS / 5120 COMMERCE CIRCLE SU-B INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46237
> PHONE / (317)859-5666
✗ EVENTS
DATE/TIME LOCATION TYPE RESULT EVENT JUDGE
> 06/30/2011 07:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT NO.1 FILE REVIEW WILLIAMS, RANDY J.
> 01/03/2012 10:30 AM SUPERIOR COURT NO.1 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAMS, RANDY J.
> 01/24/2012 07:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT NO.1 FILE REVIEW WILLIAMS, RANDY J.
✗ DOCKET INFORMATION
DATE DOCKET TEXT AMOUNT
> 04/06/2011 CIVIL FILING FEE RECEIPT: 939879 DATE: 04/06/2011 $0.00
> 04/06/2011 MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE FEE RECEIPT: 939879 DATE: 04/06/2011 $0.00
> 04/06/2011 PLAINTIFF FILES COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS
> 04/06/2011 ADDITIONAL PARTY FEE FOR CIVIL CASES RECEIPT: 939879 DATE: 04/06/2011 $0.00
> 04/06/2011 SHERIFF SERVICE FEE RECEIPT: 939879 DATE: 04/06/2011 $0.00
> 04/06/2011 PLEADINGS RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 4/5/2011
> 04/08/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/08/2011 SERVICE: SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: *SIGNATURE MAILER COST PER: $ 0.00 LAFAYETTE BANK AND TRUST ATTN: TONY S ALBRECHT 250 MAIN STREET LAFAYETTE, IN 47901 TRACKING NO: Z001103032 PORICK, LINDA 737
FARMSTEAD COURT FRANKFORT, IL 60423 TRACKING NO: Z001103033 PORICK, DENNIS 737 FARMSTEAD CT FRANKFORT, IL 60423 TRACKING NO: Z001103034 $0.00
> 04/08/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/08/2011 SERVICE: SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT % MARK R. SCHARER, REG AGENT 14 N 3RD ST SUITE 200 LAFAYETTE, IN 47901 TRACKING NO:
T001105508 SCHARER, JILL 4737 STATE RD 43 N WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906 TRACKING NO: T001105509 HOLDER, CAROLYN C/O HOLDER AND FEHFRENBACH 12 NORTH THIRD STREET LAFAYETTE, IN 47902 TRACKING NO: T001105510 HOLDER AND FEHRENBACH ATTN:
CAROLYN HOLDER 12 NORTH THIRD STREET LAFAYETTE, IN 47902 TRACKING NO: T001105511 $0.00
> 04/08/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/08/2011 SERVICE: SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 LANK, GARY 5745 E 850 S OXFORD, IN 47971 TRACKING NO: B001102061 LANK, DEWANNA S 5745 E 850 S OXFORD, IN
47971 TRACKING NO: B001102062 $0.00
> 04/08/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/08/2011 SERVICE: SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 SCHARER, MARK R 4040 S 75 E CUTLER, IN 46920 TRACKING NO: C001101113 $0.00
> 04/12/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/12/2011 RETURN : 04/12/2011 ON : SCHARER, JILL SIGNED BY : REASON :
COPY LEFT / COPY MAILED COMMENT : COPY TO LOCKED GATE TRACKING # : T001105509
> 04/12/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/12/2011 RETURN : 04/12/2011 ON : NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT SIGNED BY :
REASON : COPY LEFT / COPY MAILED COMMENT : COPY TO MAIN DOOR TRACKING # : T001105508
> 04/12/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/12/2011 RETURN : 04/12/2011 ON : HOLDER AND FEHRENBACH SIGNED BY :
REASON : PERSONAL SERVICE ON ANOTHER FOR DEFENDANT COMMENT : COPY TO MARSHA TRACKING # : T001105511
> 04/12/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/12/2011 RETURN : 04/12/2011 ON : HOLDER, CAROLYN SIGNED BY :
REASON : PERSONAL SERVICE ON ANOTHER FOR DEFENDANT COMMENT : COPY TO MARSHA TRACKING # : T001105510
> 04/13/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/11/2011 RETURN : 04/13/2011 ON : LANK, DEWANNA S SIGNED BY :
COPY LEFT/COPY MAILED REASON : SUMMONS SERVED BY SHERIFF COMMENT : TRACKING # : B001102062
> 04/13/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/11/2011 RETURN : 04/13/2011 ON : LANK, GARY SIGNED BY :
COPY LEFT/COPY MAILED REASON : SUMMONS SERVED BY SHERIFF COMMENT : TRACKING # : B001102061
> 04/18/2011 ATTORNEY JAMES R. SCHRIER FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF LAFAYETTE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N/K/A LAFAYETTE BANK & TRUST, A DIVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS BANK NA, ANSWER
WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 04/15/11. BM
> 04/18/2011 SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL METHOD : *SIGNATURE MAILER ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/11/2011 RETURN : 04/18/2011 ON : PORICK, DENNIS SIGNED BY :
D PORICK REASON : CERT. MAIL SERVICE COMMENT : TRACKING # : Z001103034
> 04/18/2011 SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL METHOD : *SIGNATURE MAILER ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/12/2011 RETURN : 04/18/2011 ON : PORICK, LINDA SIGNED BY :
D PORICK REASON : CERT. MAIL SERVICE COMMENT : TRACKING # : Z001103033
> 04/18/2011 SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL METHOD : *SIGNATURE MAILER ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/11/2011 RETURN : 04/18/2011 ON : LAFAYETTE BANK AND TRUST
SIGNED BY : A WORRELL REASON : CERT. MAIL SERVICE COMMENT : TRACKING # : Z001103032
> 04/20/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/08/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : RETURN : 04/20/2011 ON : SCHARER, MARK R SIGNED BY :
NOT FOUND REASON : SUMMONS SERVED BY SHERIFF COMMENT : TRACKING # : C001101113
> 04/27/2011 ATTORNEY JAY T. SEEGER FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT, LLC, MARK R. SCHARER, JILL A. SCHARER, GARY L. LANK, DEWANNA S. LANK, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO ANSWER OF OTHERWISE RESPOND WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. FILE MARKED 04/26/11. BM
> 04/27/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/27/2011 SERVICE: ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 SCHARER, MARK R 4737 STATE ROAD 43 N WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906 TRACKING NO: T001106575 $0.00
> 04/27/2011 ISSUE DATE: 04/27/2011 SERVICE: ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 SCHARER, MARK R 4737 STATE ROAD 43 N WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906 TRACKING NO: T001106576 $0.00
> 04/27/2011 CORRECTING ENTRY TO DOCKET: ALIAS SUMMONS TO BE SENT TO CARROLL COUNTY (4640 S 75 E, CUTLER IN)
> 04/27/2011 ISSUE DATE: SERVICE: ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ 0.00 SCHARER, MARK R 4640 S 75 E CUTLER, IN 46920 TRACKING NO: C001101131 $0.00
> 04/28/2011 ATTORNEY CAROLYN S HOLDER FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF CAROLYN S HOLDER F/N/A CAROLYN S PRICE AND HOLDER AND FEHRENBACH, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPSOED ORDER. FILE MARKED 04/27/11. BM
> 04/29/2011 ATTORNEY STEVEN P. MEYER FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DENNIS B PORICK AND LINDA M PORICK, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. BM
> 05/02/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : *TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/27/2011 SERVICE : ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 04/29/2011 RETURN : 05/04/2011 ON : SCHARER,
MARK R SIGNED BY : REASON : COPY LEFT / COPY MAILED COMMENT : TRACKING # : T001106575
> 05/04/2011 ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO AND INCLUDING MAY 25, 2011 ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
> 05/09/2011 RETURN OF SHERIFF FILED SHOWING SERVICE METHOD : CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF ISSUED : 04/27/2011 SERVICE : ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 05/02/2011 RETURN : 05/09/2011 ON : SCHARER,
MARK R SIGNED BY : COPY LEFT/COPY MAILED REASON : SUMMONS SERVED BY SHERIFF COMMENT : TRACKING # : C001101131
> 05/25/2011 DEFENDANTS, NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT, LLC, MARK R SCHARER, JILL A SCHARER, GARY L LANK AND DEWANNA S LANK,BY COUNSEL, FILES ANSWER TO COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 05/27/2011 DEFENDANTS, DENNIS B PORICK AND LINDA M PORICK, BY COUNSEL, FILE SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. FILE MARKED 05/26/11. BM
> 05/27/2011 DEFENDANT, CAROLYN S PRICE, FILES ANSWER, COUNTERCALIM AND CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVCIE. RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 05/25/11. BM
> 05/31/2011 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS DENNIS B PROICK AND LINDA M. PROICK TO AND INLCULDING JULY 1, 2011 TO ANSWER COMPLAINT. SEE ORDER. COPY TO COUNSEL. GL
> 05/31/2011 DEFENDANT, HOLDER AND FEHRENBACH, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION TO DISMISS WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. FILE MARKED 05/27/11. BM
> 06/08/2011 CROSS-DEFENDANT, LAFAYETTE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N/K/A LAFAYETTE BANK & TRUST, A DIVISION OF FIRST MERCHANTS BANK N.A. ("LBT"), BY COUNSEL, FILES ANSWER TO C
OUNSTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 06/16/2011 PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER-DEFENDANT, REGIONS BANK, BY COUNSEL, FILES REGIONS BANK'S ANSWER TO CAROLYN PRICE'S COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM. RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 06/14/11. BM
> 06/16/2011 SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT, GARNISHMENT RELEASE FILED. BM
> 07/27/2011 DENNIS AND LINDA PORICK, BY COUNSEL, FILES ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND PORICK CROSS-CLAIM BOTH WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 7/26/11.
> 07/27/2011 DEFENDANTS-CROSS CLAIMANTS, BY COUNSEL, FILE PORICK CROSS-CLAIM AND ANSWER TO COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 7-26-11. PB
> 08/03/2011 CAROYLN S PRICE, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SEVICE AND PROPSOED ORDER. FILE MARKED 08/02/11. BM
> 08/12/2011 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
> 08/22/2011 REGIONS BANK, BY COUNSEL, FILES REGION BANK'S ANSWER TO THE PORICK CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 08/22/11, RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 08/18/11. SK
> 08/23/2011 CAROLYN S PRICE BY COUNSEL FILES ANSWER OF CAROLYN S PRICE TO PORICK CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 08/22/11. BM
> 08/29/2011 PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL, FILES REGIONS BANK'S ANSWER TO CAROLYN S. PRICE'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 08/26/2011 - RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATE 08/24/2011.KS
> 08/30/2011 DEFENDANTS, NORTH THIRD STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC, MARK R SCHARER AND GARY W LANK, BY COUNSEL, FILE ANSWER TO AMENED CROSS-CLAIM WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 09/26/2011 PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. BM
> 10/12/2011 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
> 10/13/2011 ADDITIONAL PARTY FEE FOR CIVIL CASES RECEIPT: 976969 DATE: 10/13/2011 $0.00
> 10/13/2011 ISSUE DATE: 10/13/2011 SERVICE: SUMMONS ISSUED METHOD: *SIGNATURE MAILER COST PER: $ 0.00 HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY C/O NATIONAL REGISTERED AGENTS, INC 320 N MERIDIAN STREET
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46024 TRACKING NO: Z001108883 HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY HIGHEST EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOUND 3428 RASCAL DRIVE LAFAYETTE, IN 47909 TRACKING NO: Z001108884 $0.00
> 10/19/2011 SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL METHOD : *SIGNATURE MAILER ISSUED : 10/13/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 10/17/2011 RETURN : 10/19/2011 ON : HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY
COMPANY SIGNED BY : DAN STRONG REASON : CERT. MAIL SERVICE COMMENT : TRACKING #: Z001108884
> 10/20/2011 SERVICE ON DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED MAIL METHOD : *SIGNATURE MAILER ISSUED : 10/13/2011 SERVICE : SUMMONS ISSUED SERVED : 10/17/2011 RETURN : 10/20/2011 ON : HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY
COMPANY SIGNED BY : J. SIPE, NRAI REASON : CERT. MAIL SERVICE COMMENT : TRACKING #: Z001108883
> 10/21/2011 ATTORNEY SCOTT RICHARDS FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY, DEFENDANTS HOME ACRES BUILDING SUPPLY'S, ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 11/16/2011 PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DESIGNATION OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ALONG WITH PROPOSED ORDERS. FILE MARKED NOVEMBER 15, 2011 RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED NOVEMBER 14, 2011. AW
> 11/17/2011 LAFAYETTE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N/K/A LAFAYETTE BANK & TRUST, A DIVISION OF FORST MERCHANTS BANK N.A. FILES RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 11/16/11. BM
> 11/21/2011 THE COURT SETS HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR JANUARY 3, 2012, AT 10:30 AM. COPY TO COUNSEL, UNREPRESENTED PARTIES. RT ---THOMAS K. MILLIGAN, SENIOR
JUDGE EVENT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE: 01/03/2012 TIME: 10:30 AM JUDGE: WILLIAMS, RANDY J LOCATION: SUPERIOR COURT NO.1
> 12/15/2011 DEFENDANTS, DENNIS B PORICK AND LINDA M PORICK, BY COUNSEL, FILE DEFENDANTS PORICK DESIGNATION OF MATERIALS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANTS
PORICK RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JDUGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 12/20/2011 DEFENDANT, COUNTER-CLAIMT AND CROSS-CLAIMANT, CAROLYN S PRICE, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DESIGNATION OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT, COUNTER-SLAIMANT,
AND CROSS-CLAIMANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT, COUNTER-CLAIMANT, AND CROSS-CLAIMANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANT, COUNTER-CLAIMANT,
AND CROSS-CLAIMAMT, CAROLYN S PRICE AKA CAROLYN S HOLDER'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILE MARKED 12/19/11. BM
> 01/03/2012 ATTORNEY JAMES B CHAPMAN FILES APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF REGIONS BANK WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. BM
> 01/03/2012 PARTIES APPEAR BY COUNSEL AND INFORM THE COURT THAT ORDER AS PROVIDED TO IS AGREED TO BY COUNSEL. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
> 01/04/2012 JUDGMENT $6108.50 AS TO ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS $6,108.50
> 02/17/2012 PLAINTIFF, REGIONS BANK, DEFENDANT DENNIS B PORICK AND DEFENDANT LINDA M PORICK, BY COUNSEL, FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND
PROPOSED ORDER. RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 02/16/12. BM
> 02/20/2012 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS ENTERED AS TO DEFENDANT DENNIS B. PORICK AND LINDA PORICK. SEE ORDER. COPY TO COUNSEL. GL
> 02/23/2012 PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL FILES MOTION TO ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. RECEIVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL DATED 02/21/12. BM
> 02/24/2012 FIANL JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE IS ENTERED. JUDGMENT $672,653.53 PLUS INTEREST AND COSTS. SEE ORDER. COPY TO COUNSEL. GL
> 02/24/2012 JUDGMENT FOUND FOR PLAINTIFF : IS TO PAY $672,653.53 PLUS CC FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF $672,952.53 $0.00
> 03/14/2012 PLAINTIFF, BY COUNSEL, FILES PRAECIPE FOR SHERIFF SALE WITH DOCUMENTATION.
> 03/14/2012 SHERIFF SALE ORDER ISSUED; ORDER PREPARATION FEE ORDER FOR SHERIFF'S SALE SENT ON: 03/14/2012 14:56:42.11 $7.00
> 06/08/2012 COUNTER-CLAIMANT/CROSS-CLAIMANT, CAROLYN S PRICE AND DEFENDANTS.CROSS-CLAINMANTS, DENNIS B PORICK AND LINDA M PORICK BY COUNSEL FILES STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PROPOSED ORDER. BM
> 06/11/2012 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
> 06/27/2012 NOTICES WERE POSTED AND SALE WAS ADVERTISED AS COMMANDED BY LAW. SALE WAS CONDUCTED BY SRI INC. ON JUNE 6, 2012. HIGHEST BID IN THE AMOUNT OF $517,748.00 BY PLAINTIFF.
> 06/27/2012 SHERIFF SALE CONDUCTED
> 11/06/2013 JUNE 1, 2012: ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTERED. COPIES PER ORDER. RT
✗ FINANCIAL SUMMARY
> COST TYPE AMOUNT OWED AMOUNT PAID AMOUNT ADJUSTED AMOUNT OUTSTANDING
> $6,414.50 $299.00 $0.00 $6,115.50
> AR PAYMENT $6,108.50 $0.00 $0.00 $6,108.50
> FEES $170.00 $163.00 $0.00 $7.00
> FILING FEE $136.00 $136.00 $0.00 $0.00
✗ MONEY DISTRIBUTED BY COURT
PAYMENT TYPE AMOUNT
> $0.00
> AR PAYMENT $0.00
✗ RECEIPTS
RECEIPT NUMBER RECEIPT DATE RECEIVED FROM PAYMENT AMOUNT
> $299.00
> 939879 04/06/2011 REESE, CYNTHIA M $289.00
> 976969 10/13/2011 REESE, CYNTHIA M $10.00
> CASE DISPOSITION
> DISPOSITION DATE CASE JUDGE
> BENCH DISPOSITION 01/03/2012 WILLIAMS, RANDY J.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G04-1803-F5-009816
> STATE OF INDIANA V. BRANDON ISON
> CASE TYPE: F5 - FELONY 5
> DATE FILED: 03/22/2018
> LOCATION:
> CASE NUMBER HISTORY: 49G02-1803-F5-009816
> POLICE AGENCY NUMBER: DP180022902
> PROSECUTOR CASE MANAGEMENT NUMBER: 49-DM1309201
> PROTECTION ORDER REGISTRY: 673634
> 673635
> 673636
> 673637
> 673638
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> ATTORNEYS / DEFENDANT ISON, BRANDON MALE WHITE
> 5'8", 180 LBS THEODORE J MINCH
RETAINED
> SOVICH MINCH LLP
> 445 NORTH PENNSYLVANIA SUITE 605 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-939-1050(W)DAN THOMAS
RETAINED
> MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY
> 151 N. DELAWARE STREET INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-4100(W)
> 6445 S LINWOOD DRIVE INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46237
STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
> MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> 251 EAST OHIO STREET SUITE 160 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> 317-327-5338(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: ISON, BRANDON STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY 35-43-2-1 FELONY 5 03/04/2018
> 2. 35-43-4-2(A)/F6: THEFT DEF. HAS A PRIOR CONVICTION FOR EITHER THEFT OR CONVERSION. 35-43-4-2(A) FELONY 6 03/04/2018
> 3. 35-43-1-2(A)/MA: CRIMINAL MISCHIEF DAMAGE IS B/T $750 & $50K. 35-43-1-2(A) MISDEMEANOR CLASS A 03/04/2018
> 4. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY 35-43-2-1 FELONY 5 03/04/2018
> 5. 35-43-4-2.5(B)(1)/F6: AUTO THEFT -THEFT OF ENTIRE VEHICLE 35-43-4-2.5(B)(1) FELONY 6 03/04/2018
> 6. 35-43-1-2(A)/MA: CRIMINAL MISCHIEF DAMAGE IS B/T $750 & $50K. 35-43-1-2(A) MISDEMEANOR CLASS A 03/04/2018
> 7. 35-50-2-8(A)/: HABITUAL OFFENDER 35-50-2-8(A) NO STATE CODE 03/04/2018
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
03/22/2018 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
03/22/2018 CASE FILED ELECTRONICALLY
> ADDED BY EFILE MANAGER
03/22/2018 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 MOTION FOR NO CONTACT ORDER FILED
> I>NO CONTACT ORDER MOTION--PUBLIC
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR STAY AWAY ORDER UPON RELEASE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> PC ISON.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> CM ISON.PDF
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> $200,000 SURETY
> PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
03/22/2018 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> STAY AWAY ORDER GRANTED
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NO CONTACT ORDER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: COWGER, DIANE JILL- C )
> SEE STATE'S REGISTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2018
03/22/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
03/23/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/22/2018 : BRANDON ISON
03/23/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/22/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
03/26/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
03/26/2018 COURT SETS BOND
> $200,000 SURETY
> PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
03/26/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/27/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
03/27/2018 INITIAL HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER ROTHENBERG, MARC T)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/27/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/26/2018 : TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
03/27/2018 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
03/27/2018 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
> D. THOMAS
03/27/2018 COURT SETS BOND (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> $100,000 SURETY
> PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR NO CONTACT ORDER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: ROTHENBERG, MARC T )
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 OMNIBUS DATE
6/5/2018
03/27/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/20/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
03/27/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/28/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: HON MARC ROTHENBERG
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 3/27/2018 12:00 AM PERSON SERVED: BRANDON ISON;SERVED BY: DEPUTY; STREET: 200 E. WASHINGTON STREET, RM W-241; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS;
COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 2, CRIMINAL DIVISION (49G02); MANNER: COURT;
> SERVED: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: HON MARC ROTHENBERG
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 3/27/2018 12:00 AM PERSON SERVED: BRANDON ISON;SERVED BY: DEPUTY; STREET: 200 E. WASHINGTON STREET, RM W-241; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS;
COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 2, CRIMINAL DIVISION (49G02); MANNER: COURT;
> SERVED: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: HON MARC ROTHENBERG
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 3/27/2018 12:00 AM PERSON SERVED: BRANDON ISON;SERVED BY: DEPUTY; STREET: 200 E. WASHINGTON STREET, RM W-241; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS;
COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 2, CRIMINAL DIVISION (49G02); MANNER: COURT;
> SERVED: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: HON MARC ROTHENBERG
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 3/27/2018 12:00 AM PERSON SERVED: BRANDON ISON;SERVED BY: DEPUTY; STREET: 200 E. WASHINGTON STREET, RM W-241; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS;
COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 2, CRIMINAL DIVISION (49G02); MANNER: COURT;
> SERVED: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 NO CONTACT ORDER ISSUED
> POR - NO CONTACT ORDER NO CONTACT ORDER - PRETRIAL RELEASE; ISSUED BY: HON MARC ROTHENBERG
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/27/2018
03/27/2018 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED: ORDER OF PROTECTION
> POR - SERVICE PERFECTED: SERVICE DATE: 3/27/2018 12:00 AM PERSON SERVED: BRANDON ISON;SERVED BY: DEPUTY; STREET: 200 E. WASHINGTON STREET, RM W-241; CITY: INDIANAPOLIS;
COUNTY: MARION; AGENCY: MARION SUPERIOR COURT 2, CRIMINAL DIVISION (49G02); MANNER: COURT;
> SERVED: ISON, BRANDON
03/27/2018 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 03/27/2018
03/28/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/27/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 3/27/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
03/28/2018 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET 3/27/18
03/29/2018 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FORM (MAJOR FELONY)
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/29/2018
04/02/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE, INITIAL (MAJOR FELONY)
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/02/2018
04/03/2018 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO REVIEW BOND
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 04/03/2018
04/04/2018 ORDER GRANTING
> HEARING TO REVIEW BOND.
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/04/2018
04/04/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/20/2018 AT 1:00 PM.
04/04/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE, SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/04/2018
04/05/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/4/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS
04/12/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE, SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 04/12/2018
04/19/2018 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUS
> HABITUAL INTENT NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMPED: 04/19/2018
04/20/2018 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/20/2018 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
04/20/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
> BOND REMAINS THE SAME.
04/20/2018 MOTION FOR EARLY TRIAL FILED
> ORALLY
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILED BY: THOMAS, DAN
> FILE STAMP: 04/20/2018
04/20/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EARLY TRIAL (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
> DEADLINE 6/29/2018
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/20/2018
04/20/2018 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET 4/20/2018
05/16/2018 ORDER GRANTING
> COURT GRANTS REQUEST TO MOVE UP TRIAL DATE - SET FOR FAST AND SPEEDY.
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/09/2018
05/16/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/20/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
05/16/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/28/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
05/16/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/06/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
05/16/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/14/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
05/17/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 5/16/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/16/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/16/2018
: DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/16/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/16/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY
;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS
05/29/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE, SUPPLEMENTAL (MAJOR FELONY)
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 05/29/2018
05/31/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE, SUPPLEMENTAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 05/31/2018
05/31/2018 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 05/31/2018
06/06/2018 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/06/2018 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> FILED BY: MINCH, THEODORE J
> FILE STAMP: 06/06/2018
06/06/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/06/2018
06/06/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
> DEFT WITHDRAWS SPEEDY REQUEST
06/06/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 08/08/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
06/06/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/16/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
06/06/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 06/14/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
06/07/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/6/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/6/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/6/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
06/14/2018 CANCELED JURY TRIAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
06/20/2018 CANCELED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
06/28/2018 CANCELED JURY TRIAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
08/08/2018 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/08/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 08/16/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
08/08/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/14/2018 AT 1:00 PM.
08/08/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/14/2018 AT 1:00 PM.
08/08/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/14/2018 AT 1:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
08/08/2018 ORDER FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/08/2018
08/08/2018 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> MINUTE SHEET
08/09/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/8/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/8/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/8/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 8/8/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
08/13/2018 DISCOVERY FILED
> SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/13/2018
08/13/2018 MOTION FILED
> MOTION, FINGERPRINT FOR HABITUAL
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/13/2018
08/13/2018 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUS
> NOTICE OF FILING HABITUAL OFFENDER
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMPED: 08/13/2018
08/13/2018 INFORMATION FILED
> INFORMATION, HABITUAL OFFENDER
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 08/13/2018
08/13/2018 ORDER GRANTING
> MOTION TO FINGERPRINT
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/13/2018
08/14/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 8/13/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
08/16/2018 CANCELED JURY TRIAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
09/13/2018 PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT FILED
> PSI
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 09/13/2018
09/13/2018 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> NOTICE OF EXCLUSION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 09/13/2018
09/14/2018 CANCELED CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
09/14/2018 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> MOTION TO CONTINUE
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2018
09/14/2018 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> MOTION TO CONTINUE
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2018
09/14/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 09/14/2018 AT 1:00 PM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 10/10/2018 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
09/14/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/14/2018
09/15/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/14/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE ---- 9/14/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
10/09/2018 COURT ORDER - OWN MOTION (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BARBAR, AMY J - MAG )
> ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL.
10/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/10/2018 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
10/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
10/09/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/17/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
10/10/2018 CANCELED CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
09/14/2018 RESET BY COURT TO 10/10/2018
10/10/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> COURT ORDER - OWN MOTION ---- 10/9/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/9/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/9/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/9/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
10/30/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
10/30/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/17/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: JUDICIAL ACTION.
10/30/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/10/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
10/30/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/16/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
10/30/2018 ORDER GRANTING
> DUE TO CHANGE IN JUDICAL OFFICER - NEW DATE
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/23/2018
10/31/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/30/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/30/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/30/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/30/2018 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
11/01/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 10/30/2018 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
01/09/2019 CANCELED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BARBAR, AMY J - MAG)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
01/10/2019 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/10/2019 DOCUMENT FILED
> CCA CERTIFICATES
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 01/10/2019
01/10/2019 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> CCA LETTER FROM THIRD PARTY
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 01/10/2019
01/10/2019 DOCUMENT FILED
> CORE CIVIC CERTIFICATES
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 01/10/2019
01/10/2019 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> ACCEPTANCE LETTER FROM PLACE OF POWER
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILE STAMP: 01/10/2019
01/10/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/18/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
01/10/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/16/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
01/11/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 1/10/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED ---- 1/10/2019 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/10/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/10/2019 :
DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
01/16/2019 CANCELED JURY TRIAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> OTHER
01/17/2019 CANCELED JURY TRIAL (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> JUDICIAL ACTION
01/17/2019 PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> PLEA AGREEMENT
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILED STAMP: 01/17/2019
01/18/2019 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICERS FLOWERS, SHATRESE M, SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/18/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/22/2019 AT 1:00 PM.
01/18/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> PARTIES TO CALCULATE CREDIT TIME.
> HEARING DATE: 01/18/2019
01/18/2019 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> ORAL MOTION TO CONTINUE - STATE.
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 01/18/2019
01/18/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> RESET 1/22/19 @1PM. CREDIT TIME
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/18/2019
01/19/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/18/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;STEPHANIE RACHELLE EDWARDS;THEODORE J MINCH
01/22/2019 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (1:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/22/2019 MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
> DISMISSAL, MOTION
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2019
01/22/2019 NOTICE FILED
> WITHDRAW OF APPEARANCE, NOTICE
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2019
01/22/2019 MOTION TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2019
01/22/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> DEF. SWORN, FBT
01/22/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOT. TO ENTER PLEA PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY PURSUANT TO PLEA AGREEMENT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/22/2019
01/22/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> JOC
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/22/2019
01/22/2019
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> 1. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 2. 35-43-4-2(A)/F6: THEFT DEF. HAS A PRIOR CONVICTION FOR EITHER THEFT OR CONVERSION.
> DISMISSED
> 3. 35-43-1-2(A)/MA: CRIMINAL MISCHIEF DAMAGE IS B/T $750 & $50K.
> DISMISSED
> 4. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 5. 35-43-4-2.5(B)(1)/F6: AUTO THEFT -THEFT OF ENTIRE VEHICLE
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 6. 35-43-1-2(A)/MA: CRIMINAL MISCHIEF DAMAGE IS B/T $750 & $50K.
> DISMISSED
01/22/2019
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C)
> 1. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY
> COMMENT (SET TERM PLEA)
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/23/2019
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> TERM:6 YR
> JAIL CREDIT: 0 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> CONCURRENT WITH PRIOR SENTENCE: 49G021803F6008301, COUNT 4 & 5
> CONSECUTIVE WITH PRIOR SENTENCE: 49G021505F4015350,49G021504F5014109,49G021802F6006833
> COMMENT: SET TERM PLEA EXECUTED TIME TO BE ON MCCC HD W/ GPS COUNT 1 IS ENHANCED BY 2 Y FOR HABITUAL OFFENDER DEFENDANT HAS NO CREDIT AS TO THIS CASE, PARTIES AGREE.
NO CONTACT W/ BRAD ROSE, RICHARD ANDERSON, MICHAEL CHAPMAN, SCOTT FEHRMAN, LINDA HEAP, AND LUIS DE LA ROSARUIZ
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. ELECTRONIC MONITORING, 01/22/2019, ACTIVE 01/22/2019
> 2. HOME DETENTION, EXECUTED TIME TO BE ON MCCC HD W/ GPS 01/22/2019, ACTIVE 01/22/2019
> 4. 35-43-2-1/F5:BURGLARY
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/23/2019
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> TERM:4 YR
> CONCURRENT WITH PRIOR SENTENCE: COUNT 1 & 5
> 5. 35-43-4-2.5(B)(1)/F6: AUTO THEFT -THEFT OF ENTIRE VEHICLE
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/23/2019
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> TERM:1 YR
> CONCURRENT WITH PRIOR SENTENCE: COUNTS 1 & 4
01/22/2019 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY TO BE HELD FOR OTHER AGENCY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: SNYDER, JAMES KEVIN - C )
> MCCC HOME DETENTION W/ GPS
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/22/2019
01/23/2019 PLEA AGREEMENT FILED
> PLEA AGREEMENT
> FILED BY: ISON, BRANDON
> FILED STAMP: 01/23/2019
01/23/2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
> COUNTS 2,6,3
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/23/2019
01/24/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/22/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH SENTENCED ---- 1/22/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS ---- 1/23/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
04/29/2019 VIOLATION FILED
> VIOLATION - ISON
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 04/29/2019
04/29/2019 ORDER ISSUING WARRANT FOR ARREST (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> VIOLATION OF MCCC; WARRANT ISSUED; NO BOND
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/29/2019
04/29/2019 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
04/30/2019 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
04/30/2019 PARTY TO BE HELD IN CUSTODY
> AS TO THIS CASE, NO BOND
> PARTY: ISON, BRANDON
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/30/2019
04/30/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 05/02/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
04/30/2019 VIOLATION FILED
> AMENDED NOTICE OF VIOLATION - ISON
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 04/30/2019
04/30/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> VIOLATION OF MCCC; COURT NOTES THAT A HEARING HAS ALREADY BEEN SET
> ORDER SIGNED: 04/30/2019
05/01/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 4/30/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/30/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
05/02/2019 HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLOWERS, SHATRESE M)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/02/2019 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION
> AMENDED NOTICE OF VIOLATION - ISON
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 05/02/2019
05/02/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> VIOLATION OF PROBATION; COURT NOTES THAT A HEARING HAS ALREADY BEEN SET FOR 05/02/2019 AT 9:00 AM
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/02/2019
05/02/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> DEF. SWORN IN; PD AGENCY APPOINTED; DEF. HAS A NEW G04 CASE AND A NEW G14 CASE; THE COURT TRANSFER'S THIS MATTER TO G04 TO CONSOLIDATE WITH 49G04-1904-F5-016549
> HEARING DATE: 05/02/2019
05/02/2019 TRANSFER CASE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> G04
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/02/2019
05/02/2019 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLOWERS, SHATRESE M )
> JOC - VIOLATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/02/2019
05/02/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 05/03/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
05/03/2019 HEARING ON VIOLATION (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/03/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 5/2/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH ORDER ISSUED ---- 5/2/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/2/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
05/03/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 06/26/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
05/03/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG )
> DEPUTY PROSECUTOR SAMMONS DEFENDANT IN PERSON IN CUSTODY AND SWORN AND BY COUNSEL PURYEAR
> HEARING DATE: 05/03/2019
05/03/2019 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/03/2019
05/03/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG )
> TRACKING 49G04-1904-F5-016549 DEFENDANT WAIVES FORMAL READING OF CHARGES, POSSIBLE PENALTIES AND RIGHTS
> HEARING DATE: 05/03/2019
05/04/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 5/3/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
05/06/2019 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (TCN)
06/03/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 06/26/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/27/2019 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
06/04/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/3/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
06/27/2019 HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BORGES, LISA F)
> TRACKING 49G04-1904-F5-016549
> PARTIES PRESENT
06/26/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 06/27/2019
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/27/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> STATE BY SKELTON FOR SAMMONS. DEFENDANT IN PERSON, IN CUSTODY, BY COUNSEL, DIEHL.
06/27/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> TRACKING 49G04-1904-F5-016549.
06/27/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 09/05/2019 AT 9:00 AM.
06/28/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 6/27/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
09/04/2019 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> CONTINUED TO TRACK WITH 49G04-1904-F5-016549
> FILE STAMP: 09/04/2019
09/04/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 09/05/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 10/17/2019 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
09/05/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/4/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
09/30/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 10/17/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 10/24/2019 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
10/01/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 9/30/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
10/23/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 10/24/2019 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 01/30/2020 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
10/24/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 10/23/2019 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
01/30/2020 HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG)
> TRACKING 49G04-1904-F5-016549
> PARTIES PRESENT
09/05/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 10/17/2019
10/17/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 10/24/2019
10/24/2019 RESET BY COURT TO 01/30/2020
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/30/2020 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG )
> STATE BY ACKER. DEFENDANT BY DIEHL. DEFENDANT IN CUSTODY AND SWORN.
> HEARING DATE: 01/30/2020
01/30/2020 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FLANNELLY, ANNE -MAG )
> STATE ORALLY MOVES TO WITHDRAW ALLEGATION #11; GRANTED.
> HEARING DATE: 01/30/2020
01/30/2020 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON VIOLATION SCHEDULED FOR 02/21/2020 AT 9:00 AM.
01/31/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY ---- 1/30/2020 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
02/21/2020 HEARING ON VIOLATION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER BORGES, LISA F)
> MCCC
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/21/2020 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> STATE BY SKELTON. DEFENDANT BY DIEHL. DEFENDANT IN CUSTODY AND SWORN. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS BY BECK.
> HEARING DATE: 02/21/2020
02/21/2020 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> DEFENDANT ADMITS VIOLATION AS TO ALLEGATIONS #1, 10, 11. ALLEGATIONS #2-9 WITHDRAWN. COURT FINDS DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION. DEFENDANT PLACED ON STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS. ADDED CONDITION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE EVALUATION AND TREATMENT ADDED.
> HEARING DATE: 02/21/2020
02/21/2020 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> AGREED ENTRY ON COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS VIOLATION.
> HEARING DATE: 02/21/2020
02/21/2020 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> ORDER FOR JAIL COMMITMENT-SANCTION. DEFENDANT IS SANCTIONED BY THE COURT AND ORDERED TO SERVE 397 DAYS IN THE MARION COUNTY JAIL.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS TO SERVE THIS COMMITMENT IN THE MARION COUNTY JAIL FROM 4-29-2019 TO 2-20-2020. ACCRUED DAYS: 298 DAYS GOOD TIME CREDIT: 39 DAYS. DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD FOR MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS.
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/21/2020
02/21/2020 ORDER TO RELEASE FROM CUSTODY TO BE HELD FOR OTHER AGENCY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/21/2020
02/25/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 2/21/2020 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
03/02/2020 VIOLATION FILED
> CCV
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 03/02/2020
03/03/2020 ORDER ISSUING WARRANT FOR ARREST (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> NO BOND
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/02/2020
03/03/2020 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
03/11/2020 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> INTER OFFICE MEMO
> FILED BY: MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
> FILE STAMP: 03/11/2020
03/11/2020 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: BORGES, LISA F )
> ORDER ON COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS MEMORANDUM. DEFENDANT IS DECEASED; COURT FINDS CAUSE NUMBER SHOULD BE CLOSED AND WARRANT RECALLED.
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/11/2020
03/11/2020 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON RECALLED
03/12/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/11/2020 : DAN THOMAS;TERRY RAYMOND CURRY;THEODORE J MINCH
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 53C03-1302-FC-000188
> STATE OF INDIANA V. MICHAEL KEVIN WEBB
> CASE TYPE: FC - CLASS C FELONY
> DATE FILED: 02/26/2013
> LOCATION: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT 3
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
> RELATED CASES
> 53C04-0603-DR-00194 (OTHER)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> ATTORNEYS
> DEFENDANT WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN MALE WHITE
> 5'0", 185 LBS PRO SE
> C/O PLAINFIELD CORR FACILITY DOC #124264
> 727 MOON ROAD
> PLAINFIELD, IN 46168
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA AMY M. COLGAN
> MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM
> 214 WEST 7TH ST. SUITE 110 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> 812-349-2087(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 35-46-1-5(A)/FC: NONSUPPORT OF DEPENDENT CHILD 35-46-1-5(A) FELONY C 01/01/2009
✗ BONDS
> MONROE CORPORATE SURETY BOND $2,000
> 08/27/2013 SURETY BOND RECEIVED BY CLERK
> COUNTS:1
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
02/26/2013 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
02/26/2013 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> APPROVED INFORMATION FILED AND PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WARRANT HAS BEEN FOUND BY THE HONORABLE MARY ELLEN DIEKHOFF, A DISINTERESTED AND NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE.
> WARRANT IS NOW ORDERED ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA FOR ARREST OF THE DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT'S BOND IS $20,697.40. CASH BOND ONLY.
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/26/2013
02/26/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
08/22/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
08/23/2013 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
08/23/2013 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/23/2013 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: VAN WINKLE, DOUGLAS E - SJ )
> INITIAL HEARING HELD, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RIGHTS AND AFFIRMATION OF ATTENDANCE TENDERED. DEFENDANT ENTERS PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. BAIL REMAINS SET AT $20,697.40 CASH.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/23/2013
08/23/2013 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
08/23/2013 OMNIBUS DATE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> OMNIBUS DATE SET ON OCTOBER 17, 2013.
08/26/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/23/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
08/26/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/10/2013 AT 9:30 AM.
08/26/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/27/2013 AT 9:00 AM.
08/26/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/23/2013
> VOL./BOOK 314
08/27/2013 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/27/2013 SURETY BOND ENTERED IN CLERK'S OFFICE
08/27/2013 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> JASON B. MEREDITH, APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT THE DEFENDANT'S BAIL BE MODIFIED TO $2,000.00 SURETY ONLY. BAIL REVIEW ORDER ISSUED.
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> PRESENT: WELCH, WILLIAM F
08/30/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/27/2013
> VOL./BOOK 314
09/09/2013 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED. MTB
> FOR PARTY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ATTORNEY: KROTHE, KARA E.
> FILE STAMP: 08/30/2013
09/10/2013 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
09/10/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DISCUSSION HELD, CAUSE RESET ON 10/08/13 AT 9:30 AM.
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
09/10/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 10/08/2013 AT 9:30 AM.
10/08/2013 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
10/08/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DISCUSSION HELD. CAUSE SET FOR FURTHER PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE DECEMBER 10, 2013 AT 9:15 A.M. NOTICE ISSUED IN OPEN COURT.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
10/08/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 12/10/2013 AT 9:15 AM.
12/10/2013 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
12/10/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. WARRANT ISSUED; HOLD NO BOND.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
12/10/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
01/14/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
01/15/2014 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
01/15/2014 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/15/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/15/2014 AT 1:30 PM.
01/15/2014 ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY. COURT SETS PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON MARCH 11, 2014 AT 9:30 A.M. DEFENDANT REMAINS HELD WITHOUT BAIL. CRCD2-14-C02 TKS
> PARTY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/15/2014
01/16/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/11/2014 AT 9:30 AM.
01/16/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/21/2014 AT 9:00 AM.
01/21/2014 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER TODD, KENNETH G) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/21/2014 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TODD, KENNETH G )
> STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY WILLIAM WELCH. DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, AMY PAYNE. BAIL HEARING HELD. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT BE RELEASED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF PROBATION IN THIS CASE AND IN THE LAWRENCE COUNTY CASE.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> PRESENT: WELCH, WILLIAM F
01/22/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/21/2014
> VOL./BOOK 321
01/22/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/21/2014
> VOL./BOOK 319
03/11/2014 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
03/11/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENSE COUNSEL REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE. THE COURT GRANTS OVER STATE'S OBJECTION. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE RESET TO APRIL 8, 2014 AT 11:15 A.M.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
03/11/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/08/2014 AT 11:15 AM.
04/08/2014 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (11:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
04/08/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. WARRANT ISSUED; HOLD NO BOND.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
04/08/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
04/28/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
04/28/2014 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> WARRANT SERVED APRIL 26, 2014. FILE FORWARDED TO DUTY COURT FOR BAIL REVIEW HEARING ON MAY 1, 2014 AT 9:00 A.M. MTB
04/28/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/01/2014 AT 9:00 AM.
05/01/2014 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/01/2014 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PARTIES APPEAR, HEARING HELD. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS TO BE RELEASED ON HIS OWN RECOGNIZANCE. NOTICE TO DEFENDANT FOR PRETRIAL HEARING SET ON MAY 13, 2014 AT 11:30 A.M. BEFORE COMMISSIONER RAPER. NOTICE OF HEARING ISSUED.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
05/01/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/13/2014 AT 11:30 AM.
05/07/2014 TRANSPORT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/07/2014
05/13/2014 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (11:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/13/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DISCUSSION HELD. PRE-PLEA PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION SET JUNE 3, 2014 AT 9:00 A.M. TRANSPORT ORDER ISSUED. CHANGE OF PLEA/SENTENCING HEARING SET JULY 25, 2014 AT 8:30 A.M. TRANSPORT ORDER ISSUED.
HEARING TO BE HELD IN THE JUSTICE BUILDING. REQUEST FOR COURTROOM FILED WITH COURT SERVICES THIS DATE.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
05/13/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/25/2014 AT 8:30 AM.
07/23/2014 PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT FILED
> FILE STAMP: 07/22/2014
07/25/2014 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> AND SENTENCING IN JUSTICE BUILDING. DEFENDANT BEING TRANSPORTED IN FROM LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL.
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/25/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
07/25/2014
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C)
> 1. 35-46-1-5(A)/FC: NONSUPPORT OF DEPENDENT CHILD
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
07/25/2014
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C)
> 1. 35-46-1-5(A)/FC: NONSUPPORT OF DEPENDENT CHILD
> COMMENT (DEFENDANT APPEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE CO. SHERIFF. NEGOTIATED PLEA AGREEMENT TENDERED AND ACCEPTED. ORDER OF CHANGE OF PLEA, SENTENCING, PROBATION AND COMMITMENT ISSUED.
DEFENDANT PLEADS GUILTY TO NON SUPPORT OF A DEPENDANT CHILD, A CLASS C FELONY. COURT COSTS OF $168.00, $150.00 PD FEE, $25.00 IPUF/ $30.00 SUPERVISED PUF/ $15.00 UNSUPERVISED.)
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENSION, PER PLEA AGREEMENT. SHALL REMAIN SUSPENDED 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> 2. NO FIREARMS, 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> 3. NOTIFY CHANGE OF ADDRESS, 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> 4. PROBATION, MONROE COUNTY PROBATION PER PLEA AGREEMENT (CONTINGENT ON START DATE AS DEFENDANT HAS EXECUTED TIME OUT OF LAWRENCE CO.) 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> 5. ROAD CREW, 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> 6. SUPPORT DEPENDENTS, $89.60 PER WEEK FOR CURRENT SUPPORT (UNDER THE CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION). ARREARAGE PAYMENT TO BE DETERMINED AFTER RELEASE FROM INCARCERATION. 07/25/2014, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 07/25/2014
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM:7 YR
> JAIL CREDIT: 21 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 5 YR
> COMMENT: 47D021312FD0001572 IS CONSECUTIVE TO THIS CAUSE. (CREDIT TIME 42, 21 REAL DAYS),
07/25/2014 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT SENT TO DOC
07/28/2014 JUDGMENT DOCKET BOOK
> SURETY BOND RELEASED FROM CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET THIS DATE.
> VOL./BOOK 2014, PAGE 0728
07/29/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/25/2014
> VOL./BOOK 325
02/23/2016 CASE REOPENED
02/23/2016 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. WARRANT REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 02/23/2016
02/29/2016 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TODD, KENNETH G )
> VIOLATION OF PROBATION. WARRANT ISSUED. HOLD WITHOUT BAIL. / KJH
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/29/2016
02/29/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
03/01/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/29/2016
> VOL./BOOK 344
03/21/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
03/22/2016 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
03/22/2016 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/22/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
03/22/2016 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> DEFENDANT DENIES THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE PETITION TO REVOKE. DEFENDANT REMAINS HELD WITHOUT BAIL.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2016
03/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/28/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
03/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/04/2016 AT 11:00 AM.
03/23/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/22/2016
> VOL./BOOK 345
03/28/2016 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/28/2016 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS. COURT NOW ORDERS THAT DEFENDANTS BAIL REMAIN UNCHANGED WITH A HOLD.
04/04/2016 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: RESET
04/04/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/24/2016 AT 9:45 AM.
04/04/2016 RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> [CR301/C02]
04/04/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS AND WAIVES EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON TODAY'S DATE. THIS MATTER IS RESET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAY 24, 2016 AT 9:45 A.M. BEFORE COMMISSIONER RAPER'S COURT. / KJH
> HEARING DATE: 04/04/2016
05/24/2016 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (9:45 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> NON-SUPPORT
> RESULT: RESET
05/24/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON. DISCUSSION HELD. MATTER IS RESET TO AUGUST 9, 2016 AT 9:15 AM. NOTICE ISSUED IN OPEN COURT.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 05/24/2016
05/24/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/09/2016 AT 9:15 AM.
06/27/2016 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. WARRANT REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/22/2016
06/27/2016 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND.
> MOVANT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/27/2016
> VOL./BOOK Y
06/27/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
08/09/2016 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (9:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C) RESULT: RESET
08/09/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. THE COURT NOTES THAT THE DEFENDANT IS CURRENTLY WANTED ON WARRANT ISSUED UNDER THIS CAUSE ON JUNE 27, 2016. WARRANT REMAINS ACTIVE. HEARING TO BE SET ONCE DEFENDANT IS APPREHENDED.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 08/09/2016
08/18/2016 FIRST CLASS MAIL RETURNED
> CCS DATED 8/9/16 RETURNED MARKED NO MAIL RECEPTACLE
> PARTY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 08/18/2016
11/26/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
11/28/2016 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
11/28/2016 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/28/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/28/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
11/28/2016 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> DEFENDANT DENIES THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE. DEFENDANT REMAINS HELD WITHOUT BAIL.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/28/2016
11/28/2016 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
11/28/2016 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
11/29/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/12/2016 AT 11:00 AM.
11/29/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/02/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
12/02/2016 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/02/2016 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> BAIL IS UNCHANGED. DEFENDANT REMAINS HELD WITHOUT BOND. EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET DECEMBER 12, 2016 IS WAIVED BY DEFENDANT AND RESET ON JANUARY 10, 2017 AT 11:00 A.M. BEFORE COMMISSIONER RAPER.
12/02/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 12/12/2016 AT 11:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 01/10/2017 AT 11:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
12/07/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 12/01/2016
01/10/2017 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
12/12/2016 RESET BY COURT TO 01/10/2017
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/10/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS BY VIDEO CONFERENCE IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL APPEARS IN PERSON. WITNESS SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN. CAUSE IS SET FOR A DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ON APRIL 11,
2017 AT 10:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED IN OPEN COURT AND ON THE RECORD. ENTRY ON PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE HEARING ISSUED. ORDER OF RELEASE ISSUED. COPY TO PARTIES. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 01/10/2017
01/10/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/11/2017 AT 10:30 AM.
01/11/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 1/10/2017 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE
03/31/2017 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> PROBATION FILES MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANT'S PLACEMENT. ALN
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 03/30/2017
03/31/2017 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> ORDER GRANTING PLACEMENT ISSUED. COPY TO PARTIES. BY THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SET FOR APRIL 11, 2017 AT 10:30 AM. IS RESCHEDULED TO MAY 9, 2017 AT 11:15 AM. NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES. ALN
> MOVANT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/31/2017
03/31/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 04/11/2017 AT 10:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/09/2017 AT 11:15 AM. REASON: BY AGREEMENT OF PARTIES.
04/01/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING ---- 3/31/2017 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE
05/09/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> PTR: 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR: 6/22/16; ADMITS (1,6,8) ON 1/10/17
04/11/2017 CONTINUED TO 05/09/2017 - BY AGREEMENT OF PARTIES - MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> RESULT: CONTINUED
05/09/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL. DISCUSSION HELD. BY AGREEMENT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, AMY COLGAN-CLARK, DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE, AND MONROE COUNTY PROBATION, JILL BARNETT, PARTIES
REQUEST THAT THE DEFENDANT NO LONGER BE IN REQUIRED PLACEMENT WITHIN THE PROGRESS HOUSE IN INDIANAPOLIS. THE COURT GRANTS REQUEST AND SHOWS THE RECORD TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OUT OF THE PROGRESS HOUSE (NO FORMAL ORDER ISSUED). ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 05/09/2017
05/09/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/08/2017 AT 10:00 AM.
05/10/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 5/9/2017 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE
08/08/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> PTR 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR 6/22/16; ADMITS (1, 6, 8) ON 1/10/17
> RESULT: RESET
08/08/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL. DISCUSSION HELD. MATTER IS RESET TO NOVEMBER 14, 2017 AT 10:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED IN OPEN COURT. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 08/08/2017
08/08/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/14/2017 AT 10:30 AM.
08/09/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 8/8/2017 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE
11/09/2017 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, FILES MEMORANDUM. COPY TO PARTIES. ALN
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 11/08/2017
11/09/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COPY OF MEMORANDUM FORWARDED TO PARTIES.
11/14/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (10:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> PTR 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR 6/22/16; ADMITS (1, 6, 8) ON 1/10/17
> RESULT: RESET
11/14/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL CALLS THE COURT WHILE STUCK IN ANOTHER COURT WITH A SCHEDULING CONFLICT. PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON. DISCUSSION HELD.
MATTER IS RESET TO FEBRUARY 13, 2018 AT 10:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED. ALN >PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 11/14/2017
11/14/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/13/2018 AT 10:00 AM.
11/15/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 11/14/2017 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
12/13/2017 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> MEMORANDUM
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 12/13/2017
12/13/2017 MOTION FOR WARRANT FILED
> WARRANT
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 12/13/2017
12/13/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED
> PROBABLE CAUSE ORDER
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 12/13/2017
12/13/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. PROBABLE CAUSE ORDER ISSUED. DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. ALN
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/13/2017
12/14/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
01/11/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
01/11/2018 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
01/11/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/11/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
01/11/2018 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> WARRANT SERVED. DEFENDANT TO APPEAR FOR HEARING THIS DATE. DEFENDANT IS HELD WITHOUT BOND. MTB
01/17/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET JANUARY 23, 2018 AT 10:15 A.M. DEFENDANT REMAINS HELD WITHOUT BOND.
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
01/17/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/23/2018 AT 10:15 AM.
01/18/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 1/17/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
01/23/2018 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (10:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> DEFENDANT IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL
> RESULT: RESET
01/23/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE. DEFENDANT IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. MONROE COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
DISCUSSION HELD. MATTER REMAINS SET FOR DISPOSITIONAL HEARING/STATUS CONFERENCE ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018 AT 10:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 01/23/2018
01/23/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> ORDER OF RELEASE ISSUED. COPY SENT TO MONROE COUNTY JAIL. ALN
> SERVED: KROTHE, KARA E.
> SERVED: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> SERVED: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/23/2018
01/24/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 1/23/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/23/2018 : KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
02/13/2018 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> PTR FILED 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR FILED 6/22/16; ADMITS 1, 6, 8
> RESULT: RESET
02/13/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT DOES NOT APPEAR BUT WAS NOT REQUIRED. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL APPEARS IN PERSON. MONROE COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER APPEARS BY JILL BARNETT. DICUSSION HELD. MATTER IS SET FOR STATUS CONFERENCE ON MAY 15, 2018 AT 9:00 AM. NOTICE ISSUED. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 02/13/2018
02/13/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/15/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
02/14/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 2/13/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
04/02/2018 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> MONROE COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, FILES MEMORANDUM. ALN
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 04/02/2018
05/11/2018 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF FILED
> MONROE COUNTY PROBATION FILES MEMORANDUM. WARRANT REQUESTED. ALN
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/11/2018
05/11/2018 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. PROBABLE CAUSE ORDER ISSUED. DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. ALN
> MOVANT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/11/2018
05/11/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
05/12/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED ---- 5/11/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
05/15/2018 STATUS CONFERENCE (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> ACTIVE WARRANT
> RESULT: RESET
05/15/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE, APPEARS IN PERSON. MONROE COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS IN PERSON BY AMY CLARK. DEFENDANT HAS AN ACTIVE WARRANT UNDER THIS CAUSE OF ACTION ON MAY 11, 2018 (HOLD WITHOUT BOND). WARRANT REMAINS ACTIVE FOR DEFENDANT. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> NOT PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 05/15/2018
05/16/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 5/15/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
05/31/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
06/01/2018 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
06/01/2018 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER LAHN, AMELIA K - PT) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/01/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/01/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
06/01/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: LAHN, AMELIA K - PT )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. MATTER IS SET FOR BAIL REVIEW (BEFORE DUTY COURT) ON JUNE 7, 2018 AT 9:00 AM.
MATTER IS SET FOR DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (BEFORE COMMISSIONER RAPER) ON JULY 10, 2018 AT 11:15 AM. HOLD REMAINS. DEFENDANT REMANDED BACK INTO THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. ALN
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 06/01/2018
06/04/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/07/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
06/04/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/10/2018 AT 11:15 AM.
06/07/2018 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER CHAPMAN, RONALD - PT) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/07/2018 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHAPMAN, RONALD - PT )
> DEFENDANT WAIVES BAIL REVIEW. THAT DEFENDANT'S BAIL REMAINS UNCHANGED WITH A HOLD NO BOND. HEARING REMAINS SET WITH COMMISSIONER RAPER ON JULY 10, 2018 AT 11:15 AM. PRO TEM, RONALD CHAPMAN. ALN
07/03/2018 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES MOTION TO CONTINUE. ALN
> FILED BY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 07/03/2018
07/03/2018 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> STATE OF INDIANA DOES NOT OBJECT. ORDER ISSUED. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO JULY 17, 2018 AT 11:15 AM. E-NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES. ALN
> SERVED: KROTHE, KARA E.
> SERVED: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> SERVED: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/03/2018
07/03/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 07/10/2018 AT 11:15 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 07/17/2018 AT 11:15 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
07/04/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE ---- 7/3/2018 : KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
07/17/2018 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL - COURTROOM 205 - 2/23/16 PTR; 6/22/16 1ST AMENDED PTR; ADMITS (1,6,8) ON 1/10/17
07/10/2018 CONTINUED TO 07/17/2018 - BY REQUEST - WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> RESULT: RESET
07/17/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY AMY CLARK. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON IN CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF. PUBLIC DEFENDER, KARA KROTHE, APPEARS IN PERSON. PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
DISCUSSION HELD. UPON AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THE DISPOSITIONAL HEARING IS RESET TO SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 AT 11:00 A.M. HEARING WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE JUSTICE BUILDING. REQUEST FOR EXTRA COURTROOM SENT TO COURT SERVICES.
DEFENDANT REMANDED BACK INTO THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF. WMC
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
07/17/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/11/2018 AT 11:00 AM.
07/18/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 7/17/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
09/11/2018 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> HEARING IN JUSTICE BUILDING - COURTROOM 205 - 2/23/16 PTR; 6/22/16 1ST AMENDED PTR; ADMITS (1,6,8) ON 1/10/17
> RESULT: RESET
09/11/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT DOES NOT APPEAR. DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE, APPEARS IN PERSON. MONROE COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, AMY CLARK. COURT ATTEMPTED TO HAVE DEFENDANT APPEAR IN PERSON FROM THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL BUT WAS CANCELED AFTER AGREED RESET.
DISCUSSION HELD. MATTER IS RESET TO OCTOBER 23, 2018 AT 11:30 AM. NOTICE ISSUED TO COUNSEL IN OPEN COURT. DEFENDANT REMAINS IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. BAIL REMAINS UNCHANGED. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> HEARING DATE: 09/11/2018
09/11/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/23/2018 AT 11:30 AM.
09/12/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 9/11/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/23/2018 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> JUSTICE BUILDING COURTROOM: TBD - PTR 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR 6/22/16; ADMITS (1,6,8) ON 1/10/17
> RESULT: CONTINUED
10/23/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. DISCUSSION HELD. HEARING CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 31, 2018 AT 9:00 IN THE JUSTICE BUILDING. REQUEST FOR EXTRA COURTROOM SENT TO COURT SERVICES.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 10/23/2018
10/23/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/31/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
10/24/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 10/23/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/31/2018 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> IN JUSTICE BUILDING
> RESULT: CONTINUED
10/31/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR MONROE COUNTY PROBATION. DISCUSSION HELD. HEARING CONTINUED TO JANUARY 15, 2019 AT 11:30 AM.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 10/31/2018
10/31/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/15/2019 AT 11:30 AM.
11/01/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 10/31/2018 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
01/15/2019 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> JUSTICE BUILDING COURTROOM: TBD - PTR 2/23/16; 1ST AMENDED PTR 6/22/16; ADMITS (1,6,8) ON 1/10/17
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/15/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL WITH COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE, IN PERSON. PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, AMY CLARK. DISCUSSION HELD. ON JANUARY 10, 2017, DEFENDANT ENTERED AN ADMISSION TO ALLEGATIONS ONE (1), SIX (6), AND EIGHT (8) ON THE FIRST
AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED ON JUNE 22, 2016.
THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 640 DAYS (320 REAL) OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED AND SERVED IN THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION WITH GOOD TIME CREDIT OF 610 DAYS (305 REAL).
DEFENDANT HAS 30 DAYS (15 REAL) LEFT TO SERVE IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL WITH AN ANTICIPATED RELEASE DATE OF JANUARY 30, 2019 AT 8:00 AM. THAT DEFENDANT TO BE RESTORED TO PROBATION, WITH THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF PROBATION UNCHANGED,
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED: THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION BE EXTENDED (FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR) (UNTIL 05/11/2021). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DEFENDANT MEET WITH HIS PROBATION OFFICER, JILL
BARNETT, ON JANUARY 30, 2019 IMMEDIATELY UPON RELEASE.
ORDER OF DISPOSITION ORDER OF COMMITMENT VIOLATION OF PROBATION AND OTHER PETITIONS AFTER DETERMINATION OF GUILT, ISSUED. COPIES DISTRIBUTED IN OPEN COURT. ALN
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 01/15/2019
01/15/2019
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C) REASON: REVOCATION OF PROBATION
> 1. 35-46-1-5(A)/FC: NONSUPPORT OF DEPENDENT CHILD
> COMMENT ()
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. PROBATION, MONROE COUNTY PROBATION 07/25/2014 - 05/11/2021, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/15/2019
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM: 640 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 305 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> COMMENT: DEFENDANT SERVING REMAINING TIME IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. DEFENDANT'S ANTICIPATED RELEASE DATE IS JANUARY 30, 2019 AT 8:00 AM. ALN
01/16/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 1/15/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
01/17/2019 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT SENT TO DOC
> DATE SIGNED: 01/17/2019
01/18/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 1/15/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
03/21/2019 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (TCN)
03/22/2019 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
07/31/2019 CASE REOPENED
07/31/2019 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED BY PROBATION.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 07/31/2019
07/31/2019 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 9
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 07/31/2019
08/01/2019 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TALLEY HASEMAN, CHRISTINE )
> THE COURT FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE DEFENDANT'S ARREST ON THE MATTER OF VIOLATION OF PROBATION. WARRANT ISSUED. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BAIL.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/01/2019
> VOL./BOOK Y
08/01/2019 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
08/02/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/1/2019 : MICHAEL KEVIN WEBB
08/02/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED ---- 8/1/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/10/2019 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
10/11/2019 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN ARRESTED ON THE ACTIVE WARRANT AND INCARCERATED IN THE MONROE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.
DEFENDANT TO BE BROUGHT INTO OPEN COURT FOR AN INITIAL HEARING ON THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE WITH 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 AT 1:30 P.M. BEFORE THE CRIMINAL DUTY JUDGE.
10/11/2019 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER FAWCETT, DARCIE L.) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/11/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/11/2019 AT 1:30 PM.
10/11/2019 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FAWCETT, DARCIE L. )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF. AN INITIAL HEARING IS HELD ON THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. A DENIAL IS ENTERED AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS APPOINTED. THIS CAUSE IS NOW SET FOR AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON OCTOBER 22, 2019 AT 10:45 AM. DEFENDANT REMAINS IN CUSTODY WITH A HOLD. KMS.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/11/2019
10/11/2019 ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS CONDUCTED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: FAWCETT, DARCIE L. )
10/11/2019 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
10/11/2019 JAIL COURT STATUS SHEET FILED
10/14/2019 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/22/2019 AT 10:45 AM.
10/15/2019 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING ---- 10/11/2019 : MICHAEL KEVIN WEBB
10/15/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING ---- 10/11/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/17/2019 APPEARANCE FILED
> KARA E. KROTHE FILES AN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL WEBB.
> FOR PARTY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 10/17/2019
10/17/2019 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED
> DEFENDANT, BY COUNSEL, FILES A REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY.
> FILED BY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 10/17/2019
10/22/2019 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (10:45 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RAPER, BRET D - C)
> PTR FILED 7/31/19 - DEFENDANT IN JAIL /HEARING TO BE HELD IN JUSTICE BUILDING - COURTROOM 205
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/22/2019 WRITTEN ADVISEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED
> ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RIGHTS: PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE OR OTHER PETITION AFTER DETERMINATION OF GUILT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS PROVIDED IN OPEN COURT. ALN
> FILED BY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 10/22/2019
10/22/2019 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C )
> ON OCTOBER 22, 2019, DEFENDANT, MICHAEL WEBB, APPEARS IN PERSON IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL WITH COUNSEL, KARA KROTHE. PROBATION OFFICER, JILL BARNETT, APPEARS IN PERSON.
> STATE OF INDIANA APPEARS BY DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, AMY CLARK. WITNESS SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN. ON OCTOBER 22, 2019, DEFENDANT WITHDRAWS A PREVIOUS DENIAL TO THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE AND ENTERS AN ADMISSION
TO ALLEGATIONS ONE (1), THREE (3), SIX (6), AND SEVEN (7) ON THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED ON JULY 31, 2019. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 730 DAYS (365 REAL/ACTUAL) OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED AND
SERVED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION WITH GOOD TIME CREDIT OF 24 DAYS (12 REAL/ACTUAL). THE DEFENDANT BE DISCHARGED FROM PROBATION, UNSUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED.
> ALL REMAINING COURT COSTS, FINES AND FEES ASSESSED AT SENTENCING AND ALL PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FEES INCURRED SINCE SENTENCING SHALL BE REDUCED TO JUDGMENT AS FOLLOWS: COURT COSTS $138.00; PUBLIC DEFENDER $150.00; PUF
$1744.00; UDS $231.00; AND DAY REPORTING $51.00. DEFENDANT REMANDED BACK INTO CUSTODY OF THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. ORDER OF DISPOSITION ORDER OF COMMITMENT VIOLATION OF PROBATION AND OTHER PETITIONS AFTER DETERMINATION OF GUILT, ISSUED. ALN
> PRESENT: COLGAN, AMY M.
> PRESENT: KROTHE, KARA E.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> PRESENT: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> HEARING DATE: 10/22/2019
10/22/2019
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: RAPER, BRET D - C) REASON: REVOCATION OF PROBATION
> 1. 35-46-1-5(A)/FC: NONSUPPORT OF DEPENDENT CHILD
> COMMENT ()
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. PROBATION, MONROE COUNTY PROBATION 07/25/2014 - 10/22/2019, ACTIVE 07/25/2014
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 10/22/2019
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM: 730 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 12 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> COMMENT: SENTENCED TO 730 DAYS (365 REAL/ACTUAL) - CREDIT TIME OF 24 DAYS (12 REAL/ACTUAL)
10/23/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 10/22/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/23/2019 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT SENT TO DOC
10/23/2019 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
10/24/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 10/22/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
10/25/2019 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 10/22/2019 : AMY M. COLGAN;KARA E. KROTHE;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
04/08/2020 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> DEFENDANT FILES PRO SE CORRESPONDENCE. THE COURT DENIES REQUEST. NOTICE ISSUED TO DEFENDANT BY USPS FIRST CLASS MAIL.
> FILED BY: WEBB, MICHAEL KEVIN
> FILE STAMP: 04/08/2020
05/12/2020 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC ACCESS FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/12/2020
05/12/2020 NOTICE OF COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY FILED
> COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM SCREENING FILED.
> DOC: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/12/2020
05/19/2020 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TALLEY HASEMAN, CHRISTINE )
> JUDICIAL REVIEW ISSUED. COURT DENIES CTP.
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/19/2020
05/19/2020 ORDER DENYING PLACEMENT IN COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TALLEY HASEMAN, CHRISTINE )
> FINDINGS AND ORDER REJECTING COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM ISSUED.
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/19/2020
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 5/19/2020 : MICHAEL KEVIN WEBB ORDER DENYING PLACEMENT IN COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM ---- 5/19/2020 : MICHAEL KEVIN WEBB
05/20/2020 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 5/19/2020 : AMY M. COLGAN ORDER DENYING PLACEMENT IN COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM ---- 5/19/2020 : AMY M. COLGAN
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE L
2012 CV0699 BANK OF AMERICA N A VS. HUNTER, TERRILYN ET AL ARM
> CASE TYPE:
> CIVIL
> CASE STATUS:
> CLOSED
> FILE DATE:
09/24/2012
> ACTION:
> FORECLOSURE
> STATUS DATE:
09/24/2012
> CASE JUDGE:
> MAYBERRY, ALAN R
> PARTY INFORMATION
> BANK OF AMERICA N A
PLAINTIFF
> ADDRESS / 7105 CORPORATE DRIVE, MAILSTOP PTX-C-35 PLANO, TX 75024
> BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING
> FKA
> COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING
PARTY ATTORNEY
> STEELMAN, JULIA E
> BAR CODE / 82778
> ADDRESS / LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS P.O. BOX 5480 CINCINNATI, OH 45201
> PHONE (513)241-3100
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION
> HUNTER, TERRILYN
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION
> HUNTER, JERRY D
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION
> WOOD COUNTY TREASURER
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402
> ATTORNEY / DOBSON, PAUL A
> BAR CODE / 64126
> ADDRESS / ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402
> PHONE / (419)354-9250
> ATTORNEY MACK, MARY L
> BAR CODE 47132
> ADDRESS / HONORABLE PERRYSBURG MUNICIPAL COURT 300 WALNUT STREET PERRYSBURG, OH 43551
> PHONE / (419)872-7900
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / C/O OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL REVENUE RECOVERY 150 E GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
> CHAPMAN, JOSEPH
> BAR CODE /72326
> ADDRESS / 150 EAST GAY STR. 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
> PHONE / (614)466-8671
> ATTORNEY / DEWINE, MIKE
> BAR CODE / 9181
> ADDRESS / 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215
> PHONE / (614)466-8671
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 5996 W TOUHY AVENUE NILES, IL 60714
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / C/O ATTORNEY GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONSTITUTION & 10TH STREET NW, ROOM 5111 WASHINGTON, DC 20530
> ATTORNEY / SYDLOW, HOLLY TAFT
> BAR CODE / 1122
> ADDRESS / FOUR SEAGATE SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604
> PHONE (419)259-6376
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / C/O U.S. ATTORNEY (TOL) FOUR SEAGATE, SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604
> ATTORNEY / SYDLOW, HOLLY TAFT
> BAR CODE / 1122
> ADDRESS / FOUR SEAGATE SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604
> PHONE / (419)259-6376
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC.
DEFENDANT
> ADDRESS / 1901 E VOORHEES STREET, SUITE C DANVILLE, IL 61834
> MORE PARTY INFORMATION / WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
SERVICE PARTY
> ADDRESS / 1960 E. GYPSY LANE ROAD BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402
> ATTN: PHYLLIS
✗ DOCKET INFORMATION
09/24/2012 DEPOSIT PAID BY DEPOSIT RECEIVED ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS RECEIPT: 153571 DATE: 09/24/2012
09/24/2012 CIVIL FILING FEE CIVIL FILING FEE RECEIPT: 153571 DATE: 09/24/2012
09/24/2012 BASIC HANDLING FEE BASIC HANDLING FEE RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
09/24/2012 CASE DESIGNATION FORM CASE DESIGNATION FORM (2:13) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND DISMISSED CASE #2012CV0106, JUDGE MAYBERRY IMAGE
09/24/2012 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT IN FORECLOSURE WITH PRAECIPE AND WRITTEN REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE UPON THE DEFENDANTS BY CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE AND EXHIBIT A: FIXED/ADJUSTABLE RATE NOTE; EXHIBIT B: MORTGAGE; EXHIBIT
C: ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE; EXHIBIT D: CERTIFICATE OF MERGER; EXHIBIT E: CERTIFICATE OF FILING; EXHIBIT F: NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN; EXHIBIT G: NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN (2:13) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
09/26/2012 WRIT ISSUED-SUMMONS WRIT ISSUED-SUMMONS RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
09/26/2012 CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED ISSUE DATE: 09/26/2012 SERVICE: SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED METHOD: NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL COST PER: $ 7.20 HUNTER, TERRILYN 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006478
HUNTER, JERRY D 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006479 WOOD COUNTY TREASURER ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006480 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O
OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL REVENUE RECOVERY 150 E GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006481 ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES C/O CT CORPORATION SYSTEM, STATUTORY AGENT 1300 E. 9TH STREET, SUITE 1010 CLEVELAND
, OH 44114 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006482 ***TWO COPIES SERVED ON THOSE BELOW*** UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O ATTORNEY GENERAL U.S. DEPTARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONSTITUTION & 10TH STREET NW, ROOM 5111 WASHINGTON, DC 20530 TRACKING
NO: N000000000000006483 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O U.S. ATTORNEY (TOL) FOUR SEAGATE, SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006484 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 1901 E VOORHEES STREET, SUITE C DANVILLE,
IL 61834 TRACKING NO: N000000000000006485 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
10/02/2012 PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT AND EXHIBIT A: PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT (1:58) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
10/02/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 09/28/2012 RETURN : 10/02/2012 ON : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SIGNED BY : REASON :
SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : SIGNED BY DIANE (LAST NAME ILLEGIBLE) 11:24 TRACKING #: N000000000000006484 IMAGE
10/02/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 09/28/2012 RETURN : 10/02/2012 ON : WOOD COUNTY TREASURER SIGNED BY : STAMPED VENUS
ROBINSON REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : (11:24) TRACKING #: N000000000000006480 IMAGE
10/04/2012 ANSWER ANSWER OF DEFENDANT JILL ENGLE, TREASURER OF WOOD COUNTY, OHIO WITH CERTIFICATION (2:15) ATTORNEY: MACK, MARY L (47132) IMAGE
10/09/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 10/01/2012 RETURN : 10/09/2012 ON : MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC.
SIGNED BY : PAMELA J RAY (9:57) REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : TRACKING #: N000000000000006485 IMAGE
10/09/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 10/01/2012 RETURN : 10/09/2012 ON : STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION SIGNED BY
: JOHN ANDERSON REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : (9:57) TRACKING #: N000000000000006481 IMAGE
10/09/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 10/01/2012 RETURN : 10/09/2012 ON : ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES SIGNED BY : ROBERT
EMERY REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : (9:57) TRACKING #: N000000000000006482 IMAGE
10/09/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : 10/02/2012 RETURN : 10/09/2012 ON : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SIGNED BY :
SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : (9:57) TRACKING #: N000000000000006483 IMAGE
10/11/2012 CORRESPONDENCE FROM CORRESPONDENCE FROM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN REGARDS TO CASE (1:56) ATTORNEY: SYDLOW, HOLLY TAFT (1122) IMAGE
10/11/2012 ANSWER ANSWER OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE INCLUDED. (1:56) ATTORNEY: SYDLOW, HOLLY TAFT (1122) IMAGE
10/24/2012 PRAECIPE INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE UPON ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES (3:28) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
10/30/2012 WRIT ISSUED-ALIAS SUMMONS WRIT ISSUED-ALIAS SUMMONS RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
10/30/2012 CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED ISSUE DATE: 10/30/2012 SERVICE: ALIAS SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT METHOD: NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL COST PER: $ 7.40 ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES 5996 W TOUHY AVENUE NILES, IL 60714 TRACKING NO: N000000000000007116
RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
11/02/2012 SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : RETURN : 11/02/2012 ON : HUNTER, TERRILYN SIGNED BY : REASON :
UNSUCCESSFUL COMMENT : RETURN TO SENDER, UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD, RETURN TO SENDER (3:14) TRACKING #: N000000000000006478 IMAGE
11/05/2012 NOTICE/SERVICE FAILED RETURN RECEIPT OF SERVICE ON SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED TO TERRILYN HUNTER. FORWARDED NOTICE OF FAILURE TO ATTY. JULIA E STEELMAN ON 11/5/12. FAILURE OF SERVICE NOTIFICATION REQUESTER
NOTIFIED TRACKING NUMBER: N000000000000006478 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
11/06/2012 SIGNATURE CARD CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN CARD FOR SERVICE ISSUED TO HUNTER, TERRILYN RETURNED, SIGNED FOR BY VENUS ROBINSON, CENTRAL SERVICES FOR THE WOOD COUNTY OFFICE; CONTINUE TO REVIEW THE DOCKET FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM OF CERTIFIED MAIL. (2:39) IMAGE
11/09/2012 SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 09/26/2012 SERVICE : SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT ISSUED SERVED : RETURN : 11/09/2012 ON : HUNTER, JERRY D SIGNED BY : REASON :
UNSUCCESSFUL COMMENT : RETURN TO SENDER, UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD, RETURN TO SENDER (12:56) TRACKING #: N000000000000006479 IMAGE
11/13/2012 NOTICE/SERVICE FAILED RETURN RECEIPT OF SERVICE ON INFORMATION SENT TO JERRY D HUNTER RETURNED FORWARDED NOTICE OF FAILURE TO ATTY. JULIA E. STEELMAN ON 11/13/12 FAILURE OF SERVICE NOTIFICATION REQUESTER
NOTIFIED TRACKING NUMBER: N000000000000006479 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
11/13/2012 SUCCESSFUL SERVICE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE METHOD : NEOPOST CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED : 10/30/2012 SERVICE : ALIAS SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT SERVED : 11/07/2012 RETURN : 11/13/2012 ON : ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES SIGNED
BY : SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE (9:08) REASON : SUCCESSFUL COMMENT : TRACKING #: N000000000000007116 IMAGE
12/03/2012 PRAECIPE INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE UPON TERRILYN HUNTER AND JERRY D HUNTER BY ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE (2:06) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
12/03/2012 PRAECIPE INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE UPON TERRILYN HUNTER AND JERRY D HUNTER BY ORDINARY MAIL SERVICE (2:06) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
12/06/2012 WRIT ISSUED-ALIAS SUMMONS WRIT ISSUED-ALIAS SUMMONS RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
12/06/2012 POSTAGE ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2012 SERVICE: ALIAS SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT METHOD: SERVICE BY ORDINARY MAIL W/CERT. OF MAILING COST PER: $ 3.80 HUNTER, TERRILYN 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO:
O000003900 HUNTER, JERRY D 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: O000003901 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
12/07/2012 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TO RECEIPT FOR CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TO JERRY D HUNTER, DATE STAMPED AT POST OFFICE ON 12/6/2012 (10:27) IMAGE
12/07/2012 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TO RECEIPT FOR CERTIFICATE OF MAILING TO TERRYILYN HUNTER, DATE STAMPED AT POST OFFICE ON 12/6/12 (10:27) IMAGE
01/08/2013 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION AS TO MILITARY STATUS SIGNED BY JULIA E STEELMAN ALONG WITH MILITARY STATUS REPORTS (2:09) IMAGE
01/17/2013 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION AS TO MILITARY STATUS SIGNED BY JULIA E STEELMAN ALONG WITH MILITARY STATUS REPORTS (12:34) IMAGE
01/18/2013 ANSWER ANSWER OF STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION WITH EXHIBIT A: CLERK LIEN INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (2:53) ATTORNEY: CHAPMAN, JOSEPH (72326) IMAGE
01/25/2013 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (1:03) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
01/25/2013 FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT FINAL JUDICIAL REPORT (1:04) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
01/25/2013 AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT AS TO NON-EXISTENCE OF MINORITY OR INCOMPETENT STATUS SIGNED BY JULIA E STEELMAN (1:04) IMAGE
01/25/2013 AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT SUPPORTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT SIGNED BY LOUIS JOSEPH PRONIO WITH ACCOUNT INFORMATION STATEMENT (1:04) IMAGE
02/20/2013 ORDER MOTION FOR JUDGMENT GRANTED; LANDS FORECLOSED, LIENS MARSHALLED AND ORDER OF SALE TO BE ISSUED. JUDGMENT FOR COURT COSTS RENDERED TO WOOD COUNTY. (10:07) RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
02/26/2013 POSTAGE ISSUE DATE: 02/26/2013 SERVICE: MAILED COPIES OF J.E. JOURNALIZED 2/20/13 METHOD: REGULAR U.S. MAIL COST PER: $ 0.66 BANK OF AMERICA N A C/O ATTY: STEELMAN, JULIA E ***SASE*** LERNER, SAMPSON &
ROTHFUSS P.O. BOX 5480 CINCINNATI, OH 45201 TRACKING NO: R000254147 HUNTER, TERRILYN 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: R000254148 HUNTER, JERRY D 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: R000254149
WOOD COUNTY TREASURER C/O ATTY: DOBSON, PAUL A ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402 TRACKING NO: R000254150 WOOD COUNTY TREASURER C/O ATTY: MACK, MARY L ASST. WOOD CO. PROS. 1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE BOWLING GREEN,
OH 43402 TRACKING NO: R000254151 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O ATTY: DEWINE, MIKE 150 EAST GAY STREET, 21ST FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215 TRACKING NO: R000254152 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O ATTY:
CHAPMAN, JOSEPH 150 E GAY STREET 21ST FL COLUMBUS, OH 43215 TRACKING NO: R000254153 ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES 5996 W TOUHY AVENUE NILES, IL 60714 TRACKING NO: R000254154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O ATTY: SYDLOW, HOLLY
TAFT FOUR SEAGATE SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604 TRACKING NO: R000254155 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 1901 E VOORHEES STREET, SUITE C DANVILLE, IL 61834 TRACKING NO: R000254156 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
02/26/2013 COPIES COPIES OF J.E. JOURNALIZED 2/20/13 RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
03/12/2013 DEPOSIT FOR ORDER OF SALE DEPOSIT FOR ORDER OF SALE PAID BY LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF. ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) RECEIPT: 162185 DATE: 03/12/2013
03/12/2013 PRAECIPE PRAECIPE FOR ORDER OF SALE; LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION APPROVAL FORM ATTACHED. (2:47) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
03/15/2013 WRITS - CALCULATED AND FEES ATTACHED WRITS - CALCULATED AND FEES ATTACHED RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
03/15/2013 PERSONAL SERVICE ISSUED ISSUE DATE: 03/15/2013 SERVICE: ORDER OF SALE ISSUED METHOD: SHERIFF/PERSONAL PROVIDER: WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF COST PER: $ HUNTER, TERRILYN 440 EAST 2ND STREET PERRYSBURG, OH 43551 TRACKING NO: S000020942
03/15/2013 WRIT ATTACHED - ORDER OF SALE WRIT ATTACHED - ORDER OF SALE ORDER OF SALE SENT ON: 03/15/2013 09:45:03.91 IMAGE
04/04/2013 LAND APPRAISEMENT LAND APPRAISEMENT $177,000.00. (3:37) IMAGE
04/26/2013 NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE SCHEDULED FOR (DATE) @ 10:00 A.M. WITH CERTIFICATION NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE SCHEDULED FOR MAY 16, 2013 @ 10:00 A.M. WITH CERTIFICATION. (3:17) ATTORNEY: STEELMAN, JULIA E (82778) IMAGE
05/22/2013 PROPERTY SOLD AT SHERIFF'S SALE PROPERTY SOLD AT SHERIFF'S SALE METHOD : SHERIFF/PERSONAL ISSUED : 03/15/2013 SERVICE : ORDER OF SALE ISSUED SERVED : 05/16/2013 RETURN : 05/22/2013 ON : HUNTER, TERRILYN SIGNED
BY : REASON : PROPERTY SOLD COMMENT : PROPERTY SOLD TO: MARY REAMS & GARY SCOTT THOMPSON FOR $190,000.00 (2:21) TRACKING #: S000020942
05/22/2013 WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S FEES FOR RETURN OF SERVICE OF ORDER OF SALE RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 IMAGE
05/22/2013 PRINTER FEE PRINTER FEE RECEIPT: 166249 DATE: 05/24/2013
05/22/2013 APPRAISER FEES FOR APPRAISER FEES FOR PAUL SARGENT, MELISSA S. SARGENT, AND GREGG J. SNYDER RECEIPT: 166250 DATE: 05/24/2013
05/22/2013 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION: LAST DATE OF PUBLICATION CERTIFICATE OF PUBLICATION: LAST DATE OF PUBLICATION - APRIL 25, 2013 (2:21) IMAGE
05/22/2013 INVOICE FROM PRINTER INVOICE FROM PRINTER #44848; $150.99 DUE IMAGE
05/24/2013 PAYMENT TO PAYMENT TO PAUL SARGENT
05/24/2013 PAYMENT TO PAYMENT TO MELISSA SARGENT
05/24/2013 PAYMENT TO PAYMENT TO GREGG SNYDER
05/24/2013 PAYMENT TO PAYMENT TO GREGG SNYDER
05/28/2013 001.0003.401200 CLERK FEE ACCT. 001.0003.401200 CLERK FEE ACCT. RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
05/28/2013 779.0550.400000 CLERK COMPUTERIZATION ACCT. 779.0550.400000 CLERK COMPUTERIZATION ACCT. RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
05/28/2013 DEPOSIT PAID BY DEPOSIT FOR RECORDER FEES, LIENS AND TO REFUND PLTF DEPOSIT RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
05/28/2013 COST BILL COST BILL IMAGE
06/14/2013 001.0003.401200 CLERK FEE ACCT. 001.0003.401200 CLERK FEE ACCT. (FOR AMENDED REQUEST FOR COSTS) RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
06/14/2013 779.0550.400000 CLERK COMPUTERIZATION ACCT. 779.0550.400000 CLERK COMPUTERIZATION ACCT. (FOR AMENDED COST REQUEST) RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013
06/14/2013 DEPOSIT PAID BY DEPOSIT FOR ADDITONAL TWO RELEASES MINUS $5.00 FOR ONE LESS CLERK LIEN RELEASE RECEIPT: 172104 DATE: 09/19/2013 RECEIPT: 172181 DATE: 09/20/2013 RECEIPT: 172183 DATE: RECEIPT: 172185 DATE:
RECEIPT: 172187 DATE: RECEIPT: 172189 DATE: RECEIPT: 172191 DATE:
06/14/2013 COST BILL AMENDED COST BILL AND STATEMENT OF COST IMAGE
08/01/2013 COST BILL AMENDED COST BILL IMAGE
08/08/2013 ORDER SALE CONFIRMED, DEED AND DISTRIBUTION ORDERED. (FILE STAMPED 8/8/13 @ 8:52) IMAGE
08/13/2013 POSTAGE ISSUE DATE: 08/13/2013 SERVICE: MAILED COPIES OF J.E. JOURNALIZED 8/13/13 METHOD: REGULAR U.S. MAIL COST PER: $ 0.46 BANK OF AMERICA N A C/O ATTY: STEELMAN, JULIA E LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS P.O.
BOX 5480 CINCINNATI, OH 45201 TRACKING NO: R000269968 HUNTER, TERRILYN 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: R000269969 HUNTER, TERRILYN 440 EAST 2ND STREET PERRYSBURG, OH 43551 TRACKING NO: R000269970 HUNTER,
JERRY D 140 LAKENGREN DRIVE EATON, OH 45320 TRACKING NO: R000269971 WOOD COUNTY TREASURER C/O ATTY: MACK, MARY L ASST. WOOD CO. PROS. WOOD COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE ONE COURTHOUSE SQUARE - 4TH FLOOR BOWLING GREEN, OH
43402 TRACKING NO: R000269972 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION C/O ATTY: CHAPMAN, JOSEPH 150 E GAY STREET 21ST FL COLUMBUS, OH 43215 TRACKING NO: R000269973 ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES 5996 W TOUHY AVENUE NILES, IL 60714
TRACKING NO: R000269974 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O ATTY: SYDLOW, HOLLY TAFT FOUR SEAGATE SUITE 308 TOLEDO, OH 43604 TRACKING NO: R000269975 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 1901 E VOORHEES STREET, SUITE C
DANVILLE, IL 61834 TRACKING NO: R000269976 WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE ATTN: PHYLLIS 1960 E. GYPSY LANE ROAD BOWLING GREEN, OH 43402 TRACKING NO: R000269977
08/13/2013 COPIES COPIES OF JE JOURNALIZED 8/13/13
08/26/2013 SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE UNSUCCESSFUL METHOD : REGULAR U.S. MAIL ISSUED : 08/13/2013 SERVICE : MAILED COPIES OF J.E. SERVED : RETURN : 08/26/2013 ON : ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES SIGNED BY : REASON : UNSUCCESSFUL COMMENT
: FORWARD TIME EXP - PO BOX 6180, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206 (12:57) TRACKING #: R000269974 IMAGE
09/20/2013 REFUND OF DEPOSIT REFUND OF DEPOSIT LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS
09/20/2013 RELEASES SENT TO WOOD COUNTY RECORDER SIX RELEASE(S) SENT TO WOOD COUNTY RECORDER FOR PROCESSING.
09/20/2013 INFORMATION COURT COSTS PAID WITH SALE PROCEEDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,789.27.
09/26/2013 RECORDER'S RETURN OF RELEASE RECORDER'S RETURN OF RELEASE (6). 12:24 IMAGE
✗ CHECK INFORMATION
> CREATED PAYEE NAME DESCRIPTION CHECK AMOUNT
05/24/2013 MELISSA SARGENT CASE: 2012CV0699 PAYMENT TO MELISSA SARGENT 43675 $75.00
05/24/2013 GREGG SNYDER CASE: 2012CV0699 PAYMENT TO GREGG SNYDER 43667 $75.00
05/24/2013 PAUL SARGENT CASE: 2012CV0699 PAYMENT TO PAUL SARGENT 43679 $75.00
09/20/2013 LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS CASE: 2012CV0699 REFUND OF DEPOSIT LERNER SAMPSON 44992 $955.00
09/20/2013 THE WOOD COUNTY RECORDER CASE: 2012CV0699 SIX RELEASE(S) SENT TO WOOD COUN 45002 $192.00
✗ RECEIPTS
> RECEIPT NUMBER RECEIPT DATE RECEIVED FROM PAYMENT AMOUNT
> TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
> $5,090.26
153571 09/24/2012 LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS $230.00
162185 03/12/2013 LERNER SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS $725.00
166249 05/24/2013 DEPOSIT APPLY $150.99
166250 05/24/2013 DEPOSIT APPLY $225.00
172104 09/19/2013 WOOD COUNTY AUD/SH $3,789.27
172181 09/20/2013 TRANSFER TO 08TL1106 -$5.00
172183 TRANS TO 09TL1838 -$5.00
172185 TRANS TO 09TL1839 -$5.00
172187 TRANS TO 10JL593 -$5.00
172189 TRANS TO 11TL1299 -$5.00
172191 TRANS TO 11TL1505 -$5.00
✗ CASE DISPOSITION
> DISPOSITION DATE CASE JUDGE
> (A12) GUILTY/NO CNTST-ORIG. CHRG(CR / DEFAULT (CV) 02/20/2013 MAYBERRY, ALAN R
> ADDITIONAL FIELDS
YEAR JUDGMENT WAS GRANTED 2013 TERM OF THE COURT FIRST
> PROPERTY ADDRESS / 440 E 2ND STREET PERRYSBURG OH 43551
> PARCEL NUMBER / Q61-000-901107002000
✗ United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
> No. 02-1845
> Vernon Brown
> Appellant Appeal from the United States
> District Court for the v. Eastern District of Missouri.
> Allen D. Luebbers / Appellee.
> Submitted: April 14, 2004
> Filed: June 15, 2004 (Corrected June 17, 2004)
> Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges, En Banc.
✗ BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In 1991, a jury convicted Vernon Brown in Missouri state court for the 1985
strangulation death of Synetta Ford. He was sentenced to death. His consolidated
direct appeal and post-conviction challenges in the Missouri Supreme Court were
unavailing. State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 (Mo.) (en banc), cert. denied, 528 U.S.
979 (1999). His 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition in the District Court1 raising thirty-one
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
grounds for relief was denied, but the court granted a certificate of appealability on
eleven grounds. A panel of this Court affirmed the District Court in part but granted
the writ on one of Brown's claims challenging his sentence. Brown v. Luebbers, 344
F.3d 770 (8th Cir. 2003).
Both Brown and Allen D. Luebbers (representing the State) filed petitions for
rehearing with suggestions for rehearing en banc. We requested from Brown a
supplemental response addressing the appropriate standard of review to apply to the
issue upon which the writ had been granted. After receiving the response, the panel
denied both petitions for rehearing. The Court en banc rejected Brown's suggestions
for reconsideration by the full Court but granted an en banc rehearing to the State.
The claim in question concerns a letter that Brown's defense counsel sought to
have read into evidence during the penalty phase of Brown's trial for the Ford murder.
Counsel represented to the trial court that the letter was from Darius Q. Turner,
Brown's younger brother, and had been sent to Brown's counsel in the public
defender's office. According to the letter, Turner, a sergeant in the United States
Army, was deployed in Saudi Arabia in Operation Desert Shield at the time of
Brown's sentencing. As a result, he was unable to be present in the courtroom to
testify. In the letter, Turner noted the love and understanding between him and his
brother and recounted how Brown had protected Turner from bigger boys when
Turner was a child. As for their relationship as adults, Turner expressed regret for not
staying in touch and told his brother that the telephone calls and letters from Brown
meant more to him than those he received from others. Finally, he implored those
who might read the letter to let God's law decide Brown's fate. The trial court
excluded the letter as hearsay.
We now affirm the District Court's denial of relief on all grounds. In doing so,
we adopt the holdings and reasoning of the panel opinion, except for Part VIII and
the result.
-2-
Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act (AEDPA) in 1996, a decision by a state court "with respect to any claim
that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings" is entitled to deference
by the federal courts. 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). That is, we look only to see if such
adjudication "resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable
application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court
of the United States" or "resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable
determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court
proceeding." Id. 2254(d)(1), (2). AEDPA effected a move toward greater
deference in the 2254 courts' review of state-court decisions. See Lindh v. Murphy,
521 U.S. 320 , 333 n.7 (1997) (noting " 2254(d)'s new, highly deferential standard
for evaluating state-court rulings").
But as the language of the statute makes clear, there is a condition precedent
that must be satisfied before we can apply the deferential AEDPA standard to
Brown's claim. The claim must have been "adjudicated on the merits" in state court.
The majority (and the dissent, for that matter) in the panel opinion for the Court
concluded that Brown's constitutional claim regarding the Turner letter had not, in
fact, been adjudicated on the merits in state court.2 So the first question for us to
This is what the Missouri Supreme Court said in deciding Brown's claim of
state-law error as well as his claim that the exclusion of the letter violated his rights
under the Due Process Clause:
Brown contends that the trial court abused its discretion in the penalty
phase when it refused to allow his counsel to read into evidence a letter
about him that was written by his brother, Darius Turner. Turner was
stationed in Saudi Arabia during the Operation Desert Shield as a
member of the United States Army at the time of trial. The state
objected to the introduction of the letter because the letter is
-3-
consider is: what constitutes an adjudication on the merits? From the plain language
of the statute and black-letter law, we know that the state court's decision must be a
judgmentan adjudicationon a substantive issuethe merits (as compared with
a procedural or technical point). A survey of opinions from our sister circuits
demonstrates that, beyond these two considerations, resolving the question is not so
easy. One thing is clearno court has established bright-line rules about how much
a state court must say or the language it must use to compel a 2254 court's
conclusion that the state court has adjudicated a claim on the merits. That is as it
should be, given one court's difficulty in divining the thought processes of another
based only on language being used in certain ways, not to mention the comity issues
that would be raised. Cf. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 , 739 (1991) (noting
in discussion of procedural default in state habeas cases that the Court has "no power
to tell state courts how they must write their opinions" so that reviewing "federal
courts might not be bothered with reviewing state aw and the record in the case").
We must simply look at what a state court has said, case by case, and determine
whether the federal constitutional claim was considered and rejected by that court.
After careful reflection upon the adjudication issue in this case, we now
conclude that Brown's constitutional claim was indeed adjudicated on the merits in
state court, on two independent grounds, and that the AEDPA 2254(d) standard of
review should apply.
inadmissible hearsay that was unreliable. Brown alleges that the letter
should have been read into evidence pursuant to State v. Phillips and
Green v. Georgia. The determination of reliability is left to the trial
court judge who was uncertain as to the authenticity of the letter. We
uphold his ruling and note that even if he was wrong about the letter's
reliability, its exclusion does not in the context of this case seem
prejudicial.
State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 54950 (Mo.) (en banc) (citations omitted), cert.
denied, 528 U.S. 979 (1999).
-4-
In Brown's consolidated appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court, at the very least,
acknowledged that a federal constitutional claim was before it when it said, "Brown
alleges that the letter should have been read into evidence pursuant to State v.
Phillips, 940 S.W.2d 512 , 51718 (Mo. banc 1997), and Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S.
95 (1979)" (per curiam). Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549 . Phillips, a Missouri death
penalty case, concerned a Brady3 issue raised in the petitioner's consolidated appeal.
The State had argued that the Brady issue was of no consequence because the
statement in question was hearsay and would not have been admitted into evidence
even if it had been disclosed. The Phillips court, in the pages cited by the Missouri
Supreme Court in Brown, analyzed the question under Green and concluded that the
testimony was highly relevant and reliable, and it should have been admitted.
In Green, also a capital case, the hearsay at issue was the testimony of a witness
given at the trial of Carzell Moore, who was indicted on the same charges of murder
and rape as Green, the petitioner. Moore and Green were tried separately. The
witness testified in Moore's trial, the first to be held, that Moore, Green's alleged
partner in crime, had confessed to him, the witness. According to the testimony,
Green was not present when the victim was murdered. The testimony was excluded
from Green's later trial as hearsay. The Supreme Court did not second-guess the state
court's evidentiary ruling that the testimony was hearsay but held that "its exclusion
constituted a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The
excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of
the trial, and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability." Green, 442 U.S.
3
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (prosecutorial suppression of evidence
favorable to the accused).
-5-
at 97 (citing Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 60405 (1978) (plurality opinion); id. at
61316 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)).4
It is true that the bulk of the Missouri Supreme Court's brief discussion of
Brown's claim was devoted to the state-law evidentiary question and whether "the
trial court abused its discretion" in excluding the letter. Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549 .
But the "summary nature" of the discussion of the federal constitutional question does
not preclude application of the AEDPA standard. James v. Bowersox, 187 F.3d 866 ,
869 (8th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1143 (2000). Here, the Missouri Supreme
Court cited cases applying the relevant constitutional rule and held against Brown on
the question of reliability. Under Green, absent a determination that "substantial
reasons" exist to assume the reliability of the evidence in question, it will not be a due
process violation for a court to decline to admit the evidence. The citation to the
relevant law and the invocation of "reliability" in the opinion are enough to persuade
us that the Missouri Supreme Court adjudicated the due process claim on the merits.
That is not to say that citation to law and a key word from the application of that
lawor anything elseis required for us to determine that the claim was adjudicated
on the merits. We only hold that they suffice in this case for us to conclude that the
Missouri Supreme Court's decision on this claim was an adjudication on the merits.
4
In Lockett, the petitioner challenged a state death penalty statute that "did not
permit the sentencing judge to consider, as mitigating factors, [the petitioner's]
character, prior record, age, lack of specific intent to cause death, and her relatively
minor part in the crime." 438 U.S. at 597 (plurality opinion). The Court concluded
that the Constitution requires "that the sentencer . . . not be precluded from
considering, as a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant's character or
record . . . that the defendant proffers as a basis for a sentence less than death." Id.
at 604.
-6-
B.
We further conclude that the Missouri Supreme Court adjudicated Brown's
federal constitutional claimon the merits in an alternative holding. Following its
references to Green and the reliability of the letter, the court said, "We . . . note that
even if [the trial judge] was wrong about the letter's reliability, its exclusion does not
in the context of this case seem prejudicial," Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549 50, a
conclusion that is an application of the harmless-error standard set forth in Chapman
v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967).5 In Chapman, the Court held that certain federal
constitutional errors made in state-court criminal trials could "be deemed harmless,
not requiring the automatic reversal of the conviction" if the errors are shown to be
harmless "beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. at 22 , 24. Again, there are no
"magic words" that must be invoked before we can conclude that the Missouri
Supreme Court decided that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. But
here, the state court's use of "prejudicial" signals to us the application of the Chapman
standard, as the Supreme Court has long considered prejudice in its Chapman
harmless-error analyses. See, e.g., Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 , 636 (1993)
("State courts are fully qualified to identify constitutional error and evaluate its
prejudicial effect on the trial process under Chapman . . . ."); Kimmelman v.
Morrison, 477 U.S. 365 , 382 n.7 (1986) ("Furthermore, when an attorney chooses to
default a Fourth Amendment claim, he also loses the opportunity to obtain direct
review under the harmless-error standard of Chapman, which requires the State to
prove that the defendant was not prejudiced by the error.") (citation omitted); Hopper
v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605 , 61314 (1982) ("The preclusion clause did not prejudice
respondent in any way, and a new trial is not warranted.") (citing Chapman). On the
facts of this case, the state court's determination that the exclusion of the Turner letter
5
We are assuming that the Chapman harmless-error standard applies here. See
Sweet v. Delo, 125 F.3d 1144 , 1158 (8th Cir. 1997) (noting Supreme Court cases
"implying that harmless-error analysis applies to Lockett errors"), cert. denied, 523
U.S. 1010 (1998).
-7-
did not seem "prejudicial" to Brown was sufficient adjudication on the merits to
entitle this alternate holding to AEDPA deferential review.
II.
Having concluded that the standard set out in 2254(d) as amended by
AEDPA applies to Brown's claim, we now consider whether the Missouri Supreme
Court's adjudication of the claim resulted in a decision that was contrary to or an
unreasonable application of clearly established federal law.6 We will consider both
grounds on which the Missouri Supreme Court decided the constitutional claim. But
before we get to the analysis, we must lay out the evidence of aggravating and
mitigating circumstances that was before the jury, as that evidence is critical to our
legal conclusions here and in Part III.
The jury was instructed on four aggravating circumstances, two statutory and
two nonstatutory. The first factor that the jury considered was whether Brown was
convicted in 1973 in Indiana on a charge of assault and battery with intent to gratify
sexual desires. In fact, the indictment on the charge, read into evidence during the
sentencing portion of Brown's trial, accused Brown of fondling and caressing the
body of a twelve-year old girl to gratify his own sexual desires. Trial Transcript at
2298. Brown pleaded guilty to the charge.
Next, the jury was instructed to consider whether Brown's murder of Synetta
Ford "involved torture and depravity of mind and whether, as a result thereof, the
murder was outrageously and wantonly vile, horrible, and inhuman." State v. Brown,
Cause No. 861-03056, Legal File Components of the Record on Appeal in the
6
Brown throws the language from 2254(d)(2), "unreasonable determination
of the facts," into his claim, but he does not argue the facts. It appears to us that the
underlying material facts are a matter of record and are not disputed.
-8-
Missouri Supreme Court at 86. The jury could find depravity of mind only if it found
that Brown "committed repeated and excessive acts of physical abuse upon Synetta
Ford and the killing was therefore unreasonably brutal." Id. The evidence before the
jury was that nineteen-year-old Synetta Ford was found dead in her basement
apartment with a knife sticking out of her throat and the electrical cord from a curling
iron "tightly knotted around the neck." Trial Transcript at 2043, see also id. at 1662,
1684. The door to her apartment had been forced open. The evidence showed that
Brown first strangled her, taking the time to knot the electrical cord around her neck,
and then as she was dying he stabbed her in the chest and neck. The stab wound to
her neck severed her carotid artery, the major artery in the neck. The jurors saw
photographs of Ford's body as it appeared when it was discovered on the floor of her
apartment and also an autopsy photograph. In addition, the jury watched a videotape
of Brown's confession, where he claimed that Ford had accidentally stabbed herself
before and after he strangled her with the cord.
The jury was further charged with deciding whether Brown was convicted of
first degree murder in 1988. During sentencing, jurors heard evidence that in October
1986, Brown took nine-year-old Janet Perkins, who was at his home playing with his
stepsons, into the basement where he wrapped a cord around her neck and strangled
her. The boys heard her screaming as they played upstairs. The body was found near
a trash dumpster, wrapped in trash bags, with a rusty coat hanger wrapped around her
ankles and one of her arms, so that her knees were drawn up to her body. After
Brown was picked up in connection with the Perkins murder and confessed his guilt,
he led officers to another dumpster a block from where the body was found. There
they found a bag containing Janet Perkins's missing shoe, a yellow plastic raincoat,
and some of her school papers. The Ford jury also saw photographs of the little girl's
body and atched Brown's videotaped confession to the Perkins murder. Brown was
convicted of first degree murder in the Perkins case and sentenced to death.
-9-
Finally, the jury was instructed to decide whether Brown committed acts of
sodomy on his stepsons Christopher Moore, Jason Moore, and Tommy Johnson, who
were about seven, five, and nine years old, respectively, at the time of the abuse to
which they testified. Christopher, age eleven at the time of the sentencing, testified
that before Brown was arrested for the Perkins murder in October 1986, he would
take Christopher alone into the bedroom Brown shared with Christopher's mother and
tell him to undress and lie on his stomach on the bed. Brown would undress, put
"hair grease" on his penis, and put his penis in Christopher's anus and then in his
mouth. Id. at 2262. Brown committed these acts of sodomy on several different
occasions. Christopher told no one about the incidents until Brown was in jail
because Brown had said that if he told, he "would never see any of [his] brothers or
[his] mother again." Id. at 2264. Jason, nine years old when he testified, also
explained to the jury how Brown had performed anal sex on him and said that Brown
had threatened to "kill us" if he told anyone. Id. at 2288. Thirteen-year-old Tommy
Johnson testified that Brown put his penis in Tommy's anus and mouth and that
Brown also put his mouth on Tommy's penis. Id. at 2323. The boys said that Brown
would commit the acts of sodomy when their mother was not at home, taking them
one at a time from playing with their brothers and locking the door so that the boys
who were not being victimized at the time could not come in.
The jury found all four aggravating circumstances, unanimously, beyond a
reasonable doubt.
Brown's defense team called a number of witnesses who gave mitigating
evidence. First, the jury heard from Maggie and Donald Coplen who knew Brown,7
his wife, and his wife's sons (the children who testified for the State in the penalty
phase). They became acquainted in 1981 (four years before the Ford murder, ten
7
The witnesses who testified about relationships they had with Brown in the
early 1980s knew him as Thomas Turner.
-10-
years before the trial) at Sunday school. The Coplens testified that the families spent
two Christmases together, and Donald Coplen said he and Brown delivered Christmas
baskets to the needy one year. They saw each other socially an additional time or two.
The Coplens also saw Brown regularly at church until he stopped attending in 1984
and became distant. They did not see him after that, although Maggie Coplen said
that she had visited him in the city jail and in state prison and was staying in touch
with him. Both Coplens testified that they had not seen Brown physically abuse his
wife or her sons during the time that they were in regular contact with him.
Paul Sasser, a retired minister and former director of a homeless center that was
affiliated with Brown's church, became acquainted with Brown at the center. Brown
began to help Sasser at the homeless center, first as a volunteer, then for a small
salary, and lived with Sasser for a while. While working at the center, Brown had
protected Sasser from angry or drunk clients who had threatened Sasser. Brown
found his future wife and her three sons living on the streets and was concerned for
them, according to Sasser, eventually taking them in. Sasser was still in contact with
Brown at the time of the trial.
Forensic social worker Jill Miller testified next. She had spent hours talking
with Brown, his family, and others who knew him, and she also had reviewed his
educational, medical, and correctional records. She noted that Brown had refused
educational and neurological testing that she had recommended for her use in
preparing her testimony for the sentencing.
From the school records, Miller gleaned that Brown had a borderline IQ, at
best, and generally performed two to three grades below his grade level. She testified
that he was close to his mother, brothers, and sister growing up, although his mother
was strict. He was protective of his younger siblings (he was the oldest), sometimes
taking the blame for things they had done so that they would not be punished.
-11-
Personally, she found Brown to be "personable, pleasant, generally
cooperative . . . verbal, polite, but . . . very guarded." Trial Transcript at 2415.
The jury then heard the testimony of three corrections officers. The supervisor
of social services at the city jail when Brown was held there said Brown had made
few requests of the staff and did not get in trouble for fighting. Also testifying were
corrections officers from Potosi Correctional Center, where Brown had been
incarcerated for about a year and a half before his trial for the Ford murder. A
recreation supervisor said that Brown, an inmate worker at the prison, was
"cooperative, self-motivated and honest" in the work setting. Id. at 2423. Brown got
"along exceptionally well with the staff" but would not have much to do with other
prisoners. Id. Another Potosi officer who had substantial contact with Brown from
the time Brown arrived testified that Brown was being held in minimum custody
(although in a maximum security facility). His behavior was good, he avoided other
inmates, and in one case, he literally ran from trouble when a fight broke out.
In addition to the testimony of these live witnesses, Brown's counsel read to the
jury joint stipulations as to what the testimony of Janie Brown, Brown's daughter, and
Irvin Brimmage, who knew Brown as a teenager in Indianapolis, would be, had those
witnesses been present in the courtroom to testify. Janie Brown was born when
Brown was seventeen years old. She saw her father occasionally until she was ten,
and she had not seen him since. She had, however, started to write to him in prison.
Brown never behaved inappropriately around her. Brimmage met Brown when they
were teenagers, and they became good friends. Although he was poor, Brown would
share whatever money he had. Brown was helpful to older people, and Brimmage
never saw him behave inappropriately around children. As a teenager, Brown did not
abuse alcohol or drugs.
Finally, there was an audiotape interview with Patricia Beverly, Brown's
mother, recorded at her home in Indianapolis late in 1990. She was unable to travel
-12-
to St. Louis for the trial because she was totally disabled at the time. She had last
seen Brown in 1984 when he came to visit her after she was injured.
Beverly said that Brown was born at home after a problem pregnancy, two
months early and following a difficult labor and delivery. He struggled in school,
although he enjoyed some sports, ROTC, and wood shop. He eventually quit high
school at age 16. Beverly said that she had three other sons, including one who was
stationed in Saudi Arabia at the time of the interview, and one daughter. As the
oldest, Brown was protective of them as they were growing up, such as when they
were threatened by other children going to and from school. Brown tended to the
needs of his grandmother after she had a stroke, essentially taking responsibility for
her care while Beverly was at work. He was respectful of his grandparents and
mother and regularly attended church where his grandfather was the minister.
He married a woman in Indianapolis who already had children, and Beverly
said he always treated those children well. After he moved to St. Louis, he would
write and call Beverly; he continued to call once or twice a week from prison. As the
interview was drawing to a close, Beverly said that she loved Brown, and she asked
the jury to spare his life.
A.
We turn first to the state court's Green adjudication. At the outset, we decline
Brown's invitation to revisit the trial court's conclusion that the letter was hearsay
under Missouri's law of evidence. "[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court
to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions." Estelle v. McGuire,
502 U.S. 62 , 6768 (1991). We assume the state court properly applied state law. All
that concern us are issues raised under the United States Constitution.
-13-
In its review, the Missouri Supreme Court left undisturbed the trial court's
conclusion that the letter was not reliable, citing Green, which sets out the applicable
federal law. Under Green, as we explained in Part I.A, the hearsay evidence in
question must be "highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase" and
"substantial reasons [must exist] to assume its reliability" before its exclusion will be
deemed a due process violation. Green, 442 U.S. at 97 . Brown has not shown that
the state courts' conclusion is "opposite to that reached by" the Supreme Court in
Green or any other case "on a question of law." Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 ,
405 (2000). Likewise, Brown has not directed us to, and we have not found, a
Supreme Court case with "materially indistinguishable" facts in which the Court
reached a different result. Id. The Missouri Supreme Court decision is therefore not
contrary to clearly established federal law.
We note again the brevity of the adjudication and its emphasis on the question
of state law. This does not affect our determination that the result is not contrary to
federal law. The Supreme Court advises us that the state court need not cite or even
be aware of the governing Supreme Court cases, "so long as neither the reasoning nor
the result of the state-court decision contradicts them." Early v. Packer, 537 U.S. 3 ,
8 (2002) (per curiam). In the "contrary to" analysis of the state court's decision, our
focus is on the result and any reasoning that the court may have given; the absence
of reasoning is not a barrier to a denial of relief. Cf. James, 187 F.3d at 869 ("The
summary nature of the [state court] opinion does not affect this [AEDPA] standard
of review.").
We now consider whether the decision was the result of an unreasonable
application of federal law. The Green standard, the applicable law here, has two
parts: relevance and reliability. The Missouri Supreme Court did not specifically
address relevance. Indeed, there was no reason to, given its ruling on reliability, as
the evidence must be both relevant and reliable. Nevertheless, we have considered
the question and have determined that it is not an objectively unreasonable
-14-
application of Green and its progeny to conclude on the facts of this case that the
letter did not meet the first part of the Green standard, as it was not "highly relevant
to a critical issue in the punishment phase." Green, 442 U.S. at 97 .
The issue in mitigation, to which the Turner letter would go, was Brown's
character. The letter had essentially two messages.8 First, Turner described how
Brown protected Turner and his friends from older boys who chased them home from
school, then taught Turner to stand on his "own two feet." The letter conveyed the
additional message that Turner loved Brown, although the brothers had been out of
touch. Turner said that Brown had "too much good in him to let go of" and that he,
Turner, found it "very hard to believe" that Brown was guilty.
We have no quarrel with the general propositions that a defendant's character
may be a "critical issue" in the sentencing phase of a death penalty case and that the
testimony of relatives as to character may be "highly relevant." Here, however, the
situation is different. The only real example of Brown's character that Turner gave,
acknowledging that it "might not sound like much," was an incident that occurred
years before Brown murdered Synetta Ford, when Brown protected Turner from older
boys. It is clear from the letter that Turner had not spent time with his brother since
they were much younger, although they had reconnected through telephone calls and
letters. We think it is an objectively reasonable application of Green to conclude that
stale evidence of a convicted murderer's character, evidence that harkens back to
incidents or relationships of years past, well before the murder was committed, is not
"highly relevant" to a "critical issue." The degree of relevance is further diminished
by the fact that, as described above, the jury had before it other evidence of Brown's
character. Indeed, the "aspect of [Brown's] character" suggested by the letterhis
8
To the extent Brown suggests that the jury would have found mitigating
circumstances in Turner's service to his country in the Gulf War, that is, in deeds of
Turner that have no relevance to Brown, his crime, his character, or his relationship
with Turner, we hold that is not proper mitigation evidence.
-15-
efforts to protect those less able to protect themselveswas before the jury through
the testimony of other witnesses. Lockett, 438 U.S. at 604 (plurality opinion). As we
noted above, the forensic social worker testified that she had spoken with Brown's
family, who described Brown as being "pretty protective of his younger brothers and
sister." Trial Transcript at 2413. Brown's mother stated the same thing. Likewise,
Paul Sasser testified that Brown protected him from belligerent patrons of the
homeless center. That evidence is precisely the sort of evidence that Turner offered
in his one memory of his relationship with BrownBrown's protection of people
close to himand is actually broadened beyond Turner's recollection to include
Brown's friend and all of Brown's siblings, not just Turner. Addiional character
testimony, as recited above, came from witnesses who apparently had more recent and
frequent contact with Brown than Turner. Several of those witnesses recalled
specific, positive incidents that were more contemporaneous both to the approximate
time of the murder and to the time of sentencing. Finally, Turner's love for his
brother, his belief in Brown's innocence, and his opinion that "God's law" should
decide Brown's fate are subjective feelings that cannot be deemed "highly relevant"
under Green to the question of Brown's character, and it would not be objectively
unreasonable to so conclude.
On this record, we cannot say that it is an unreasonable application of clearly
established law to conclude that the Turner letter was not "highly relevant to a critical
issue" at Brown's sentencing.
The Missouri Supreme Court did mention the letter's reliability, deferring to the
trial court's uncertainty "as to the authenticity of the letter." Brown, 998 S.W.2d at
549 . Under Green, excluding otherwise inadmissible hearsay will result in a violation
of due process if the evidence is not only relevant but also "substantial reasons
existed to assume its reliability." We hold that the circumstances surrounding the
letter do not make it contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established
-16-
federal law for the state courts to have concluded there were not "substantial
reasons . . . to assume its reliability."
The Supreme Court opinion dealing with reliability that Brown cites in his brief
is Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973). At issue in that case was the
exclusion of the testimony of three witnesses that someone other than the petitioner
had confessed to them the crime for which the petitioner was being tried. The
petitioner also alleged that his constitutional right to confront a witness had been
violated.9 The Chambers Court noted that the statements in question "were originally
made and subsequently offered at trial under circumstances that provided
considerable assurance of their reliability." Id. at 300 (noting that the statements were
spontaneous, made to several people, corroborated, and against interest, and that the
person who purportedly made the out-of-court statements was in the courtroom and
could be called to testify). Moreover, the witnesses' testimony went directly to the
question of guilt or innocence. On the facts of this case, we do not think it is contrary
to or an objectively unreasonable application of Chambers (or any other Supreme
Court case that we have identified, for that matter) for the state courts to have
concluded there were not "substantial reasons" to assume the Turner letter's
reliability, that is, that the letter's reliability could not be assured because it was not
submitted as a sworn affidavit. We may believe the state courts got it wrong, but that
is not our call to make. "[A] federal habeas court may not issue the writ simply
because that court concludes in its independent judgment that the relevant state-court
9
The Supreme Court since Chambers has noted that the opinion "was an
exercise in highly case-specific error correction." Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 ,
52 (1996) (plurality opinion). The Egelhoff Court went on to say that "the holding
of Chambersif one can be discerned from such a fact-intensive caseis certainly
not that a defendant is denied 'a fair opportunity to defend against the State's
accusations' whenever 'critical evidence' favorable to him is excluded, but rather that
erroneous evidentiary rulings can, in combination, rise to the level of a due process
violation." Id. at 53 (emphasis added).
-17-
decision applied clearly established federal law erroneously or incorrectly. Rather,
that application must also be unreasonable." Williams, 529 U.S. at 411 . We hold that
the state courts' decision on the question of reliability is not contrary to or an
unreasonable application of Green.
B.
As for Chapman prejudice, the Missouri Supreme Court had before it the
transcript of Brown's trial and sentencing, and noted that its decision was made "in
the context of this case." Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 550 . As we have demonstrated,
there was before the jury extensive evidence of aggravating circumstances, as well
as mitigating character evidence to which the Turner letter was cumulative. In
addition, as we have said, the jury heard from character witnesses who had more
recent contact with Brown, including three correctional officers who testified to his
model behavior while incarcerated. The Missouri Supreme Court might have been
a bit more forceful in its conclusion, where it stated that the letter's exclusion did not
"seem prejudicial." Id. at 550. But we do not think the state court was expressing
ambivalence or anything less than an unequivocal conclusion of law, although
perhaps not in the strongest terms. In any event, that court's use of "seem" does not
make the decision contrary to any Supreme Court precedent. Likewise, we hold that
the result of the Missouri Supreme Court's application of the Chapman harmless-error
standard, given the record in this case, is not objectively unreasonable.
III.
If we have misjudged congressional intent and the Supreme Court's
interpretation of "adjudicated on the merits" for purposes of 2254, we nevertheless
would hold that the District Court's decision should be affirmed under the pre-
AEDPA standard of review. See Robinson v. Crist, 278 F.3d 862 , 865 (8th Cir. 2002)
-18-
("Because this claim apparently was not adjudicated by the [state] court, we likely
should apply the pre-AEDPA standard of review.").
We have gone to some lengths in Part II of our opinion to describe the law
applicable to Brown's claim and the facts related to it in order to explain why we
reject his claim that the Missouri Supreme Court's decision was contrary to or an
unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. Little more needs to be
said here. For the reasons we have already explained in some detail, we d not think
Brown has shown that the Turner letter was "highly relevant to a critical issue" in his
sentencing. While we may be less certain under the pre-AEDPA standard of review
about the state courts' decision that Brown failed to show "substantial reasons" to
conclude that the letter was reliable, we need not decide the question because the
relevance standard cannot be met.
In any event, we are confident that the exclusion of the letter was harmless
beyond a reasonable doubt. "A constitutional error is harmless when 'it appears
"beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the
verdict obtained."'" Mitchell v. Esparza, 124 S. Ct. 7, 12 (2004) (citations to quoted
cases omitted). As we have explained, the Turner letter's statements, to the extent
they may be relevant, were cumulative to evidence as to Brown's character that was
already before the jury. Moreover, the evidence of aggravating circumstances was
devastating. This is not a case, like Chambers, where the evidence in question was
highly relevant to actual guilt or innocence. The Turner letter was not offered to
prove that Brown was actually innocent, either of the crime or of the death penalty.
Here, Brown received the constitutionally required "individualized consideration"
before the death penalty was imposed. Lockett, 438 U.S. at 605 (plurality opinion).
In these circumstances, we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the
admission of the letter would not have altered the jury's decision to impose the death
penalty on Brown, and thus its exclusion was harmless error at most.
-19-
The judgment of the District Court denying the writ on any and all of Brown's
claims is affirmed.
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom MURPHY, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring
in the judgment.
I agree with the court that because Browns constitutional claim was
adjudicated on the merits in state court, AEDPAs 2254(d) standard of review
should apply. I also agree that any error in excluding the Turner letter was harmless
beyond a reasonable doubt.
For the reasons so persuasively advanced in Judge Richard Arnolds dissent,
however, I cannot agree that the letter was properly excluded on either relevancy or
reliability grounds. Accordingly, I concur in the judgment affirming the denial of the
writ.
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring.
I join the opinion of the court, but add a few points to clarify my views.
It is quite reasonable to ask, as does the dissent, whether the AEDPA-standard
issue is properly before the en banc court, if the state did not assert before the three-
judge panel that 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) should apply to review of the state court's
adjudications. It must be remembered, however, that as this case first came to the en
banc court on a petition for rehearing, a panel of the court already had reached and
decided the question whether 2254(d) applied in this case. Brown v. Luebbers, 344
F.3d 770, 785 (8th Cir. 2003). At that point, the panel opinion established the law of
the circuit on the AEDPA-standard issue, regardless what the parties had asserted in
their briefs, and I believe it was properly the business of the en banc court to decide
whether the panel opinion should remain the law of the circuit on that issue. If the
-20-
panel opinion merely had reported a concession or waiver by the state in this case,
and left the AEDPA-standard issue for another day, then the matter of judicial
administration might be resolved differently.
Harmless error analysis is sufficient to resolve this case, but with brief
amplification, I also join the court's conclusion that the state court proceedings did
not result in a decision that involved an unreasonable application of Green v.
Georgia, 442 U.S. 95 (1979) (per curiam). With respect to reliability of the disputed
letter, it is true that the Missouri Supreme Court referred to the trial court's
uncertainty as to the authenticity of the letter, while the trial court did not appear to
rely on authenticity in excluding the letter. On the other hand, the trial judge did say
that he rejected the letter because it was unsworn hearsay -- "We're not talking about
depositions where a man is under oath, you're talking about a letter, plain and
simple," (Tr. 2443) -- and the state supreme court said more generally that "[w]e
uphold his ruling," which the court said was "about the letter's reliability." State v.
Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 549 (Mo. 1999) (en banc).
If we were reviewing the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court as though it
were an administrative agency, then it may well be that the unclear reasoning of the
state court would be inadequate to sustain its judgment on the issue of reliability
without further explanation. I understand the court, however, to join our sister
circuits in rejecting this model of judicial review, which would tend to "place the
federal court in just the kind of tutelary relation to the state courts that the recent
amendments are designed to end." Hennon v. Cooper, 109 F.3d 330 , 335 (7th Cir.
1997); see also Bell v. Jarvis, 236 F.3d 149 , 159 (4th Cir. 2000) (en banc); Bui v.
DePaolo, 170 F.3d 232 , 243 (1st Cir. 1999).
Under AEDPA, the question for a federal habeas court is not whether the state
court's opinion is well reasoned, but whether the decision reached in state court
proceedings is "objectively unreasonable." Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 , 409
-21-
(2000). The rule of reliability established by Green is quite general in nature, and
state courts thus have a good deal of leeway in reaching reasonable outcomes.
Yarborough v. Alvarado, No. 02-1684, 2004 WL 1190042, at * 8 (U.S. June 1,
2004). On this understanding, I agree with the court that the decision of the Missouri
state courts to exclude hearsay contained in an unsworn letter, while perhaps incorrect
if reviewed de novo, does not represent an unreasonable application of federal law as
determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. See Bchanan v. Angelone,
103 F.3d 344 , 348-49 (4th Cir. 1996), aff'd on other grounds, 522 U.S. 269 (1998);
Alley v. Bell, 307 F.3d 380 , 398-99 (6th Cir. 2002); Glenn v. Tate, 71 F.3d 1204, 1207
(6th Cir. 1995).
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, with whom BYE and MELLOY, Circuit
Judges, join, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, Vernon Brown is entitled to relief on his
habeas corpus petition because during the penalty phase, the trial judge excluded the
letter written by Mr. Brown's brother. I would therefore vacate Mr. Brown's sentence.
Mr. Brown's conviction would of course stand. Unless the state sought to retry the
penalty phase within a reasonable time to be set by the District Court, he would be in
prison for life.
I believe the Court is mistaken in concluding that the state trial court made no
constitutionally significant errors in the penalty phase of Mr. Brown's trial. In my
view, the trial court violated petitioner's rights under both the Eighth Amendment and
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by excluding as hearsay a
letter written by his brother, Mr. Darius Q. Turner, who was on active duty in the
United States Army serving in the Middle East as part of Operation Desert Shield
during petitioner's trial. Petitioner wanted the jury to see the letter as mitigating
evidence. This Court discounts both the reliability and relevance of the letter, and I
respectfully disagree.
-22-
Under the amended AEDPA standard, our Court may grant habeas relief if a
state court decision is either contrary to federal law or involves an unreasonable
application of federal law. 28 U.S.C.A. 2254(d). Mr. Brown alleges that the
exclusion of the letter violated both the Eighth Amendment and Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (plurality
opinion), and later cases, the Supreme Court established that the Eighth Amendment
guarantees a capital defendant the right to introduce all relevant mitigating evidence
in the penalty phase. The Court noted that "the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
require that the sentencer, in all but the rarest kind of capital case, not be precluded
from considering, as a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant's character or
record and any of the circumstances of the offense that the defendant proffers as a
basis for a sentence less than death." Lockett, 438 U.S. at 604 ; see also Eddings v.
Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 , 110 (1982). The Supreme Court has also held that the Due
Process Clause requires that a state's rules of evidence not be applied mechanically
when doing so would preclude the defendant from introducing relevant evidence at
the penalty phase. See Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 302 (1973) ("[T]he
hearsay rule may not be applied mechanistically to defeat the ends of justice."). Thus,
the exclusion of hearsay testimony at the penalty phase of a death penalty case
violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment where "[t]he excluded
testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial,
and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability." Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S.
95 , 97 (1979) (per curiam) (citations omitted).
The first question is whether the AEDPA-standard issue is properly before us
as a matter of judicial administration. I think the answer is no, and the procedural
history of the case is instructive on the point. In briefs submitted to the three-judge
panel that initially cited Brown's case, the state did not assert that it should be
governed by the AEDPA standard. In fact, this particular question was not
controversial before the panel. Both the panel majority and the dissent (as the Court
today acknowledges) hold, or at least assume, that the AEDPA standard does not
-23-
apply, because the Missouri Supreme Court had not reached the merits. The first time
the applicability of the AEDPA standard was urged was in the state's petition for
rehearing en banc. Petitioner was reduced to the last-minute expedient of placing his
entire argument on this point in the response to the petition for rehearing en banc on
this point. No supplemental briefing was allowed prior to the oral argument on
rehearing en banc.
I am not questioning at all the power of this Court to decide the issue. Courts
often (sometimes too often, it seems) decide issues that are somewhat irregularly
before them for example, an issue not properly raised in the court below. But that
is certainly not the normal practice. I am not saying that proceedings before three-
judge panels are analogous in every respect to proceedings in lower courts, but there
is a certain similarity. The state, like petitioner, should be required to come with all
of its guns loaded the first time. This it has not done. Instead, it has saved one bullet.
I do not think this practice should be encouraged, even though the effect of the
argument is to affirm the judgment of a district court.
Assuming we decide the standard-of-review question, what is the answer? The
standard set out in AEDPA that the holding of the state court cannot be set aside
unless it was contrary to clearly established law as set forth in opinions of the
Supreme Court of the United States, or was unreasonable in light of the facts in the
state-court record is crucial here. This standard, more difficult for habeas
petitioners, comes into play, however, only if the state court decided the federal
constitutional issue on its merits. In deciding this question, it is critical to examine
closely the opinion of the Supreme Court of Missouri. In my view, the Missouri
Supreme Court did not clearly decide the case on federal grounds.
The relevant passage from the opinion of the Missouri Supreme Court is set
forth by this Court ante, at 3-4 n.2. The Court rightly recognizes two separate legal
issues: whether the letter was unreliable, and whether its exclusion was prejudicial.
-24-
As to unreliability, the opinion clearly reads, with the exception of a citation to
Green, like a garden-variety state-evidence-lawissue. The first sentence of the
quoted part of the Missouri Supreme Court opinion says: "Brown contends that the
trial court abused its discretion in the penalty phase when it refused to allow his
counsel to read into evidence a letter about him that was written by his brother,
Darius Turner." State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 549 (en banc), cert. denied, 528
U.S. 979 (1999). The state court does not explain what it believes Green stands for,
or how it helps the position taken by the State of Missouri. I believe a habeas
petitioner is entitled to a more thorough answer. Indeed, it must have been with such
a situation in mind that Congress included the "on the merits" language. The more
attention the state court appears to have given the federal issue, the more its decision
is entitled to respect. As to the prejudice holding, I do not see any "holding,"
properly so called, at all in the state court's opinion. The Missouri Supreme Court's
discussion of prejudice says only that admission of the letter did not seem prejudicial.
This is not a holding, but simply an off-the-cuff observation made in passing.
So we come to the merits, applying, according to my way of thinking, pre-
AEDPA law. In my opinion, regardless of whether the letter constituted hearsay, its
exclusion violated Mr. Brown's due-process rights. The Green standard involves a
two-part inquiry, requiring a court to determine whether evidence relevant to a critical
issue at the punishment phase is both relevant and reliable. Green, 442 U.S. at 97 .
If such evidence is both relevant and reliable, its exclusion at the punishment phase
is reversible error. Ibid. Here, the letter was highly relevant to a critical issue,
petitioner's character, at the punishment phase and no substantial reasons existed not
to assume its reliability.
This Court acknowledges that the Missouri Supreme Court did not specifically
address relevance. This notwithstanding, this Court concludes that the letter was not
relevant to a critical issue because the letter contained "stale evidence" of petitioner's
relationship with his brother. I disagree with this characterization of the contents of
-25-
the letter, and do not join the Court in its conclusion that "evidence that harkens back
to incidents or relationships of years past, well before the murder was committed, is
not 'highly relevant' to a 'critical issue.' " Indeed, if courts were to follow this
standard, I doubt that much mitigating evidence of a defendant's character could ever
be admitted. No better method of describing a person's character likely exists than
by recounting incidents and interactions of years past.
The Court also intimates that the character evidence contained in the letter was
repetitive of other evidence already before the jury. I disagree with this conclusion.
It appears from the letter's contents that petitioner and his brother shared a unique,
although often distant, relationship that was unlike that which he shared with any
other witness whose testimony was admitted. Furthermore, I am convinced that its
effect on the jury would have been greater than the other mitigating evidence
petitioner presented. Mr. Turner was not only a member of the armed services on
active duty, he was also serving in the Gulf War, and over and over again during the
trial, on the record, and in the presence of the jury, the Court praised the performance
of our troops in the Gulf War. Theirs is the highest example of patriotism, the Court
says. But the minute the defendant adduces evidence of this kind in his favor, the
Court takes a completely different stance. I think the jury's opinion of Mr. Brown
might well have risen dramatically if it had known about the letter.
As to the reliability of the letter, this Court refers to the Missouri Supreme
Court's deference to the trial court's uncertainty of the letter's authenticity. I am
troubled by this. The Missouri Supreme Court appears to defer to a finding that was
not made by the trial judge. When the prosecution objected to the admission of the
letter, the trial judge relied on state evidence law, not lack of authenticity, to exclude
the letter. Specifically, the trial judge stated: "I have no problems with the
authenticity of [the letter] except that it's just not admissible even if this was an
affidavit. The law is clear even an affidavit in the absence of a consent by both
parties is not admissible, now that's evidentiary law." Tr. 2443. I am unpersuaded
-26-
that the trial judge believed the letter was unauthentic and find no basis upon which
it would be considered unauthentic. Furthermore, the letter's return address was to
"SFC Darius Q. Turner, HLM 801st MAINT BN, 101st ABN DIV (AASLT), APO
NY 09309" and the letter's postmark indicates that it was sent from the United States
Army. I therefore believe that "substantial reasons existed to assume [the letter's]
reliability" and that due process required its admission because it was highly relevant
to a critical issue. Green, 442 U.S. at 97 .
The exclusion of Mr. Turner's letter was not harmless. "A constitutional error
is harmless when 'it appears "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of
did not contribute to the verdict obtained".' " Mitchell v. Esparza, 124 S. Ct. 7, 12
(2004) (internal quotations omitted). The critical issue in the penalty phase of Mr.
Brown's trial was his character. The State of Missouri aimed to convince the jury that
petitioner was a bad person. Petitioner's attorneys, on the other hand, attempted to
prove that although he had committed bad acts, petitioner was a man whose life was
worth saving. Mr. Turner's letter seems highly relevant in itself, and it would have
been even more compelling than the other mitigating evidence because its author was
a member of the armed services on active duty in time of war. Thus, I conclude that
the exclusion of Mr. Turner's letter violated Mr. Brown's rights under the Eighth and
Fourteenth Amendments and that, upon applying the proper prejudice standard, the
exclusion was not harmless.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 53C09-1209-CM-003536
> STATE OF INDIANA V. CHRISTOPHER K BRADLEY
> CASE TYPE: CM - CRIMINAL MISDEMEANOR
> DATE FILED: 09/14/2012
> LOCATION: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT 9
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K MALE WHITE
> 6'1", 187 LBS
> ADDRESS / 5653 N GREENE COUNTY LINE RD BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403
> PROBATION DEPARTMENT MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> ADDRESS / 214 W 7TH ST #200 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
> INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
> 151 N DELAWARE ST SUITE 1800 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
> PHONE NUMBER / 317-829-3087(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K CITATION STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. 9-30-5-2(A)/MA: OPERATING A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED ENDANGERING A PERSON NA 9-30-5-2(A) MISDEMEANOR CLASS A 06/20/2012
> 2. 9-30-5-1(B)/MA: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO .15 OR MORE NA 9-30-5-1(B) MISDEMEANOR CLASS A 06/20/2012
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
09/14/2012 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
09/17/2012 SUBPOENA/SUMMONS ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> SUMMONS, ISSUED. DEFENDANT TO APPEAR 10-18-12 AT 1:30 P.M. (SHERIFF SERVICE)
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2012
09/17/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/18/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
09/21/2012 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> SHERIFF SERVICE OF SUMMONS SERVED LEFT COPY ON 9/18/12 AND MC ON 9/21/12 FILED. ADT
> PARTY SERVED: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> DATE SERVED: 09/19/2012
10/18/2012 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/18/2012 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> NOT GULTY PLEA ENTERED ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR NOVEMBER 29, 2012, AT 1:30 P.M. KMP
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/29/2012
> VOL./BOOK Y
10/18/2012 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
10/18/2012 COURT REQUESTS SUSPENSION OF DRIVER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT'S DRIVER'S LICENSE ARE SUSPENDED THIS DATE. AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE SENT TO THE CLERK TO SEND TO THE BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES. KMP
> VOL./BOOK Y
10/19/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 11/29/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
10/22/2012 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/18/2012
> VOL./BOOK 304
10/22/2012 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT SENT TO BMV
> SIGNED BY JUDGE HARPER. BLOOD DRAW. ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION DATE 10-18-2012.
10/29/2012 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPERANCE, REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY FILED. SML
> FOR PARTY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> ATTORNEY: MEREDITH, JASON B
> FILE STAMP: 10/26/2012
11/29/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/29/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> FURTHER PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR JANUARY 23, 2013, AT 3:00 P.M. KMP
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: SCHULZ, MATTHEW T
11/29/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/23/2013 AT 3:00 PM.
01/23/2013 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> GRANTED AND RESCHEDULED. KMP
> FILED BY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILED BY: MEREDITH, JASON B
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2013
01/23/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/23/2013 AT 3:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: AGREED RESOLUTION.
01/23/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/21/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
03/21/2013 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/21/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HOFF, E. MICHAEL )
> CAUSE IS SET FOR A FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON MAY 13, 2013 AT 3:00 PM. ASB
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: SCHULZ, MATTHEW T
03/22/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/13/2013 AT 3:00 PM.
05/13/2013 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (3:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/13/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: SCHULZ, MATTHEW T
> NOT PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
05/13/2013 FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> WARRANT TO BE ISSUED FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT IN SEVEN DAYS WITH BAIL SET AT $500.00 CASH BOND IF HE DOES NOT CONTACT HIS COUNSEL OR THE COURT. ASB
> PARTY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 05/13/2013
05/22/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
11/26/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
11/26/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
> STATE WILL BE NOTIFIED AND HAVE THIRTY DAYS TO ADVISE THE COURT ON HOW THEY WISH TO PROCEED. ASB
02/27/2014 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR REISSUANCE OF ARREST WARRANT FILED BY THE STATE OF INDIANA. COURT GRANTS SAME. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
09/10/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
09/10/2014 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> THE STATE WILL BE NOTIFIED OF THE EXPIRED WARRANT AND HAVE THIRTY DAYS TO ADVISE THE COURT ON HOW THEY WISH TO PROCEED OR THIS CAUSE MAY BE DISMISSED. ASB
09/12/2014 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR REISSUANCE OF ARREST WARRANT FILED BY THE STATE OF INDIANA. GRANTED. WARRANT REISSUED WITH $500.00 CASH BOND. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 09/12/2014
09/12/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
03/18/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
03/18/2015 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> WARRANT RETURNED MARKED "EXPIRED". THE COURT DIRECTS THE STATE OF INDIANA TO INFORM THE COURT HOW THEY WISH TO PROCEED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, OR THIS CAUSE WILL BE DROPPED FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET. KMP
04/18/2015 MOTION FILED
> STATE'S MOTION FOR RE-ISSUANCE OF ARREST WARRANT FILED. THE COURT GRANTS. SML
> FILED BY: RODDYE, JUSTIN D.
> FILE STAMP: 04/17/2015
04/18/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
10/26/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
10/26/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON EXPIRED
> STATE TO INFORM THE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS HOW THEY WISH TO PROCEED, OR THIS CAUSE WILL BE DROPPED FROM THE ACTIVE DOCKET. KMP
10/30/2015 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR RE-ISSUANCE OF ARREST WARRANT FILED.
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/30/2015
10/30/2015 ORDER ISSUED
> MOTION GRANTED. ARREST WARRANT IS RE-ISSUED FOR THE ARREST OF DEFENDANT.
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/30/2015
> VOL./BOOK Y
10/30/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
11/02/2015 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/30/2015
> VOL./BOOK 342
12/15/2015 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
12/15/2015 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
12/15/2015 HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/15/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/15/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
12/15/2015 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND SIGNS AN ORDER TO APPEAR FOR THE NEXT SCHEDULED HEARINGS. BAIL REVIEW HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 21, 2015, AT 9:00 A.M. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR JANUARY 26, 2016, AT 11:00 A.M. BAIL REMAINS
$500.00 CASH BOND ONLY. KMP
12/16/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/21/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
12/16/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/26/2016 AT 11:00 AM.
12/21/2015 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER TODD, KENNETH G) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/21/2015 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TODD, KENNETH G )
> DEFENDANT'S BOND REMAINS UNCHANGED. CAUSE SET FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA ON JANUARY 6, 2016, AT 10:00 A.M. VIDEO AT 7:45 A.M. KMP
12/21/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/06/2016 AT 10:00 AM.
12/21/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/26/2016 AT 11:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: AGREED RESOLUTION.
01/06/2016 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO
> RESULT: CONCLUDED
01/06/2016 COURT REQUESTS SUSPENSION OF DRIVER FOR OWI
> DEFENDANT'S DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENDED FOR 90 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION. KMP
> VOL./BOOK 90, PAGE DAYS
01/06/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO COUNT II, A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR. DEFENDANT ASSESSED $183.50 COURT COSTS; $200.00 ALCOHOL COUNTERMEASURES FEE; $300.00 ALCOHOL/DRUG PROGRAM FEE; AND $50.00 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE.
JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCING ORDER ISSUED. KMP
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: RODDYE, JUSTIN D.
> VOL./BOOK Y
01/06/2016
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 1. 9-30-5-2(A)/MA: OPERATING A VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED ENDANGERING A PERSON
> DISMISSED
> 2. 9-30-5-1(B)/MA: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO .15 OR MORE
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
01/06/2016
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 2. 9-30-5-1(B)/MA: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO .15 OR MORE
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. COMMUNITY SERVICE, 01/06/2016, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> 2. DRIVER'S LICENSE SUSPENSION, 01/06/2016, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> 3. PROBATION, 01/06/2016 - 12/26/2016, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> 4. SUBSTANCE ABUSE EVALUATION, 01/06/2016, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> 5. VICTIM IMPACT PANEL, 01/06/2016, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> COMMENT: DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE 50 HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE. KMP
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 01/12/2016
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 360 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 5 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 355 DAYS
01/12/2016 ZNT - AN ELECTRONIC SR16 HAS BEEN SENT TO THE BMV
> TICKET SUBSTITUTE SR16 SENT TO BMV FOR CHARGE 2 FOR STATUTE 9-30-5-1(B)
01/12/2016 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/06/2016
> VOL./BOOK 345
01/13/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> THE COURT NOTES THAT THE ONLY CREDIT TIME APPLIED TO THIS CAUSE WAS FROM DECEMBER 14, 2015 TO DECEMBER 19, 2015. CREDIT TIME BETWEEN DECEMBER 20, 2015 AND JANUARY 6, 2016 WERE NOT APPLIED TO THIS CAUSE AND MAY BE APPLIED TO
DEFENDANT'S OUT OF COUNTY CASE. SML
01/26/2016 CANCELED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> AGREED RESOLUTION
08/10/2016 CASE REOPENED
08/10/2016 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. WARRANT REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/10/2016
08/11/2016 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PROBABLE CAUSE IS FOUND. DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. SML
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/11/2016
08/11/2016 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
03/16/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
03/16/2017 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
03/16/2017 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER TODD, KENNETH G)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/16/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/16/2017 AT 1:30 PM.
03/16/2017 WRITTEN ADVISEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED
> FILED BY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/16/2017
03/16/2017 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHAPMAN, RONALD - PT )
> ERIKA OLIPHANT APPEARS FOR THE STATE. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY. DENIAL IS ENTERED. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET FOR MARCH 27, 2017 AT 11:00 AM. BAIL REVIEW HEARING IS MARCH 22, 2017 AT 9:00 AM. PUBLIC DEFENDER IS APPOINTED.
DEFENDANT REMAINS IN CUSTODY WITH A HOLD. ASB
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/16/2017
> VOL./BOOK Y
03/16/2017 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
03/17/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/22/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
03/17/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/27/2017 AT 11:00 AM.
03/19/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING ---- 3/16/2017 : CHRISTOPHER K BRADLEY;ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
03/21/2017 APPEARANCE FILED
> FILED BY JASON MEREDITH. KMP
> FOR PARTY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/21/2017
03/21/2017 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED
> KMP
> FILED BY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/21/2017
03/22/2017 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/22/2017 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> TRISHA BUSHEY APPEARS FOR THE STATE. DEFENDANT IS RELEASED ON HIS OWN RECOGNIZANCE AND IS PLACED ON DAY REPORTING. NEXT COURT DATE IS AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON APRIL 24, 2017 AT 10:45 AM. ASB
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
03/22/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 04/24/2017 AT 10:45 AM.
03/22/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/27/2017 AT 11:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
03/22/2017 APPEARANCE FILED
> TRANSACTION CONTROL NUMBER SUPPLEMENTAL APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2017
03/27/2017 CANCELED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> OTHER
04/24/2017 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (10:45 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
04/24/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLLEGATIONS #1 AND #4 AND THE COURT ACCEPTS THE ADMISSION. DISPOSITIONAL HEARING IS SET FOR JULY 17, 2017 AT 10:30 AM. DAY REPORTING RELEASE IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PROBATION OFFICER. ASB
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: KORNYA, ADAM CHRISTOPHER
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
04/24/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/17/2017 AT 10:30 AM.
04/25/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 4/24/2017 : ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
04/25/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 4/24/2017 : JASON B MEREDITH
06/13/2017 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> MEMORANDUM FROM PROBATION. ASB
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/13/2017
06/13/2017 NOTICE OF EXCLUSION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
> ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 9
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/13/2017
06/14/2017 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. SML
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/14/2017
06/14/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
06/29/2017 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
06/29/2017 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
06/29/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 07/17/2017 AT 10:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 07/05/2017 AT 10:30 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
07/05/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (10:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
07/17/2017 RESET BY COURT TO 07/05/2017
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/05/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. CAUSE IS SET FOR FURTHER DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ON JULY 12, 2017 AT 2:00 PM. SML
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: KORNYA, ADAM CHRISTOPHER
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> HEARING DATE: 07/05/2017
07/05/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/12/2017 AT 2:00 PM.
07/06/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 7/5/2017 : ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
07/06/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 7/5/2017 : JASON B MEREDITH
07/12/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/12/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DAVID GOHN APPEARS FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA. JILL BARNETT APPEARS FROM THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT. DISPOSITIONAL HEARING RESCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 5, 2017, AT 2:00 P.M. KMP
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
07/12/2017 RELEASE ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT PLACED ON DAY REPORTING AND SHALL REMAIN ON DAY REPORTING AT THE PROBATION OFFICER'S DISCRETION. KMP
07/13/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/05/2017 AT 2:00 PM.
09/05/2017 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/05/2017 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. ON APRIL 24, 2017, DEFENDANT ADMITTED TO ALLEGATIONS #1 & 4 OF THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 42 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED
AND SERVED IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. DEFENDANT IS GIVEN 21 DAYS OF GOOD-TIME CREDIT THEREFORE TIME SERVED. DEFENDANT IS RESTORED TO PROBATION WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION UNCHANGED EXCEPT THAT IT IS EXTENDED TO
JANUARY 10, 2018. ORDER OF DISPOSITION, ISSUED. SML
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> HEARING DATE: 09/05/2017
09/05/2017 CASE CLOSED
09/05/2017
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D) REASON: REVOCATION OF PROBATION
> 2. 9-30-5-1(B)/MA: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO .15 OR MORE
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. PROBATION, 01/06/2016 - 01/10/2018, ACTIVE 01/06/2016
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 09/05/2017
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 42 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 21 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
09/05/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> THE COURT NOTES THAT DAY REPORTING IS AT THE DISCRETION OF DEFENDANT'S PROBATION OFFICER. SML
09/06/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 9/5/2017 : ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
09/06/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 9/5/2017 : JASON B MEREDITH
01/10/2018 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. WARRANT REQUESTED. KMP
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 01/10/2018
01/11/2018 CASE REOPENED
01/16/2018 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> WARRANT TO BE ISSUED FOR ARREST OF DEFENDANT WITH A HOLD WITHOUT BAIL. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/17/2018
> VOL./BOOK Y
01/16/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/16/2018 : CHRISTOPHER K BRADLEY;ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
01/17/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/16/2018 : MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
02/21/2018 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
02/21/2018 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
02/21/2018 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/21/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/21/2018 AT 1:30 PM.
02/21/2018 WRITTEN ADVISEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED
> FILE STAMP: 02/21/2018
02/21/2018 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DENIAL TO THE PETITION TO REVOKE ENTERED ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT. EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET FOR MARCH 5, 2018, AT 11:00 A.M. HOLD REMAINS. KMP
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/21/2018
> VOL./BOOK Y
02/21/2018 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
02/22/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/05/2018 AT 11:00 AM.
02/23/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING ---- 2/21/2018 : CHRISTOPHER K BRADLEY;ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
02/23/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING ---- 2/21/2018 : MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
03/01/2018 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT FILED BY JASON MEREDITH. SML
> FOR PARTY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/01/2018
03/01/2018 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED
> REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENSE. SML
> FILED BY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/01/2018
03/05/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 03/05/2018 AT 11:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 03/06/2018 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
03/06/2018 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
03/05/2018 RESET BY COURT TO 03/06/2018
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/06/2018 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT'S BOND REMAINS UNCHANGED WITH A HOLD. CAUSE IS SET FOR FURTHER EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MARCH 26, 2018 AT 11:00 AM. SML
> PRESENT: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> PRESENT: MEREDITH, JASON B
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> HEARING DATE: 03/06/2018
03/06/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/26/2018 AT 11:00 AM.
03/07/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 3/6/2018 : ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
03/07/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY ---- 3/6/2018 : JASON B MEREDITH;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
03/26/2018 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: CONCLUDED
03/26/2018 WRITTEN ADVISEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED
> FILED BY: BRADLEY, CHRISTOPHER K
> FILE STAMP: 03/26/2018
03/26/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION ISSUED. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLEGATION #1 IN THE PTRSS AND THE COURT ACCEPTS THE ADMISSION. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 70 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED AND SERVED IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL
WITH GOOD-TIME CREDIT OF 35 DAYS. TIME SERVED. THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COSTS/FEES ARE REDUCED TO JUDGMENT: $50.00 ADMIN FEE, $270.00 PUF, $339.00 DR, $225.00 UDS, $200.00 CS, $123.50 COURT COSTS, $200.00 COUNTERMEASURES, $300.00 A/D
PROGRAM FEE AND $50.00 PD FEE. DEFENDANT IS DISCHARGED UNSUCCESSFULLY FROM PROBATION. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/26/2018
> VOL./BOOK Y
03/26/2018
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D) REASON: REVOCATION OF PROBATION
> 2. 9-30-5-1(B)/MA: OPER VEH W/ ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENT TO .15 OR MORE
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 03/26/2018
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 70 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 35 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> COMMENT: TIME SERVED.
03/27/2018 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 3/26/2018 : ADAM CHRISTOPHER KORNYA
03/27/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE ---- 3/26/2018 : JASON B MEREDITH;MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
01/10/2020 DISPOSITION SENT ELECTRONICALLY TO INDIANA STATE POLICE
> ADDED BY CHRIS INTERFACE (SNTC)
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
> 371 F.3d 458
> Vernon BROWN, Appellant, v. Allen D. LUEBBERS, Appellee.
> No. 02-1845.
> United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
> Submitted: April 14, 2004.
> Filed: June 15, 2004.
> John W. Simon, argued, Clayton, MO (Richard H. Sindel, Clayton, MO, on the brief), for appellant.
> Stephen D. Hawke, argued, AAG, Jefferson City, MO, for appellee.
> Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges, En Banc.
✗ BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
[pg. 1]
In 1991, a jury convicted Vernon Brown in Missouri state court for the 1985 strangulation death of Synetta Ford. He was sentenced to death. His consolidated direct appeal and post-conviction challenges in the
Missouri Supreme Court were unavailing. State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 (Mo.) (en banc), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 979, 120 S. Ct. 431, 145 L. Ed. 2d 337 (1999). His 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition in the District Court 1 raising thirty-one grounds
for relief was denied, but the court granted a certificate of appealability on eleven grounds. A panel of this Court affirmed the District Court in part but granted the writ on one of Brown's claims challenging his sentence. Brown v. Luebbers,
344 F.3d 770 (8th Cir.2003).
[pg. 2]
Both Brown and Allen D. Luebbers (representing the State) filed petitions for rehearing with suggestions for rehearing en banc. We requested from Brown a supplemental response addressing the appropriate standard of
review to apply to the issue upon which the writ had been granted. After receiving the response, the panel denied both petitions for rehearing. The Court en banc rejected Brown's suggestions for reconsideration by the
full Court but granted an en banc rehearing to the State.
[pg. 3]
The claim in question concerns a letter that Brown's defense counsel sought to have read into evidence during the penalty phase of Brown's trial for the Ford murder. Counsel represented to the trial court that the
letter was from Darius Q. Turner, Brown's younger brother, and had been sent to Brown's counsel in the public defender's office. According to the letter, Turner, a sergeant in the United States Army, was deployed
in Saudi Arabia in Operation Desert Shield at the time of Brown's sentencing. As a result, he was unable to be present in the courtroom to testify. In the letter, Turner noted the love and understanding between him
and his brother and recounted how Brown had protected Turner from bigger boys when Turner was a child. As for their relationship as adults, Turner expressed regret for not staying in touch and told his brother that
the telephone calls and letters from Brown meant more to him than those he received from others. Finally, he implored those who might read the letter to let God's law decide Brown's fate. The trial court excluded the letter as hearsay.
[pg. 4]
We now affirm the District Court's denial of relief on all grounds. In doing so, we adopt the holdings and reasoning of the panel opinion, except for Part VIII and the result.
I.
[pg. 5]
Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) in 1996, a decision by a state court "with respect to any claim that was
adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings" is entitled to deference by the federal courts. 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). That is, we look only to see if such adjudication
"resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States" or
"resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding." Id. 2254(d)(1), (2). AEDPA effected
a move toward greater deference in the 2254 courts' review of state-court decisions. See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 , 333 n. 7, 117 S. Ct. 2059 , 138 L. Ed. 2d 481 (1997) (noting " 2254(d)'s new,
highly deferential standard for evaluating state-court rulings").
[pg. 6]
But as the language of the statute makes clear, there is a condition precedent that must be satisfied before we can apply the deferential AEDPA standard to Brown's claim.
The claim must have been "adjudicated on the merits" in state court. The majority (and the dissent, for that matter) in the panel opinion for the Court concluded that Brown's
constitutional claim regarding the Turner letter had not, in fact, been adjudicated on the merits in state court. 2 So the first question for us to consider is: what constitutes an
adjudication on the merits? From the plain language of the statute and black-letter law, we know that the state court's decision must be a judgment an adjudication on a substantive
issue the merits (as compared with a procedural or technical point). A survey of opinions from our sister circuits demonstrates that, beyond these two considerations, resolving the question is
not so easy. One thing is clear no court has established bright-line rules about how much a state court must say or the language it must use to compel a 2254 court's conclusion that the state
court has adjudicated a claim on the merits. That is as it should be, given one court's difficulty in divining the thought processes of another based only on language being used in certain ways,
not to mention the comity issues that would be raised. Cf. Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 , 739, 111 S. Ct. 2546 , 115 L. Ed. 2d 640 (1991) (noting in discussion of procedural default in state
habeas cases that the Court has "no power to tell state courts how they must write their opinions" so that reviewing "federal courts might not be bothered with reviewing state law and the record in the case").
We must simply look at what a state court has said, case by case, and determine whether the federal constitutional claim was considered and rejected by that court.
[pg. 7]
After careful reflection upon the adjudication issue in this case, we now conclude that Brown's constitutional claim was indeed adjudicated on the merits in state court,
on two independent grounds, and that the AEDPA 2254(d) standard of review should apply.
A.
[pg. 8]
In Brown's consolidated appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court, at the very least, acknowledged that a federal constitutional claim was before it when it said, "Brown alleges
that the letter should have been read into evidence pursuant to State v. Phillips, 940 S.W.2d 512 , 517-18 (Mo. banc 1997), and Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S. 95 , 99 S. Ct. 2150 ,
60 L. Ed. 2d 738 (1979)" (per curiam). Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549. Phillips, a Missouri death penalty case, concerned a Brady 3 issue raised in the petitioner's consolidated appeal.
The State had argued that the Brady issue was of no consequence because the statement in question was hearsay and would not have been admitted into evidence even if it had been disclosed.
The Phillips court, in the pages cited by the Missouri Supreme Court in Brown, analyzed the question under Green and concluded that the testimony was highly relevant and reliable, and it should have been admitted.
[pg. 9]
In Green, also a capital case, the hearsay at issue was the testimony of a witness given at the trial of Carzell Moore, who was indicted on the same charges of murder and
rape as Green, the petitioner. Moore and Green were tried separately. The witness testified in Moore's trial, the first to be held, that Moore, Green's alleged partner in crime,
had confessed to him, the witness. According to the testimony, Green was not present when the victim was murdered. The testimony was excluded from Green's later trial as hearsay.
The Supreme Court did not second-guess the state court's evidentiary ruling that the testimony was hearsay but held that "its exclusion constituted a violation of the Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment. The excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial, and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability."
Green, 442 U.S. at 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 (citing Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 604-05, 98 S. Ct. 2954 , 57 L. Ed. 2d 973 (1978) (plurality opinion); id. at 613-16, 98 S. Ct. 2954 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)). 4
[pg. 10]
It is true that the bulk of the Missouri Supreme Court's brief discussion of Brown's claim was devoted to the state-law evidentiary question and whether "the trial court abused its
discretion" in excluding the letter. Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549. But the "summary nature" of the discussion of the federal constitutional question does not preclude application of the
AEDPA standard. James v. Bowersox, 187 F.3d 866 , 869 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1143, 120 S. Ct. 994, 145 L. Ed. 2d 942 (2000). Here, the Missouri Supreme Court cited cases
applying the relevant constitutional rule and held against Brown on the question of reliability. Under Green, absent a determination that "substantial reasons" exist to assume the reliability
of the evidence in question, it will not be a due process violation for a court to decline to admit the evidence. The citation to the relevant law and the invocation of "reliability" in the
opinion are enough to persuade us that the Missouri Supreme Court adjudicated the due process claim on the merits. That is not to say that citation to law and a key word from the application
of that law or anything else is required for us to determine that the claim was adjudicated on the merits. We only hold that they suffice in this case for us to conclude that the Missouri Supreme
Court's decision on this claim was an adjudication on the merits.
B.
[pg. 11]
We further conclude that the Missouri Supreme Court adjudicated Brown's federal constitutional claim on the merits in an alternative holding. Following its references
to Green and the reliability of the letter, the court said, "We ... note that even if [the trial judge] was wrong about the letter's reliability, its exclusion does not
in the context of this case seem prejudicial," Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549-50, a conclusion that is an application of the harmless-error standard set forth in Chapman v. California,
386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 , 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 (1967). 5 In Chapman, the Court held that certain federal constitutional errors made in state-court criminal trials could "be deemed
harmless, not requiring the automatic reversal of the conviction" if the errors are shown to be harmless "beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. at 22, 24, 87 S. Ct. 824 . Again,
there are no "magic words" that must be invoked before we can conclude that the Missouri Supreme Court decided that any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. But here, the
state court's use of "prejudicial" signals to us the application of the Chapman standard, as the Supreme Court has long considered prejudice in its Chapman harmless-error analyses.
See, e.g., Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 , 636, 113 S. Ct. 1710 , 123 L. Ed. 2d 353 (1993) ("State courts are fully qualified to identify constitutional error and evaluate its
prejudicial effect on the trial process under Chapman...."); Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365 , 382 n. 7, 106 S. Ct. 2574 , 91 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1986) ("Furthermore, when an attorney
chooses to default a Fourth Amendment claim, he also loses the opportunity to obtain direct review under the harmless-error standard of Chapman, which requires the State to prove that
the defendant was not prejudiced by the error.") (citation omitted); Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605 , 613-14, 102 S. Ct. 2049 , 72 L. Ed. 2d 367 (1982) ("The preclusion clause did not
prejudice respondent in any way, and a new trial is not warranted.") (citing Chapman). On the facts of this case, the state court's determination that the exclusion of the Turner letter
did not seem "prejudicial" to Brown was sufficient adjudication on the merits to entitle this alternate holding to AEDPA deferential review.
II.
[pg. 12]
Having concluded that the standard set out in 2254(d) as amended by AEDPA applies to Brown's claim, we now consider whether the Missouri Supreme Court's adjudication
of the claim resulted in a decision that was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. 6 We will consider both grounds on which the
Missouri Supreme Court decided the constitutional claim. But before we get to the analysis, we must lay out the evidence of aggravating and mitigating circumstances that was before the jury,
as that evidence is critical to our legal conclusions here and in Part III.
[pg. 13]
The jury was instructed on four aggravating circumstances, two statutory and two nonstatutory. The first factor that the jury considered was whether
Brown was convicted in 1973 in Indiana on a charge of assault and battery with intent to gratify sexual desires. In fact, the indictment on the charge, read into
evidence during the sentencing portion of Brown's trial, accused Brown of fondling and caressing the body of a twelve-year old girl to gratify his own sexual desires.
Trial Transcript at 2298. Brown pleaded guilty to the charge.
[pg. 14]
Next, the jury was instructed to consider whether Brown's murder of Synetta Ford "involved torture and depravity of mind and whether, as a result thereof, the murder
was outrageously and wantonly vile, horrible, and inhuman." State v. Brown, Cause No. 861-03056, Legal File Components of the Record on Appeal in the Missouri Supreme Court
at 86. The jury could find depravity of mind only if it found that Brown "committed repeated and excessive acts of physical abuse upon Synetta Ford and the killing was therefore
unreasonably brutal." Id. The evidence before the jury was that nineteen-year-old Synetta Ford was found dead in her basement apartment with a knife sticking out of her
throat and the electrical cord from a curling iron "tightly knotted around the neck." Trial Transcript at 2043, see also id. at 1662, 1684. The door to her apartment had been
forced open. The evidence showed that Brown first strangled her, taking the time to knot the electrical cord around her neck, and then as she was dying he stabbed her in the chest
and neck. The stab wound to her neck severed her carotid artery, the major artery in the neck. The jurors saw photographs of Ford's body as it appeared when it was discovered on the floor
of her apartment and also an autopsy photograph. In addition, the jury watched a videotape of Brown's confession, where he claimed that Ford had accidentally stabbed herself before and after he strangled her with the cord.
[pg. 15]
The jury was further charged with deciding whether Brown was convicted of first degree murder in 1988. During sentencing, jurors heard evidence that in October 1986, Brown took nine-year-old Janet
Perkins, who was at his home playing with his stepsons, into the basement where he wrapped a cord around her neck and strangled her. The boys heard her screaming as they played upstairs. The body was
found near a trash dumpster, wrapped in trash bags, with a rusty coat hanger wrapped around her ankles and one of her arms, so that her knees were drawn up to her body. After Brown was picked up in
connection with the Perkins murder and confessed his guilt, he led officers to another dumpster a block from where the body was found. There they found a bag containing Janet Perkins's missing shoe,
a yellow plastic raincoat, and some of her school papers. The Ford jury also saw photographs of the little girl's body and watched Brown's videotaped confession to the Perkins murder. Brown was convicted
of first degree murder in the Perkins case and sentenced to death.
[pg. 16]
Finally, the jury was instructed to decide whether Brown committed acts of sodomy on his stepsons Christopher Moore, Jason Moore, and Tommy Johnson, who were about seven, five,
and nine years old, respectively, at the time of the abuse to which they testified. Christopher, age eleven at the time of the sentencing, testified that before Brown was arrested for the
Perkins murder in October 1986, he would take Christopher alone into the bedroom Brown shared with Christopher's mother and tell him to undress and lie on his stomach on the bed. Brown would
undress, put "hair grease" on his penis, and put his penis in Christopher's anus and then in his mouth. Id. at 2262. Brown
committed these acts of sodomy on several different occasions. Christopher told no one about the incidents until Brown was in jail because Brown
had said that if he told, he "would never see any of [his] brothers or [his] mother again." Id. at 2264. Jason, nine years old when he testified, also explained to the jury how Brown had performed anal
sex on him and said that Brown had threatened to "kill us" if he told anyone. Id. at 2288. Thirteen-year-old Tommy Johnson testified that Brown put his penis in Tommy's anus and mouth and that Brown also put his
mouth on Tommy's penis. Id. at 2323. The boys said that Brown would commit the acts of sodomy when their mother was not at home, taking them one at a time from playing with their brothers and locking the door so
that the boys who were not being victimized at the time could not come in.
[pg. 17]
The jury found all four aggravating circumstances, unanimously, beyond a reasonable doubt.
[pg. 18]
Brown's defense team called a number of witnesses who gave mitigating evidence. First, the jury heard from Maggie and Donald Coplen who knew Brown, 7 his wife,
and his wife's sons (the children who testified for the State in the penalty phase). They became acquainted in 1981 (four years before the Ford murder, ten years before the trial)
at Sunday school. The Coplens testified that the families spent two Christmases together, and Donald Coplen said he and Brown delivered Christmas baskets to the needy one year. They saw
each other socially an additional time or two. The Coplens also saw Brown regularly at church until he stopped attending in 1984 and became distant. They did not see him after that,
although Maggie Coplen said that she had visited him in the city jail and in state prison and was staying in touch with him. Both Coplens testified that they had not seen Brown physically
abuse his wife or her sons during the time that they were in regular contact with him.
[pg. 19]
Paul Sasser, a retired minister and former director of a homeless center that was affiliated with Brown's church, became acquainted with Brown at the center. Brown began
to help Sasser at the homeless center, first as a volunteer, then for a small salary, and lived with Sasser for a while. While working at the center, Brown had protected Sasser
from angry or drunk clients who had threatened Sasser. Brown found his future wife and her three sons living on the streets and was concerned for them, according to Sasser, eventually
taking them in. Sasser was still in contact with Brown at the time of the trial.
[pg. 20]
Forensic social worker Jill Miller testified next. She had spent hours talking with Brown, his family, and others who knew him, and she also had reviewed his educational, medical, and
correctional records. She noted that Brown had refused educational and neurological testing that she had recommended for her use in preparing her testimony for the sentencing.
[pg. 21]
From the school records, Miller gleaned that Brown had a borderline IQ, at best, and generally performed two to three grades below his grade level. She testified that he was close to his
mother, brothers, and sister growing up, although his mother was strict. He was protective of his younger siblings (he was the oldest), sometimes taking the blame for things they had done
so that they would not be punished. Personally, she found Brown to be "personable, pleasant, generally cooperative ... verbal, polite, but ... very guarded." Trial Transcript at 2415.
[pg. 22]
The jury then heard the testimony of three corrections officers. The supervisor of social services at the city jail when Brown was held there said Brown had made few requests of the staff and did
not get in trouble for fighting. Also testifying were corrections officers from Potosi Correctional Center, where Brown had been incarcerated for about a year and a half before his trial for the Ford
murder. A recreation supervisor said that Brown, an inmate worker at the prison, was "cooperative, self-motivated and honest" in the work setting. Id. at 2423. Brown got "along exceptionally well with
the staff" but would not have much to do with other prisoners. Id. Another Potosi officer who had substantial contact with Brown from the time Brown arrived testified that Brown was being held in minimum
custody (although in a maximum security facility). His behavior was good, he avoided other inmates, and in one case, he literally ran from trouble when a fight broke out.
[pg. 23]
In addition to the testimony of these live witnesses, Brown's counsel read to the jury joint stipulations as to what the testimony of Janie Brown, Brown's daughter,
and Irvin Brimmage, who knew Brown as a teenager in Indianapolis, would be, had those witnesses been present in the courtroom to testify. Janie Brown was born when Brown
was seventeen years old. She saw her father occasionally until she was ten, and she had not seen him since. She had, however, started to write to him in prison. Brown never
behaved inappropriately around her. Brimmage met Brown when they were teenagers, and they became good friends. Although he was poor, Brown would share whatever money he had.
Brown was helpful to older people, and Brimmage never saw him behave inappropriately around children. As a teenager, Brown did not abuse alcohol or drugs.
[pg. 24]
Finally, there was an audiotape interview with Patricia Beverly, Brown's mother, recorded at her home in Indianapolis late in 1990. She was unable to travel to St. Louis
for the trial because she was totally disabled at the time. She had last seen Brown in 1984 when he came to visit her after she was injured.
[pg. 25]
Beverly said that Brown was born at home after a problem pregnancy, two months early and following a difficult labor and delivery. He struggled in school, although he enjoyed
some sports, ROTC, and wood shop. He eventually quit high school at age 16. Beverly said that she had three other sons, including one who was stationed in Saudi Arabia at the time
of the interview, and one daughter. As the oldest, Brown was protective of them as they were growing up, such as when they were threatened by other children going to and from
school. Brown tended to the needs of his grandmother after she had a stroke, essentially taking responsibility for her care while Beverly was at work. He was respectful of his
grandparents and mother and regularly attended church where his grandfather was the minister.
[pg. 26]
He married a woman in Indianapolis who already had children, and Beverly said he always treated those children well. After he moved to St. Louis, he would write and call Beverly;
he continued to call once or twice a week from prison. As the interview was drawing to a close, Beverly said that she loved Brown, and she asked the jury to spare his life.
A.
[pg. 27]
We turn first to the state court's Green adjudication. At the outset, we decline Brown's invitation to revisit the trial court's conclusion that the letter was hearsay under
Missouri's law of evidence. "[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions." Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62
, 67-68, 112 S. Ct. 475 , 116 L. Ed. 2d 385 (1991). We assume the state court properly applied state law. All that concern us are issues raised under the United States Constitution.
[pg. 28]
In its review, the Missouri Supreme Court left undisturbed the trial court's conclusion that the letter was not reliable, citing Green, which sets out the applicable federal law.
Under Green, as we explained in Part I.A, the hearsay evidence in question must be "highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase" and "substantial reasons [must exist] to
assume its reliability" before its exclusion will be deemed a due process violation. Green, 442 U.S. at 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 . Brown has not shown that the state courts' conclusion is
"opposite to that reached by" the Supreme Court in Green or any other case "on a question of law." Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 , 405, 120 S. Ct. 1495 , 146 L. Ed. 2d 389 (2000).
Likewise, Brown has not directed us to, and we have not found, a Supreme Court case with "materially indistinguishable" facts in which the Court reached a different result. Id. The Missouri
Supreme Court decision is therefore not contrary to clearly established federal law.
[pg. 29]
We note again the brevity of the adjudication and its emphasis on the question of state law. This does not affect our determination that the result is not contrary to federal law.
The Supreme Court advises us that the state court need not cite or even be aware of the governing Supreme Court cases, "so long as neither the reasoning nor the result of the state-court
decision contradicts them." Early v. Packer, 537 U.S. 3 , 8, 123 S. Ct. 362 , 154 L. Ed. 2d 263 (2002) (per curiam). In the "contrary to" analysis of the state court's decision, our focus
is on the result and any reasoning that the court may have given; the absence of reasoning is not a barrier to a denial of relief. Cf. James, 187 F.3d at 869 ("The summary nature of the
[state court] opinion does not affect this [AEDPA] standard of review.").
[pg. 30]
We now consider whether the decision was the result of an unreasonable application of federal law. The Green standard, the applicable law here, has two parts: relevance and reliability.
The Missouri Supreme Court did not specifically address relevance. Indeed, there was no reason to, given its ruling on reliability, as the evidence must be both relevant and reliable.
Nevertheless, we have considered the question and have determined that it is not an objectively unreasonable application of Green and its progeny to conclude on the facts of this case that
the letter did not meet the first part of the Green standard, as it was not "highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase." Green, 442 U.S. at 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 .
[pg. 31]
The issue in mitigation, to which the Turner letter would go, was Brown's character. The letter had essentially two messages. 8 First, Turner described how Brown protected Turner and
his friends from older boys who chased them home from school, then taught Turner to stand on his "own two feet." The letter conveyed the additional message that Turner loved Brown,
although the brothers had been out of touch. Turner said that Brown had "too much good in him to let go of" and that he, Turner, found it "very hard to believe" that Brown was guilty.
[pg. 32]
We have no quarrel with the general propositions that a defendant's character may be a "critical issue" in the sentencing phase of a death penalty case and that the testimony of
relatives as to character may be "highly relevant." Here, however, the situation is different. The only real example of Brown's character that Turner gave, acknowledging that it
"might not sound like much," was an incident that occurred years before Brown murdered Synetta Ford, when Brown protected Turner from older boys. It is clear from the letter that
Turner had not spent time with his brother since they were much younger, although they had reconnected through telephone calls and letters. We think it is an objectively reasonable
application of Green to conclude that stale evidence of a convicted murderer's character, evidence that harkens back to incidents or relationships of years past, well before the
murder was committed, is not "highly relevant" to a "critical issue." The degree of relevance is further diminished by the fact that, as described above, the jury had before it other
evidence of Brown's character. Indeed, the "aspect of [Brown's] character" suggested by the letter his efforts to protectthose less able to protect themselves was before the jury
through the testimony of other witnesses. Lockett, 438 U.S. at 604, 98 S. Ct. 2954 (plurality opinion). As we noted above, the forensic social worker testified that she had spoken
with Brown's family, who described Brown as being "pretty protective of his younger brothers and sister." Trial Transcript at 2413. Brown's mother stated the same thing. Likewise,
Paul Sasser testified that Brown protected him from belligerent patrons of the homeless center. That evidence is precisely the sort of evidence that Turner offered in his one memory
of his relationship with Brown Brown's protection of people close to him and is actually broadened beyond Turner's recollection to include Brown's friend and all of Brown's siblings,
not just Turner. Additional character testimony, as recited above, came from witnesses who apparently had more recent and frequent contact with Brown than Turner. Several of those witnesses
recalled specific, positive incidents that were more contemporaneous both to the approximate time of the murder and to the time of sentencing. Finally, Turner's love for his brother,
his belief in Brown's innocence, and his opinion that "God's law" should decide Brown's fate are subjective feelings that cannot be deemed "highly relevant" under Green to the question
of Brown's character, and it would not be objectively unreasonable to so conclude.
[pg. 33]
On this record, we cannot say that it is an unreasonable application of clearly established law to conclude that the Turner letter was not "highly relevant to a critical issue" at Brown's sentencing.
[pg. 34]
The Missouri Supreme Court did mention the letter's reliability, deferring to the trial court's uncertainty "as to the authenticity of the letter." Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 549.
Under Green, excluding otherwise inadmissible hearsay will result in a violation of due process if the evidence is not only relevant but also "substantial reasons existed to
assume its reliability." We hold that the circumstances surrounding the letter do not make it contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law for
the state courts to have concluded there were not "substantial reasons ... to assume its reliability."
[pg. 35]
The Supreme Court opinion dealing with reliability that Brown cites in his brief is Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S. Ct. 1038 , 35 L. Ed. 2d 297 (1973). At issue in
that case was the exclusion of the testimony of three witnesses that someone other than the petitioner had confessed to them the crime for which the petitioner was being tried.
The petitioner also alleged that his constitutional right to confront a witness had been violated. 9 The Chambers Court noted that the statements in question "were originally made
and subsequently offered at trial under circumstances that provided considerable assurance of their reliability." Id. at 300, 93 S. Ct. 1038 (noting that the statements were
spontaneous, made to several people, corroborated, and against interest, and that the person who purportedly made the out-of-court statements was in the courtroom and could be called to testify).
Moreover, the witnesses' testimony went directly to the question of guilt or innocence. On the facts of this case, we do not think it is contrary to or an objectively unreasonable
application of Chambers (or any other Supreme Court case that we have identified, for that matter) for the state courts to have concluded there were not "substantial reasons" to assume
the Turner letter's reliability, that is, that the letter's reliability could not be assured because it was not submitted as a sworn affidavit. We may believe the state courts got it wrong,
but that is not our call to make. "[A] federal habeas court may not issue the writ simply because that court concludes in its independent judgment that the relevant state-court decision
applied clearly established federal law erroneously or incorrectly. Rather, that application must also be unreasonable." Williams, 529 U.S. at 411, 120 S. Ct. 1495 . We hold that the state
courts' decision on the question of reliability is not contrary to or an unreasonable application of Green.
B.
[pg. 36]
As for Chapman prejudice, the Missouri Supreme Court had before it the transcript of Brown's trial and sentencing, and noted that its decision was made "in the
context of this case." Brown, 998 S.W.2d at 550. As we have demonstrated, there was before the jury extensive evidence of aggravating circumstances, as well
as mitigating character evidence to which the Turner letter was cumulative. In addition, as we have said, the jury heard from character witnesses who had more
recent contact with Brown, including three correctional officers who testified to his model behavior while incarcerated. The Missouri Supreme Court might have
been a bit more forceful in its conclusion, where it stated that the letter's exclusion did not "seem prejudicial." Id. at 550. But we do not think the state court
was expressing ambivalence or anything less than an unequivocal conclusion of law, although perhaps not in the strongest terms. In any event, that court's use of
"seem" does not make the decision contrary to any Supreme Court precedent. Likewise, we hold that the result of the Missouri Supreme Court's application of the Chapman
harmless-error standard, given the record in this case, is not objectively unreasonable.
III.
[pg. 37]
If we have misjudged congressional intent and the Supreme Court's interpretation of "adjudicated on the merits" for purposes of 2254, we nevertheless would hold that
the District Court's decision should be affirmed under the pre-AEDPA standard of review. See Robinson v. Crist, 278 F.3d 862 , 865 (8th Cir.2002)
("Because this claim apparently was not adjudicated by the [state] court, we likely should apply the pre-AEDPA standard of review.").
[pg. 38]
We have gone to some lengths in Part II of our opinion to describe the law applicable to Brown's claim and the facts related to it in order to xplain why we
reject his claim that the Missouri Supreme Court's decision was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. Little more needs
to be said here. For the reasons we have already explained in some detail, we do not think Brown has shown that the Turner letter was "highly relevant to a critical issue"
in his sentencing. While we may be less certain under the pre-AEDPA standard of review about the state courts' decision that Brown failed to show "substantial reasons" to
conclude that the letter was reliable, we need not decide the question because the relevance standard cannot be met.
[pg. 39]
In any event, we are confident that the exclusion of the letter was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. "A constitutional error is harmless when `it appears
"beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained."'" Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, ___, 124 S. Ct. 7, 12, 157 L. Ed. 2d 263 (2004)
(citations to quoted cases omitted). As we have explained, the Turner letter's statements, to the extent they may be relevant, were cumulative to evidence as to Brown's character
that was already before the jury. Moreover, the evidence of aggravating circumstances was devastating. This is not a case, like Chambers, where the evidence in question was highly
relevant to actual guilt or innocence. The Turner letter was not offered to prove that Brown was actually innocent, either of the crime or of the death penalty. Here, Brown received
the constitutionally required "individualized consideration" before the death penalty was imposed. Lockett, 438 U.S. at 605, 98 S. Ct. 2954 (plurality opinion). In these circumstances,
we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the admission of the letter would not have altered the jury's decision to impose the death penalty on Brown, and thus its exclusion was harmless error at most.
[pg. 40]
The judgment of the District Court denying the writ on any and all of Brown's claims is affirmed.
Notes:
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri
2
This is what the Missouri Supreme Court said in deciding Brown's claim of state-law error as well as his claim that the exclusion of the letter violated his rights under the Due Process Clause:
Brown contends that the trial court abused its discretion in the penalty phase when it refused to allow his counsel to read into evidence a letter about him that
was written by his brother, Darius Turner. Turner was stationed in Saudi Arabia during the Operation Desert Shield as a member of the United States Army at the time of trial.
The state objected to the introduction of the letter because the letter is inadmissible hearsay that was unreliable. Brown alleges that the letter should have been read into
evidence pursuant to State v. Phillips and Green v. Georgia. The determination of reliability is left to the trial court judge who was uncertain as to the authenticity of the letter.
We uphold his ruling and note that even if he was wrong about the letter's reliability, its exclusion does not in the context of this case seem prejudicial.
State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 549-50(Mo.) (en banc) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 979, 120 S. Ct. 431, 145 L. Ed. 2d 337 (1999).
3
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963) (prosecutorial suppression of evidence favorable to the accused).
4
InLockett, the petitioner challenged a state death penalty statute that "did not permit the sentencing judge to consider, as mitigating factors, [the petitioner's] character, prior
record, age, lack of specific intent to cause death, and her relatively minor part in the crime." 438 U.S. at 597, 98 S. Ct. 2954 (plurality opinion). The Court concluded that the
Constitution requires "that the sentencer ... not be precluded from considering, as a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant's character or record ... that the defendant proffers
as a basis for a sentence less than death." Id. at 604, 98 S. Ct. 2954 .
5
We are assuming that theChapman harmless-error standard applies here. See Sweet v. Delo, 125 F.3d 1144 , 1158 (8th Cir.1997) (noting Supreme Court cases "implying that harmless-error
analysis applies to Lockett errors"), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1010, 118 S. Ct. 1197, 140 L. Ed. 2d 326 (1998).
6
Brown throws the language from 2254(d)(2), "unreasonable etermination of the facts," into his claim, but he does not argue the facts. It appears to us that the
underlying material facts are a matter of record and are not disputed
7
The witnesses who testified about relationships they had with Brown in the early 1980s knew him as Thomas Turner
8
To the extent Brown suggests that the jury would have found mitigating circumstances in Turner's service to his country in the Gulf War, that is, in deeds of Turner
that have no relevance to Brown, his crime, his character, or his relationship with Turner, we hold that is not proper mitigation evidence
9
The Supreme Court sinceChambers has noted that the opinion "was an exercise in highly case-specific error correction." Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 , 52, 116 S.
Ct. 2013 , 135 L. Ed. 2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion). The Egelhoff Court went on to say that "the holding of Chambers if one can be discerned from such a fact-intensive
case is certainly not that a defendant is denied `a fair opportunity to defend against the State's accusations' whenever `critical evidence' favorable to him is excluded,
but rather that erroneous evidentiary rulings can, in combination, rise to the level of a due process violation." Id. at 53, 116 S. Ct. 2013 (emphasis added).
[pg. 41]
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom MURPHY, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring in the judgment.
[pg. 42]
I agree with the court that because Brown's constitutional claim was adjudicated on the merits in state court, AEDPA's 2254(d) standard of review should apply. I also
agree that any error in excluding the Turner letter was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
[pg. 43]
For the reasons so persuasively advanced in Judge Richard Arnold's dissent, however, I cannot agree that the letter was properly excluded on either relevancy or reliability
grounds. Accordingly, I concur in the judgment affirming the denial of the writ.
[pg. 44]
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring.
[pg. 45]
I join the opinion of the court, but add a few points to clarify my views.
[pg. 46]
It is quite reasonable to ask, as does the dissent, whether the AEDPA-standard issue is properly before the en banc court, if the state did not assert before the three-judge
panel that 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) should apply to review of the state court's adjudications. It must be remembered, however, that as this case first came to the en banc court on a
petition for rehearing, a panel of the court already had reached and decided the question whether 2254(d) applied in this case. Brown v. Luebbers, 344 F.3d 770 , 785 (8th Cir.2003).
At that point, the panel opinion established the law of the circuit on the AEDPA-standard issue, regardless what the parties had asserted in their briefs, and I believe it was properly
the business of the en banc court to decide whether the panel opinion should remain the law of the circuit on that issue. If the panel opinion merely had reported a concession or waiver
by the state in this case, and left the AEDPA-standard issue for another day, then the matter of judicial administration might be resolved differently.
[pg. 47]
Harmless error analysis is sufficient to resolve this case, but with brief amplification, I also join the court's conclusion that the state court proceedings did not result in a
decision that involved an unreasonable application of Green v. Georgia, 442 U.S. 95 , 99 S. Ct. 2150 , 60 L. Ed. 2d 738 (1979) (per curiam). With respect to reliability of the disputed
letter, it is true that the Missouri Supreme Court referred to the trial court's uncertainty as to the authenticity of the letter, while the trial court did not appear to rely on authenticity
in excluding the letter. On the other hand, the trial judge did say that he rejected the letter because it was unsworn hearsay "We're not talking about depositions where a man is under oath,
you're talking about a letter, plain and simple," (Tr. 2443) and the state supreme court said more generally that "[w]e uphold his ruling," which the court said was "about the letter's reliability."
State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 549 (Mo.1999) (en banc).
[pg. 48]
If we were reviewing the decision of the Missouri Supreme Court as though it were an administrative agency, then it may well be that the unclear reasoning of the state
court would be inadequate to sustain its judgment on the issue of reliability without further explanation. I understand the court, however, to join our sister circuits in
rejecting this model of judicial review, which would tend to "place the federal court in just the kind of tutelary relation to the state courts that the recent amendments
are designed to end." Hennon v. Cooper, 109 F.3d 330 , 335 (7th Cir.1997); see also Bell v. Jarvis, 236 F.3d 149 , 159 (4th Cir.2000) (en banc); Bui v. DiPaolo, 170 F.3d 232 , 243 (1st Cir.1999).
[pg. 49]
Under AEDPA, the question for a federal habeas court is not whether the state court's opinion is well reasoned, but whether the decision reached in state court proceedings
is "objectively unreasonable." Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 , 409, 120 S. Ct. 1495 , 146 L. Ed. 2d 389 (2000). The rule of reliability established by Green is quite general
in nature, and state courts thus have a good deal of leeway in reaching reasonable outcomes. Yarborough v. Alvarado, 541 U.S. 652 , 124 S. Ct. 2140 , 158 L. Ed. 2d 938 (2004).
On this understanding, I agree with the court that the decision of the Missouri state courts to exclude hearsay contained in an unsworn letter, while perhaps incorrect if
reviewed de novo, does not represent an unreasonable application of federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. See Buchanan v. Angelone, 103 F.3d 344 , 348-49
(4th Cir.1996), aff'd on other grounds, 522 U.S. 269 , 118 S. Ct. 757 , 139 L. Ed. 2d 702 (1998); Alley v. Bell, 307 F.3d 380 , 398-99 (6th Cir.2002); Glenn v. Tate, 71 F.3d 1204 , 1207 (6th Cir.1995).
[pg. 50]
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, with whom BYE and MELLOY, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting.
[pg. 51]
I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, Vernon Brown is entitled to relief on his habeas corpus petition because during the penalty phase, the trial judge excluded the letter
written by Mr. Brown's brother. I would therefore vacate Mr. Brown's sentence. Mr. Brown's conviction would of course stand. Unless the state sought to retry the penalty phase
within a reasonable time to be set by the District Court, he would be in prison for life.
[pg. 52]
I believe the Court is mistaken in concluding that the state trial court made no constitutionally significant errors in the penalty phase of Mr. Brown's trial. In my view,
the trial court violated petitioner's rights under both the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by excluding as hearsay a letter written by
his brother, Mr. Darius Q. Turner, who was on active duty in the United States Army serving in the Middle East as part of Operation Desert Shield during petitioner's trial. Petitioner
wanted the jury to see the letter as mitigating evidence. This Court discounts both the reliability and relevance of the letter, and I respectfully disagree.
[pg. 53]
Under the amended AEDPA standard, our Court may grant habeas relief if a state court decision is either contrary to federal law or involves an unreasonable application of federal
law. 28 U.S.C. 2254(d). Mr. Brown alleges that the exclusion of the letter violated both the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Lockett v.
Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 98 S. Ct. 2954 , 57 L. Ed. 2d 973 (1978) (plurality opinion), and later cases, the Supreme Court established that the Eighth Amendment guarantees a capital defendant
the right to introduce all relevant mitigating evidence in the penalty phase. The Court noted that "the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that the sentencer, in all but the
rarest kind of capital case, not be precluded from considering, as a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant's character or record and any of the circumstances of the offense
that the defendant proffers as a basis for a sentence less than death." Lockett, 438 U.S. at 604, 98 S. Ct. 2954 ; see also Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 , 110, 102 S. Ct. 869 , 71
L. Ed. 2d 1 (1982). The Supreme Court has also held that the Due Process Clause requires that a state's rules of evidence not be applied mechanically when doing so would preclude the
defendant from introducing relevant evidence at the penalty phase. See Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 93 S. Ct. 1038 , 35 L. Ed. 2d 297 (1973) ("[T]he hearsay rule may not be
applied mechanistically to defeat the ends of justice."). Thus, the exclusion of hearsay testimony at the penalty phase of a death penalty case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment where "[t]he excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial, and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability." Green v. Georgia,
442 U.S. 95 , 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 , 60 L. Ed. 2d 738 (1979) (per curiam) (citations omitted).
[pg. 54]
The first question is whether the AEDPA-standard issue is properly before us as a matter of judicial administration. I think the answer is no, and the procedural history of the
case is instructive on the point. In briefs submitted to the three-judge panel that initially cited Mr. Brown's case, the state did not assert that it should be governed by the
AEDPA standard. In fact, this particular question was not controversial before the panel. Both the panel majority and the dissent (as the Court today acknowledges) hold, or at least
assume, that the AEDPA standard does not apply, because the Missouri Supreme Court had not reached the merits. The first time the applicability of the AEDPA standard was urged was in
the state's petition for rehearing en banc. Petitioner was reduced to the last-minute expedient of placing his entire argument on this point in the response to the petition for
rehearing en banc. No supplemental briefing was allowed prior to the oral argument on rehearing en banc.
[pg. 55]
I am not questioning at all the power of this Court to decide the issue. Courts often (sometimes too often, it seems) decide issues that are somewhat irregularly before them for
example, an issue not properly raised in the court below. But that is certainly not the normal practice. I am not saying that proceedings before three-judge panels are analogous
in every respect to proceedings in lower courts, but there is a certain similarity. The state, like petitioner, should be required to come with all of its guns loaded the first time.
This it has not done. Instead, it has saved one bullet. I do not think this practice should be encouraged, even though the effect of the argument is to affirm the judgment of a district court.
[pg. 56]
Assuming we decide the standard-of-review question, what is the answer? The standard set out in AEDPA that the holding of the state court cannot be set aside unless it was contrary
to clearly established law as set forth in opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States, or was unreasonable in light of the facts in the state-court record is crucial here.
This standard, more difficult for habeas petitioners, comes into play, however, only if the state court decided the federal constitutional issue on its merits. In deciding this question,
it is critical to examine closely the opinion of the Supreme Court of Missouri. In my view, the Missouri Supreme Court did not clearly decide the case on federal grounds.
[pg. 57]
The relevant passage from the opinion of the Missouri Supreme Court is set forth by this Court ante, at 460-61 n. 2. The Court rightly recognizes two separate legal issues: whether
the letter was unreliable, and whether its exclusion was prejudicial. As to unreliability, the opinion clearly reads, with the exception of a citation to Green, like a garden-variety
state-evidence-law issue. The first sentence of the quoted part of the Missouri Supreme Court opinion says: "Brown contends that the trial court abused its discretion in the penalty
phase when it refused to allow his counsel to read into evidence a letter about him that was written by his brother, Darius Turner." State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531 , 549 (en banc), cert.
denied, 528 U.S. 979, 120 S. Ct. 431, 145 L. Ed. 2d 337 (1999). The state court does not explain what it believes Green stands for, or how it helps the position taken by the State of
Missouri. I believe a habeas petitioner is entitled to a more thorough answer. Indeed, it must have been with such a situation in mind that Congress included the "on the merits" language.
The more attention the state court appears to have given the federal issue, the more its decision is entitled to respect. As to the prejudice holding, I do not see any "holding," properly
so called, at all in the state court's opinion. The Missouri Supreme Court's discussion of prejudice says only that admission of the letter did not seem prejudicial. This is not a holding,
but simply an off-the-cuff observation made in passing.
[pg. 58]
So we come to the merits, applying, according to my way of thinking, pre-AEDPA law. In my opinion, regardless of whether the letter constituted hearsay, its exclusion violated Mr.
Brown's due-process rights. The Green standard involves a two-part inquiry, requiring a court to determine whether evidence relevant to a critical issue at the punishment phase is both
relevant and reliable. Green, 442 U.S. at 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 . If such evidence is both relevant and reliable, its exclusion at the punishment phase is reversible error. Ibid. Here, the
letter was highly relevant to a critical issue, petitioner's character, at the punishment phase and no substantial reasons existed not to assume its reliability.
[pg. 59]
This Court acknowledges that the Missouri Supreme Court did not specifically address relevance. This notwithstanding, this Court concludes that the letter was not relevant to a critical
issue because the letter contained "stale evidence" of petitioner's relationship with his brother. I disagree with this characterization of the contents of the letter, and do not join the
Court in its conclusion that "evidence that harkens back to incidents or relationships of years past, well before the murder was committed, is not `highly relevan' to a `critical issue.'"
Indeed, if courts were to follow this standard, I doubt that much mitigating evidence of a defendant's character could ever be admitted. No better method of describing a person's character
likely exists than by recounting incidents and interactions of years past.
[pg. 60]
The Court also intimates that the character evidence contained in the letter was repetitive of other evidence already before the jury. I disagree with this conclusion. It appears from the
letter's contents that petitioner and his brother shared a unique, although often distant, relationship that was unlike that which he shared with any other witness whose testimony was admitted.
Furthermore, I am convinced that its effect on the jury would have been greater than the other mitigating evidence petitioner presented. Mr. Turner was not only a member of the armed services
on active duty, he was also serving in the Gulf War, and over and over again during the trial, on the record, and in the presence of the jury, the Court praised the performance of our troops
in the Gulf War. Theirs is the highest example of patriotism, the Court says. But the minute the defendant adduces evidence of this kind in his favor, the Court takes a completely different
stance. I think the jury's opinion of Mr. Brown might well have risen dramatically if it had known about the letter.
[pg. 61]
As to the reliability of the letter, this Court refers to the Missouri Supreme Court's deference to the trial court's uncertainty of the letter's authenticity. I am troubled by this.
The Missouri Supreme Court appears to defer to a finding that was not made by the trial judge. When the prosecution objected to the admission of the letter, the trial judge relied on
state evidence law, not lack of authenticity, to exclude the letter. Specifically, the trial judge stated: "I have no problems with the authenticity of [the letter] except that it's
just not admissible even if this was an affidavit. The law is clear even an affidavit in the absence of a consent by both parties is not admissible, now that's evidentiary law." Tr.
2443. I am unpersuaded that the trial judge believed the letter was unauthentic and find no basis upon which it would be considered unauthentic. Furthermore, the letter's return address
was to "SFC Darius Q. Turner, HLM 801st MAINT BN, 101st ABN DIV (AASLT), APO NY 09309" and the letter's postmark indicates that it was sent from the United States Army. I therefore
believe that "substantial reasons existed to assume [the letter's] reliability" and that due process required its admission because it was highly relevant to a critical issue. Green, 442 U.S. at 97, 99 S. Ct. 2150 .
[pg. 62]
The exclusion of Mr. Turner's letter was not harmless. "A constitutional error is harmless when `it appears "beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute
to the verdict obtained."'" Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, ___, 124 S. Ct. 7, 12, 157 L. Ed. 2d 263 (2004) (internal quotations omitted). The critical issue in the penalty phase of
Mr. Brown's trial was his character. The State of Missouri aimed to convince the jury that petitioner was a bad person. Petitioner's attorneys, on the other hand, attempted to prove that
although he had committed bad acts, petitioner was a man whose life was worth saving. Mr. Turner's letter seems highly relevant in itself, and it would have been even more compelling than
the other mitigating evidence because its author was a member of the armed services on active duty in time of war. Thus, I conclude that the exclusion of Mr. Turner's letter violated Mr.
Brown's rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and that, upon applying the proper prejudice standard, the exclusion was not harmless.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 53C09-1110-FC-001045
> STATE OF INDIANA VS. KANDYCE Y. LANE
> CASE TYPE: FC - CLASS C FELONY
> DATE FILED: 10/26/2011
> LOCATION: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT 9
✗ RELATED CASE INFORMATION
> RELATED CASES
> 53C09-1110-FC-001043 (CO-DEFENDANT CASE)
> 53C09-1110-FC-001044 (CO-DEFENDANT CASE)
> 53C09-1110-FC-001046 (CO-DEFENDANT CASE)
> 53C09-1110-FC-001047 (CO-DEFENDANT CASE)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT LANE, KANDYCE Y. ALSO KNOWN AS LANE, KANDYCE YVONNE FEMALE BLACK
> 5'5", 125 LBS
> 5524 MARILYN RD INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46226 PROBATION DEPARTMENT MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> 214 W 7TH ST #200 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA DAVID J. GOHN
> MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
> 301 N COLLEGE AVENUE BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> 812-349-2670(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: LANE, KANDYCE Y. STATUTE LEVEL DATE
1. 35-43-5-8(A)(2)/FC: FRAUD ON A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION 35-43-5-8(A)(2) FELONY C 06/02/2011
2. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT 35-43-4-2(A) FELONY D 06/02/2011
3. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT 35-43-4-2(A) FELONY D 06/06/2011
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
10/26/2011 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
10/26/2011 INFORMATION FILED
> APPROVED INFORMATION FILED. SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED FOR THE APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT.
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 10/25/2011
10/26/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/09/2011 AT 1:30 PM.
10/26/2011 SERVICE ISSUED
> SUMMONS FOR INITIAL HEARING FORWARDED TO MONROE CO. SHERIFF FOR SERVICE TO DEFENDANT. INITIAL HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 9, 2011 AT 1:30 PM.
> REQUESTED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> SERVE TO: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
10/26/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/09/2011 AT 1:30 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: ASSIGNED IN ERROR.
10/26/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/16/2011 AT 1:30 PM.
11/04/2011 SERVICE RETURNED SERVED
> MARION COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE RETURNED MARKED LEFT COPY ON OCTOBER 31, 2011 AND MAILED COPY. CEA/I>
> PARTY SERVED: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
11/09/2011 CANCELED INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN)
> ASSIGNED IN ERROR
11/16/2011 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
11/16/2011 FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. WARRANT ISSUED. $1000.00 SURETY BOND. NCL
> PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
11/16/2011 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
12/06/2011 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
12/06/2011 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> FILE FORWARDED TO THE DUTY JUDGE FOR INITIAL HEARING. KMP
12/06/2011 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/06/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/06/2011 AT 1:30 PM.
12/06/2011 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> DEFENDANT RELEASED ON HER OWN RECOGNIZANCE. DEFENDANT TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THE VICTIM AND SHE IS TO STAY OUT OF PEOPLE'S STATE BANK. KMP
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/06/2011
> VOL./BOOK Y
12/06/2011 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
12/07/2011 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/05/2012 AT 2:30 PM.
12/09/2011 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/06/2011
> VOL./BOOK 294
12/15/2011 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY STUART BAGGERLY. KMP
> FOR PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> FILE STAMP: 12/15/2011
01/05/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (2:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> OMNIBUS DATE IS 1/20/12
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/05/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MANN, ELIZABETH N - SJ )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS LATE FOR HEARING AND SHE IS GIVEN THE NEXT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE. KMP
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
01/06/2012 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> STATE FILES NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 01/06/2012
01/06/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 02/02/2012 AT 3:00 PM.
01/12/2012 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> STATE FILES NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 01/11/2012
02/02/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (3:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/02/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PRETRIAL ORDER TENDERED TO THE COURT. KMP
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
02/03/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/26/2012 AT 3:30 PM.
02/15/2012 NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
> STATE FILES NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE. KMP
> FILE STAMP: 02/14/2012
03/26/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (3:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: CONTINUED
03/26/2012 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENSE COUNSEL STUART BAGGERLY APPEARS TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE AND WAIVES CR4. COURT GRANTS. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS RESET ON MAY 21, 2012 AT 1:30 P.M. MOTION AND ORDER ON CONTINUANCE ISSUED. CRCD12-12-C09 TKS
> FILED BY: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> FILED BY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> FILE STAMP: 03/26/2012
03/28/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/21/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
05/21/2012 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> PARTIES PRESENT
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/21/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PRETRIAL ORDER TENDERED TO THE COURT. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JULY 9, 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. VIDEO AT 7:45 A.M.
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
05/22/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 07/09/2012 AT 10:00 AM.
07/09/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 07/09/2012 AT 10:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 08/09/2012 AT 10:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
07/09/2012 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> HEARING ON AUGUST 9, 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. IS A CHANGE OF PLEA. RLR
08/09/2012 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> VIDEO AT 7:45 A.M. REQUIRED
07/09/2012 CONTINUED TO 08/09/2012 - BY REQUEST - LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/09/2012 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> NOAH WILLIAMS APPEARS WITH DEFENDANT AND FOR STUART BAGGERLY. DEFENDANT TO PAY $166.00 IN COURT COSTS, AND $150.00 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE. DEFENDANT'S PROBATION CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO MARION COUNTY. JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCING ORDER ISSUED. KMP
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> VOL./BOOK Y
08/09/2012
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 1. 35-43-5-8(A)(2)/FC: FRAUD ON A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
> DISMISSED
> 2. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT
> PLEA BY AGREEMENT
> 3. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT
> DISMISSED
08/09/2012
> SENTENCED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D)
> 2. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT
> COMMENT ()
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. COMMUNITY SERVICE, 08/09/2012, ACTIVE 08/09/2012
> 2. PROBATION, 08/09/2012 - 01/31/2014, ACTIVE 08/09/2012
> COMMENT: DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE 35 HOURS OF PUBLIC RESTITUTION. JUDGMENT CAN BE REDUCED A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR IF PROBATION COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, AND UPON APPLICATION. KMP
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 08/09/2012
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM: 540 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 1 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 538 DAYS
08/10/2012 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/09/2012
> VOL./BOOK 302
10/03/2012 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FILE STAMP: 10/02/2012
10/03/2012 SERVICE ISSUED
> SUMMONS FOR PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FORWARDED TO DEFENDANT THIS DATE VIA US MAIL. INITIAL HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 17, 2012 AT 1:30 PM.
> REQUESTED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> SERVE TO: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> ISSUED: 10/03/2012
10/03/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/17/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
10/17/2012 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/17/2012 FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: LOZANO, JOSEPH )
> NO PROOF OF SERVICE. CAUSE TO BE RESET. PROBATION OFFICER TO NOTIFY DEFENDANT OF NEW INITIAL HEARING DATE. KMP
> PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
10/23/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/14/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
11/05/2012 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 11/05/2012
11/08/2012 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
11/08/2012 WARRANT /WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON
> ISSUED IN ERROR
11/14/2012 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/14/2012 FAILURE TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> COURT FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT. BOND IS $1,000.00 CASH. SML
> PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
11/14/2012 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
12/10/2012 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
12/10/2012 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
12/10/2012 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/10/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/10/2012 AT 1:30 PM.
12/10/2012 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DENIAL ENTERED ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT. BAIL REVIEW HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 14, 2012, AT 9:00 A.M. EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 21, 2012, 11:00 A.M. KMP
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/10/2012
> VOL./BOOK Y
12/10/2012 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
12/11/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/14/2012 AT 9:00 AM.
12/11/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/21/2012 AT 11:00 AM.
12/12/2012 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/10/2012
> VOL./BOOK 306
12/14/2012 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/14/2012 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> MATT SCHULZ APPEARS FOR THE STATE. DEFENDANT IS RELEASED ON HER OWN RECOGNIZANCE AND IS TO IMMEDIATELY CONTACT HER PROBATION OFFICER. DEFENDANT IS ALSO TO CONTACT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY DAVID GOHN FOR TRANSPORTATION AND LODGING FOR HEARING IF NEEDED. SML
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
12/17/2012 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 12/21/2012 AT 11:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 01/29/2013 AT 1:30 PM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
12/18/2012 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED. SML
> FOR PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> ATTORNEY: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> FILE STAMP: 12/17/2012
01/29/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
12/21/2012 RESET BY COURT TO 01/29/2013
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
01/29/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR. WARRANT ISSUED FOR DEFENDANT WITH A HOLD, NO BOND. KMP
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
01/29/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
01/31/2013 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> COURT INFORMED THAT DEFENDANT DID CALL IN BEFORE THE HEARING ON JANUARY 29, 2013, REQUESTING ANOTHER DATE, AND SHE WAS GIVEN THE DATE OF FEBRUARY 26, 2013, AT 2:00 P.M. DAVID GOHN, PROSECUTOR, DID NOT OBJECT.
> THE COURT NOW VACATES THE WARRANT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED. EVIDENTIARY HEARING RESET FOR FEBRUARY 26, 2013, AT 2:00 P.M. KMP
01/31/2013 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON RECALLED
01/31/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/26/2013 AT 2:00 PM.
02/26/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/26/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR THE STATE. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS RESET FOR MAY 22, 2013 AT 2:00 PM. ASB
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
02/26/2013 ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/26/2013
02/26/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/22/2013 AT 2:00 PM.
03/15/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 05/22/2013 AT 2:00 PM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 05/20/2013 AT 10:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
05/09/2013 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> GRANTED AND RESCHEDULED. KMP
> FILED BY: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> FILED BY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> FILE STAMP: 05/08/2013
05/09/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 05/20/2013 AT 10:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/19/2013 AT 2:00 PM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
05/09/2013 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> SECOND AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/09/2013
06/19/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
05/20/2013 CONTINUED TO 06/19/2013 - BY REQUEST - LANE, KANDYCE Y.
05/22/2013 RESET BY COURT TO 05/20/2013
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/19/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 13, 2013 AT 3:00 PM. ASB
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> HEARING DATE: 06/19/2013
06/19/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/13/2013 AT 3:00 PM.
08/13/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: CONTINUED
08/13/2013 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> MOTION TO CONTINUE FILED AND THE COURT GRANTS. CAUSE CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 9, 2013 AT 1:30 PM. SML
> FILED BY: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> FILE STAMP: 08/12/2013
08/19/2013 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/09/2013 AT 1:30 PM.
10/09/2013 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
10/09/2013 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> JILL BARNETT APPEARS FOR PROBATION.
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART KEEN
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
10/09/2013 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION ISSUED. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLEGATION #5 AND THE COURT ACCEPTS THE ADMISSION.
> THE COURT NOW ORDERS 16 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE BE REVOKED AND EXECUTED IN THE MONROE COUNTY
> JAIL WITH GOOD-TIME CREDIT FOR 8 DAYS. PROBATION IS EXTENDED FOR 6 MONTHS WHICH WILL END ON JULY 1, 2014 AND MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO MARION COUNTY. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/09/2013
> VOL./BOOK Y
10/09/2013
> AMENDED DISPOSITION ON VIOLATION/NONCOMPLIANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D) REASON: PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE
> 2. 35-43-4-2(A)/FD: THEFT
> COMMENT ()
> CONDITION - ADULT:
> 1. COMMUNITY SERVICE, 08/09/2012, ACTIVE 08/09/2012
> 2. PROBATION, 08/09/2012 - 01/31/2014, ACTIVE 08/09/2012
> COMMENT: DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE 35 HOURS OF PUBLIC RESTITUTION. JUDGMENT CAN BE REDUCED A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR IF PROBATION COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, AND UPON APPLICATION. KMP
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 08/09/2012
> INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
> TERM: 540 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 1 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 538 DAYS
> CONFINEMENT TO COMMENCE 10/09/2013
> COUNTY JAIL
> TERM: 16 DAYS
> JAIL CREDIT: 8 DAYS
> SUSPENDED: 0 DAYS
> COMMENT: TIME SERVED.
10/10/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/09/2013
> VOL./BOOK 316
12/09/2013 CASE REOPENED
12/09/2013 MOTION TO MODIFY PROBATION FILED
> PETITION TO MODIFY PROBATION FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 12/06/2013
12/12/2013 ORDER OF PROBATION MODIFICATION
> MOTION GRANTED. DEFENDANT MUST COMPLETE AN ADDITIONAL 10 HOURS OF PUBLIC RESTITUTION DUE TO A NEW ARREST IN MARION COUNTY. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/11/2013
> VOL./BOOK Y
12/13/2013 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/11/2013
> VOL./BOOK 318
05/30/2014 CASE REOPENED
05/30/2014 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. SUMMONS REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 05/30/2014
05/30/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/11/2014 AT 1:30 PM.
06/11/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 06/11/2014 AT 1:30 PM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/25/2014 AT 1:30 PM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
06/11/2014 TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION WITH PARTY
> DEFENDANT CONTACTS THE COURT DUE TO A CONFLICT WITH HER HEARING DATE. DEFENDANT STATES THAT DUE TO WORK, SCHOOL AND OTHER HEARING IN MARION COUNTY JUNE 25, 2014 IS THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE THAT WILL WORK FOR HER.
> THE COURT CONTINUES AND NOTIFIES DEFENDANT TELEPHONICALLY. SML
> PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
06/24/2014 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FIRST AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED THIS DATE. WARRANT REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/24/2014
06/25/2014 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
06/11/2014 CONTINUED TO 06/25/2014 - BY REQUEST - LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/25/2014 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR FOR INITIAL HEARING. PROBATION FILES A SECOND AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE WITH A WARRANT REQUEST. THE COURT FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A
> PROBATION VIOLATION WARRANT. DEFENDANT IS TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. SML
06/25/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
06/30/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/25/2014
> VOL./BOOK 324
08/14/2014 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> THIRD AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED THIS DATE. WARRANT REQUESTED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/14/2014
08/18/2014 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
08/18/2014 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
08/18/2014 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D)
> PTR
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/18/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/18/2014 AT 1:30 PM.
08/18/2014 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: CHAPMAN, RONALD - PT )
> DENIAL ENTERED FOR DEFENDANT. BAIL REVIEW HEARING SET FOR AUGUST 20, 2014, AT 9:00 A.M. EVIDENTIARY HEARING SET FOR SEPTEMBER 3, 2014, AT 11:00 A.M. KMP
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/18/2014
> VOL./BOOK Y
08/18/2014 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE
08/19/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> BAIL REVIEW HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/20/2014 AT 9:00 AM.
08/19/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/03/2014 AT 11:00 AM.
08/19/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/18/2014
> VOL./BOOK 326
08/20/2014 BAIL REVIEW HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/20/2014 BAIL REVIEW ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> MICHAEL HUNT APPEARS FOR STUART BAGGERLY AND WITH THE DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT'S BOND REMAINS UNCHANGED. KMP
08/26/2014 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED. SML
> FOR PARTY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> ATTORNEY: BAGGERLY, STUART K
> FILE STAMP: 08/22/2014
09/03/2014 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/03/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> KELLIE PILLAR APPEARS FOR THE STATE. NIKKI FALETTI APPEARS FOR PROBATION.
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 15, 2014 AT 11:00 AM. DEFENDANT REMAINS IN JAIL WITH A HOLD. ASB
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART K
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
09/03/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/15/2014 AT 11:00 AM.
09/15/2014 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/15/2014 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> FILE STAMP: 09/12/2014
09/15/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS RESET TO SEPTEMBER 19, 2014 AT 11:00 AM. ASB
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART K
> PRESENT: GOHN, DAVID J.
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
09/15/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/19/2014 AT 11:00 AM.
09/19/2014 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER HARPER, TERESA D) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/19/2014 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> KELLIE PILLAR APPEARS FOR THE STATE. NIKKI FALETIC APPEARS FOR PROBATION.
> PRESENT: BAGGERLY, STUART K
> PRESENT: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
09/19/2014 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HARPER, TERESA D )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION ISSUED. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO PREVIOUS ALLEGATIONS A AND B IN THIRD AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE AND ALLEGATION #9.
> THE COURT ACCEPTS THE ADMISSION. THE COURT NOW ORDERS
> 120 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPENDED SENTENCE TO BE EXECUTED AND SERVED IN THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL WITH GOOD-TIME CREDIT OF 36 DAYS.
> DEFENDANT MUST SERVE 24 MORE REAL DAYS AND HER RELEASE DATE IS
> OCTOBER 13, 2014 AT 11:00 AM. OUTSTANDING COSTS OF $315.00 AND $92 PROBATION AND FEES ARE REDUCED TO JUDGMENT. ASB
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/19/2014
09/23/2014 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/19/2014
> VOL./BOOK 327
10/06/2014 CASE REOPENED
10/06/2014 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> FILED BY: LANE, KANDYCE Y.
> FILE STAMP: 10/02/2014
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 29D01-1412-DR-012357
> IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF DOUGLAS S BANNING AND BRENDA BANNING
> CASE TYPE: DR - DOMESTIC RELATION
> DATE FILED: 12/29/2014
> LOCATION: HAMILTON SUPERIOR COURT 1
RELATED CASE INFORMATION
> RELATED CASES
> 29A02-1710-DR-02266 (LOWER TRIAL COURT CASE)
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> ATTORNEYS INTERVENOR VECTREN CORPORATION WAYNE C TURNER
RETAINED
> 111 MONUMENT CIR STE 4400 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46244
> 317-822-4400(W)JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN
RETAINED
> 111 MONUMENT CIRCLE SUITE 4400 PO BOX 44989 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46244
> 3178224400(W)
> MEDIATOR GOLDENBERG, JILL
> COHEN GARELICK & GLAZIER
> 8888 KEYSTONE CROSSING STE 800 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
> PETITIONER BANNING, DOUGLAS S MICHAEL G RUPPERT
RETAINED
> RUPPERT & SCHAEFER PC
> 2910 EAST 96TH STREET SUITE D INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
> 317-580-9295(W)JASON L FULK
RETAINED
> 111 MONUMENT CIRCLE #4400 P.O. BOX 44989 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46244-0989
> 317-822-4400(W)PAULA J SCHAEFER
RETAINED
> RUPPERT & SCHAEFER PC
> 2910 E 96TH ST SUITE D INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240
> 317-580-9295(W)WAYNE C TURNER
RETAINED
> 111 MONUMENT CIR STE 4400 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46244
> 317-822-4400(W)
> NO ADDRESS PROVIDED
> RESPONDENT BANNING, BRENDA JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES
RETAINED
> CHURCH CHURCH HITTLE + ANTRIM
> 10765 LANTERN RD SUITE 201 FISHERS, IN 46038
> 317-773-2190(W)KEVIN SEAN SMITH
RETAINED
> CHURCH CHURCH HITTLE AND ANTRIM
> 10765 LANTERN ROAD SUITE 201 FISHERS, IN 46038
> 317-773-2190(W)LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS
RETAINED
> 10765 LANTERN RD SUITE 201 FISHERS, IN 46038
> 317-773-2190(W)
> 20840 FREEMONT MOORE RD SHERIDAN, IN 46069
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
12/29/2014 CASE OPENED AS A NEW FILING
12/30/2014 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/21/2015 AT 8:30 AM.
01/02/2015 PETITION FOR LEGAL SEPARATION FILED
> ORDER SUBMITTED.
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> RESPONDENT: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 12/29/2014
01/02/2015 SERVICE ISSUED
> BY C/M 92148901066154000046488295.
> REQUESTED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> SERVE TO: BANNING, BRENDA
> ISSUED: 12/29/2014
01/05/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> ATTORNEY: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> FILE STAMP: 12/29/2014
01/05/2015 ORDER TO APPEAR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAHN, VALORIE SUZANNE )
> ORDER TO APPEAR FOR HEARING SET FOR 01/21/2015 AT 8:30 A.M. VIA C/M #9214-8901-0661-5400-1146-5476-40.
> PARTY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/30/2014
> VOL./BOOK RJO
01/09/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, BRENDA
> ATTORNEY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> ATTORNEY: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> FILE STAMP: 01/07/2015
01/13/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> SIGNED: BRENDA BANNING. MP
> PARTY SERVED: BANNING, BRENDA
> DATE SIGNED: 01/03/2015
01/13/2015 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED
> SIGNED: BRENDA BANNING. MP
> PARTY SERVED: BANNING, BRENDA
> DATE SIGNED: 01/05/2015
01/16/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> FIRST MOTION TO CONTINUE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. (TO COURT) MM
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILED BY: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> FILE STAMP: 01/15/2015
01/16/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 01/21/2015 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 03/06/2015 AT 2:00 PM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
01/20/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> HEARING SET JANUARY 21, 2015 IS CONTINUED AND RESET FOR MARCH 6, 2015 AT 2:00PM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/16/2015
02/23/2015 ORDER SUBMITTED
> AGREED PROVISIONAL ORDER SUBMITTED. (TO COURT 02/24/2015) MB
> NOTICED: BANNING, BRENDA
> NOTICED: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> NOTICED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> NOTICED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> FILE STAMP: 02/23/2015
02/24/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/06/2015 AT 2:00 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: AGREED RESOLUTION.
03/02/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> AGREED PROVISIONAL ORDER ENTERED. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/27/2015
> VOL./BOOK RJO
03/06/2015 CANCELED HEARING (2:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER RUETZ, TODD L - MAG)
> AGREED RESOLUTION
> 3D
01/21/2015 CONTINUED TO 03/06/2015 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, DOUGLAS S
03/18/2015 PETITION FILED
> VERIFIED COUNTER-PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND PRAECIPE FOR FIRST CHOICE TRIAL SETTING AND APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT TO MEDIATE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. (TO COURT 03/18/2015) MB
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> FILE STAMP: 03/17/2015
03/18/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/03/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
03/24/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ISSUING FIRST CHOICE SETTING AND APPROVING AGREEMENT TO MEDIATE ENTERED. HEARING SET FOR AUGUST 3, 2015 AT 9:00AM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/23/2015
07/14/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL SETTING FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. (TO COURT 07/15/2015) MB
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> FILE STAMP: 07/14/2015
07/17/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 08/03/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 11/23/2015 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
07/21/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER CONTINUING FINAL HEARING - RESET FOR 11/23/2015 AT 9:00 A.M., FIRST CHOICE SETTING. MB
> MOVANT: BANNING, BRENDA
> MOVANT: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> MOVANT: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/20/2015
07/28/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> ORDER SUBMITTED. (TO COURT 07/29/15) MM
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> FILE STAMP: 07/28/2015
07/29/2015 MOTION TO MODIFY FILED
> PETITIONER'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER
> FILE STAMP: 07/29/2015
07/31/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 11/23/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 12/08/2015 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
08/03/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> HEARING SET NOVEMBER 23, 2015 IS CONTINUED AND RESET FOR DECEMBER 8 AT 9:00AM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/31/2015
08/06/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULED FOR 10/26/2015 AT 2:30 PM.
08/07/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER FOR HEARING ON HUSBAND'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER - HEARING SET FOR 10/26/2015 AT 2:30 P.M., FOR ONE (1) HOUR, (FIRST CHOICE). MB
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/06/2015
08/20/2015 MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> MOTION FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 08/20/2015
08/25/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 09/14/2015 AT 1:30 PM.
08/25/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ENTERED. HEARING SET FOR SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 AT 1:30PM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/25/2015
09/14/2015 TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
09/15/2015 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> ATTORNEY: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ATTORNEY: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2015
09/15/2015 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NON-PARTIES VECTREN CORPORATION AND MILLER PIPELINE LLC. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: TURNER, WAYNE C
> FILED BY: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2015
09/15/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/26/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
09/16/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAHN, VALORIE SUZANNE )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED TELEPHONICALLY BY COUNSEL ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 FOR A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. PARTIES ADVISE THAT THERE MAY BE DISCOVERY
> DISPUTE AND/OR MOTION TO QUASH FILED. COURT SET HEARING ON OCTOBER 26, 2015 AT 9:00AM (2ND CHOICE) FOR ANY SUCH DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/14/2015
09/17/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: PROFFITT, JUDITH S - SR )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF 9-16-15. PARTIES ARE HEREBY GIVEN TO AND INCLUDING OCTOBER 7, 2015 TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED BY
> NON-PARTIES VECTREN CORPORATION AND MILLER PIPELINE.
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/16/2015
> VOL./BOOK RJO
09/24/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> MOTION TO CONTINUE OCT 26 HEAIRNG ON NON-PARTIES' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED. REC'D BY CM. ORDER SUBMITTED.
> FILED BY: TURNER, WAYNE C
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 09/21/2015
09/24/2015 DOCUMENT FILED
> SUPPLEMENT TO NON-PARTIES' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED. SS
> FILED BY: TURNER, WAYNE C
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 09/17/2015
10/05/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 10/26/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 11/02/2015 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
10/06/2015 RESPONSE FILED
> HUSBAND'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 10/06/2015
10/08/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> VERIFIED MOTION TO CONTINUE FINAL HEARING SET DECEMBER 8, 2015 FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. MM
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> FILE STAMP: 10/07/2015
10/08/2015 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S VERIFIED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NON-PARTIES VECTREN CORPORATION AND MILLER PIPELINE LLC'S MTOION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> FILE STAMP: 10/07/2015
10/09/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
> HEARING RESET FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2015. EC
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/05/2015
10/14/2015 OBJECTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S STRENUOUS OBJECTION TO WIFE'S MOTION TO CONTINUE FINAL HEARING.
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 10/14/2015
10/21/2015 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> WIFE'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING SET NOVEMBER 2, 2015 AND PROPOSED ORDER
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/21/2015
10/22/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULED FOR 10/26/2015 AT 2:30 PM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
10/26/2015 CANCELED HEARING ON MOTION TO MODIFY (2:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NAJJAR, DAVID K - MAJ)
> OTHER
> MAG
10/26/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 12/08/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/02/2016 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
10/26/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 11/02/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 12/08/2015 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
10/27/2015 ORDER ISSUED
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF OCT 26, 2015. THE COURT, HAVING INADVERTENTLY CONTINUED THE HEARING SET OCT 26, 2015 AT 2:30PM.,
> DOES NOW RESET THIS MATTER FOR DEC 8, 2015 AT 9:00AM, 1ST CHOICE, BEHIND JURY. SS
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/26/2015
10/29/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NAJJAR, DAVID K - MAJ )
> HEARING SET NOVEMBER 2, 2015 IS CONTINUED AND RESET FOR DECEMBER 8, 2015 AT 9:00AM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/21/2015
10/29/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 8, 2015 IS CONTINUED AND RESET FOR FEBRUARY 2, 2106 AT 9:00AM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/26/2015
12/07/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/08/2015 AT 9:00 AM WAS CANCELLED. REASON: OTHER.
12/07/2015 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/08/2015 AT 9:00 AM.
12/08/2015 CANCELED HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> OTHER
> 345-1ST CHOICE BEHIND JURY
10/26/2015 CONTINUED TO 11/02/2015 - BY REQUEST - VECTREN CORPORATION
11/02/2015 CONTINUED TO 12/08/2015 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, BRENDA
12/08/2015 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
12/17/2015 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER FROM DECEMBER 8, 2015 HEARING ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND/OR BY COUNSEL ON DECEMBER 8,
> 2015 FOR A HEARING CONCERNING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER BY NON-PARTIES VECTREN
> CORPORATION AND MILLER PIPELINE LLC FILED ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 AND RELATED PLEADINGS AND PETITIONER'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
> PROVISIONAL ORDER FILED ON JULY 25, 2015.
> ARGUMENTS PRESENTED AND COMPLETED AS TO BOTH ISSUES. COUNSELS ADVISED THEY MAY HAVE A RESOLUTION TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND WILL NOTIFY THE COURT AS TO
> WHETHER AN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN
> REACHED OR TO REQUEST THE COURT TO RULE. PARTIES TO FILE PROPOSED ORDERS CONCERNING THE PETITION FOR MODIFICATION ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 18,
> 2015 AND TO PROVIDE A COURTESY COPY BY E-MAIL TO THE COURT REPORTER. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/11/2015
12/18/2015 ORDER SUBMITTED
> WIFE'S AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED.
12/18/2015 NOTICE FILED
> NOTIFICATION TO COURT
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 12/18/2015
12/22/2015 ORDER SUBMITTED
> PROPOSED ORDER FROM HEARING ON 12/17/15 FILED.
12/29/2015 ORDER SUBMITTED
> PROTECTIVE ORDER SUBMITTED. MM
01/04/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON PETITIONER'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER ENTERED. COURT HAVING TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT THE MATTERS HEARD ON DECEMBER 8,
> 2015 NOW ENTERS ITS ORDER
> CONCERNING PETITIONER'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER FILED ON JULY 25, 2015. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/30/2015
> VOL./BOOK RJO
01/11/2016 MOTION FILED
> BANNING: WIFE'S PROPOSED ORDER ON NON-PARTIES' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 01/08/2016
01/11/2016 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF FAILURE TO AGREE ON RESOLUTION TO NON-PARTY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: TURNER, WAYNE C
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 01/08/2016
01/21/2016 ORDER ISSUED
> PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED. SS
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/20/2016
01/25/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED
> HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 DOCUMENT FILED
> HUSBAND'S DESIGNATION OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> HUSBAND'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE DATE: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> AFFIDAVIT OF FRED COX
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE DATE: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> AFFIDAVIT OF PAULA SCHAEFER IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE DATE: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 AFFIDAVIT FILED
> HUSBAND'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE DATE: 01/22/2016
01/25/2016 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
> HUSBAND'S FIRST MOTION TO CONTINUE FINAL HEARING. ORDER SUBMITTED.
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 01/22/2016
01/28/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/02/2016 AT 9:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 06/21/2016 AT 9:00 AM. REASON: BY REQUEST.
01/28/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/18/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
01/28/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER FROM JANUARY 27, 2016 HEARING ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED BY COUNSEL TELEPHONICALLY FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE. DISCUSSIONS WERE HAD. COURT GRANTED HUSBAND'S FIRST MOTION TO CONTINUE
> FINAL HEARING FILED ON JANUARY 22, 2016 AND CONTINUED THE HEARING SET FEBRUARY 2, 2016. COURT RESET FOR JUNE 21, 2016 AT 9:00AM. CONCERNING HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
> ALSO FILED ON JANUARY 22, 2016. DEADLINES WERE ESTABLISHED FOR A RESPONSE AND REPLY. COURT SET THE MOTION FOR HEARING ON MAY 18, 2016 AT 9:00AM. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/28/2016
03/02/2016 MOTION FILED
> PETITIONER'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER FILED.
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/01/2016
03/04/2016 ORDER DENYING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER DENYING VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER ENTERED. MM
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/04/2016
03/07/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONAL ORDER FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED.
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 03/04/2016
04/27/2016 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED. MM
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> FILE STAMP: 04/25/2016
04/29/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED WITH DESIGNATION OF MATERIALS AND EXHIBITS. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> FILE STAMP: 04/28/2016
04/29/2016 DOCUMENT FILED
> TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - CASE LAW FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILED BY: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> FILE STAMP: 04/28/2016
05/10/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> HUSBAND'S REPLY TO WIFE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 05/09/2016
05/10/2016 TR56 EVIDENCE DESIGNATION FILED
> HUSBAND'S SUPLEMENTAL DESIGNATION OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 05/09/2016
05/18/2016 HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/20/2016 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> PER CCS ENTRY: PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL ON MAY 18, 2016 FOR A HEARING CONCERNING HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED JANUARY 22, 2016 AND RELATED
> PLEADINGS. ARGUMENTS WERE PRESENTED AND COMPLETED AND THE COURT TOOK UNDER ADVISEMENT. MM
06/07/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER FROM MAY 18, 2016 HEARING ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED BY COUNSEL ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED ON JANUARY 22, 2016. COURT NOW ENTERS ITS ORDER ON SUCH MOTION. MM
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/06/2016
06/08/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
06/10/2016 MOTION FOR FINDING OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED
> REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED. MM
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 06/10/2016
06/14/2016 MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> NON-PARTIES' REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE TO ADDRESS MULTIPLE UNNECESSARY TRIAL SUBPOENAS FILED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/13/2016
06/16/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/20/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
06/20/2016 TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/20/2016 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT FILED
> MEDIATOR'S REPORT TO COURT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: GOLDENBERG, JILL
> FILE STAMP: 06/17/2016
06/20/2016 FINANCIAL DECLARATION FORM FILED
> WIFE'S VERIFIED FINANCIAL DECLARATION FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 06/17/2016
06/20/2016 MOTION TO QUASH FILED
> NON-PARTIES' PROTECTIVE MOTION TO QUASH UNSERVED SUBPOENAS FILED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/20/2016
06/20/2016 FINANCIAL DECLARATION FORM FILED
> HUSBAND'S FINANCIAL DECLARATION FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 06/20/2016
06/21/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
345
08/03/2015 CONTINUED TO 11/23/2015 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, BRENDA
11/23/2015 CONTINUED TO 12/08/2015 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, BRENDA
12/08/2015 CONTINUED TO 02/02/2016 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, BRENDA
02/02/2016 CONTINUED TO 06/21/2016 - BY REQUEST - BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
06/21/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> APPEARANCE FILED. SS
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 06/21/2016
06/21/2016 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTIES' REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE ENTERED. MM
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/16/2016
06/22/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
06/22/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
06/23/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER FROM JUNE 20, 2016 HEARING ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED BY COUNSEL FOR A TELEPHONIC HEARING ON JUNE 20, 2016 ON NON-PARTIES' PROTECTIVE MOTION TO QUASH UNSERVED SUBPOENAS FILED ON
> JUNE 20, 2016. ARGUMENTS WERE PRESENTED AND COMPLETED AND THE COURT FINDS SUCH MOTION SHOULD BE AND IS HEREBY GRANTED AS TO THE PRESENTLY-ISSUED SUBPOENAS ON THE BASIS THAT THE SUBPOENAS
> WERE NOT PROPERLY ISSUED TO THE INDIVIDUALS. SUCH MOTION IS DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. MM
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/20/2016
06/24/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
06/24/2016 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> PER CCS ENTRY: PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL FOR FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING. A WITNESS WAS SWORN AND EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED BUT NO COMPLETED. PARTIES REQUESTED AN ADDITIONAL
> TWO DAYS IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE MATTER. COURT SETS AN ATTORNEY TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON JUNE 24, 2016 AT 8:30AM. MM
> HEARING DATE: 06/21/2016
06/24/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/17/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
06/24/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/19/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
06/25/2016 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: GOLDENBERG, JILL
06/25/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
06/27/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF JUNE 24, 2016 ENTERED. PARTIES APPEAR BY COUNSEL ON JUNE 24, 2016 FOR A TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESETTING THE TRIAL BEGUN ON JUNE 21, 2016
> AND NOT COMPLETED. PARTIES AGREE TO AUGUST 17, 2016 AT 9:00AM AND AUGUST 19, 2016 AT 9:00AM. MM
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/24/2016
06/28/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
07/20/2016 MOTION TO QUASH FILED
> NON-PARTIES' MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO VECTREN'S CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER FOR TESTIMONY ABOUT PRIVILEGED MATTERS FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 07/19/2016
07/20/2016 MOTION FILED
> NON-PARTIES' MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THAT ANY NEEDED TESTIMONY FROM VECTREN CEO CARL CHAPMAN BE RECEIVED BY LEAST BURDENSOME MEANS FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 07/19/2016
07/22/2016 MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> VECTREN'S NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS TO QUASH OR LIMIT SUBPOENAS FOR AUGUST 19 TESTIMONY FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 07/22/2016
08/01/2016 APPEARANCE FILED
> KEVIN S. SMITH APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 07/29/2016
08/01/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NON-PARTIES MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THAT ANY NEEDED TESTIMONY FROM VECTREN CEO CARL CHAPMAN BE RECEIVED BY LEAST BURDENSOME MEANS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 07/29/2016
08/01/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NON-PARTIES MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO VECTREN S CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER FOR TESTIMONY ABOUT PRIVILEGED MATTERS, ORDER SUBMITTED
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 07/29/2016
08/03/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON NON- PARTIES MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ENTERED. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/01/2016
08/04/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
08/09/2016 SCANNED/MICROFILMED
> ENTIRE PAPER FILE SCANNED TO ODYS
08/15/2016 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF MOOTNESS OF VECTREN'S MOTION TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY VIA COURTCALL AND REQUEST TO TAKE TESTIMONY FROM NONPARTIES AT SUBPOENAED TIMES FILED. SS
> FILED BY: VECTREN CORPORATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/15/2016
08/16/2016 CONSENT FORM FILED
> HUSBAND'S CONSENT REGARDING REQUEST TO TAKE TESTIMONY FROM NONPARTIES AT SUBPOENAED TIMES FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 08/15/2016
08/17/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
08/17/2016 MOTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S MOTION TO TERMINATE OR REDUCE HIS SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS PENDING COMPLETION OF FINAL HEARING AND ISSUANCE OF DECREE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 08/16/2016
08/19/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
08/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/04/2016 AT 9:00 AM.
08/22/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/05/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
08/25/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL FOR CONTINUED FINAL HEARING ON AUG. 17 AND AUG. 19, 2016. EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED BUT NOT COMPLETED. MATTER WAS CONTINUED AND
> RESET FOR COMPLETION ON OCT. 4, 2016 AT 9:00AM AND IF NEEDED, OCT. 5, 2016 AT 1:30PM. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/22/2016
08/26/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
08/30/2016 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S VERIFIED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S MOTION TO TERMINATE OR REDUCE SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 08/30/2016
09/14/2016 MOTION FILED
> RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE LOCAL RULE, COURT ORDERS, AND PRECLUDE DEFERRAL FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 09/14/2016
09/26/2016 OBJECTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO WIFE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE DEFERRAL OF COMPENSATION TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 09/23/2016
10/03/2016 MOTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER REGARDING TESTIMONIAL DEPOSITIONS OF VECTREN CORPORATION WITNESSES FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 10/03/2016
10/04/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
10/05/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
10/06/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/18/2016 AT 1:30 PM.
10/06/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (8:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
10/06/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/06/2016 AT 8:00 AM.
10/06/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (8:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
10/06/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/06/2016 AT 8:00 AM.
10/07/2016 ORDER ISSUED
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/06/2016
10/08/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> SENT TO: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SENT TO: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SENT TO: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SENT TO: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SENT TO: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SENT TO: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SENT TO: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SENT TO: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
10/11/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/08/2016 AT 8:00 AM.
10/13/2016 REPORT FILED
> REPORT TO THE COURT ON MOTION TO PRECLUDE VECTREN FROM ACTING ON PETITIONER'S DEFERRALS FILED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/12/2016
10/17/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 12/08/2016 AT 8:00 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 12/09/2016 AT 8:00 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
10/19/2016 REPORT FILED
> REPORT TO THE COURT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/18/2016
11/18/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
11/28/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 11/29/2016 AT 3:30 PM.
11/29/2016 TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE (3:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
11/30/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF NOV. 28, 2016 ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL ON NOV. 18, 2016 FOR THE SIXTH DAY OF THE FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING. EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS
> WERE PRESENTED BUT NOT COMPLETED. COURT TOOK UNDER ADVISEMENT. COURT SET A TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE FOR NOV. 29, 2016 AT 3:30PM FOLLOWING THE DEPOSITIONS TO DETERMINE THE
> STATUS OF THE CASE AND WHETHER THE MATTER MAY BE COMPLETED IN THE TIME ALLOTTED. PARTIES ARE TO CALL 317-776-9656 AND USE ACCESS CODE 59951. COURT CONFIRMS THE MATTER AT THIS
> TIME REMAINS SET FOR COMPLETION ON DEC. 9, 2016 AT 8:00AM. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/28/2016
12/01/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 11/30/2016 : PAULA J SCHAEFER;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;LAURA STEPHEN RYAN;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES
12/01/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/03/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
12/05/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE OF NOV. 29, 2016 ENTERED. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/29/2016
12/06/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 12/5/2016 : JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;PAULA J SCHAEFER;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;LAURA STEPHEN RYAN;MICHAEL G RUPPERT
12/09/2016 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (8:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
12/08/2016 RESET BY COURT TO 12/09/2016
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
12/21/2016 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/01/2017 AT 9:00 AM.
12/22/2016 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF DECEMBER 14, 2016 ENTERED. PARTIES APPEARED IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL ON DECEMBER 9, 2016 FOR THE SEVENTH DAY OF THE FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING. EVIDENCE AND
> ARGUMENTS WERE PRESENTED BUT NOT COMPLETED. COURT TOOK UNDER ADVISEMENT. COURT SETS THE MATTER FOR COMPLETION OF EVIDENCE ON FEBRUARY 1, 2017 AT 9:00 A.M. FOR ONE DAY AND IF NOT COMPLETED, FEBRUARY 3, 2017 AT 9:00 A.M. FOR ONE DAY.
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> ORDER SIGNED: 12/14/2016
12/23/2016 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 12/22/2016 : PAULA J SCHAEFER;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;MICHAEL G RUPPERT
01/27/2017 MOTION TO RECONSIDER
> MOTION TO RECONSIDER COURT S RULING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT DUE TO SUBSEQUENT APPELLATE DECISION IN FISCHER VS. FISCHER FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 01/26/2017
01/31/2017 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO HUSBAND'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER RULING ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 01/30/2017
02/01/2017 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND RECESSED
02/03/2017 FINAL DISSOLUTION HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/23/2017 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FILED
> MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. JS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 02/23/2017
03/01/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/24/2017
03/02/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME ---- 3/1/2017 : JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;LAURA STEPHEN RYAN;PAULA J SCHAEFER;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;WAYNE C TURNER;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS
03/03/2017 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FILED
> MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO WHICH COUNSEL HAS NO OBJECTION FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 03/03/2017
03/07/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ENTERED. THE RESPONDENT HAS TO THE END OF BUSINESS ON MAR. 28, 2017 TO SUBMIT THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/06/2017
03/08/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME ---- 3/7/2017 : WAYNE C TURNER;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;PAULA J SCHAEFER;LAURA STEPHEN RYAN;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;MICHAEL G RUPPERT
03/24/2017 MOTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR ORDERS (1) PERMITTING HIM TO LIST THE MARITAL RESIDENCE FOR SALE AND (2) GRANTING HUSBAND A PRE-DISTRIBUTION OF THE SALE PROCEEDS FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/23/2017
03/24/2017 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S RESPONSE TO HUSBAND'S MOTION FOR ORDERS PERMITTING HIM TO LIST THE MARITAL RESIDENCE FOR SALE AND GRANTING HUSBAND A PRE-DISTRIBUTION OF SALE PROCEEDS FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 03/24/2017
03/27/2017 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FILED
> MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 03/27/2017
03/28/2017 OBJECTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S STRENUOUS OBJECTION TO WIFE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/28/2017
03/28/2017 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER AUTHORIZING SALE OF MARITAL RESIDENCE AND PRE- DISTRIBUTION ENTERED. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/28/2017
03/28/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ENTERED. THE COURT DOES HEREBY GRANT THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO BOTH PARTIES. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> ERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/28/2017
03/29/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/28/2017 : PAULA J SCHAEFER;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;WAYNE C TURNER;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;LAURA
> STEPHEN RYAN ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME ---- 3/28/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;WAYNE C TURNER;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;PAULA J SCHAEFER;MICHAEL G RUPPERT
03/29/2017 NOTICE TO COURT FILED
> NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/28/2017
04/10/2017 ORDER SUBMITTED
> WIFE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE SUBMITTED. EC
05/12/2017 MOTION FILED
> VERIFIED MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FINDINGS OF FACT FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 05/12/2017
05/18/2017 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED
> MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. JS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 05/18/2017
05/19/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
> MOVANT: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: BANNING, BRENDA
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: RYAN, LAURA STEPHEN
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 05/19/2017
05/19/2017 OBJECTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S COMBINED: (1) OBJECTION TO WIFE'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FINDINGS OF FACT; (2) MOTION TO STRIKE WIFE'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT; AND, (3) MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT TO AVOID TR 53.2 MOTION FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 05/19/2017
05/20/2017 AUTOMATED PAPER NOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> RDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 5/19/2017 : BRENDA BANNING
05/20/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ---- 5/19/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;LAURA STEPHEN RYAN;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
05/31/2017 AMENDED PLEADING FILED
> AMENDED VERIFIED MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT FINDINGS OF FACT SO AS TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR FILED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 05/30/2017
08/14/2017 MOTION FILED
> HUSBAND'S REQUEST FOR RULING FILED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 08/11/2017
09/11/2017 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
> FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECREE FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ENTERED. SS
> PARTY 2: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> PARTY 2: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> PARTY 2: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> PARTY 2: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> PARTY 2: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/08/2017
09/11/2017 ORDER ISSUED
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF SEPT 8, 2017 ENTERED. SS
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/08/2017
09/12/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER ---- 9/11/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER ORDER ISSUED ---
- 9/11/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER
10/02/2017 APPEARANCE FILED
> E-FILING APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE FILED. EC
> FOR PARTY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 10/02/2017
10/05/2017 MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR FILED
> MOTION TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN DISSOLUTION DECREE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/04/2017
10/06/2017 NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVED
> FILE STAMP: 10/06/2017
10/09/2017
> FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R)
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 10/08/2017
> AWARDED TO: CHURCH CHURCH HITTLE & ANTRIM
> AWARDED AGAINST: DOUGLAS BANNING
> JUDGMENT: $210,000.00
> RJO: BOOK 2017, PAGE 0911
> JUDGMENT: BOOK 2017, PAGE 1013
> COMMENT: FILE MARKED 9-11-17 PLUS INTEREST
10/09/2017 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF OCT. 9, 2017 ENTERED. RESPONDENT BRENDA BANNING FILED ON OCT. 4, 2017 RESPONDENT'S RULE 60(A) MOTION TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN DISSOLUTION DECREE.
> PETITIONER SHALL HAVE UNTIL OCT. 19, 2017 TO FILE ANY RESPONSE. COURT WILL THEN RULE. EC
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/09/2017
10/09/2017 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF CLERK'S RECORD
> COPY TO CLERK, COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL PARTIES BY IEFS.
10/10/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 10/9/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
10/20/2017 MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR FILED
> SECOND MOTION TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/20/2017
10/24/2017 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON RESPONDENT'S RULE 60(A) MOTION TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR ENTERED. EC
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/23/2017
10/25/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR ---- 10/24/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
10/27/2017 MOTION FILED
> VERIFIED PETITION FOR CONTEMPT & TO ENFORCE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW & DECREE FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 10/27/2017
11/01/2017 RESPONSE TO A PETITION FILED
> RESPONSE TO WIFE'S OCTOBER 27, 2017 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. CG
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 11/01/2017
11/03/2017 ORDER SUBMITTED
> QDRO SUBMITTED. SS
11/03/2017 ORDER SUBMITTED
> ORDER TO TRANSFER IRA FUNDS SUBMITTED. SS
11/15/2017 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/11/2018 AT 8:30 AM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1 COURTROOM (345), LOCATED AT ONE HAMILTON COUNTY SQUARE , NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060.
11/15/2017 ORDER ISSUED
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF NOVEMBER 14, 2017, RESPONDENT BRENDA BANNING OCTOBER 27, 2017 VERIFIED PETITION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION AND TO ENFORCE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECREE
> FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. PETITIONER FILED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2017 RESPONSE TO WIFE'S OCTOBER 27, 2017 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION AND ALSO FILED ON NOVEMBER 3, 2017 A PROPOSED QUALIFIED
> DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TRANSFER IRA FUNDS. COURT HAVING REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS NOW SETS THIS MATTER TO A TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE FOR THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY , 2018 AT 8:30 A.M. JW
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> ORDER SIGNED: 11/15/2017
11/16/2017 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 11/15/2017 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER
11/20/2017 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF TRANSCRIPT FILED
> NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT FILED. EC
> PARTY: HAMILTON SUPERIOR/CIRCUIT COURT REPORTER
> DATE 2: 11/20/2017
11/21/2017 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF TRANSCRIPT FILED
> COPY TO CLERK, COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL PARTIES BY IEFS.
11/22/2017 MOTION FILED
> RESPONDENT'S APPELLATE RULE 9(G) SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT FILED. EC
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 11/22/2017
11/30/2017 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S VERIFIED REPLY TO HUSBAND'S RESPONSE TO WIFE'S OCTOBER 27, 2017 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 11/30/2017
20/15/2017 MOTION FOR STAY
> VERIFIED MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 12/15/2017
12/20/2017 MOTION FOR HEARING FILED
> MOTION FOR HEARING ON VERIFIED MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 12/19/2017
01/02/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER SETTING HEARING ON VERIFIED MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL ENTERED. HEARING WILL BE SET DURING THE JAN. 11, 2018 PHONE CONFERENCE. EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/02/2018
01/03/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/2/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
01/08/2018 RESPONSE FILED
> WIFE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DOUGLAS S. BANNING, JR.'S VERIFIED MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 01/05/2018
01/16/2018 NOTICE OF TRANSCRIPT FILED
> NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSCRIPT FILED. EW
> FILED BY: HAMILTON SUPERIOR/CIRCUIT COURT REPORTER
> DATE 2: 01/16/2018
01/17/2018 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF TRANSCRIPT FILED
> COPY TO CLERK, COURT OF APPEALS AND ALL PARTIES BY IEFS.
01/17/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 01/11/2018 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/08/2018 AT 8:30 AM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1 COURTROOM (345), LOCATED AT ONE HAMILTON
> COUNTY SQUARE , NOBLESVILLE, IN 46060. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
01/17/2018 CASE REOPENED
01/17/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF JAN 10, 2018. COMES NOW THE COURT AND CONTINUES THE TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE SET FOR JAN 11, 2018 DUE TO A FIRST CHOICE JURY TRIAL BEING HEARD. HEARING RESCHEDULED FOR
> FEB 8, 2018 AT 8:30AM. PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CALL INTO THE CONFERENCE LINE AT 317-776-9656 AND USE CODE 59951. SS
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/10/2018
01/18/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 1/17/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
01/31/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED ON 02/08/2018 AT 8:30 AM WAS RESCHEDULED TO 02/06/2018 AT 8:30 AM. REASON: COURT'S OWN MOTION.
02/01/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> JUDGE'S ENTRY OF JAN 31, 2018. COMES NOW THE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION AND RESETS THE TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR FEB 8, 2018 AT 8:30AM TO FEB 6, 2018 AT 8:30AM. PARTIES SHALL CALL 317-776-9656 AND USE ACCESS CODE 59951. SS
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 01/31/2018
02/02/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 2/1/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
02/06/2018 TELEPHONIC ATTORNEY CONFERENCE (8:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345-SRN (59951)
01/11/2018 RESET BY COURT TO 02/08/2018
02/08/2018 RESET BY COURT TO 02/06/2018
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/09/2018 ORDER SUBMITTED
> ORDER TO TRANSFER IRA FUNDS AND QDRO SUBMITTED. SS
02/09/2018 ORDER SUBMITTED
> ORDER TO TRANSFER IRA FUNDS SUBMITTED. EW
02/12/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER TO TRANSFER IRA FUNDS ENTERED. EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/12/2018
02/12/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDER ENTERED. EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/12/2018
02/12/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON FEB. 6, 2018 TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ENTERED. HEARING SCHEDULED MARCH 27, 2018 AT 9:00AM (2ND CHOICE) EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/12/2018
02/12/2018 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 03/27/2018 AT 9:00 AM.
02/13/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 2/12/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER ORDER ISSUED ---- 2/12/2018 : LESLIE
> CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER ORDER ISSUED ---- 2/12/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;JONATHAN
> BRENT TURPIN;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
02/16/2018 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO RECONSIDER PARAGRAPH NUMBERED ONE OF ORDER ENTERED FEBRUARY 12, 2018, RESULTING FROM THE FEBRUARY 6, 2018 TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. C J
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 02/16/2018
03/02/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER ENTERED. MOTION GRANTED. AMENDED ORDER TO BE ISSUED. EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/28/2018
03/02/2018 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: NATION, STEVEN R )
> AMENDED ORDER ON FEB. 6, 2017 TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ENTERED. HEARING IS SET MARCH 27, 2018 AT 9:00AM. SECOND CHOICE. EW
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: SMITH, KEVIN SEAN
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> SERVED: TURPIN, JONATHAN BRENT
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/28/2018
03/03/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/2/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/2/2018 :
> LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;JONATHAN BRENT TURPIN;KEVIN SEAN SMITH;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
03/19/2018 RESPONSE FILED
> DOUGLAS S. BANNING, JR.'S VERIFIED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EW
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/19/2018
03/23/2018 MOTION FILED
> PETITION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EW
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/22/2018
03/26/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> ORDER CONSOLIDATING HUSBAND'S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES WITH WIFE'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION ENTERED. SS
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/23/2018
03/26/2018 MOTION FILED
> MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED. ORDER SUBMITTED. EW
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 03/26/2018
03/27/2018 HEARING (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER NATION, STEVEN R)
> 345-SRN (2ND CHOICE)
> RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
03/27/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 3/26/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
04/02/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> ORDER ON MAR 27, 2018 HEARING CONCERNING PENDING MATTERS ENTERED. SS
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 03/29/2018
04/03/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 4/2/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JASON L FULK;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
04/10/2018 ORDER SUBMITTED
> PETITIONER'S PROPOSED ORDER AFTER HEARING ON MARCH 27, 2018 SUBMITTED. EW
04/11/2018 ORDER SUBMITTED
> ORDER FROM HEARING MARCH 27, 2018 ON WIFE'S VERIFIED PETITION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION AND TO ENFORCE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECREE FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE AND
> HUSBAND'S VERIFIED MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL SUBMITTED. EW
05/21/2018 NOTICE TO COURT FILED
> NOTICE TO COURT CENTERPOINT ENERGY AND VECTREN TO MERGE FILED. EW
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 05/18/2018
05/21/2018 APPELLATE COURT'S REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT
> TRANSCRIPT SENT TO CLERK, COURT OF APPEALS BY C/M.
> FILE STAMP: 05/21/2018
05/21/2018 RESPONSE FILED
> DOUGLAS S. BANNING, JR.'S VERIFIED RESPONSE TO WIFE'S NOTICE OF PROPOSED VECTREN MERGER FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 05/21/2018
06/04/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> RESPONDENT FILED ON MAY 18, 2018 NOTICE TO COURT: "CENTERPOINT ENERGY AND VECTREN TO MERGE." PETITIONER FILED ON MAY 21, 2018 DOUGLAS S. BANNING, JR'S VERIFIED RESPONSE TO WIFE'S NOTICE
> OF PROPOSED VECTREN MERGER. AS NO SPECIFIC REQUEST WAS MADE, THE COURT WILL NOT TAKE ANY ACTION ON THIS MATTER. SS
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HENDERZAHS, LESLIE CRAIG
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/01/2018
06/04/2018 ORDER ISSUED
> ORDER ON MAR 27, 2108 HEARING ENTERED. SS
> SERVED: FULK, JASON L
> SERVED: HUGHES, JENNIFER CHRISTINE
> SERVED: RUPPERT, MICHAEL G
> SERVED: SCHAEFER, PAULA J
> SERVED: TURNER, WAYNE C
> ORDER SIGNED: 06/01/2018
06/05/2018 AUTOMATED ENOTICE ISSUED TO PARTIES
> ORDER ISSUED ---- 6/4/2018 : LESLIE CRAIG HENDERZAHS;JASON L FULK;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER ORDER ISSUED ----
> 6/4/2018 : JENNIFER CHRISTINE HUGHES;JASON L FULK;MICHAEL G RUPPERT;PAULA J SCHAEFER;WAYNE C TURNER
07/31/2018 ORDER RECEIVED FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
> APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE PAYMENT OF AN APPEAL BOND.
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/30/2018
> VOL./BOOK RJO
08/01/2018 ORDER RECEIVED FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
> ORDER SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT ON 10/15/18 ENTERED.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/01/2018
09/04/2018 ORDER RECEIVED FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/31/2018
> VOL./BOOK RJO
10/01/2018 NOTICE FILED
> NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT FILED. EW
> FILED BY: BANNING, DOUGLAS S
> FILE STAMP: 10/01/2018
10/15/2018 ORDER RECEIVED FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS
> APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
> ORDER SIGNED: 10/09/2018
> VOL./BOOK RJO
02/14/2019 RELEASE FILED FOR JUDGMENT PAID IN FULL
> NOTICE OF SATISFACTION AND RELEASE OF JUDGMENT FILED. SS
> FILED BY: BANNING, BRENDA
> FILE STAMP: 02/14/2019
✗ MEMORANDUM DECISION
> Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
> this Memorandum Decision shall not be
> regarded as precedent or cited before any
> Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appeals and Tax Courtthe defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.
> ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
> Danielle Sheff
> Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
> Sheff Law Office
> Indianapolis, Indiana
> Attorney General of Indiana
> Abigail R. Recker
> Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana
> IN THECOURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
> In the Matter of the Termination September 11, 2018
> of the Parent-Child Relationship Court of Appeals Case No.
> of: Ka.C., R.W., A.W. and L.C., 18A-JT-646
> Minor Children, Appeal from the Marion Superior
> K.C., Mother, Court
> The Honorable Gary Chavers,
> Appellant-Respondent,
> Judge Pro Tem
> v. The Honorable Larry Bradley, MagistrateThe Indiana Department of
> Trial Court Cause Nos.Child Services, 49D09-1706-JT-520
> Appellee-Petitioner, 49D09-1706-JT-521
> 49D09-1706-JT-522
> 49D09-1706-JT-523
> Child Advocates, Inc.,
✗ Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 1 of 14
> Guardian Ad Litem.
> Brown, Judge.
> [1] K.C. (Mother) appeals the involuntary termination of her parental rights with
respect to Ka.C., R.W., A.W., and L.C. (the Children). We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
> [2] Ka.C. was born in October 2003, R.W. was born in December 2007, A.W. was
born in August 2009, and L.C. was born in May 2011. On June 12, 2017, the
Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS) filed a petition for termination
of Mothers parental rights as to the Children. On January 31, 2018, the court
held an evidentiary hearing.
> [3] On February 27, 2018, the court entered an order terminating Mothers parental
rights as to the Children which provided in part:
2. [Ka.C.s] father is unknown.
3. The father of [R.W.], [A.W.], and [L.C.] has had his parental
rights involuntarily terminated.
*****
6. In August of 2015, the children were detained and placed in
kinship care where they remain.
7. On October 30, 2015, the children were found to be in need of
services after [Mother] filed an admission that [Ka.C.] had made
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 2 of 14
allegations of sexual abuse by extended family members and the
family needed services to address those allegations.
*****
12. Home based case management was referred multiple times to
address issues of housing, employment, transportation, and to
access community resources. [Mother] failed to successfully
complete case management due to her inconsistent participation.
13. Housing has not been adequately addressed as [Mother] and
her husband have been residing in a hotel for the past two to
three months. They had lived with [Mothers] mother prior to
the hotel.
14. [Mother] has failed to obtain independent, appropriate
housing in the two and one half years the childrens CHINS case
has been pending.
15. Transportation has been an issue for [Mother] who failed to
obtain her drivers permit.
l6. [Mother] has reported being employed at Walmart.
17. [Mother] does not feel she needs further case management
services because she has employment.
18. Home based therapy has been in place consistently for a little
over one year to address neglect and keeping her children safe,
anger, and education toward the childrens mental health needs.
19. Jessica Gordon is the current therapist.
20. [Mother] has made a big improvement in her mood and
anger management.
21. After a year in therapy, [Mother] still does not totally grasp
the mental health needs of her children, although Therapist
Gordon believes with continued consistent participation,
[Mother] could meet this goal.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 3 of 14
22. The main barrier in keeping her children safe is [Mothers]
underlying lack of accepting that [Ka.C.] was molested and the
extent of it. She continues to minimize her role in the
involvement with the IDCS, and fails to take responsibility.
23. At trial in this matter, [Mother] acknowledged that she did
not believe [Ka.C.s] cousin abused her.
24. On the day of trial [Mother] told her therapist she wanted the
whole family to take a lie detector test.
25. At an early provider meeting in August of 2015, [Mother]
did describe seeing molestation but not pursuing it because she
thought her family would be put out on the street.
26. [Mothers] therapist believes [Mother] needs to continue in
therapy and that she is capable of improving.
27. [Mother] has recently started meeting with her therapist two
times a month instead of weekly because of her work schedule.
28. [Mother] did not attend three child and family team
meetings held in December of 2017, and January of 2018.
29. Due to [Mothers] aggressive and negative behavior, her
parenting was stopped by the IDCS in 2015, and the Court
ordered the suspension of parenting time on January 27, 2016,
when the Guardian ad Litem reported to the CHINS Court that
the children expressed concerns during their parenting time, and
although they miss their mother, they were being traumatized by
having contact with her.
30. On May 24, 2017, the CHINS Court changed the childrens
permanency plan to adoption and finding, in part, that [Mother]
had failed to address untreated mental health needs, she had not
reached a point in treatment to where providers recommended
parenting time resume, and that further delay in achieving
permanency for the children was likely to cause additional
emotional distress.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 4 of 14
31. The children have resided together in the same kinship care
placement since their removal.
32. This placement is pre-adoptive.
33. The children are very bonded with one another, and have a
cloe relationship to their caregivers.
34. [Ka.C.] had believed her caregiver . . . was her father and she
looks to him as her father.
35. All four children have been involved in therapy with Deidre
Lloyd [sic] for approximately fourteen months.
36. [Ka.C.] is involved in individual therapy and with her sisters
due to trauma from physical and sexual abuse. A specialist in
sexually maladaptive behavior has also been referred.
37. [L.C.] and [R.W.] receive therapy for separation trauma.
38. [A.W.] has a learning disability and receives therapy for
anxiety and depression.
39. The childrens special needs are being met by their caregivers
who are aware of what the girls need and provide consistency.
40. The children have always been together, and their Therapist
Lloyd [sic] would be concerned if they were separated.
41. The children have stated to the therapist their desire to
remain where they are.
42. After Therapist Lloyd [sic] recently spoke with [Mothers]
therapist, Ms. Gordon, she did not have the impression that
[Mother] was getting better.
43. There is a reasonable probability that the conditions that
resulted in the childrens removal and continued placement
outside the home will not be remedied by their mother. [Mother]
may have made progress in therapy but it [is] unknown whether
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 5 of 14
she can apply skills in real life. After two and one-half years, she
has not reached the stage of having visits recommended. Most
concerning is [Mothers] lack of acceptance for the reason (and
lack of accepting responsibility) why the children became wards.
[Mother] has not been able to provide a home appropriate for her
children during the pendency of the CHINS matter.
44. There is a reasonable probability that the continuation of the
parent-child relationship poses a threat to the childrens well-
being in that it would pose as a barrier to obtaining permanency
for them through an adoption into the home in which they wish
to remain. Without addressing unstable or inappropriate
housing, and not accepting the molestation, and truly
understanding its impact, [Mother] would not be able to
maintain the children in a safe and stable environment.
45. Jill English-Cheatham has served as the childrens Guardian
ad Litem since the beginning of the CHINS action in July of
2015. Based on lack of safety, and the childrens wishes, Ms.
English-Cheatham recommends adoption as a satisfactory plan
for the children and believes termination of [Mothers] parental
rights would be in the childrens best interests.
46. Guardian ad Litem English-Cheatham does not believe
[Mother] should be given more time as she has had multiple
providers and the children have been in limbo for two and one-
half years. She believes the children would be harmed if
removed from their placement.
47. Termination of the parent-child relationship is in the best
interests of the children. Termination would allow them to be
adopted into a stable and permanent home where their needs will
be safely met.
48. There exists a satisfactory plan for the future care and
treatment of the children, that being adoption.
✗ Appellants Appendix Volume II at 34-37.
> Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 6 of 14
Discussion
> [4] The issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the termination of
Mothers parental rights. In order to terminate a parent-child relationship, DCS
is required to allege and prove, among other things:
(B) that one (1) of the following is true:
(i) There is a reasonable probability that the conditions
that resulted in the childs removal or the reasons for
placement outside the home of the parents will not be
remedied.
(ii) There is a reasonable probability that the continuation
of the parent-child relationship poses a threat to the well-
being of the child.
(iii) The child has, on two (2) separate occasions, been
adjudicated a child in need of services;
(C) that termination is in the best interests of the child; and
(D) that there is a satisfactory plan for the care and treatment of
the child.
Ind. Code 31-35-2-4(b)(2). If the court finds that the allegations in a petition
described in Ind. Code 31-35-2-4 are true, the court shall terminate the parent-
child relationship. Ind. Code 31-35-2-8(a).
> [5] The States burden of proof for establishing the allegations in termination cases
is one of clear and convincing evidence. In re G.Y., 904 N.E.2d 1257 , 1260-
1261 (Ind. 2009) (quoting Ind. Code 31-37-14-2), rehg denied. This is a
heightened burden of proof reflecting terminations serious social
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 7 of 14
consequences. In re E.M., 4 N.E.3d 636, 642 (Ind. 2014) (quoting In re G.Y.,
904 N.E.2d at 1260-1261 , 1260 n.1). But weighing the evidence under that
heightened standard is the trial courts prerogativein contrast to our well-
settled, highly deferential standard of review. Id. We do not reweigh the
evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses, but consider only the
evidence that supports the judgment and the reasonable inferences to be drawn
from the evidence. Id. We confine our review to two steps: whether the
evidence clearly and convincingly supports the findings, and then whether the
findings clearly and convincingly support the judgment. Id.
> [6] Reviewing whether the evidence clearly and convincingly supports the findings,
or the findings clearly and convincingly support the judgment, is not a license to
reweigh the evidence. Id. [W]e do not independently determine whether that
heightened standard is met, as we would under the constitutional harmless
error standard, which requires the reviewing court itself to be sufficiently
confident to declare the error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Id.
(quoting Harden v. State, 576 N.E.2d 590 , 593 (Ind. 1991) (citing Chapman v.
California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967))). Our review must give due
regard to the trial courts opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses
firsthand, and not set aside [its] findings or judgment unless clearly
erroneous. Id. (quoting K.T.K. v. Ind. Dept of Child Servs., Dearborn Cty. Office,
989 N.E.2d 1225, 1229 (Ind. 2013) (citing Ind. Trial Rule 52(A))). Because a
case that seems close on a dry record may have been much more clear-cut in
person, we must be careful not to substitute our judgment for the trial court
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 8 of 14
when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence. Id. at 640. The involuntary
termination statute is written in the disjunctive and requires proof of only one of
the circumstances listed in Ind. Code 31-35-2-4(b)(2)(B).
> [7] Mother contends the trial courts order is not supported by clear and convincing
evidence, her failure to protect the Children from abuse was being addressed,
and, although she had not resolved her housing, the time needed to obtain
suitable housing should not be the determining factor. She also asserts
termination is not in the Childrens best interests and the plan of adoption by P.
and M. would be detrimental to the Children.
> [8] DCS maintains that Mother failed to fully engage in reunification services,
denied home-based case management was necessary despite not having stable
housing, demonstrated she is unable to provide the Children with a safe
environment, and was aware Ka.C. was being sexually molested but failed to
protect her. DCS also argues that termination is in the Childrens best interests
and that it has a satisfactory plan for their care and treatment.
> [9] In determining whether the conditions that resulted in the Childrens removal
will not be remedied, we engage in a two-step analysis. See E.M., 4 N.E.3d at
642-643. First, we identify the conditions that led to removal, and second, we
determine whether there is a reasonable probability that those conditions will
not be remedied. Id. at 643. In the second step, the trial court must judge a
parents fitness as of the time of the termination proceeding, taking into
consideration evidence of changed conditions, balancing a parents recent
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 9 of 14
improvements against habitual patterns of conduct to determine whether there
is a substantial probability of future neglect or deprivation. Id. We entrust that
delicate balance to the trial court, which has discretion to weigh a parents prior
history more heavily than efforts made only shortly before termination. Id.
Requiring trial courts to give due regard to changed conditions does not
preclude them from finding that a parents past behavior is the best predictor of
her future behavior. Id.
> [10] The statute does not simply focus on the initial basis for a childs removal for
purposes of determining whether a parents rights should be terminated, but
also those bases resulting in the continued placement outside the home. In re
N.Q., 996 N.E.2d 385, 392 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). A court may consider
evidence of a parents prior criminal history, history of neglect, failure to
provide support, lack of adequate housing and employment, and the services
offered by the DCS and the parents response to those services. Id. Where
there are only temporary improvements and the pattern of conduct shows no
overall progress, the court might reasonably find that under the circumstances
the problematic situation will not improve. Id.
> [11] To the extent Mother does not challenge the trial courts findings of fact, the
unchallenged facts stand as proven. See In re B.R., 875 N.E.2d 369 , 373 (Ind.
Ct. App. 2007) (failure to challenge findings by the trial court resulted in waiver
of the argument that the findings were clearly erroneous), trans. denied.
✗ Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 10 of 14
> [12] The court found that Ka.C. had made allegations of sexual abuse by extended
family members, home-based case management was referred multiple times to
address housing, employment, and transportation, and Mother failed to
successfully complete case management due to her inconsistent participation.
With respect to housing, the court found that Mother failed to obtain
independent, appropriate housing during the two and one-half years the CHINS
cases were pending and that she and her husband were residing in a hotel for
the prior two to three months. The court also found that transportation has
been an issue for Mother and she failed to obtain her drivers permit. It found
that home-based therapy to address neglect had been in place for over a year
and that Therapist Gordon believed Mother made improvement in her mood
and anger management, but that Mother still does not totally grasp the mental
health needs of the Children although she could meet the goal with continued
consistent participation. It also found that the primary barrier in keeping the
Children safe is Mothers failure to accept the extent to which Ka.C. was
molested, that Mother continues to fail to take responsibility, that she
acknowledged she did not believe Ka.C.s cousin abused her, that Mother told
her therapist she wanted the whole family to take a lie detetor test, and that
she described seeing molestation but not pursuing it because she thought her
family would be on the street. Therapist Gordon testified that Mother lived in a
motel with her husband and did not have a vehicle. Jill English-Cheatham, the
Childrens Guardian ad Litem, (GAL English-Cheatham) testified that at one
point Mother discussed sexual abuse she witnessed Ka.C. endure with Mothers
brother and that Mother described that the family was living with her mother
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 11 of 14
at the time and that she did not pursue it because her mother threatened that if
she did that she would put the family out on the streets. Transcript Volume II
at 116.
> [13] Based upon the courts findings and the record, we conclude that clear and
convincing evidence supports the trial courts determination that there is a
reasonable probability that the conditions leading to the Childrens removal will
not be remedied or that the continuation of the parent-child relationship poses a
threat to the well-being of the Children.
> [14] In determining what is in the best interests of a child, the trial court is required
to look beyond the factors identified by DCS and to the totality of the evidence.
McBride v. Monroe Cty. Office of Family & Children, 798 N.E.2d 185 , 203 (Ind. Ct.
App. 2003). In so doing, the court must subordinate the interests of the parent
to those of the children. Id. Children have a paramount need for permanency
which the Indiana Supreme Court has called a central consideration in
determining the childs best interests, and the Court has stated that children
cannot wait indefinitely for their parents to work toward preservation or
reunification and courts need not wait until the child is irreversibly harmed such
that the childs physical, mental, and social development is permanently
impaired before terminating the parent-child relationship. In re E.M., 4 N.E.3d
at 647-648. However, focusing on permanency, standing alone, would
impermissibly invert the best-interests inquiry. Id. at 648. The testimony of a
childs guardian ad litem regarding the childs need for permanency supports a
finding that termination is in the childs best interests. McBride, 798 N.E.2d at
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 12 of 14
203. Recommendations by both the case manager and child advocate to
terminate parental rights, in addition to evidence that the conditions resulting in
removal will not be remedied, is sufficient to show by clear and convincing
evidence that termination is in the childs best interests. A.D.S. v. Ind. Dept of
Child Servs., 987 N.E.2d 1150, 1158-1159 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).
> [15] The record reveals that Jonquil Pettigrew, a family case manager, (FCM
Pettigrew) testified that termination of Mothers parental rights is in the
Childrens best interests. Also, GAL English-Cheatham testified that it was in
the Childrens best interests that Mothers parental rights be terminated, she did
not believe Mother should be given additional time to complete services, and
[w]eve been working at this for two and a half years with little to no progress
and the Children need to be able to process with a direction. Transcript
Volume II at 128. Based on the testimony, as well as the totality of the
evidence in the record and set forth in the courts termination order, we
conclude that the courts determination that termination is in the best interests
of the Children is supported by clear and convincing evidence.
> [16] In addition, adoption is a satisfactory plan for the care and treatment of a
child under the termination of parental rights statute. In re B.M., 913 N.E.2d
1283 , 1287 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). This plan need not be detailed, so long as it
offers a general sense of the direction in which the child will be going after the
parent-child relationship is terminated. In re Termination of Parent-Child
Relationship of D.D., 804 N.E.2d 258 , 268 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004), trans. denied.
FCM Pettigrew and GAL English-Cheatham testified that adoption is a
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 13 of 14
satisfactory plan for the Childrens care and treatment. To the extent Mother
argues that P. and M. are not suitable potential adoptive parents, we observe
that we have found that a plan for a child to be adopted by current foster
parents or another family may constitute a suitable plan for the childs future
care. See id. The termination order here does not require that adoption by P.
and M. be pursued, and any petition for adoption will be adjudicated in a
subsequent proceeding. See Ind. Code 31-19. Deidra Loyd, the Childrens
therapist, testified that the Children have shared with me and expressed with
me in session stating that they desire to stay where they are. Transcript
Volume II at 84. The record reveals support for the courts determination that
adoption is a satisfactory plan for the care and treatment of the Children.
Conclusion
> [17] We conclude that the trial courts judgment terminating the parental rights of
Mother is supported by clear and convincing evidence. We find no error and
affirm.
> [18] Affirmed.
Altice, J., and Tavitas, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-JT-646 | September 11, 2018 Page 14 of 14
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 53C02-0706-FD-00511
> ST VS PRESTON JAKE LEPINE
> CASE TYPE: FD - CLASS D FELONY
> DATE FILED: 06/04/2007
> LOCATION: MONROE CIRCUIT COURT 2
✗ PARTY INFORMATION
> DEFENDANT LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE MALE WHITE
> 5'10", 145 LBS MICHAEL J SPENCER
> PUBLIC DEFENDER
> MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER 304 N MORTON STREET BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> 812-349-2590(W)
> 6324 OLD MILL DR INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46221
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
> 000000684151INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE
> PROBATION DEPARTMENT MONROE COUNTY PROBATION 214 W 7TH ST #200 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA JEFFREY ALLEN KEHR
> 301 N. COLLEGE AVENUE RM 211 BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404
> 812-349-2670(W)
✗ CHARGE INFORMATION
> CHARGES: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE STATUTE LEVEL DATE
> 1. FRAUD 35-43-5-4 FELONY D 06/04/2007
✗ EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
06/04/2007 PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED
> HEARING HELD. STATE APPEARS BY TRISH HUFFMAN, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND PRO SE FOR HEARING. DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. THE COURT APPOINTS THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AND
> SETS THIS CAUSE FOR AN OMNIBUS DATE OF JULY 19, 2007. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JULY 23, 2007 AT 10:15 A.M. AND A BOND REVIEW HEARING ON JUNE 8, 2007 AT 9:00 A.M. DEFENDANT
> REMANDED WITH BOND SET AT $5,000 SURETY AND A HOLD UNDER C020609FD00422. INITIAL HEARING ENTRY ISSUED. SKB/CRCD121-07-C03/KENNETH G. TODD, DUTY JUDGE RJO: Y NOTICE: A
06/04/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> THE COURT IS NOTIFIED THAT THE WARRANT/WRIT ISSUED HEREIN HAS BEEN CANCELED BY DEFENDANT'S ARREST. SSG RJO: N NOTICE: N
06/04/2007 WARRANT ISSUED
> APPROVED INFORMATION FILED AND IT APPEARS THAT PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WARRANT HAS BEEN FOUND BY ELIZABETH MANN, A DISINTERESTED AND NEUTRAL MAGISTRATE. WARRANT IS NOW ORDERED
> ISSUED TO THE SHERIFF OF MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA FOR ARREST OF THE DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT'S BOND IS $5,000.00 SURETY AND $500.00 CASH BOND. NTB RJO: N NOTICE: N
06/06/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> MICHAEL SPENCER FILES APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: N
06/08/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE APPEARS BY TRISHA HUFFMAN; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH STUART K. BAGGERLY AND WAIVES THE BAIL REVIEW HEARING THIS DATE. CAUSE IS RESET FOR BAIL REVIEW HEARING ON JUNE 15, 2007 AT
> 9:00AM. HEARING HELD BY JUDGE PRO TEMPORE VALERIE HAUGHTON. CRCD13-07-C03 SSG RJO: N NOTICE: N
06/08/2007 BOND REDUCTION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
06/13/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> THE COURT IS INFORMED THAT THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS WILL BE OUT OF THE OFFICE ON JUNE 15, 2007. THE COURT RESETS THIS CAUSE FOR A BOND REVIEW HEARING ON JUNE 14, 2007 AT 9:00 A.M. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: A
06/14/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> BOND HEARING HELD. STATE APPEARS BY MICHAEL SCARTON, DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH COUNSEL MICHAEL SPENCER. DEFENDANT'S BOND IS TO REMAIN UNCHANGED. DEFENDANT REMANDED WITH BOND ST AT HOLD UNDER
> C020609FD00422 AND $5,000 SURETY AND $500 CASH UNDER C020706FD00511. SKB/CRCD6-07-C05/MARYELLEN DIEKHOFF, DUTY JUDGE RJO: N NOTICE: A
06/14/2007 BOND REDUCTION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
06/15/2007 BOND REDUCTION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
07/23/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> HEARING HELD. STATE APPEARS BY JEFFREY KEHR, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL TONJA KINDER FOR HEARING. PARTIES FILE PLEA AGREEMENT WITH THE COURT. THE COURT SETS THIS CAUSE
> FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING ON JULY 26, 2007 AT 9:45 A.M. DEFENDANT WILL BE BROUGHT DOWN AT 7:45 A.M. TO VIEW ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS. DEFENDANT REMANDED WITH BOND SET AT HOLD UNDER C020609FD00422
> AND $5,000 SURETY AND $500 CASH UNDER C020706FD00511. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: A
07/23/2007 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE (10:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
07/26/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> HEARING HELD. STATE APPEARS BY JEFFREY KEHR, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL MICHAEL SPENCER FOR HEARING. DEFENDANT PLEADS GUILTY TO FRAUD, CLASS D FELONY. THE COURT SENTENCES
> DEFENDANT TO 18 MONTHS INCARCERATION AND SUSPENDS ALL BUT 30 DAYS OF SENTENCE. DEFENDANT IS TO SERVE 30 DAYS ON WORK RELEASE BEGINNING JULY 30, 2007 AT 8:00 A.M. AND WILL BE RELEASED ON AUGUST 14,
> 2007 AT 8:00 A.M. ALL JAIL TIME CREDIT IS APPLIED TO C020609FD00422. DEFENDANT IS PLACED ON 18 MONTHS OF SUPERVISED PROBATION. DEFENDANT IS TO PAY COSTS AND FEES BY NOVEMBER 30, 2007. RESTITUTION ORDER
> ISSUED IN THE AMOUNT OF $235.51 TO USA BANK. JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION ISSUED. JUDICIAL OVER-RIDE ISSUED. SKB/GP/CR32-07-C02 RJO: Y NOTICE: A
07/26/2007 CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING (9:45 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
07/26/2007
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R)
> 1. FRAUD
> PLEA GUILTY
07/30/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> RESTITUTION AGREEMENT AND ORDER ISSUED. YMD RJO: Y NOTICE: N
09/07/2007 WARRANT ISSUED
> PROBABLE CAUSE ORDER ISSUED. WARRANT ISSUED FOR THE ARREST OF THE DEFENDANT - HOLD/NO BOND. YMD RJO: Y NOTICE: N
09/07/2007 REDOCKET
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED. NTB RJO: N NOTICE: N
09/10/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> THE COURT UPON REVIEW OF THIS CAUSE NOTES THE STATE HAS NOT PROVIDED THE ADDRESS OF THE VICTIM USA BANK AND DIRECTS THE STATE TO DO SO WITHIN 10 DAYS. YMD RJO: N NOTICE: A
09/14/2007 PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED
> STATE APPEARS BY SHELLY K. MCBRIDE; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY PRO SE AND DENIES ALLEGATIONS IN PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED AND CAUSE SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
> OCTOBER 17, 2007, 3:00 P.M. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY WITH HOLD AND FURTHER SET FOR BAIL REVIEW SEPTEMBER 20, 2007, 9:00 A.M. PROBATION REQUESTED TO APPEAR FOR BAIL REVIEW WITH ANY RECOMMENDATION.
> INITIAL HEARING ENTRY ISSUED. CRCD-15-07-C02 KS RJO: Y NOTICE: A
09/17/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE FILES MOTION FOR AMENDED RESTITUTION ORDER. COURT GRANTS SAME AND ISSUES AMENDED RESTITUTION ORDER FOR RESTITUTION IN THE SUM OF $235.51 TO FIRST FINANCIAL BANK OF TERRE HAUTE. KS ** JD 67 PG 182 ** RJO: Y NOTICE: A
09/18/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> MICHAEL SPENCER FILES APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: N
09/20/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE APPEARS BY TRISH HUFFMAN; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH MICHAEL J. SPENCER. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS APPEARS BY VALERIE COLLINS. BAIL REVIEW HEARING CONDUCTED. COURT ORDERS DEFENDANT RELEASED
> FROM CUSTODY AND PLACED ON DAY REPORTING AS A CONDITION OF HIS RELEASE, TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF DAY REPORTING. BAIL REVIEW ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE PRO TEMPORE FREDERICK A. TURNER. CRCD-19-07-C03 KS RJO: N NOTICE: A
09/20/2007 BOND REDUCTION (9:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
09/21/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> SECOND AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE/NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE FILED. PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND AND ORDER ISSUED BY JUDGE PRO TEMPORE RONALD L. CHAPMAN. WARRA NT ISSUED. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. KS RJO: Y NOTICE: A
09/25/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE APPEARS BY GUY HASKELL; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY PRO SE AND DENIES ALLEGATIONS IN THE THIRD AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. CAUSE REMAINS SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
> OCTOBER 17, 2007, 3:00 P.M. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. INITIAL HEARING ENTRY ISSUED BY JUDGE MARYELLEN DIEKHOFF. CRCD-10-07-C05 KS RJO: Y NOTICE: A
09/25/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> PROBATION FILES THIRD AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE/NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: N
09/25/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> THE COURT IS NOTIFIED THAT THE WARRANT/WRIT ISSUED HEREIN HAS BEEN CANCELED BY DEFENDANT'S ARREST ON 9-24-07. DEFENDANT ALSO ARRESTED FOR NEW OFFENSE OF POSSESSION OF PARAPHERNALIA. KS RJO: N NOTICE: N
10/17/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> HEARING HELD. STATE APPEARS BY JEFFREY KEHR, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL MICHAEL SPENCER, PROBATION APPEARS BY VALERIE COLLINS FOR HEARING. THE COURT SETS THIS CUASE FOR AN
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON NOVEMBER 7, 2007 AT 3:30 P.M. ALLOWING 30 MINUTES. DEFENDANT REMANDED WITH A HOLD. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: A
10/17/2007 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:00 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
10/30/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE OF INDIANA FILES MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. THE COURT GRANTS MOTION AND RESETS THIS CAUSE FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON NOVEMBER 26, 2007 AT 11:00 A.M. SKB RJO: N NOTICE: A
11/07/2007 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (3:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
11/26/2007 CONVERTED EVENT
> STATE APPEARS BY JEFFREY A. KEHR; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH MICHAEL J. SPENCER. PROBATION APPEARS BY VALERIE COLLINS. DEFENDANT ADMITS TO ALLEGATIONS IN THE 3RD AMENDED PETITION TO
> REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. CAUSE RESET FOR DISPOSITIONAL HEARING JANUARY 14, 2008, AT 10:00 A.M. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY WITH HOLD. CRCD-18-07-C02 KS RJO: N NOTICE: A
11/26/2007 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
12/14/2007 JUDGMENT / WILL BOOK ENTRY
> LAST KNOWN JUDGMENT BOOK ENTRIES FOR 53C02-0706-FD-00511: BOOK: 67 PAGE: 182
> VOL./BOOK 1, PAGE 1, 1 PAGES
01/14/2008 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (10:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
01/14/2008 RESET BY COURT TO 01/14/2008
01/14/2008 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> STATE APPEARS BY JOSEPH T. LOZANO; PROBATION APPEARS BY VALERIE COLLINS; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH COUNSEL, MICHAEL J. SPENCER. HEARING HELD. CAUSE RESET FOR DISPOSITIONAL HEARING ON
> JANUARY 25, 2008 AT 11:30AM TO ALLOW PROBATION DEPARTMENT TO FIND OUT WHEN A BED WILL BE AVAILABLE AT AMETHYST HOUSE. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF WITH BAIL SET AT HOLD. NOTICE IN OPEN COURT. CRCD1-08-C02 SSG
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
01/14/2008 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> DISPOSITIONAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 01/25/2008 AT 11:30 AM.
01/25/2008 DISPOSITIONAL HEARING (11:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R)
03/03/2008
> CIVIL JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R)
> 1. FRAUD
> COMMENT ()
> STATUS: ACTIVE; SIGNED DATE: 07/26/2007
> AWARDED TO: FIRST FINANCIAL BANK OF TERRE HAUTE
> AWARDED AGAINST: PRESTON LEPINE
> JUDGMENT: $235.51
05/01/2008 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
05/02/2008 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: TODD, KENNETH G )
> PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND TELEPHONICALLY BY THE HONORABLE KENNETH G. TODD. WARRANT ISSUED. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BAIL. SSG
05/05/2008 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> FOURTH AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE/NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE FILED. SSG
05/28/2008 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> WARRANT CANCELLED BY DEFENDANT'S ARREST ON MAY 27, 2008. FILE FORWARDED TO DUTY JUDGE FOR INITIAL HEARING THIS DATE. SSG
05/28/2008 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
05/28/2008 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 05/28/2008 AT 1:30 PM.
05/28/2008 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
05/28/2008 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> STATE APPEARS BY GUY HASKELL. DEFENDANT ENTERS DENIAL TO ALLEGATIONS IN FOURTH AMENDED PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE. CAUSE SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING JUNE 4, 2008 AT 9:30 AM.
> DEFENDANT REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF WITH A HOLD. ORDER ISSUED.
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> VOL./BOOK 249
05/28/2008 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
05/29/2008 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 06/04/2008 AT 9:30 AM.
06/03/2008 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> APRIL LEPINE FILES CORRESPONDENCE. COPY TO COUNSEL. KS
> FORWARDED TO: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> FORWARDED TO: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
06/04/2008 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (9:30 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
06/04/2008 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> HEARING CONDUCTED. COURT NOW REVOKES ALL SUSPENDED TIME IN THIS CAUSE. COURT TO DETERMINE EXACT CREDIT AND ISSUE ORDER. DEFENDANT TO BE EVALUATED FOR POSSIBLE PLACEMENT IN RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL. CAUSE DIARIED. AA
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
08/11/2008 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> DEFENDANT FILE PRO SE CORRESPONDENCE. COPY TO COUNSEL AND PROBATION.
> FILED BY: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> FORWARDED TO: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> FORWARDED TO: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
09/10/2008 TRANSPORT ORDER ENTERED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT TO BE TRANSPORTED TO RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL TO ARRIVE NO LATER THAN 11:00 A.M. ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2008. UPON COMPLETION OF TREATMENT, CAUSE TO BE SET FOR FURTHER HEARING. CAUSE DIARIED FOR FURTHER REVIEW.
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/10/2008
09/24/2008 PETITION FILED
> PROBATION FILES PETITION TO PLACE FEES AND COURT COSTS ON CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET. KS
> FILED BY: STATE OF INDIANA
> FILE STAMP: 09/22/2008
09/24/2008 ORDER GRANTING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> ORDER ISSUED GRANTING PETITION TO PLACE FEES AND COSTS ON CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET IN THE SUM OF: $219 JOB RELEASE FEES, $100 PROBATION ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, $240 MONTHLY PROBATION USER FEES,
> $150 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES AND $150 COURT COSTS. COURT ORDERS SAME AS A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY OF THE DEFENDANT, TO BE RECORDED AS SUCH IN THE CLERK'S RECORDS. KS
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/22/2008
09/25/2008 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/24/2008
09/25/2008 JUDGMENT DOCKET BOOK
> CLERK NOTES COURT AND PROBATION FEES PLACED IN JUDGMENT DOCKET AS ORDERED THIS DATE. NTB
> VOL./BOOK 68, PAGE 251
12/18/2008 NOTICE TO COURT FILED
> RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL FILES NOTICE THE DEFENDANT WILL HAVE THERAPEUTIC LEAVE FROM DECEMBER 24, 2008, UNTIL DECEMBER 26, 2008. KS
> FILE STAMP: 12/17/2008
01/27/2009 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/11/2009 AT 11:00 AM.
01/27/2009 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENT
> RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL ADVISES DEFENDANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TREATMENT. CAUSE NOW RESET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING FEBRUARY 11, 2009, 11:00 A.M. DEFENDANT'S CASEWORKER AT RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL TO ADVISE DEFENDANT OF HEARING.
01/29/2009 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL FILES PAPERWORK CONFIRMING DEFENDANT'S COMPLETION OF PROGRAM AND DISCHARGE AND PROVIDING DEFENDANT'S CURRENT ADDRESS. KS
> FORWARDED TO: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> FORWARDED TO: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FORWARDED TO: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
> FILE STAMP: 01/27/2009
02/11/2009 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
02/11/2009 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> STATE APPEARS BY JEFFREY KEHR; DEFENDANT APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, MICHAEL SPENCER. PROBATION APPEARS BY JILL BARNETT. HEARING CONDUCTED. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 275 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY
> REVOKED SENTENCE BE STAYED TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF PROBATION TERMS. DEFENDANT TO RECEIVE GOOD-TIME CREDIT (SEE ATTACHED SUMMARY OF CREDIT PLUS 125 CLASS III DAYS FROM RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL).
> THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION SHALL BE MODIFIED BY EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE DEFENDANT'S PROBATION FOR 275 DAYS, UNTIL 11/18/09. COURT NOTES THAT IF THE DEFENDANT COMPLETES PROBATION SUCCESSFULLY
> THE STATE WILL DISMISS 53C020803FD00314. AA
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
02/11/2009 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> ORDER OF MODIFICATION ISSUED. AA
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/11/2009
02/12/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 02/11/2009
> VOL./BOOK 260
02/25/2009 CORRESPONDENCE TO/FROM COURT FILED
> RICHMOND STATE HOSPITAL FILES DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF SEPARATION. CAUSE REMAINS DISPOSED.
> FORWARDED TO: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> FORWARDED TO: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FORWARDED TO: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
> FILE STAMP: 02/24/2009
06/04/2009 CASE REOPENED
06/04/2009 PETITION TO REVOKE FILED
> PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE FILED THIS DATE.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 06/04/2009
06/04/2009 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/07/2009 AT 1:30 PM.
06/04/2009 SERVICE ISSUED
> SUMMONS FOR PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE SENT TO DEFENDANT THIS DATE VIA US MAIL. INITIAL HEARING DATE OF JULY 7,2009 AT 1:30 PM.
> REQUESTED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> SERVE TO: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
07/07/2009 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/07/2009 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HOLT, J. DAVID - SJ )
> DEFENDANT ENTERS A DENIAL TO ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE PETITION TO REVOKE SUSPENDED SENTENCE.
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/07/2009
> VOL./BOOK Y
07/07/2009 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
07/08/2009 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/29/2009 AT 11:00 AM.
07/08/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/07/2009
> VOL./BOOK 265
07/29/2009 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (11:00 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
07/29/2009 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> PROBATION APPEARS BY JILL BARNETT. DEFENDANT ENTERS AN ADMISSION TO ALLEGATION 1 OF THE MOTION TO EXECUTE FILED ON JUNE 4, 2009 AND THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT. THE COURT ORDERS THAT 275 DAYS
> OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVOKED AND STAYED SENTENCE REMAIN STAYED TO ALLOW COMPLETION OF PROBATION. DEFENDANT IS RESTORED TO PROBATION, WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS UNCHANGED EXCEPT THE PERIOD OF
> PROBATION SHALL BE EXTENDED FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS, UNTIL MAY 18, 2010. DEFENDANT'S PROBATION MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO MARION COUNTY. AA
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
07/29/2009 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION - ORDER OF COMMITMENT ISSUED. AA
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/29/2009
07/29/2009 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> COURT ORDER TRANSFERRING PROBATION ISSUED. AA
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/29/2009
07/30/2009 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> COURT NOTES THAT IF THE DEFENDANT COMPLETES PROBATION SUCCESSFULLY UNDER THIS CAUSE THAT THE STATE WILL DISMISS 53C020803FD00214. AA
07/31/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 07/29/2009
> VOL./BOOK 265
08/07/2009 CASE REOPENED
> FILE STAMPED: 08/07/2009
08/07/2009 MOTION FILED
> MOTION TO EXECUTE SENTENCE FILED.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/07/2009
08/07/2009 MOTION FOR WARRANT FILED
> WARRANT REQUESTED BY PROBATION.
> FILED BY: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> FILE STAMP: 08/07/2009
08/07/2009 PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND: ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: MANN, ELIZABETH N - SJ )
> WARRANT TO BE ISSUED. DEFENDANT TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND.
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/07/2009
08/10/2009 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON ISSUED
08/18/2009 WARRANT OR WRIT OF ATTMNT FOR THE BODY OF A PERSON SERVED
08/19/2009 INITIAL HEARING (1:30 PM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
08/19/2009 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 08/19/2009 AT 1:30 PM.
08/19/2009 DEFENDANT APPEARS ON ARREST LIST
> WARRANT CANCELLED BY DEFENDANT'S ARREST. FILE FORWARDED TO THE DUTY JUDGE FOR AN INITIAL HEARING ON THIS DATE. AA
08/19/2009 ORDER ON INITIAL HEARING (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> STATE APPEARS BY GUY HASKELL; DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY PRO SE AND DENIES ALLEGATIONS IN THE MOTION TO EXECUTE SENTENCE. CAUSE SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING SEPTEMBER 15, 2009, 10:15 A.M.
> DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY TO BE HELD WITHOUT BOND. COURT DECLINES TO SET BAIL REVIEW HEARING. NOTICE IN OPEN COURT.
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: STATE OF INDIANA
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/19/2009
08/19/2009 INDIGENT COUNSEL APPOINTED AT COUNTY EXPENSE (JUDICIAL OFFICER: DIEKHOFF, MARY ELLEN )
> MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED.
08/20/2009 HEARING SCHEDULING ACTIVITY
> EVIDENTIARY HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 09/15/2009 AT 10:15 AM.
08/21/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 08/19/2009
> VOL./BOOK 266
08/24/2009 APPEARANCE FILED
> FOR PARTY: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> ATTORNEY: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
> FILE STAMP: 08/21/2009
08/24/2009 REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED
> FILED BY: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
> FILE STAMP: 08/21/2009
09/15/2009 EVIDENTIARY HEARING (10:15 AM) (JUDICIAL OFFICER KELLAMS, MARC R) RESULT: COMMENCED AND CONCLUDED
09/15/2009 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> HEARING CONDUCTED. THE COURT NOW ORDERS THAT 275 DAYS OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVOKED AND STAYED SENTENCE BE EXECUTED AND SERVED IN THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
> THE DEFENDANT RECEIVES GOOD-TIME CREDIT FOR 32 ACTUAL DAYS NOT PREVIOUSLY CREDITED (8/14/09 - 8/18/09 IN MARION COUNTY AND 8/18/09 - 9/15/09 IN MONROE COUNTY). THE DEFENDANT
> IS TO BE DISCHARGED FROM PROBATION, UNSUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. URINE DRUG SCREEN FEE OF $75.00 AND PROBATION USER FEE OF $420.00 TO BE PLACED ON THE CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET. ABSTRACT TO BE PREPARED. AA
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
09/15/2009 ORDER ISSUED (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> ORDER OF DISPOSITION - ORDER OF COMMITMENT ISSUED. AA
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/15/2009
09/15/2009 HEARING JOURNAL ENTRY (JUDICIAL OFFICER: KELLAMS, MARC R )
> DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY THIS DATE AND ENTERS AN ADMISSION TO ALLEGATION 1 OF THE MOTION TO EXECUTE. AA
> PRESENT: KEHR, JEFFREY ALLEN
> PRESENT: LEPINE, PRESTON JAKE
> PRESENT: MONROE COUNTY PROBATION
> PRESENT: SPENCER, MICHAEL J
09/17/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/15/2009
> VOL./BOOK 267
09/17/2009 JUDGMENT DOCKET BOOK
> CLERK NOTES PROBATION FEES PLACED IN CIVIL JUDGMENT DOCKET AS ORDERED THIS DATE.
> VOL./BOOK 69, PAGE 371
09/22/2009 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT SENT TO DOC
> ABSTRACT ISSUED THIS DATE. DOC PACKET FORWARDED TO THE MONROE COUNTY JAIL. AA
09/22/2009 RJO ENTRY
> ORDER SIGNED: 09/22/2009
> VOL./BOOK 267
> PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT REFLECT INTEREST THAT HAS ACCRUED SINCE THE LAST PAYMENT.
✗ CHRONOLOGICAL CASE SUMMARY
> CASE NO. 49G05-9705-CF-078620
STATE OF INDIANA VS. ESSETT, DARREN
CASE TYPE: CF - CRIMINAL FELONY
DATE FILED: 05/30/1997
LOCATION:
PARTY INFORMATION
ATTORNEYS
DEFENDANT ESSETT, DARREN E MALE BLACK
5'9", 235 LBS JOHN T RIBBLE
RETAINED
STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
ONE NORTH CAPITAL
SUITE 800
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2026
317-232-2475(W)FERD SAMPER
RETAINED
307 BARRISTER BUILDING
155 EAST MARKET STREET
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204
317-634-5544(W)
4420 BROOKLINE PL APT. D
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46220
OTHER AGENCY NUMBERS
000000330858INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, 2634840PROTECTION ORDER REGISTRY, 2634847PROTECTION ORDER REGISTRY, 2634849PROTECTION ORDER REGISTRY, 956445INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
STATE PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA
CHARGE INFORMATION
CHARGES: ESSETT, DARREN E STATUTE LEVEL DATE
1. BURGLARY/FA 35-43-2-1 DEGREE CODE 05/30/1997
2. BATTERY/FC 35-42-2-1 DEGREE CODE 05/30/1997
3. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF/MA 35-43-1-2 DEGREE CODE 05/30/1997
4. HABITUAL OFFENDER/SE 35-50-2-8 DEGREE CODE 08/06/1997
EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT
05/30/1997 NEW FILINGS PRE 01/01/2002
> NEW FILINGS PRE 01/01/2002
05/30/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUTRIGHT SCREENING
06/02/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRELIMINARY SCREENING
06/02/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> INITIAL HEARING
> 000 COURT REPORTER: SHELLY GLORE.
> 001 INITIAL HEARING MINUTES 6/2/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY F. GLEAVES.
> 005 DEFENDANT STATES TRUE NAME TO BE DARREN ESSETT,
> AND D.O.B. 09/23/64.
> 006 DEFENDANT FOUND TO BE INDIGENT; PUBLIC DEFENDER
> NOVELLA NEDEFF APPOINTED.
> 007 COURT ADVISES THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TOI.C. 35-33-7-5, 6.
> DEFENDANT OR COUNSEL PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF INFORMATION. A
> PRELIMINARY PLEA OF NOT GUILTY IS ENTERED FOR THE DEFENDANT.
> COURT NOW SETS: OMNIBUS D
> 008 COURT ORDERS PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH COURT RULES ON AUTOMATIC
> DISCOVERY.
> 009 DISCOVERY DEADLINE 9/8/97.
> 010 NO CONTACT: WITH JILL CHAPMAN.
> 011 PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
> 012 STATE FILES MOTION TO DETAIN ON NO BOND(H.I.).
> COURT GRANTS MOTION AND ORDERS DEFENDANT REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY
> OF THE MARION COUNTY SHERIFF AND HELD WITHOUT BOND,
> WITH BOND ORDERED TO BE SET ON DATE OF 06/13/97
06/02/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 PROBABLE CAUSE MINUTES 6/2/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 INFORMATION AND PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT FILED (H.I.). PROBABLE
> CAUSE FOUND TO HOLD DEFENDANT, AND INITIAL HEARING SCHEDULED.
06/10/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 6/10/1997
> 002 STATE ON 06/10/97 FILES NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE (H.I.).
07/01/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
> 000 COURT REPORTER: SHELLY GLORE.
> 001 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARNG MINUTES 7/1/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL R. CASANOVA FOR N. NEDEFF.
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY C. CRISPIN.
> 005 HPTC ON 08/20/97 AT A.
> 006 HJRT ON 08/25/97 AT A.
07/22/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 7/22/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 07/22/97 FILES NOTICE OF DEPOSITION (H.I.).
08/05/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/5/1997
> 002 STATE ON 08/05/97 FILES SUP. NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLI (H.I.).
08/06/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/6/1997
> 002 STATE ON 08/06/97 FILES HABITUAL OFFENDER INFORMATION (H.I.).
> 003 STATE FILES MOTION TO ADD COUNT(S) 4 (H.I.). MOTION GRANTED.
> 004 STATE ON 08/06/97 FILES SUP. NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLI (H.I.).
> 005 STATE ON 08/06/97 FILES MOTION TO FINGERPRINT DEFENDANT (H.I.).
08/07/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/7/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 08/07/97 FILES NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE (H.I.).
08/07/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/7/1997
> 002 STATE ON 08/07/97 FILES SUP. NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLI (H.I.).
08/08/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/8/1997
> 002 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 003 STATE'S MOTION TO FINGERPRINT FILED
> 004 8/6/97.
> 005 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
08/15/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/15/1997
> 002 STATE ON 08/15/97 FILES SUP. NOTICE OF DISCOVERY COMPLI (H.I.).
08/20/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING MINUTES 8/20/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 003 STATE OF INDIANA BY C. CRISPIN.
> 004 CASE REMAINS ON TRIAL CALENDAR.
08/22/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/22/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 COURT FILES CONGESTED CALENDAR DUE TO
> 004 STATE VS ANDERSON/CARTER/RICHARDSON.
> 005 COURT VACATED JURY TRIAL ON 08/25/97 AT A.
> 006 HPTC ON 09/24/97 AT A.
> 007 HJRT ON 09/29/97 AT A.
> 008 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
09/24/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
> 000 COURT REPORTER: SHELLY GLORE.
> 001 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING MINUTES 9/24/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL K. BEEHLER FOR N. NEDEFF.
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY C. CRISPIN.
> 005 CASE REMAINS ON TRIAL CALENDAR.
09/26/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 9/26/1997
> 002 COURT FILES CONGESTED CALENDAR DUE TO
> 003 STATE VS GRADY AND PRYOR 96165948/51.
> 004 COURT VACATED JURY TRIAL ON 09/29/97 AT A.
> 005 HPTC ON 10/29/97 AT A.
> 006 HJRT ON 11/03/97 AT A.
> 007 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
10/03/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 10/3/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 10/03/97 FILES MOTION FOR BOND ADJUSTMENT (H.I.).
10/07/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 10/7/1997
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 004 PETITION FOR BOND REDUCTION FILED
> 005 10/3/97.
> 006 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
10/29/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING MINUTES 10/29/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 003 STATE OF INDIANA BY C. CRISPIN.
> 004 CASE REMAINS ON TRIAL CALENDAR.
11/03/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> JURY TRIAL
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 JURY TRIAL MINUTES 11/3/1997
> 002 MATTER COMES ON FOR JURY TRIAL.
> 003 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY V. BECKER AND JUDY JOHNSON SHOCK.
> 005 DEFENDANT ON 11/03/97 FILES MOTION IN LIMINE (H.I.).
> 006 COURT GRANTS IN PART. COURT DENIES
> 007 IN PART.
> 008 STATE ON 11/03/97 FILES MOTION TO AMEND INFORMATION (H.I.).
> 009 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 010 DEFENDANT MOVES FOR SEPARATION OF WITNESSES.
> 011 SEPARATION GRANTED, ADMONISHMENT GIVEN,AND WITNESSES SEPARATED.
> 012 PROSPECITVE JURORS BROUGHT INTO
> 013 COURTROOM AND VOIR DIRE BEGINS 10:05.
> 014 VOIR DIRE CONCLUDED 11:40.
> 015 VENIRE SWORN AND EXAMINED. JURY ACCEPTED BY STATE AND DEFENDANT.
> 016 THE FOLLOWING ARE SWORN AS THE JURY IN THIS CAUSE:
> 017 1. DEBORAH TINGEN
> 018 2. THERESA BOLTON
> 019 3. KENNETH CORLETTE
> 020 4. GREGORY WANNEMUEHLER
> 021 5. LOIS DAY
> 022 6. JAMES SHIERENBERG
> 023 7. DARLENE GAMMONS
> 024 8. RODNEY LAWSON
> 025 9. CLARENCE KISSEL
> 026 10. LARRY HOFFMAN
> 027 11. KEITH BOSELL
> 028 12. MORRIS PRIFOGLE
> 029 ALTERNATE JURORS:
> 030 1. THOMAS DODSON
> 031 2. REBECCA COX
> 032 COURT TAKES LUNCHEON RECESS.
> 033 JURY ADMONISHED UPON EACH SEPARATION.
> 034 PARTIES RETURN FROM LUNCHEON RECESS
> 035 1:05 P.M.
> 036 PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS SETTLED.
> 037 JURY RETURNS.
> 038 PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN.
> 039 STATE MAKES OPENING STATEMENT.
> 040 DEFENDANT MAKES OPENING STATEMENT.
> 041 STATE SUBMITS EVIDENCE.
> 042 WITNESSES SWORN AS CALLED.
> 043 COURT TAKES RECESS 2:50 P.M. PARTIES
> 044 RETURN FROM RECESS 3:15. STATE
> 045 CONTINUES WITH THE PRESENTATION OF
> 046 IT'S CASE.
> 047 COURT ADJOURNS FOR THE DAY. JURY
> 048 ADMONISHED.
> 049 HJRT ON 11/04/97 AT A.
11/04/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> JURY TRIAL
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 JURY TRIAL MINUTES 11/4/1997
> 002 MATTER COMES ON FOR JURY TRIAL.
> 003 DAY 2 OF JURY TRIAL.
> 004 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 005 STATE OF INDIANA BY V. BECKER AND J. SCHOCK.
> 006 STATE CONTINUES WITH THE PRESENTATION
> 007 OF IT'S CASE.
> 008 STATE RESTS.
> 009 JURY EXCUSED.
> 010 DEFENDANT MOVES FOR JUDGMENT ON EVIDENCE.
> 011 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 012 COURT TAKES RECESS 10:45.
> 013 PARTIES RETURN FROM RECESS 11:25.
> 014 JURY RETURNED TO COURTROOM.
> 015 DEFENDANT RESTS.
> 016 JURY EXCUSED.
> 017 DEFENDANT SUBMITS PROPOSED FINAL INSTRUCTIONS NUMBERED 1-4.
> 018 FINAL INSTRUCTIONS SETTLED.
> 019 JURY RETURNED TO COURTROOM.
> 020 STATE MAKES CLOSING ARGUMENT.
> 021 DEFENDANT MAKES CLOSING ARGUMENT.
> 022 STATE RESPONDS TO DEFENDANT'S CLOSING ARGUMENT.
> 023 JURY INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN. BAILIFF SWORN.
> 024 JURY DELIBERATIONS BEGIN AT 12:30.
> 025 PARTIES GO ON THE RECORD TO ADDRESS A
> 026 QUESTION FROM THE JURY (3:00 P.M.).
> 027 WRITTEN RESPONSE SENT TO JURY ROOM.
> 028 THE JURY HAS REACHED A VERDICT 4:20.
> 029 JURY RETURNED INTO COURTROOM. JURY
> 030 FOREMAN IS GREGORY WANNEMUEHLER.
> 031 JURY RETIRED TO DELIBERATE AND JURY RETURNS VERDICT:
> 032 COUNT (001) GL
> 033 COUNT (002) G
> 034 COUNT (003) NG
> 035 VERDICT FORMS EXAMINED.
> 036 JURY POLLED AT REQUEST OF DEFENDANT.
> 037 JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION ENTERED ON COUNT(S) 1 2.
> 038 DEFENDANT REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
> WITHOUT BOND PENDING SENTENCING.
> 039 JURY DISCHARGED.
> 040 DEFENDANT FILES WAIVER OF JURY ON
> 041 HABITUAL OFFENDER PHASE ONLY.
> 042 HABITUAL OFFENDER PHASE ON 11/05/97 AT P.
> INTO COURT ROOM
11/05/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> HEARING OTHER
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 COURT TRIAL MINUTES 11/5/1997
> 002 MATTER SUBMITTED TO COURT FOR TRIAL ON DEFENDANT'S PLEA OF
> NOT GUILTY.
> 003 OF HABITUAL OFFENDER CHARGE.
> 004 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 005 STATE OF INDIANA BY V. BECKER.
> 006 DEFENDANT FILED WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
> 007 FOR HABITUAL OFFENDER PHASE ONLY.
> 008 WITNESSES SWORN AS CALLED.
> 009 STATE SUBMITS EVIDENCE.
> 010 STATE RESTS.
> 011 DEFENDANT RESTS.
> 012 COURT NOW FINDS THE DEFENDANT:
> 013 COUNT (004) P
> 014 COURT ORDERS PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND SETS CAUSE FOR
> SENTENCING 12/05/97 PM.
> 015 DEFENDANT REMANDED TO THE CUSTODY OF THE MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
> WITHOUT BOND PENDING SENTENCING.
11/05/1997
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAWKINS, GRANT W)
> 1. BURGLARY/FA
> FINDING OF GUILTY
11/05/1997
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAWKINS, GRANT W)
> 2. BATTERY/FC
> FINDING OF GUILTY
11/05/1997
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAWKINS, GRANT W)
> 3. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF/MA
> FINDING OF NOT GUILTY
12/05/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> SENTENCING
> 000 COURT REPORTER: SHELLY GLORE.
> 001 SENTENCING HEARING MINUTES 12/5/1997
> 002 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL N. NEDEFF.
> 003 STATE OF INDIANA BY M. HOLLINGSWORTH FOR C. CRISPIN.
> 004 PROBATION DEPARTMENT FILES PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT
> (H.I.). PARTIES SERVED.
> 005 JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION ENTERED ON COUNT(S) 1 2 4.
> 006 COURT CONDUCTS SENTENCING HEARING AND, AFTER CONSIDERING THE
> PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATIONREPORT AND ALL EVIDENCE PRESENTED,
> SENTENCES THE DEFENDANT AS FOLLOWS:
> 007 AS TO COUNT 001, SENTENCE IMPOSED 30 Y;
> EXECUTED 10950 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 008 AS TO COUNT 002, SENTENCE IMPOSED 8 Y;
> EXECUTED 2920 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 009 ALL COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH ONEANOTHER.
> 010 DEFENDANT ORDERED COMMITTED TO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND GIVEN
> 190 DAYS CREDIT TIME.
> 011 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED AND FILED (H.I.).
> 012 CRIMINAL COURT COMMITMENTORDER
> 013 END OF UPDATE SENTENCING/COMMITMENT
> 014 SENTENCING COMMENTS: DEFENDANT FOUND GUILTY OF LESSER
> 015 SENTENCING COMMENTS: INCLUDED BURGLARY CLASS B FELONY AS TO
> 016 SENTENCING COMMENTS: COUNT 1. COUNT 1 ENHANCED BY 10 YEARS
> 017 SENTENCING COMMENTS: FOR HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUS FOR A
> 018 SENTENCING COMMENTS: TOTAL OF 30 YEARS.
> 019 COURT FINDS MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES.
> 020 COURT FINDS AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES.
> 021 COURT ADVISES DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL OF RIGHTS OF APPEAL.
> 022 COURT FINDS DEFENDANT INDIGENT FOR APPEAL PURPOSES AND REFERS
> MATTER TO MARION COUNTY PAUPER APPEALS PANEL.
> 023 COURT SIGNS AND ISSUES ORDER APPOINTINGPAUPER APPELLATE COUNSEL
> (H.I.).
> 024 AS A RESULT OF FINDINGS IN SENTENCING HEARING, COURT ENHANCES
> DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE ON COUNT 001 BY 10 YEARS.
12/05/1997 CONVERTED EVENT
> CASE DISPOSED
01/27/1998 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 1/27/1998
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 01/27/98 FILES MOT TO FILE BELATED PRAECIPE (H.I.).
02/09/1998 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/9/1998
> 002 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 003 MOTION TO FILE BELATED PRAECIPE FILED
> 004 1/27/98.
> 005 DEFENDANT ON 02/06/98 FILES PRAECIPE (H.I.).
> 006 PRAECIPE FORWARDED TO CLKER AND
> 007 REPORTER.
03/03/1998 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/3/1998
> 002 CLERK'S PORTION OF THE RECORD OF
> 003 PROCEEDINGS COPIED AND GIVEN TO MARY
> 004 ROWLETT THIS DATE.
12/08/1998 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 12/8/1998
> 002 COURT RECEIVES OFFICIAL OPINION FROM
> 003 THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS.
> 004 JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
01/28/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 MINUTE ENTRY 01/27/99
> 002 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 01/27/99 FILES PLEA AGREEMENT (H.I.).
02/04/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/4/1999
> 002 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 02/04/99 FILES ORDER TO COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF (H.I.).
02/09/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/9/1999
> 002 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 003 FOR ORDER TO COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF
> 004 LAWS FILED 2-4-99.
> 005 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 006 FOR PRAECIPE FILED 1-27-99.
> 007 COURT DENIES MOTION FOR INJUNCTION.
> 008 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
07/13/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 7/13/1999
> 002 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/13/99 FILES APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (H.I.).
> 003 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/13/99 FILES PRAECIPE (H.I.).
> 004 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/13/99 FILES VERIF P-PROS APPEAL AS POOR PER (H.I.).
07/15/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 7/15/1999
> 002 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 003 MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS FILED 7-13-99.
08/05/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/5/1999
> 002 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 08/05/99 FILES PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RE (H.I.).
08/06/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/6/1999
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 COURT RECEIVES DEFENDANT'S PETITION
> 004 FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF AND
> 005 FORWARDS TO STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER.
> 006 PCR STATUS ON 02/07/00 AT A.
> INTO COURT ROOM
> 007 TRANSPORT ORDER SENT.
08/11/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/11/1999
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 08/11/99 FILES APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (H.I.).
12/02/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 12/2/1999
> 002 DEFENDANT ON 12/01/99 FILES MOT. TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE/COU (H.I.).
12/02/1999 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 12/2/1999
> 002 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 003 MOTION TO WITDRAW APPEARANCE
> 004 FILED 12-1-99. ORDER FILED
> 005 CASE IS ALREADY SET FOR 2-7-00
> 006 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
01/31/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 1/31/2000
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT ON 01/28/00 FILES APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (H.I.).
> 004 DEFENDANT ON 01/28/00 FILES DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUA (H.I.).
02/02/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/2/2000
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 004 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED ON
> 005 01-28-00.
> 006 COURT VACATED HEARING OTHER ON 02/07/00 AT A.
> 007 PCR STATUS ON 05/05/00 AT A.
> INTO COURT ROOM
02/23/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/23/2000
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 STATE ON 02/23/00 FILES STATE'S ANSWER (H.I.).
05/05/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 5/5/2000
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 NEITHER PARTY IS PRESENT FOR THIS
> 004 HEARING.
> 005 COURT CONTINUES THIS MATTER.
> 006 PCR STATUS HEARING ON 05/15/00 AT A.
> INTO COURT ROOM
> 007 COURT VACATED HEARING OTHER ON 05/05/00 AT A.
05/15/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> HEARING OTHER
> 000 COURT REPORTER: ROBIN HELTON.
> 001 POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING MINUTES 5/15/2000
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 DEFENDANT BY COUNSEL SAMPER.
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY FRANK GLEAVES.
> 005 PETITIONER ORALL REQUESTS A
> 006 CONTINUANCE.
> 007 HPCR ON 07/10/00 AT A.
> 008 DEFT. ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT TRANSPORT
> 009 ORDER TO THE COURT.
07/10/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> POST CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING
> 000 COURT REPORTER: CAROL NOLAN.
> 001 POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING MINUTES 7/10/2000
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 PETITIONER IN BY COUNSEL SAMPER
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY FRANK GLEAVES.
> 005 PETITIONER ORALLY REQUESTS A
> 006 CONTINUANCE
> 007 HPCR ON 09/18/00 AT A.
> 008 DEFENDANT ATTORNEY TO FILE TRANSPORT
> 009 ORDER.
09/18/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> POST CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING
> 000 COURT REPORTER: SHELLY GLORE.
> 001 POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING MINUTES 9/18/2000
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 PETITIONER, BY COUNSEL FERD SAMPER
> 004 STATE OF INDIANA BY FRANK GLEAVES.
> 005 PETITIONER MOVES TO WITHDRAW PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
> 006 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 007 COURT ORDERS PETITION DISMISSED WITHOUTPREJUDICE.
12/01/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 12/1/2000
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 12/01/00 FILES MOTION TO CORRECT ERRONEOUS SEN (H.I.).
12/12/2000 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING MINUTES 12/12/2000
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 004 MOTION TO CORRECT ERRONEOUS
> 005 SENTENCE FILED 12-1-00. ORDER FILED.
> 006 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
02/21/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 2/21/2001
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT ON 02/21/01 FILES PRAECIPE (H.I.).
03/28/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/28/2001
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 004 PRO SE PRAECIPE
08/14/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/14/2001
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT ON 08/14/01 FILES PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RE (H.I.).
08/29/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 8/29/2001
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 STATE ON 08/28/01 FILES STATES ANSWER (H.I.).
09/20/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 9/20/2001
> 002 MASTER COMMISSIONER
> 003 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 004 PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF
> 005 COURT NOW ORDERS JUDGMENT OF CONVICTIONAS TO CT(S) 4 SET
> ASIDE.
> 006 HPTC ON 10/09/01 AT P.
> 007 TRANSPORT ORDER ISSUED
10/09/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
> 000 COURT REPORTER: 51637 ANNA MULLIN.
> 001 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE HEARING MINUTES 10/9/2001
> 002 MASTER COMMISSIONER
> 003 STATE OF INDIANA BY C. CRISPIN.
> 004 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL F. SAMPER.
> 005 DEFENDANT IN JAIL.
> 006 HPTC ON 10/30/01 AT P.
> 007 JUDGE BROYLES TO HEAR THIS CASE.
10/15/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> REOPEN CASE
> 001 PCR GRANTED FOR RESENTENCING
10/31/2001 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 10/31/2001
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 MATTER SCHEDULED FOR PRE-TRIAL
> 004 CONFERENCE.
> 005 THIS CASE TO BE HEARD BY JUDGE BROYLES
> 006 WHO IS IN A THREE DAY JURY TRIAL.
> 007 MATTER IS NOW RESET.
> 008 HPTC ON 12/11/01 AT P.
> 009 PARTIES NOTIFIED OF NEW COURT DATE.
> 010 COURT VACATED PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ON 10/30/01 AT P.
> 011 DEFENDANT ON 10/30/01 FILES MOTION TO TRANSPORT (H.I.).
> 012 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 013 ORDER FILED.
> 014 ORDER TO TRANSPORT DEFENDANT ISSUED.
03/14/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> OUT OF SESSION
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/14/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 MINUTE ENTRY MADE TO CORRECT
> 004 SENTENCING RECORD, TO REFLECT COUNT 1
> 005 20 YEARS PURSUANT TO HABITUAL OFFENDER
> 006 SET ASIDE.
> 007 SENTENCE MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
> 008 AS TO COUNT 001, SENTENCE IMPOSED 20 Y;
> EXECUTED 7300 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 009 AS TO COUNT 002, SENTENCE IMPOSED 8 Y;
> EXECUTED 2920 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 010 ALL COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH ONEANOTHER.
> 011 DEFENDANT ASSESSED COURT COSTS OF $129.00 AND TOTAL FINES OF$0.00.
> 012 DEFENDANT ORDERED COMMITTED TO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND GIVEN 190 DAYS CREDIT TIME.
> 013 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED AND FILED (H.I.).
> 014 CRIMINAL COURT COMMITMENTORDER
> 015 END OF UPDATE SENTENCING/COMMITMENT
> 016 SENTENCING COMMENTS: DEFENDANT GUILTY OF LESSER INCLUDED
> 017 SENTENCING COMMENTS: BURGLARY CLASS B FELONY AS TO COUNT 1.
03/15/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/15/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT
> 004 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
03/28/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/28/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT ON 03/28/02 FILES PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SE (H.I.).
04/11/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 4/11/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT TAKES MOTION UNDER ADVISEMENT.
> 004 TO MODIFY SENTENCE
> 005 ORDER FILED
> 006 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
> 007 MODIFY SENTENCE ON 05/06/02 AT A.INTO COURT ROOM
> 008 DEFENDANT ON 04/11/02 FILES MOTION TO TRANSPORT (H.I.).
> 009 COURT GRANTS MOTION.
> 010 ORDER FILED
> 011 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
> 012 TRANSPORT ORDER ISSUED
04/29/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 4/29/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 TRANSPORT ORDER ISSUED FOR DEFENDANT
> 004 COURT VACATED HEARING OTHER ON 05/06/02 AT A.
> 005 MOD. OF SENTENCE ON 05/08/02 AT P. INTO COURT ROOM
> 006 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
05/06/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 5/6/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT VACATED PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ON 12/11/01 AT P.
05/08/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 000 COURT REPORTER: 36381 PATSY HAMMOND.
> 001 HEARING OF MOTION MINUTES5/8/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 STATE OF INDIANA BY DOUG PURDY.
> 004 DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND BY COUNSEL FRED SAMPER.
> 005 PARTIES SUBMIT TO COURT FOR HEARING ON
> 006 PETITION TO MODIFY SENTENCE FILED
> 007 03-28-02
> 008 WITNESSES SWORN. HEARING HAD. PARTIESREST.
> 009 SENTENCE MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
> 010 AS TO COUNT 001, SENTENCE IMPOSED 15 Y;
> EXECUTED 5475 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 011 AS TO COUNT 002, SENTENCE IMPOSED 8 Y;
> EXECUTED 2920 D; SUSPENDED 0 Y.
> 012 ALL COUNTS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH ONEANOTHER.
> 013 DEFENDANT ASSESSED COURT COSTS OF $129.00 AND TOTAL FINES OF $0.00.
> 014 DEFENDANT ORDERED COMMITTED TO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND GIVEN
> 190 DAYS CREDIT TIME.
> 015 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED AND FILED (H.I.).
> 016 CRIMINAL COURT COMMITMENTORDER
> 017 END OF UPDATE SENTENCING/COMMITMENT
> 018 SENTENCING COMMENTS: SENTENCE MODIFIED AS TO COUNT 1 ONLY
> 019 SENTENCING COMMENTS: DEFENDANT GUILTY OF LESSER CONCLUDED
> 020 SENTENCING COMMENTS: BUGLARY CLASS B FELONY JAIL CREDIT IS
> 021 SENTENCING COMMENTS: AS OF 12-5-97
05/08/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> FEE ASSESSMENT
> 001 $ 100.00 SUPP PUB DEF SERVICE FEE ASSESSED. REASON: IA
06/18/2002 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 6/18/2002
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT DENIES LETTER FROM DEFENDANT
> 004 FOR PROBATION
03/31/2003 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/31/2003
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 TO REFLECT ENTRY ON HABITUAL OFFENDER
> 004 COURT NOW ORDERS JUDGMENT OF CONVICTIONAS TO CT(S) 4 SET ASIDE.
> 005 PER JUDGE BROYLES RULING ON P.C.R. TO
> 006 SET HABITUAL OFFENDER ASIDE.
03/31/2003
> JUDGMENT (JUDICIAL OFFICER: HAWKINS, GRANT W)
> 4. HABITUAL OFFENDER/SE
> CONVERSION UNKNOWN
07/01/2003 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 7/1/2003
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/01/03 FILES APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (H.I.).
07/01/2003 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 MINUTE CORRECTIONS FOR OUT OF SESSION ON 07/01/03 AT 15:16
> 002 ADDITION AFTER MINUTE SEQUENCE 003 FOLLOWS:
> 003 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/01/03 FILES PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF SE (H.I.).
> 004 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 07/01/03 FILES MOTION 4 ORDER 4 EVALUATION (H.I.).
07/07/2003 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 7/7/2003
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT DENIES MOTION.
> 004 MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCE
> 005 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
01/02/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 DISPOSED
> 03/17/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/17/2004
> 002 PRO TEM
> 003 DEFENDANT PRO SE ON 03/17/04 FILES CORRESPONDENCE (H.I.).
03/18/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/18/2004
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 STATE ON 03/18/04 FILES OBJ.DEFENDANTS RELEASE INTO C.T (H.I.).
03/22/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/22/2004
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 LETTER RECEIVED AND NOTED
03/22/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 3/22/2004
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 STATES OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS RELEASE
> 004 INTO COMMUNITY TRANSITION PROGRAM
> 005 COURT TAKES MOTION UNDER ADVISEMENT.
> 006 UNTIL C.T.P FILED
04/15/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 4/15/2004
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMMUNITY
> 004 TRANSITION STAFFING MEMORANDUM
> 005 RECEIVED 04-14-04
04/16/2004 CONVERTED EVENT
> 001 OUT OF COURT FILING/RULING MINUTES 4/16/2004
> 002 PRESIDING JUDGE
> 003 COURT DENIES MOTION
> 004 ADMITTANCE INTO C.T.P
> 005 COPIES SENT TO ALL PARTIES.
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
:
., t#, . L.
,Wt i ;##W. ;Wt EW: ,ft .Gt cherry was here
i#D. LE :#L:WE f#EEj E##; t#E j#W:
f#f L#E .KG ,#D .E#f E#, E###t t#E ;K#f
.D#i G#W. EE ;#f iWW; E#t E#fE#f t#E .G#D.
:KW, D#K. f#. t#i L##LffiE#t E#t D#G t#E j#K;
t#f E#K. :#G GK tLLG##L E#t E#t f#E. t#E ,K#f ,GD;
;#G .E#E. ;#L LW. ,W#i E#t E#t t#K: t#E j#Wi E#t
:KE. .K#E t#f f#: j#E. E#t E#t ;#W,t#E .G#D: E#t
.DW: .K#D f#D#; .D#j E#t E#t :K#D#E ,K#fK#t
L#, .W#G G#t ,WK, E#t E#t .E##E j###t
jt :W##########Wt t EG. E#t .. G#E .G#t
:,,,,,,,,,,,,,. , ,;. fE ;; Loading data...
,
Welcome to,
____ _ _
| _ \ _____ _| |__ (_)_ __
| | | |/ _ \ \/ / '_ \| | '_ \
| |_| | (_) > <| |_) | | | | |
|____/ \___/_/\_\_.__/|_|_| |_| .gg/pretty .gg/zoc
✞ LINE COUNT // 16,834
✞ CREDIT //
✗ MAIN DOXER & TEMPLATE / FEDERAL
> DISCORD / federal#4321
> TELEGRAM / swatxr
> DOXBIN / doxbin.com/user/ft
✗ ASSISTANT / PEP
> DISCORD / pep#0420
> DOXBIN / doxbin.com/user/pep
✗ FORMAT SLAVE / CHERRY
> DISCORD / target practice#0001
> DOXBIN / doxbin.com/user/goddesss
✗ LEGAL INQUIRIES /
federal@terrorist.services
cherry@terrorist.services
__ _____ ____ _____ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ ____ _ ____ _____ ____ ______ __ ________ ____
\ \ / /_ _| _ \_ _| | | | / \ | | | | \ \ / / | _ \ / \ | _ \| ____| _ \ | __ ) \ / / |__ / _ \ / ___|
\ \ / / | || |_) || | | | | |/ _ \ | | | | \ V / | |_) | / _ \ | |_) | _| | | | | | _ \\ V / / / | | | | pep was here >_<
\ V / | || _ < | | | |_| / ___ \| |___| |___| | | _ < / ___ \| __/| |___| |_| | | |_) || | / /| |_| | |___
\_/ |___|_| \_\|_| \___/_/ \_\_____|_____|_| |_| \_\/_/ \_\_| |_____|____/ |____/ |_| /____\___/ \____|
✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞-✞
kt is my egirl
.,,,,****/&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&(**,,,.
,#%%%%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&@&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&@@@@@@@@@@@&&&%%%%%,
.*#%&&&&%%%&&&&&&&&&&@@&@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@&&&&&&%%(****.
.(##&&&&&%%%%&&&%&&&@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@&&&&&&&&&&&&&&@@@@@@@@@@&&&%%%###*
*(#%&&@&&&%%&&&&&%%&&&@@@@@@@&&&&&%%%#(((//****,,,,,,,,,*/(#%&@@@@@@@@@@@&&&%###(//,
*##%&@@&&&&&&&&&&%%%%###(//**,,,,*******//((##%%%%%###(((#(((((#%%&&@@@@@@@@@@&&%###(*.
*##%&@@@&&&&&&&%(*,.....,*//(((////////******/(%&@@@&&&&&&%%(///((((#%&@@@@@@@@@@@&%##/
*##%&&&@&&&%(*,...,*(##%%##(//////////(((((////((%&&@&&&&%#/******//(##%%&@@@@@@@@@&%#/
*###%%&&%(*,..,/(#######(((((((((((((((((((((((((((##%%%##(////******/(##(##&&@@@@@&%#/
*#####(/**/(#%&&&&%%####(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((###((((((////***/(###(#%&@@@&%#/
..*(#((###%%&@@@&&&&&&%%%####(########((((((((((((((((((((((((((((####((///**/(#%%###%&%#(*
*((##%&&@@@@@@@@@&%%%&&&%%###############(((((((((((((((((((((((((#####%###((//***/#%&%#//((*
,/(##%%%###%%&@@@@&%%###%##############%%###(((((((((((((((((((((((#####%%%%%%##((////(#%&&%#((*
*((#%&&%%###((((#%&&%%###################%%###((((((((((((((((((((((######%%%%%%%###(((((##%%%&&%%#,
./((%&&&&&&%%###((##%%##(((((((((((#############(((((((((((((((((((((########%%%%%%%%%###(##%%%%%&&&%#/
,/(#%&&&&&&&&&%%%%%##(((/////////////**,,**//((##(((((((((########################%%%%%%####%%%%%%%%&&&#,.
.//(#&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%#((/////////((#(/*,....,..,**((((((((((#################((/*****/((###(#%&&&&&%%%&&&&/
.*(#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&#(/((((//////((###(*, .,*((((((((##############(/,...,...,*(#####%&&@@@&&&&&&&&&#.
*(#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%(//(((((////////(##(/,. ....,*(##(((((#########%%#(/,. .,/(#%%###%&@@@@@@@&&&&&&&%/
,/(#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%#////(((((//////////(((((//*****,*/((#(((((########%%%#/***,,,,,*((###((((#&@@@@@@@@@@@@@@%#/.
,(#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%%(/***///(((((//////////((########((/(((((((((###########(((((((((####((////#&&@@@@@@@@@@@@&%##,
*(#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%%#/******//////////////////((((#####((///////(((((#####(((((#%%%%#####(((////(#&&@@@@@@@@@@@@&%##,
./((#%&&&&&&&&&&&&&&%%#(/********///////////////////((((((((/////////(((((((((((((((#######((((///*//#%&&&&&&&@@@@@@@@&&%(*.
*((##%&&&&&&&&&&&%##(//******///******///********///((((((///****//(((((((((((((((((##(((((///****/#&&@@&&&&@@@@@@@@@@&&%%(.
./##%&&&&&&&&&%#((/////////////****************//(((((((((/****//(((((((((/(((((#####((//******/(%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@&&%(//,
/##%%&&&&%%##((((/////////////************////(((#####(//****/(((((((((/((###%%%###(/***,,,*/#&&&&&&&%&&&&&&&@@@@@@@@&&&%%%%*.
./(((##%%%%%%%###((((///////////////////////((((#########((/***/(((###(((((##%%%%%%##(/**,,,,,,*////////////(((((########%%&%%%#(,
/((((#####%%&&&%%%##(((//***//(((((//////////((((############(/***////(((((##%%%%%%%##(/*,,,,,,,,**************//////(########%%##,
,/(((##(##%%&&&&&&&%%%##((//**////(((//////////((((((((((((((#####(/****/(##%%%%%%%%%%##(/************************/////(%&&&&%%%%###,
./(((((((((###%%&&&&&%%%%##(/////////////////////////(((((/((((((#####(//((###############((/////////**************//////(#&&&&&%%#*.
*(((((((((((#######%%%%%%%#((///(///////////////*////////////////(((((//////(((#####(((((####((((((///************/////////(####((*
.(((#((((((############((((((///((((((((//////////*************/////////////////(((((((((((((((###((((//*********////////(((((,..
/((##((((((##############(((((//((((###(((((((///////************//(((((((((#######(((((((((((((((((((((////*****/////(((((#(/*.
,(#########################(((((((((((((####(((((((((((//////********///(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((//////////((######((*
,(#######(((((((((((((((////((((((((((((((#####((((((((((((((//////*****//////((((((((((((################((///////((#######((.
,///((///***********, ,*//(((#####(((((((#######((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((##########################((//////(((######(//.
... ,*//((###########################################################################((///////(((###((//,
,///(((####%%%%%#####(##########################################################(((//////(((((((//*
.**////(((((#####%%%%#####(((((((((((((#####%%%%%%%%#################((############((////((((((((///*
.,**///((((((((#####%%%%%%###(((((((((#####%%%%%%%%%%%%%%#########(((((#######%%%%%%#((///////(///*,
,***//(((((((((##########################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%#####(######%%%%%%%%%%%##(/////////**,
.****///(((((((((##########################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%######%%%%%%##%%%%##(/********,.
,****///(((((((((##########################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%#(/* .,,
,*****///((((((((((########################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%#((*
,*****///(((((((((((#######################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&%&%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%##(*
******///((((((((((((((####################%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%##(//,
.*****////((((((((((((((((((((((###############%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%##########%%%%%%%%%%#(//,
.*//***///////((((((#((((((///////(((############%%%%%%%%%%%####################%%%%%%%%%#((/*.
,///*****///////((((((((((((//////////((####################(((((((((((((#######%%%%%%%%%%##(((/.
,///****///////((((((((((((((((////////((((###########(((((((((((((((((#########%%%%%%%%%%###((((*,
,//***///((((((((((((((###(((((((/////////((((##########((((((((((((((#########################(((/.
.////**///((((####(((((((####((((((((/////////((((######(((///////(((((##########################(((((*
,///****///(((#########(#####((((((((((((//////((((((((////****///(((((#################%%%########(((*
*///*****///((((###########(((((((((((((((((////((((((/////********//(((###########%%%%%%%%%%%######(((*
.*//*******///(((############((((((((((((((((/////(((((/////****,,,**//(((#######%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%####(((*
.///*********////((((##########((((((((((((((////////////////********///(((#######%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%#####((*
.//////*******/////(((((((((((((((((((((((((/////////////////*******///((((((######%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%####(((*
,////////******////////((((///////((((((((((/////////(((((///*****///(((((((((######%%%%%%%%%%%%%#####((///.
*///////////***//////(((((((///////(((((((((((///////(((((((((///////((((((((((########################((//*.
*///(((((((/////((((#########((////(((((((((((//////(((((##(((((((/(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((#####(//**.
*////((####((((((####%%%%%%%%##((//(((((((((((((((((((#######(((((((((((((((((((((////////(((((((######((/**.
*////(((####(((((####%%%%%%%%%##(((((((((((((((((############(((((////(((((((((((///////(((############((/**.
*//////((((((#######%%%%%%%%%%%##((((///(((((((##############(((///////((((((((((//////(####%%%%%%%%###((//**,
*/////////(((((######%%%%%%%%%%##((/////(((((((############(((//////////(((((((///***/((##%%%%%%%%%%%###(//**,
*////////(((((((####%%%%%%%%%%%##((/((((((################(((////////////(((((//*****//(###%%%%%%%%%%%##((//*,
*///////(((((((((###############(((/(((##################(((///////((((((((///////**///(####%%%%%%%######(///*
*///////(((###((((((((((((((((((////((((########(((((((((/////((((#######((///////////((###%%%%%%#########(//*
,*//////((######(((((///((((((//////((((((((((((((//////////((((#########(((//((((((((((####%%%%%%#########(///,
.////////(((#####(((((((((##(((//////(((((((/////////////(((((###########((((((((((((((########%#######%###(//*,
.*//*/////((((###########%%%%##(//*////////////******////((((((((#########((((((((((((((///(((((############((/*
.******///(((##########%%%%%%%##(//***/////**********///((((((((((((######((((((((((//******/////((((((((##((((//,
.,*******//((#############%%%%###(//*********,,,,,**//((((((((((((((((####(((((/////***,,,****///(((((#######(((((,
,***,,****//((##################((/**,,,,,,,,,,,,**/(((((#######((((((####(((////****,,,,,,**//((#####%%%%%%##(((((/.
,*************//(((###############((//*,,,......,,**//(((((##################((/******,,,,,,,**/((##%%%%%%%%%%%%%##(((/.
...*///////************//((((((#((((((((((((/*,........,,**//(((((((###%%%%%%%%######((/*,,,,,******///((###%%%%%%%%%%%%%##(((/.
.///((((((////////*********//((((########((((((//*,. ..,**/((((((((((####%%%%%%%%###((((/*,,,,**///(((((((##############%##(((//.
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago