Name:
Lee Jia Hui Candice

National ID Card:
S8509638I

TEL:
+6597851733

DOB:
9 April 1985

Former car:
SKZ9989X

PROFESSIONAL ADMISSION:
AAS 218/2008

Bank account:
DBS 271-144340-6

Medical:
handicapped and brain damaged, subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2018, Singapore General Hospital

Address:
7 Jalan Pemimpin Seasons View, #19-02 Singapore

Work:
Deputy Director Enforcement, Competition Commission Singapore
State Counsel, Attorney General Chambers
Senior Assistant Director, Ministry of Law, Civil and Policy Division
Future:
Assistant Chief Executive
District Judge
Crony to Zahedah Abdul Rashid - Director, Legal & Regulatory - Temasek International Holdings, kings college, university college London, hyperthyroidism, overweight

Education:
Economic Development Board Scholar
2018/2019 National Day Commendation Award
Singapore Chinese Girls School
National Junior College - CHOIR BADMINTON
Kings College London
National University of Singapore DipSing

Former lovers: 
Timothy Huang Jun jia - junior college lover, jigsaws, sleepovers, choirs, hand drawn cartoons, offered to cook nutmeg dog to eat
Jonathan Kao, lawyer, Bird&Bird - ex husband, cuckolded, abused, accuser, vixtim
Steven Chia Kok Young, Senior Assistant Director Competition Consumer Commission Singapore
LUK YEE ON ANN (ANN LUK) R060958J, S8672507Z - Mr. fluffy 201530912C, Allbricks 201831443E


Offspring (paternity unknown/in question):
Leandra En Hui - T1915426I 
Singapore Chinese Girls Primary or CHIJ 


Facts:

Aided and abetted by Terence Tan Wee Kio (NUS'12, Blackstone Chambers) and Wang Shang Yew (NUS'23, called 2024).
https://www.drewnapier.com/DrewNapier/media/DrewNapier/Terence-Tan-CV_200919.pdf?ext=.pdf
https://www.drewnapier.com/Our-Lawyers/Terence-Tan
https://www.drewnetworkasia.com/partners/terence-tan/
https://law.nus.edu.sg/media/moots-spotlight-july-sept-2022/

Along with Satanists Loo Teck Lee Johnson AAS 600058/2001, S7629531Z proprietor of 202144179M Damu Nasha Pre Ltd - Blood and Thirst, 14 Jalan Kathi 468666 and Lew Zi Qi
https://sg.linkedin.com/in/zi-qi-lew-a4a126287
https://worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/11521

breach Rules 10 and 8 for and on behalf of Legal Service Officer - MinLaw Senior Assistant Director Lee Jia Hui Candice S8509638I and sibling Lee Shi Hui Laura S8803974B in DC/OC 388 AND 436/2024 AND FC/D 1154/2024.

Loo Teck Lee Johnson and Lew Zi Qi flagrantly disregarded the prohibitions in the Estate Agents Act on the grounds of a "technicality", and flagrantly and UNLAWFULLY demanded a fee, commission or reward in the absence of a written agreement IN BREACH OF ESTATE AGENTS ACT on the instructions of Legal Service Officer Lee Jia Hui Candice and sibling Lee Shi Hui Laura (both NOT estate agencies), IN FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS.

Estate Agents Act:
44.—(1)  Subject to subsection (4), where an estate agent proposes or undertakes (whether or not for a commission or other fee) to perform estate agency work for a client, whether as regards a particular property or not, a right or other cause of action whereby agreed sums, damages or any other relief or remedy may be recovered or obtained in legal proceedings as regards the proposal or undertaking shall lie at the suit of the estate agent if, and only if —

Close ally of Natalie Boon - St Francis Methodist School. Affair and broke of engagement.


Flagrant lie(a) an estate agency agreement embodying the terms of the proposal or undertaking, being an agreement between the estate agent and the client which is in the form prescribed and which contains such particulars (if any) in respect of the proposal or undertaking as are prescribed for the purposes of this section has been entered into and, in the case of a written document, properly executed; and
(b) the estate agent was a licensed estate agent at the time when the estate agency agreement was so entered into and executed.
(2)  Subject to subsection (4), where an estate agent makes a proposal or gives an undertaking to perform estate agency work for a client as described in subsection (1), the agent is entitled to recover from, or to require the payment by any other person of, any amount in respect of any outgoing paid or payable by the agent as regards any acquisition or disposition of any property to which the proposal or undertaking relates if, and only if —
(a) an estate agency agreement between the estate agent and the client which is in the prescribed form and contains, in respect of the proposal or undertaking, such particulars (if any) as are prescribed for the purposes of this section has been entered into and, in the case of a written document, properly executed;
(b) the estate agency agreement expressly provides for such recovery or reimbursement; and
(c) the estate agent was a licensed estate agent at the time when the estate agency agreement was so entered into and executed.
(3)  A right or other cause of action described in subsection (1) shall not lie at the suit of any person other than the estate agent within the meaning of this section by reason only of anything contained in this section.
(4)  Regulations made under section 72 may exclude any class or description of estate agency work from the operation of subsections (1) and (2).

Estate Agents (Estate Agency Work) Regulations Code of Ethics and Professional Client Care
7.—(1)  Estate agents and salespersons shall not do anything that may bring discredit or disrepute to the estate agency trade or industry.
(2)  Sub-paragraph (1) means, among other things, that estate agents and salespersons —
(a) must not do anything that may be fraudulent, dishonest, deceitful or misleading;
(b) must not engage in touting; and
(c) must not use threatening or harassing tactics or apply unreasonable or improper pressure.
...
(4)  Estate agents and salespersons must not solicit for the payment of any reward, commission or fee from any person who did not engage their services.


For your convenience Rule 8(4) and 10 principles:

8.(4)  When a legal practitioner issues a letter of demand, the legal practitioner must not demand in the letter anything that is not recoverable by due process of law.

10.—(1)  The following principles guide the interpretation of this rule.
Principles
(a) A legal practitioner’s duty to assist in the administration of justice includes a responsibility, commensurate with the amount of control the legal practitioner has over his or her client, to prevent the client from misleading a court or tribunal in any manner and from otherwise acting improperly.
(b) A legal practitioner must exercise professional judgment over the substance and purpose of any advice which the legal practitioner gives and any document which the legal practitioner drafts.
(c) A legal practitioner must not engage in any conduct which would be unlawful, unethical or otherwise improper, whether or not such conduct would promote the cause of his or her client.

Now extracts from DREW & NAPIER LOO TECK LEE JOHNSON, LEW ZI QI, Legal Service Officer - MinLaw Senior Assistant Director Lee Jia Hui Candice S8509638I and sibling Lee Shi Hui Laura S8803974B:

Drew & Napier - Loo Teck Lee Johnson, Lew Zi Qi 2023:
"In respect of Laura, Candice's position is that your client should pay his 50% share for the work done by Laura in assisting your client and Candice in selling the matrimonial home. We are instructed that Laura was originally appointed as the estate agent for the marketing and sale of the matrimonial home at 15 Sembawang Crescent #11-26 Skypark Residences Singapore 747060. we are further instructed that your client refused to pay Laura for her commission , even though it was Laura who found the buyer, prepared the paperwork for the sale and procured the buyer's agreement for the same. in the circumstances, we are instructed that it is only fair that Laura be paid for her work"

Drew & Napier - Loo Teck Lee Johnson, Lew Zi Qi 2023:
"In respect of Laura's work done in selling the matrimonial home, our client notes that your client does not dispute that the parties had indeed appointed Laura as the estate agent and that it was Laura who found the buyer, prepared the paperwork for the sale and procured the buyers agreement for the same, save that your client is objecting on a technicality that there was no signed agreement.
We are further instructed that in any event and at your client's request, an engagement letter was prepared but he refused to sign it. In the circumstances, we are instructed that your client should not try to rely on this technicality to avoid paying Laura for the work that was done by her.
notwithstanding the above, in the spirit of compromise, LAURA is prepared to lower the quantum of your client's payment from SGD13,500 TO SGD10,000."

Candice Lee Jia Hui 2021:
"YEON has discharged herself. Both YEON AND LAURA are no longer representing us. Prop!ex is aware of this situation and does not wish to get involved even if this means they will not receive commission. Propnexs advice to LAURA AND YEON is to allow us to deal privately with the buyer agent."

LAURA Lee Shi Hui 2021:
" Hi sis, understand that Jonathan has some concerns about our working relationship. As such it might be best for me to excuse myself from the sale of this house.
Since there is a pending offer, I would be happy to link you and Jonathan up with the buyer's agent so you can proceed with the transaction without me. I WILL NOT BE COLLECTING ANY COMMISSION / FEES FOR THE SERVICES I HAVE RENDERED THUS FAR."

LAURA Lee Shi Hui 2021:
"I REALLY want to hire someone to hurt him"


Rule 8(5):
Where any civil claim made against a person, by a client of a legal practitioner, remains unsatisfied, the legal practitioner must not threaten the institution of any criminal or disciplinary proceedings against the person.

Tan Wee Kio Terence and Wang Shang Yew:
3 May 2024:
"Our clients are also aware that your client has, in parallel with sending settlement offers through your firm, separately pushed complaints with the Council for Estate Agencies and the Legal Service Commission. This is not compatible with amicable resolution of the dispute. OUR CLIENTS HAVE THUS FAR NOT LODGED ANY COMPLAINTS WITH THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE, OR WITH YOUR CLIENT'S EMPLOYER. Your client's aggravation of the dispute is again not compatible with amicable resolution."

"THUS FAR NOT LODGED ANY COMPLAINTS WITH THE LAW SOCIETY" is apparently NOT a threat of proceedings, a "technicality"?

s filed by Drew & Napier Lawyers and Candice Lee Jia Hui and Laura Lee Shi Hui in:
FC/D 1154/2024
DC/OC 388/2004
DC/OC 436/2004

Impressive Drew & Napier lawyers can help Candice Lee Jia Hui and Laura Lee Shi H QQui threaten to hire people to harm Jonathan Kao, intimidated by demanding:
I)who they threatened to hire
II)what harm will befall him
III)when they made the threat
AND help Candice Lee Jia Hui and Laura Lee Shi Hui get the victim to pay them $50,000 each for making the threats, intimidating, and then getting called out, impressive.
14 Jalan Kathi is well funded.